Ethnonationalist Filth Exposed Once Again

Ethnoimperialist hypocrisy on display and other news. In all cases, emphasis added.

And here we go:

…we British…my own adopted country of Costa Rica...

God forbid that the Costa Ricans be allowed to have their own nation without pushy and intrusive Britons invading.  After all, having Britons living in Costa Rica is…ethnonationalism.

So, could we see white flight from European nations to the V4?

Last I looked, the V4 were European nations. But I suppose by “movement” standards, they are not. After all, to Der Movement, the eastern boundary of Europe is Berlin and the southern boundary is Vienna.

The other beneficiaries may be the V4 countries themselves, who stand to gain economically from such a migration.

So, that’s the ethnonationalism of Counter-Currents: Herrenvolk colonizing the nations of Eastern Europe; John Morgan being the archetype. Gee…what happened to homogeneity? Or does that only apply to Northwest Europe? Note that ethnically alien immigration is being justified by an alleged economic benefit…the same excuse the System uses for the invasion of the West. Tells you a lot about the intellectual and moral fraud of Counter-Currents, doesn’t it?

Here's an excerpt from a comment left for this article:

I have always found expatriots, particularly those who choose to relocate for political reasons, to be the most contemptible of parasites. What is to be held up as virtuous in men too weak or cowardly to fight for the territory and ideals of their forebears, who instead run to foreign shores and depend on the tolerance of an alien host culture?

I agree. Is John Morgan paying attention?

Back to the main post:

An influx of economically viable, can-do, high-IQ Dutch, Germans, Belgians, Scandinavians, and so on might put the V4 countries’ economies on steroids.

Thus, a Counter-Currents writer openly advocates for the ethnic replacement of native Eastern Europeans by Germanics; after all, it’ll be good for the economy. Ethnonationalism! And, hey, if you want economically viable, can-do, high-IQ folk, what about the Chinese?

Racial mixing at the right end of the bell curve worked for the founding of America, no?

Counter-Currents writer thus:

1. Considers Germanic Europeans and Eastern Europeans to be different races.

2. Advocates that Germanic Europeans invade Eastern Europe and racially admix the native populations, thus destroying the ethno-genetic integrity of the natives.

Good to see that the ethnonationalists are being so open in their imperialism and in their  contemptuous utter disregard for the interests and rights of the Untermenschen.

In a sane world, Germany would not now exist and we would all have German servants. Imagine how shiny your shoes would be. You never saw the Gestapo in scuffed old trainers. Hans, you can clean that car again and do it properly this time. Lotte, where is my dinner? Instead, Merkel is continuing the war on the West she began when a fresh-faced commissar.

First, I thought that Germans were part of the economically viable, can-do, high-IQ folk we want?  Well, I suppose they’ll be servants; Hans and Lotte fetching things for Swedes  living in Eastern Europe...or perhaps for Britons living in Costa Rica. Second, if I wrote that paragraph, I’d be accused of being “insane” or “an anti-German swarthoid” or both. These days it seems like Britons outrank Germans in Der Movement’s hierarchy. They both have to take a back seat to Swedes, though.

When you read nonsense like that at Counter-Currents, you can easily discern why Johnson refuses to debate his more cogent critics and instead defames them as "insane."

Laugh at this. That is more of the sort of superficial, near-mindless, pitiful “thinking” that goes on at Counter-Currents nowadays. Libertarians are part of the problem, not part of the solution. I maintain that one reason the Alt Right, and WN 2.0 more generally, was such an unserious disaster was that if was full of ex-libertarians. I would counsel the Far Right to ignore and eschew libertarians and libertarianism as much as possible, and if interaction is necessary, libertarians should be mocked and their juvenile ideology deconstructed.

Imagine paying to get through the “paywall” to get early access to this hypocritical, poorly thought out, and superficial trash that passes for Counter-Currents articles these days..

