An Interesting Coincidence
A fascinating convergence of articles. In all cases, emphasis added.
See this. Certainly an interesting article for TOO, eh?
I can see some credit in the main thesis of her argument that we should not automatically reject people because they have some Jewish ancestry (obviously part-Jews would be more acceptable than full). However, ironically enough, this person’s distasteful (Nutzis want to to have sex with her – You might be surprised at the number of blatant “Nazis” I have dated or who have hit on me) and dishonest (see below) arguments disqualify her as being among those part-Jews we should accept. She damns herself with her own, essentially very Jewish, behavior. I reject her not because she is half-Jewish but because she is essentially vulgar and fundamentally dishonest (of course, if you believe those traits are at least in part genetically determined, then I am rejecting her for her ancestry).
Here’s an example of what I would consider (unless there is proof otherwise and then we should then see it) dishonesty:
..my mother’s ancestors, whose lineage can be traced largely to converts from Ancient Rome…
Let me translate that from “movement speak” to English for you:
See! I’m really half-Italian! And if some of you guys (although she’s really on the wrong website for this argument) accept greasy wops, then you must accept me!
In reality, this dishonest Jewess (to eliminate redundancy – “this Jewess”) can have no idea whether her specific maternal ancestry is really derived from “converts from Ancient Rome.” How can she know what her ancestors were doing in Ancient Rome? That's ~ 2000 years ago! I know Jews are self-obsessed, but do they really have genealogical records going back twenty centuries? Sort of hard to believe, isn't it? How can they know whether they were descended from the Middle Eastern Diaspora or from “converts?”
If her argument instead is that ALL Ashkenazim are such “converts,” that’s a lie. Genetic studies show that Ashkenazi Jews are a mix of Middle Eastern, Southern European (e.g., Italian), and Eastern European (e.g., Russian, Polish), perhaps with a bit of Germanic ancestry sprinkled in. If the Jews were an even mix of Middle Eastern and Southern European then they would be found ~ midway between those two groups in West Eurasian PCA, and indeed some fraction of Jews are found there. But, given that groups like Russians and Poles are at the other end of European PCA compared to, say, Italians, the Eastern European ancestry found in many Ashkenazim cause them to be “pulled” in the direction of (North)Eastern Europe in PCA, so that some of them overlap into the Southern European area. But this does NOT mean that the Jews and the Southern Europeans are identical. It merely means that they share some ancestry and that other components of Ashkenazi ancestry cause them to be “northerly” shifted in PCA compared to what they would be had they lacked the Eastern European ancestry (hence, Sephardic Jews who tend to lack the Eastern European component are more “southerly” sifted compared to Ashkenazim). Of course, we are talking averages. Ashkenazi Jews more Middle Eastern in ancestry will be more southerly shifted, those more Eastern European more northerly shifted. Some Jews may be mostly Southern European in heritage and those will overlap with Southern Europe for that reason. But on average, the above explanation holds.
And we must consider that Jews, particularly Ashkenazi Jews, are more than just the sum of their ancestral components. They are also a product of their peculiar history, including the centuries of selection within Europe for ethnocentrism, verbal intelligence, etc., as well as a cultural and historical tradition ("Magian") completely separate from that of the West, that sets them as a people apart. You can take gentiles who are mixtures of, say, Syrians, Italians, and Russians, and those hybrids would not have high levels of Tay Sachs Disease and other of the myriad of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic diseases, nor would they have the particular Jewish cognitive profile, nor the stereotypical Jewish physical appearance, nor the unique Jewish genetic signature. Again, just because a Jew is in position “X” in a PCA plot doesn’t mean that they are at all similar to gentiles who may be relatively close to such a position, which is determined by clines of gene frequencies along two principal component axes.
Unless this Jewess has genetic evidence that she is half-Italian, using the typical testing protocols that can distinguish European and Ashkenazi genetics, then there is no way for her to know that, specifically, her own Jewish lineage is from “Roman converts.” Given the nation-hopping of Jews, how can any Jew really know for certain their specific antecedents from 2,000 years ago?
Unless there is information available that absolutely confirms her narrative, then it is typical gaslighting Jewish dishonesty, and a good reason why she herself should be rejected, even if other half-Jews, who are more honest and honorable, are accepted.
I care not about her “button nose” and her self-satisfied narcissistic tales of being “hit on” by Nutzis. To me, the problem is not that she’s half-Jewish, it is that she is dishonest and is slyly trying to appeal to sweaty fetishism to guarantee her own acceptance. Southern Europeans are not here to be exploited by Jews in order to demand acceptance as Jews. Southern Europeans are not a “racial yardstick" for NEC White-wanna-bes to compare themselves to. As genetic assays can distinguish Jews and part-Jews from ANY and ALL Europeans, then, unless you have evidence of not having Jewish genetic ancestry, then you had better make your pitch for acceptance based on being a part-Jew, not a part-“Roman.”
