Ignorance is Bliss, 12/23/19

Der Movement must be very happy.

Counter-Currents comment and my riposte:

James Dunphy

Posted December 21, 2019 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

Thanks for sharing. Hindu people are very open minded about sending their kids to Catholic school. They dont have the hostility to Christianity most Jews do. The next time I see a South Asian person, I’ll wish them a Merry Christmas.

That’s the HBD thing to do. GNXP no doubt wishes all you White untouchables a very Merry Christmas!

Overall, I consider South Asians, Iranians, Turks, Cypriots and Caucasus peoples to be non-white but close to the white borderline. They are genetically closest to whites of all non-whites. 

What about Berbers?

You can see this on a principal component analysis. 

And Jews are even closer. Mazel Tov!

Together with whites they are Caucasoids, meaning they have similar skull, face, and brain characteristics. 

Even European ethnic groups and subraces differ among themselves in those metrics, idiot.

This relates to mental function in my opinion.

Your opinion is worthless.

On Myers Briggs, South Asians are closer to whites than Hispanics. They differ only on Thinker vs Feeler psychology. Whites are Feelers and South Asians Thinkers, which basically means South Asians are more rational and whites more spirited, principled etc. 

Can you believe this stupidity?

On the other traits they are nearly identical. 

Whew!  Hey, there’s no race problem!  There are over a billion near-Whites in South Asia. All they need is Matt Parrot’s “functional Whiteness” program and they’ll move into the White category.

I imagine other non-whites close to the borderline are similar to South Asians.

I imagine that you are an idiot.

Intellectually, South Asians in America don’t reflect their home nations well because their average IQ is 110 whereas in India the average IQ is I believe in the upper 80s, with it differing strongly along caste lines.

IQ!  HBD!

Overall, I’m not surprised Indians adopt Christmas or that some whites adopt Buddhism. They are close genetically, and it makes sense.

That’s what we call Der Movement Type I logic.

South Asians are not “close” to Whites (Europeans) genetically unless you mean relatively speaking compared to Sub-Saharan Africans or East Asians. Myers Briggs test results are irrelevant for genetic kinship and ethnic genetic interests, as are imbecilic speculations about alleged Hindu affinity for the Middle Eastern religion of Christianity (and is that a good thing even if true?).

This “Dunphy” seems familiar. Is this the same moron who, years ago at Majority Rights (comments section), was confusing geological ancestry with genetic ancestry and inventing a “law of halves” so he insisted that it wasn’t possible for a person to be, say, 7% of a certain ancestry – they could only be 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, etc.?  It didn’t matter how many times it was carefully explained to him; he just couldn’t understand it.  If this is the same moron, that would explain a lot.  Do we wonder why the HBDers and fetishists have such an easy time lying to the droolcup contingent of the semi-retarded “movement?”

Watching the miniseries A Very English Scandal (*), I was impressed with Ben Whishaw’s realistic portrayal of an effeminate homosexual/bisexual.  Alas, art and life overlap:

Whishaw entered into a civil partnership with Australian composer Mark Bradshaw in August 2012.[27] In 2014, he publicly discussed his coming out, saying that it was a tense experience for him but "everyone was surprisingly lovely.”

They really like using the word “lovely,” don’t they?  Have we seen that recently elsewhere?

Homosexuality obviously has a strong biological component, the cries to the contrary from Christinsanity (not a misspelling) notwithstanding.

*A show that was a shameless shilling for gay rights and tolerance.  Further, if all the assertions there were accurate (Bessell and Carman being bisexual in addition to Thorpe), then one wonders how widespread homosexuality was in the post-WWII (and pre-WWII for that matter) English/British elite. You know, the folks who sold out their racial patrimony in the most disgusting lickspittle fashion (emphasis added):

Jeremy Thorpe was one of the most talented politicians of postwar Britain. Elected to Parliament in 1959 at the age of thirty, he was an advocate for liberal causes (small and capital “L”), including the abolition of capital punishment, increased immigration from the Commonwealth, proportional representation in elections, and British membership in the European Economic Community (forerunner to the European Union). One of the most impassioned parliamentary critics of white minority rule in South Africa and Rhodesia, Thorpe was an outspoken supporter of sanctions on both these formerly British territories; he even advocated bombing the latter after its illegal Unilateral Declaration of Independence.