In Der News, 3/5/20

News.

Kevin MacDonald has degenerated into a pathetic HBD fetishist.

Notice that my book does not have a separate chapter on the southern European cultures deriving from the Anatolian farmers, the reason being that they were not important for understanding the main currents of European culture, i.e., the currents that derived from the other two groups—the Indo-Europeans and the northern hunter-gatherers.

Sure! I mean, Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, and all of the other cultures of the European Mediterranean, which were overwhelmingly farmer in origin, support “the southern European cultures deriving from the Anatolian farmers, the reason being that they were not important for understanding the main currents of European culture.”

No one denies that there was a minority of steppe ancestry in those cultures -.Europeans are a mix.  So what?  They were overwhelmingly of farmer ancestry.  So, the 30% you focus on is more important than the 70% you ignore?  The same applies to Bronze age Rome. Yes, as is common in Europe, there’s introduction of steppe ancestry.  This is a component of European genetics.  But the majority ancestry is farmer.  

To put this in modern terms - these fetishsts will likely assert that Greta Thunberg and Hubert Humphrey represent "the main currents of European culture" while Julius Evola and Giovanni Gentile do not represent such currents at all.  I'll let the reader evaluate that viewpoint.  And lest I be accused of wrongly emphasizing individuals ("anecdotal evidence") I will point out that unless you subscribe to the Marxist theory of apersonal "historical trends" determining all, the reality is that it are individuals - important, prominent individuals - who are most often the drivers of history, the makers of history, the representatives of the "main currents" of a culture.

Fact is, on  a per capita basis, areas of Europe disdained by MacDonald have actually contributed more than their fair share to "the main currents of European culture," even when compared to those areas of Europe MacDonald worships.

The persistent contrasts between the relatively collectivist south and the much more individualist north…

See this.  If there’s a clear cut north-south cline evident among the European countries, it’s not immediately clear to those of us who don’t have to wipe the sweat off of our forehead every time we see a picture of hapa Greta Thunberg.

Speaking of which:

….Swedes seem to need collective support for their opinions. Collective solutions are a hallmark of Swedish society and dominate Swedish politics. Survey data are used to illustrate this theme empirically.

Wrong again.  What else is new?

So it seems quite reasonable to infer a genetic pattern…

“Seems quite reasonable…”  That’s what the HBDers consider evidence.

So, it also “seems quite reasonable” when looking at the types leaving breathless comments to MacDonald’s screed, that his current work is meant to be a political appeal to the HBD Nordicist crowd, rather than any scholarly analysis.

Even Duchesne of all people had to critique the childish Ostara-like characteristics of MacDonald's recent foray into sweaty fetishism.  That all should tell you something.

Indeed, it is ironic how conformist and collectivist these “movement” types are in their dogmatic beliefs.  Hey,if they truly believe what they write, then they should advocate having fewer pathologically individualist northerners in positions of authority in their "movement," and more of these collectivist southerners.  The latter could hardly do worse than the former, who have made a mockery of racial activism for the last half century.

The nothingburger!

“The worst kind of White people”…you mean White women, right?

Apparently so:

Chapo Trap House touches on a defining characteristic of Mrs. Warren: she’s a “woke” scold. She may be the most prominent example of a certain class of white professionals who revel in their status of “enlightened anti-racist liberals” and try to use that status for their own benefit while posing as generous and compassionate. I’ve met people like this — almost always white women: Teachers who ignore black-on-white violence but punish students for using the word “retarded;” professors who lower your grade because you use “gendered” words such as “mankind” instead of “humankind;” people who tell you you have no right to an opinion on whether welfare recipients should have to pass drug tests because you’ve never been on welfare.

Greg Johnson weeps.  Joan of Arc, Joan of Arc, my woke scold Pocahontas for a Joan of Arc!

Open up Counter-Currents on March 4 2020, in the middle of a viral pandemic that has definite racial overtones, and we see zero articles on that, but multiple separate articles on ‘Richard Weaver.”

Behold the Turk – a Eurasian mongrel from the sewers of Central Asia.

Mr. Stylometry Durocher writes a long, rambling, incoherent piece allegedly about “expat nationalism” without ever defining what that is and what its implications are – to the amusement of some of his commentators who notice the same omission I have.

Maybe John Morgan can help us figure it out – you know, the non-Hungarian ethnonationalist American expat living in Hungary, blatantly violating the ethnic homogeneity and sovereignty of the Hungarian people.  Is that “expat nationalism?”

A HuWhite mollusc  A Jewtopus?

It’s the nothingburger!

Globalist Neocon Arnold sees the public portion of his event cancelled.  What goes around comes around.  Globalism has its price, Mr. Austrian Oak.

Joan of Arc, Joan of Arc, my cancel culture for a Joan of Arc!

We now need some homosexuals – whose only experience with women is giggling with them while admiring some “hunky man” – to tell us how much we need, need,  need these “women” in the “movement.”

Zman:

There have been many technical explanations for why democracy is a system that eventually destroys itself. Those explanations are sound, but one reason seldom mentioned is that democracy selects for the worst people. You cannot run anything with feckless airheads and narcissistic nitwits. That’s democracy though. It elevates the vain and stupid into positions of authority. It elevates narcissism and boasting over prudence and caution. It makes the people reckless and stupid.

Wow!  Did you think of that yourself? How insightful!  We certainly have never read or heard anything like that, ever!  His whole essay is – pot, meet kettle.