The Moral Responsibility for Buffalo

Here we go again.

We once again observe an explosion of Type I retardation, this time in Buffalo, and we observe the boringly repetitive boilerplate “movement” response. The same tired imbecility repeats itself over and over again.

Based on current available data, the only person legally responsible for this event is the shooter (assuming an eventual conviction). What about moral responsibility (apart from the shooter himself)? Certainly, a large portion of moral responsibility lies with the System/Left, which creates, maintains, and enforces the anti-White infrastructure and culture of America. That is obvious. That is what ultimately provokes outbursts such as this. The Mainstream Right also has moral responsibility, as they are part of the same System, are complicit in the anti-White structures of American society, and represent a fake opposition to the Left.  

However, and this must be emphasized, there is also considerable moral responsibility further to the right – right-wing populists (e.g., Trump), the Far Right (e.g., Der Movement), as well as the gray area in between (e.g., the Alt Lite). And this moral responsibility is NOT for the reasons that the lying System/Left claims – e.g., “The Right creates, promotes, legitimizes, and encourages hatred and violence” – since Der Right does NOT want these violent events to happen and indeed responds negatively to such events, which are certainly not promoted or encouraged by Der Right. Indeed, Der Right constantly attacks the idea of using violence, and instead counsels its followers to "give donations" or "buy books" or "vote for Trump" or other such cul-de-sacs of "activity." Instead, the opposite is more true, these events occur not because Der Right is so successful (in “promoting hate”) but because Der Right is so unsuccessful in everything that it actually does, so dishonest, so betraying, so contemptuous, and so utterly useless that it makes vulnerable Whites disillusioned and depressed, and makes them feel that the only thing they can do to make a difference is to last out with violence. 

How (more specifically) does Der Right disillusion people so badly that they explode in this manner?

White people voted for Trump in the hope that finally someone in power would defend, even if just implicitly, White American interests. What they got instead was the Kardashian/West prison reform for Blacks, the Jack Johnson pardon, a bizarre diplomatic spat with Sweden in defense of Black rapper ASAP Rocky, endless talk about “Black unemployment rates,” and empty tweets of “Law and Order!” as America burned in the spring and summer of 2020.

Der Movement and the Alt Lite talk big, and promise victory, but instead exhibit endless failure and humiliation, as they lurch from one catastrophe to another. The collapse of the Alt Right is just a recent example of decades-long failure. They then add to that negative record by always rattling the tin cup; the pro-White Right is, in my opinion, composed of money-hungry grifters more concerned with their bank accounts than with achieving any success for their people. Vulnerable Whites, particularly disenfranchised and disgruntled young White men, are told that giving money is important and will lead to victory. Instead, what they actually observe is this support allowing one Quota Queen to go to movies, allegedly travel Europe with young men in tow, and allegedly engage in a bizarre incident in a European men's room; another Quota Queen to grow a porn star moustache while waxing eloquent over the merits of high-IQ Asians; and yet another Quota Queen to maintain his lustrous head of hair and receive CEO-level “executive compensation.” Then there is the Grand King of the Alt Lite who receives supporter money while describing an aging Filipina as “Mommy.”

Confronted with all of that, immature and weak-minded people become disillusioned, depressed, and lash out with violence.

If there was an authentic, honest, honorable, and successful Far Right then there would likely not be such a build-up of dashed hopes and frustrated disillusionment that the pressure needs to be vented by unfortunate bursts of acting out.

Actually, the “successful” is I believe not even necessary (although of course desirable) – the other components alone could be sufficient to prevent these types of events. The Sallis Groupuscule is certainly (currently) not successful at all, but let us consider what it preaches:

• 1. The situation is very grim; there is no attempt to foster illusion with false hopes.
• 2. A strategic plan is proposed, since although the situation is grim there is still a slight possibility of success if things are done correctly.
• 3. Regardless of the outcome, the first priority for our people, especially the young, is to take care of themselves first – their health, their families, their careers, their economic viability, and their personal self-fulfillment. Only once you have solidified your own life should you engage in sane and legal productive activism.

The Sallis Groupuscule may not be exciting, may not get many “page views,” is not part of “the good old boys network,” but the memes promoted by the Sallis Groupuscule lead to an acceptance of reality, long-range planning, and people building productive lives to “ride the tiger” while hoping one day to (legally, politically) destroy the tiger.

In contrast, Der Right lies to its followers that victory is certain and inevitable, proposes “plans” that conflate to endless fundraising and utter failure with respect to actual real-world White advocacy, and encourages followers to be downwardly mobile and make sacrifices for the “movement.” These memes are tailor-made to lead to disillusionment, dashed hopes, and despair.  This leads to the moral responsibility for events like the Buffalo shooting.

Der Movement’s “leaders” view themselves as swan-like angelic Eloi; in actuality, they are morally deformed monsters.

They disgust me and they should disgust you as well.