Marry Your Own Kind?

Lies and hypocrisy.

Here we see an article that perfectly reflects the HBD-Nordicist-ethnoimperialist alliance, an article that perfectly encapsulates HBD lies, pseudoscientific ignorance, and rank hypocrisy.  Excerpts, emphasis added:

We can marry whomever we want. Anti-miscegenation laws are gone, and social norms have been relaxed. “Empowered” women, sexual liberation, and lesbianism mean there are fewer white women available or desirable as wives. White men are looking elsewhere, especially to Asian women.

Especially for the Alt Right, eh?  Didn’t a representative of the Alt Right openly write online that dating Asian females was a “rite of passage” for the Alt Right?

There is a bitter backlash from white women who resent this, but nobody wants to marry a bitter woman. 

Misogyny! Womanizing gigolos like Greg Johnson and James O’ Meara, who preach to us about sexual mores, won’t like that.

The “manosphere” is full of complaints about white women, so why should a white man marry one? I was married for eight years to an Asian….

From a HBD perspective, you started on top.

…and for 25 years to a half Asian (three children)…

Thanks for producing mixed-race racial enemies, you scum.

…and am now ten years into a successful marriage (two kids) with a white woman. 

Serial monogamy – sounds real omnidominant to me.

Marrying your own kind — after choosing carefully — makes the most sense.

Choose carefully!  Third time’s the charm.

I have read widely on evolution. 

And learned nothing.

Survival of the fittest means differentiation and competition. The strategies that work best win out.

In Race, Evolution and Behavior Philippe Rushton applied r/K strategy to races. We evolved different reproductive strategies because we occupy different niches. Northeast Asians — fighting a harsh but predictable climate — became the most K selected. Africans, in a benign but unpredictable environment because of disease and predators, remained the most r selected.

Rushton was exposed as a fraud by his fellow HBDer Dutton.  But, hey, continue to push a discredited narrative.

Families reflect these differences. Asian “tiger moms” invest a great deal of effort in each child. 

Hardcore science.

Asian wives tend to feel obligated to feed their husbands, whether they like them or not…

After all, “Rosie” cooks meals for Derb and Jared “with her own hands” (as opposed to “her own feet”).

On the other hand, libido is weaker among the K-selected Asians. The newspapers carry stories of young Japanese and Chinese of both sexes who have no interest in sex. They are more likely to be faithful, but perhaps less likely to be satisfying partners. 

Is that because the “women” have the bodies of pre-pubescent boys and the "men” make Peewee Herman look like a Mr. Olympia winner?

Africans on average have measurably higher levels of sex hormones…

Lie.

…mature earlier, and tend to have higher sex drives compared to Asians, but they don’t feel the Asian sense of obligation to spouses and children.

Kevin MacDonald, writing in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition…

Time to bring in the HBD Nordicism.

…pushes the practice back further. He links it to the individualism of the hunter gatherers of preagricultural Europe. 

You forgot “high trust.”  Like Hubert Humphrey and Greta Thunberg,

Each individual rose on his own merits in the “Männerbund,” or brotherhood of men. 

Cue James O’Meara and Jack Donovan.

Dr. MacDonald proposes that monogamy was the standard in these societies. 

How about serial monogamy?

The upshot is that romantic love is a Western notion, and we white people evolved the mental equipment to make it work. We believe in love. 

Evidence?

The children of a mixed marriage are . . . mixed.

Thank you for that insight.

I had hoped my children would inherit their mother’s Asian work ethic and conscientiousness and my drive and curiosity. I was disappointed. Is this common? Anecdotally, I do not see as many successful mixed-race Asian Americans as one would expect.

That’s hardcore scientific empiricism right there!

Only one of my mixed-race children inherited the sense of romantic love I got from my parents. 

After all, “romantic love” is a strictly genetically deterministic behavioral trait, right?  Essentially, this individual is implying that his children are some sort of error.  What do they think about that?

There is unlikely to be a statistical study of the characteristics of Asian-Caucasian “mixers.” It is hard to imagine a more politically charged research thesis. Moreover, a rigorous statistical study would be very hard to construct. And there is the question of which Asians? Profs. Lynn and Vanhanen find that the average intelligence in Asian nations varies by as much as 20 points.

What HBD flim-flam would be complete without mention of The King of Pseudoscience, Tricky Dick Lynn?

Look in the right places. Find religion. 

Christianity – that makes no racial distinctions for marriage.

If you are a woman, you should attend American Renaissance conferences, where you will find many like-minded men. 

John Derbyshire?

You will find younger people in identitarian groups. Don’t just attend — take leadership roles. Learn to speak publicly. If a person’s first impression is looking up at you on a podium, he might continue looking up at you.

And engage in “measured groveling?”

You can expect the commenters on articles at American Renaissance to be on your wavelength. 

Tinfoil hat wavelength.

The logical choice for me was to look elsewhere. While there are substantial white populations in Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, and southern Brazil, the largest number by far are in Europe. Women in just about every less-developed or recently-developed country, whatever their race, are less affected by cultural disease than women in the United States and Western Europe. Moreover, an American income is also more attractive to them.

I consider the Visegrad countries — Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, and the Baltics to be recently developed. Although their standards of living approach those of Western Europe, the people remain traditional. I am continually encouraged by their resistance to the dictates from the European Union that they take immigrants. They are standing their ground, asserting that they are Christian countries and want to stay that way. The former members of the Soviet Union — Russia itself, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine — might properly be considered underdeveloped. Average monthly salaries are less than $1,000. Though Western culture is making inroads, these peoples are still better marriage prospects.

And here we have the ethnoimperialism.  Eastern Europe is just a grab bag for racially superior Northwest European Inner Hajnal men to invade, live in, and engage in “mate poaching” (any complaints, Jeelvy?) in, taking the native woman.

Although most people think going abroad means American men looking for foreign brides, it works the other way. The men in these countries are more traditional. They tend to be more courtly, more inclined to observe the traditional courtesies such as opening doors. They can fix things. They expect to marry, the major constraint being whether they can afford it. At the same time, the characteristics now called “toxic masculinity” haven’t been beaten out of them. A white woman looking for a real man — with both the advantages and disadvantages — could do worse than Eastern Europe.

And, yes, obnoxious, overweight SJW Inner Hajnal women can invade Eastern Europe to find some hunkie dupe.  

But, hey, if we believe MacDonald’s latest flim-flam, and believe that every nuance of behavior is genetically determined, then what happens when you mix those Individualist Northwest European Inner Hajnal superiors with inferior collectivist Outer Hajnal Eastern Europeans?  Won’t you dilute all those “romantic love hunter gatherer” genes?

Further, if we should marry our own kind, and if you believe that Eastern Europeans are “the same kind” as Northwest Europeans, then what’s the justification for the sort of petty nationalist ethnonationalism that the Amren-Counter-Currents alliance promotes?  You can’t have it both ways. Complete hypocrisy all around. They’re different enough for petty nationalism, but when it comes to living in other people’s nations and taking natives for spouses, then they are “the same kind.”  These guys praise the Reed Johnson Act, but Eastern Europe is The Promised Land for Northwest European Manifest Destiny.  Hitler wanted to dispossess the Slavs; modern Hitler worshippers want to take Eastern European housing, spouses, etc.

And as regards the piece of trash who wrote the article, he spent his prime years in inter-racial marriage, producing mixed-race children, and then, in how old age, married a younger Eastern European woman, depriving some Eastern European man of a potential mate.