WN Reality Redux

And other news.

Stupid liar.

A White Nationalist is someone who believes that white peoples have a right to their own homelands.

No, a White nationalist is someone who prioritizes race over ethnicity or national identity as their primary allegiance – race over ethnicity as the primary identity.

Let us do a thought experiment. Imagine you talk to some German nationalists, people who specifically identify as German nationalists – German ethnonationalists – but who reject the label of “White nationalist."  If you were to ask these people whether “white peoples have a right to their own homelands” what do you think their answer would be?  I’m sure – absolutely sure – that they would say YES. They would agree that Germany is for Germans, France for the French, England for the English, etc. This isn’t 1939 – the Germans are not going to be screaming for lebensraum; they are not going to deny other White people the right for their own homelands. I’m sure that virtually all European ethnonationalists – people who do NOT identify as White nationalists – would agree that “white peoples have a right to their own homelands.”

So, if ethnonationalists who are not White nationalists agree with that, then how can that be a definition of White nationalism?  It is obviously not, and my definition – accepted by everyone but Greg Johnson and his sycophants at the despicable and execrable anti-White Counter-Currents site – is correct: A White nationalist is someone who prioritizes race over ethnicity or nation as a primary allegiance – race as the primary identity.  White nationalism is the prioritization of race over other narrower identities as the fundamental allegiance and identity of the nationalists – race as nation; hence, White nationalism.

I for one am sick and tired of Counter-Currents’ constant lying about this topic, which is probably rooted in Johnson’s fetishistic obsession with (the more pan-European) Richard Spencer.

The importance and the seriousness of this issue cannot be over-stated: It is a battle to define the central tenet of White racial nationalism. Johnson's attempt to gaslight the rank-and-file to accept a logically incoherent and ludicrously false definition of White nationalism is far worse than the System falsely equating White nationalism with "White supremacy" - because in the case of Johnson and Counter-Currents the lying subversion is taking place from within. It's treason, and if I'm the only one who is going to say it (although others would reject Johnson's flim-flam if they were honest, they know better, but they'll stay silent to protect their "political viability" in their failed "movement" - grifters all), then so be it. The definition, the meaning, of White nationalism cannot be distorted because of one person's bizarre obsessive feud with Richard Spencer.

Remember – there is no way out but through Johnson.  Oppose Counter-Currents – that’s what we need for Whites to win.

And: Hey, Costello, are you going to defend yourself against Goad? – Johnson having thrown you to the wolves – or wolf as they case may be.  That's a common behavior of Johnson and the other Quota Queens - once they get a shiny new toy (e.g.,Jim Goad, Andrew Hamilton, "Hippocrates") they'll turn their backs on previous loyal supporters and contributors - sort of acting like women with faithless hypergamy. That's an interesting analogy given the, let us say, preferences of some of the people involved.

Sailer’s Jeuraian and Redblex moving on forward.

This is HBD:

JohnEngelman  

No Oriental man has ever hated me, although several Oriental women have been attracted to me. The attraction, of course, was mutual.

Engelman must be praised in one sense for so completely and neatly embodying the reality of HBD - essentially HBD is nothing more or less than a sexual fetish for Oriental women. Measured groveling!

More proof of the voting fraud.