More pathetic trash. The question about the covid vaccination was amusing. Two of the three morons don’t plan to be vaccinated, with Johnson saying “eventually.” It’s because of selfish retarded morons who won’t get vaccinated that this pandemic will go on and on. Viral transmission will continue, increasing the chances of further mutations. Woes and Frodi are the lowest form of irresponsible filthy scum imaginable. Putting aside the fact they are not as invulnerable as they believe, another reason to get vaccinated is to protect others, even if the vaccines do not provide "sterilizing immunity" (more data are needed), it is likely they will significantly reduce the risk of transmission. But I suppose that the amoral psychopaths of Der Movement only care about their own health. Screw everyone else and screw society!  Poor babies Woes and Frodi don't want to get jabbed. And Johnson wants to wait and see what other folks have as side effects – free riding on display. Pathetic.

Have you ever noticed that in real life, as opposed to "movement" dogma, the vaunted "disinterested collective goods social activity" of the Herrenvolk never actually materializes, and instead we observe selfishness and free riding.

The thoughtful Counter-Currents crew speaks:

Scott WeisswaldApril 14, 2021 at 5:44 am

Dismissing an examination of party politics because it’s not RaHoWa isn’t an argument, but it is sufficient grounds for me to call you an obtuse faggot.

This sort of lowbrow activity from Counter-Currents is to be expected in its decline phase, with shock jock essays by Goad, stupidity from Borat Jeelvy, and navel-gazing from Full Moon Ancestry lowering the tone. And, gee, if you are going to call someone a "faggot" - indeed, an "obtuse faggot" - I believe that there is someone else for whom that label is more accurate than some random commentator.  But, alas, the irony of the Counter-Currents crew throwing around words like "faggot" is lost to them, it seems.

But, remember, when reading Weisswald's comment, that it is Sallis who is the “unpleasant piece of crap.”

Another European who thinks he knows America but really does not.

Bracken could be of more use than writing books. So many Whites out there with so many useful skills and education and we end up with the flotsam and jetsam of Der Movement.

Systemic collusion.

A woman making history in the manner milady does best. Everyone contributes to human progress in the manner that they are capable; men do their thing and women do theirs.

Err…excuse me, but the risk is not necessary when there is the alternative of the “mRNA operating systems.”

While I agree with the underlying message of this picture, that is not a picture that I would have used to make the point. But I suppose that Steve Reeves was a “beautiful male,” so some cannot resist. Was Steve Rand a “beautiful male” as well?

Gee…how’s Derbyshire’s “Arctic Alliance” coming along? ANYONE (White) who supports Derbyshire, directly or indirectly funds Derbyshire, and/or gives any sort of platform of forum to Derbyshire, IS A TRAITOR TO THE WHITE RACE.

Read this. Regardless of the details of the essay, the main point is accurate: The System has been deincentivizing Whiteness for decades, as part of the genocide against White people, worldwide. The Left always wins; the Right always loses.  The Left understands that this is a political war, fought to win, while the Right plays games. The mainstream Right gives us “capital gains tax cuts” and “wars for Israel” and “school prayer” while the Far Right gives us “The Turner Diaries” and “Yogi Bear and The Men Who Can’t Tell Time in the Age of Aluminum” and “Ethnonationalism means John Morgan invading Hungary” and “Arthur Kemp was right” (when totally discredited by the scientific literature). The Left understands that you can follow multiple strategies and tactical approaches simultaneously, while our beloved Quota Queen Herrenvolk “leaders,” with their limited rigid “thinking,” believe that we can only do vanguardism or mainstreaming, revolutionary tactics or mainstream politics, metapolitics or electoral politics. They seemingly lack the ability to comprehend that you have to be a flexible strategizer, willing to use different methods, emphasizing one method or the other as context dictates, worrying more about ends than about means. But this may be a misleading criticism since it assumes that the Quota Queens actually care about achieving racialist goals, rather than just grifting on the “D’Nations” of their deluded followers.