Behold the Dishonest Retard

Laughter.

See below. I'm not going to waste more time with this fundamentally dishonest loon, but two brief comments.

First, no real answer to more than a dozen detailed explanations, defenses, and extensions of Salterism.  Just name calling. So, I'll return the favor here.

Second, this buffoon specifically cites "admixture" in Southern Europe, ignoring it elsewhere, and then pretends that I'm "dishonest, or intoxicated, or semiliterate, or retarded, or some combination of all four" for calling that out - essentially the Greg Johnson pathologization approach. The Quota Queens are all the same. 

Why I expected any better from Liddell's site, I do not know. Mea culpa. Another "movement" site to cross off my list.

Dishonest retard:

I knew this post would get a riposte at Ted Sallis' blog, so I made sure to have a look. What I found is really not worth posting here, or anywhere else for that matter. But outright lies demand correction, and since comments aren't welcome at that site, there's no other option:

http://eginotes.blogspot.com/2021/07/defending-salterism-and-against.html

Most of it is just a tirade about the "self-evident" truth of ethnic genetic interests and the wickedness of its critics, and the only part of my post that gets some direct engagement is this paragraph:

"But white nationalists are happy to admit this. They tend to view racial identity as a kernel of biological kinship, surrounded by a protective shell of cultural commonalities. That is why they do not (in theory) want to disown the more racially-admixed parts of southern Europe, or embrace non-Western peoples who may be biologically related to whites."

...Which the author swallows uncomprehendingly, twists and embellishes, and finally shits out as the following stream of garbage:

"Note that the same fetishist who emphasizes “the more racially-admixed parts of southern Europe” also promotes the idea of “embrace non-Western peoples who may be biologically related to whites.” ... Therefore, to take the position of the author – implying that the “non-Western peoples” deserve to be embraced as much or more than the allegedly admixed peoples of “the more racially-admixed parts of southern Europe”- is reflective of the author’s obsessions and ethnic fetishism and ethnic animus."

Hmm. Is this person dishonest, or intoxicated, or semiliterate, or retarded, or some combination of all four? The point of that paragraph was simply that most WNs view Europe as a cultural entity, not just a biological one, and do not try to draw jagged divisive lines across it on a purely genetic basis. That I *agree* with them on this point should be obvious from everything that precedes and follows it.

The only way to get "Nordicism", "fetishism", and "ethnic animus" out of any part of that text is by dishonestly projecting them onto it. But of course, this is just what every crank and loon in the Movement does with his own pet obsessions and conspiracies, so that he can tar strawmen together and beat them to the applause of his nitwit audience. The Movement, the Movement, the Movement marches on – and all that can be done, it seems, is to persuade a few redeemable people to abandon the cult, and wave the rest good riddance as they march off a cliff.