Odds and Ends, 1/20/22

In der news.

A Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog alerts me to this. Note that many other versions of that have already been deleted from YouTube and so this may not be up that long. That is your “movement.” That’s the vaunted WN 2.0 and WN 3.0 that Greg Johnson assures us is so much better than backwoods WN 1.0.  Victory is nigh!  Just give some D’Nations!

Ever notice that whenever one of the Quota Queens gets angry at someone of a different ethnicity, the elitist superiority resentment pours out of them?  Sort of like Taylor here.

Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower…Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are…

Would he say that about the myriad Jews who do the same?  What about Asians?

Also, Spencer's tirade against Fuentes reminds me of his octoroon speech.

We are coming back here like a hundred fucking times. I am so mad. I am so fucking mad at these people. They don’t do this to fucking me. We are going to fucking ritualistically humiliate them. I am coming back here every fucking weekend if I have to. Like this is never over. I win! They fucking lose! That’s how the world fucking works.

Little fucking kikes. They get ruled by people like me. Little fucking octoroons ... I fucking ... my ancestors fucking enslaved those little pieces of fucking shit. I rule the fucking world. Those pieces of fucking shit get ruled by people like me. They look up and see a face like mine looking down at them. That’s how the fucking world works. We are going to destroy this fucking town.

If a wop made tirades like that, we'd hear "movement"/HBD pontifications about "gesticulating Meds" who have "anxiety and neurosis."  But, hey, in this case...means nothing.  Sort of like the HBD hysteria over Schettino, followed by a deafening silence after a Korean ship captain did the same thing. 

See this. Well then, cuckservatives could easily point out that this ruling means that sanctuary city and sanctuary state laws are unconstitutional, as they interfere with federal immigration enforcement, and that any state (or other local) interference with federal immigration enforcement, like what occurred under Trump, is also unconstitutional. Or is it “unconstitutional” only when the end result is actual enforcement?  But, alas, cuckservatives aren’t making these easy arguments.  Wonder why?  Is it because they actually want illegal immigration and their grandstanding about (faux) enforcement is electoral politics to fool the rubes?

I give credit for Trump for actually using the word "White" in the sense of defending Whites against medical care discrimination. Amusingly, the "fact checkers" "refute" Trump by merely trying to explain and defend the discrimination - they can't deny it exists.So, Trump is "wrong" because they approve of what he complains about, not that his statements were factually incorrect.

Hey! I thought this was "fact-checked" and was a "KKK Trump" fantasy. If so, why is the "fantasy" being reversed under pressure?

By the way, this a good sign of White group self-awareness.