Animal Mother vs. Joker

Full Metal Jacket.

See this. I would recommend watching the full movie for context.

We will assume three premises.

First, we will examine this as normal people, not as sexually deviant HBDers, who would sacrifice all of these soldiers for one Southeast Asian female (as is the sniper), or who would sacrifice the entire US military for one Northeast Asian female.

Second, we will ignore all of the keyboard warriors, who have never been even in a fistfight, who would bleat that “rules of war” are nonsense, and any actions that contribute to victory are equally valid. We will assume that certain accepted rules of armed engagement apply here.

Third, we will assume (the questionable stance) that Whites, Negroes, Asians, Hispanics are all equally human.

That said, what do we have here?  

The sniper is a non-uniformed partisan, not a uniformed solder – war rule violation number one.

With respect to the actual sniper shots, the killing of Cowboy was an acceptable military necessity and a “clean kill,” while the torture shots of Eightball and Doc J, clearly intended to lure more Marines into the killing zone, were war rule violations two and three.

Thus, the sniper was a war criminal.  Even if she were captured alive and unhurt, the proper outcome was her execution.

Given the circumstances given in the movie, was Animal Mother correct in his plan to leave her to slowly die, suffering in agony, left for the rats, or was Joker correct to give a quick mercy killing?

The “two wrongs don’t make a right” pious Christians would side with Joker; I, however, side with Animal Mother. When your opponent behaves in a manner in opposition to all standards of decency, in violation of accepted rules of warfare, when they abdicate their humanity (assuming their humanity to begin with) by their actions, what do you owe them?  One can respect an honorable opponent, but how should one deal with evil?  With malice?  With an inhuman absence of decency and honor?

Animal Mother was correct. 

The idea given in the YouTube video that the person making the choice would themselves benefit from giving mercy makes assumptions about the mentality of that person. One assumes that the only guilt and regret would be that of Joker if he had listened to Animal Mother.  What about the opposite?  Maybe Animal Mother – and the other soldiers – will later feel guilt and regret that they didn’t exact proper justice by letting the yellow filth suffer. And such suffering would indeed be justice. Even the YouTube video maker accepts that justification, to at least some extent. Why let Joker’s sentimental “morality” trump the morality of justice felt by others?  Or do we consider those "vengeful" just others to be merely “animals driven by instinct” (see below), in contrast to the wonderfully moral fully formed human Joker?

Some would argue that the Animal Mother choice would itself be a war crime. Really? Are soldiers obligated to dole out mercy killings on the battlefield?  Are they obligated to endanger themselves by staying around to give useless medical aid to mortally wounded partisan war criminals who would be shot anyway if they survived? If the soldiers had simply walked away and let nature take its course, would that have been a war crime?  Or merely an affront to the tender sensitivities of Joker?

More: Given the activity of partisans, and the fact that any little Asiatrix could be a sniper, how wrong was that helicopter “get some” gunner?  How really wrong was he?

And, is it in any way surprising that a Jew director would preach that self-sacrificial instinctual heroism for “kin” is less moral than mercy to an enemy that hates you?  After all, who was it who infected European Man with Christianity, a religion the infectors themselves reject? Do they show mercy to, say, elderly Nazis or to young Palestinians?  Hardly. Merciful behavior for thee but not for me.

This whole analysis is important not only in its own right, but as a proxy, an analogy, for the relationship between pro-White activists and the System. Right now, the System has the upper hand, and is treating pro-White activists, and Whites in general, the same as the sniper treated Eightball and Doc J. What if we eventually get the upper hand?  Should our response be that of Animal Mother or of Joker?  I prefer the former. What about you?