An Unsurprising Catastrophe
In der news.
The concept of envy — the hatred of the superior — has dropped out of our moral vocabulary. The idea that white Christian civilization is hated more for its virtues than its sins doesn’t occur to us, because it’s not a nice idea. Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of western power long after colonialism, imperialism and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. Superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call “minorities.”
Those White-hating “minorities” include Asians by the way.
See this for a related analysis..
Shh…don’t tell the Tolkien fanatics…get out of your hobbit hole!
See this. Well, yes, Colin, that is certainly true.
A defective is someone whose ideas and/or behavior will repulse, alienate, and turn-off most White people independent of racial nationalism.
The last four words of the definition are crucially important. We acknowledge that just being pro-White is itself often enough to repulse many Whites and is enough to have one be considered "defective" by the mainstream. What I'm saying is let's eliminate that variable. Let's look at the person above and beyond their racial nationalism. Forget all about their pro-White activism. Is there anything else - anything independent of pro-White attitudes - that would make the person truly defective? That's the key. If we are pro-White, then that's a given and whether or not pro-White attitudes are considered "defective" by the mainstream is irrelevant, since we still need to promote pro-White memes. But that should not, and must not, be complicated by truly defective ideas and behaviors that have nothing directly to do with being pro-White
Don’t over-complicate with extraneous matters. I’ve been writing recently about the paranoid retards of Der Right and their conspiracy theories, including covid-19 and vaccination. I’ve previously written about the other three factors Liddell mentioned, particularly factor two.
There’s yet another factor as well. Even though Der Right is full of freaks, rightists are still more normal than leftists. People on the Right are typically folks with jobs, families, more to lose, and less time and energy for activism. Leftists are typically bioleninist mattoids with little or nothing to lose, people with plenty of time and energy, plenty of rage to fuel their radicalism, and nothing else to do but engage with their activist beliefs. Coupled with the fact that the Right tends to be reactionary and the Left revolutionary, we can see that the motive force is on the side of the Left. And then there’s the JQ…
Heavy breathing now heard coming from Der Movement.
Prudent with money? When are any of these guys going to address millions of dollars going to “an online publication?” How about $180,000 per year compensation for managing that publication? And how is Counter-Currents itself making good use of its “D’Nations?”
To be fair, most of what Johnson says in that livestream was sound, but there’s always the usual lies, distortions, fetishism, and omissions. His sycophants can suggest all the debates that they like, but if Johnson believes he’ll be beaten, I doubt he’d agree. Forget about the dastardly "insane" untermensch Sallis, what about some sane Herrenvolk? I nominate Andrew Joyce as someone having the intellectual firepower and aggressiveness to battle Johnson. Topics could include the homosexual question and/or Mishima. Other people like Friberg, Liddell, von Hoffmeister, etc. could be interesting, but Joyce is my first choice. I suppose Taylor could be a friendly debate about the JQ, or Derbyshire can be an option, but, on the other hand, a Johnson-Derbyshire conversation would be too vomit-inducing.
I note that Johnson mentioned Eric Kaufmann and Whiteshift – sound familiar? – but of greater interest is Johnson equating Sicilians with Cubans (and other Hispanics). If Johnson doesn’t realize that comments like that completely alienate wops and other White ethnics, then he’s even more stupid than I ever imagined. The man is a catastrophe. Certainly not surprising though. I do wonder when all of the shabbos suds and shabbos osts in Der Movement will realize that White ethnics are utterly despised by that "movement" and that they are wasting their time there, instead of helping to build a New Movement, which is desperately needed.
This brings us to another feature of our new site. On April 10th, Counter-Currents will be extending special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
This year, our goal is $200,000, up from last year for two reasons.
First, we have a lot more readers.
Second, last year’s goal was set before we took on Jim Goad as a featured writer. We need the extra money not only to pay his salary…
…but also to take on other “names,” i.e., established professional writers who will bring us new audiences.
Labels: Andrew Joyce, Counter Currents, debate, debates, defund the movement, Greg Johnson, Hispanics, homosexuals, Italians, Left vs. Right, Liddell, Nietzsche, Nordicism, racial resentment, Sicily, Youtube
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home