Another point – virtually every single self-identified open Jew or part-Jew associated with the “movement” inevitably proves to be a mendacious troublemaker. With such a history, are the rest of us being unreasonable in being suspicious when these “fellow huWhites” want “in?” I’m trying to think of one single person in Der Movement who (1) openly identifies as Jewish or part-Jewish; and (2) doesn’t peddle in lies, misinformation, gaslighting, destructive memes, etc. I cannot think of one single example – and that’s after 25 years of being involved in activism.
But now, compare that Jewish TOO essay to the following that popped at Amren up at virtually exactly the same time; thus, note this.
RW: While most if not all within the “alt-right” or more relevantly, the “Dissident Right” are against miscegenation, it seems like some of them won’t settle for anything less than a 100 percent white ethnostate. They say things like, “If we allow even one good, decent black person in, it will be the slippery slope that will lead us right back to the same problems.” So, they are hostile to even one black or mixed person being either within or allied to the Dissident movement. Do whites need to be 100 percent exclusionary towards non-whites and mixed-race people or families to bring back the much-needed positive white identity to take back the country and stop the Great Replacement?
NS: No, I think that they are just extremely paranoid. If you truly fix the problem and come up with a competent system that adequately judges peoples’ character, then you will not have that problem. It’s an overreaction to what is happening now. You don’t have to exclude all non-whites and ban all mixed-race families to control the numbers and keep the white population the majority and dominant. It is irrational.
I’m definitely not saying that most blacks are like me, I know that they aren’t, but there definitely are a few, and I don’t see why the few who don’t hate whites, who don’t hate America, need to be cast out with all the rest who deserve it. Jesse Lee Peterson, for example, is not going to undermine and subvert the white ethnostate from within if he were allowed. The amount of blacks like me and Jesse is probably under 5 percent.
There we go. An article at Amren saying we should accept “conservative” Negroes. Well, why not? Isn’t that the current position of the great and good Professor Hart? More to the point, if we accept nice mixed White-Black marriages like this, then certainly we must also accept nice White-Yellow marriages like that of Johnny and “Rosie.” After all, as we well know, the real problem is with the low-IQ wops, anyway. Why object to a few upstanding Negroes? You may even find a nice “red-pilled” Black to marry. It's all good! Interesting that The Occidental Observer and American Renaissance, two of the major HBD sites in Der Movement, publish at exactly the same time articles telling us that it is irrational to reject Jews, Negroes, mixed marriages, etc. You see, Italians, Romanians, Hungarians, etc. are all no-goodniks, but we need to look out for “Rosie and the kids.” After all, we must remember our priorities. Miscegenation is A-OK, and if you disagree, an elderly and diseased HBDer will invite you to his home so as to punch you in the nose!
And with respect to this excerpt:
You don’t have to exclude all non-whites and ban all mixed-race families to control the numbers and keep the white population the majority and dominant. It is irrational.
Yeah, irrational. Well, my answer here is the same as my response to “J Richards” long ago, who was saying that a 5% non-White (and since he was a rabid anti-Semite, he wasn’t talking about Jews and part-Jews but rather Negresses and “Rosies”) minority was acceptable. Very well. And how are you going to manage that? How are you going to ensure that the numbers stay where you want them? If the non-White percentage starts increasing you will do what? Deport? Sterilize? Kill? If the percentage decreases below your set point, will you let more in? And what about miscegenation? Will you outlaw intermarriage? If not, what about the widening numbers of individuals with ancestry derived from the non-White minority? Will they be assimilated into the White majority, permanently adding their genes to the White genepool? Will they agitate for more “rights” and increased numbers for their fully non-White kin? Where do you draw the line? How do you prevent the whole race problem from starting again? And given “regression to the mean” (HBDers believe in that, right?) how do you know that the offspring of those intelligent and upstanding conservative Blacks will not’ start spray-painting graffiti, throwing garbage in the streets, attacking Whites, rioting, and demanding “equal rights” and “closer relations” with their “Black brothers and sisters” elsewhere? We’ll go through all the trouble to set up the “ethnostate” just so we can retain the same race problem that destroyed the old America and forced the creation of the ethnostate to begin with. That is what is truly irrational.
And, since my family genetic history traces back to blacks who lived in Europe, I’m sure there’s a small portion of European DNA that helps me see things the way I do as well.
It sure hasn’t helped your intelligence much, since you completely ignore the fact that your typical “African-Americans” – including all those that this Negress says she despises – are approximately 15-20% of European ancestry (mostly Herrenvolk British) and they display all the behaviors decried in the article. So, why hasn’t that “small portion of European DNA” helped them?
In summary, it’s interesting that websites that represent factions of HBD, which consider Southern Europeans to be the lowest form of humanity possible, eagerly grasp onto half-Jews, conservative Negroes, and mixed-race couples. But, Jews are Jews (high IQ!) and there are more White-Yellow couples than White-Black, and we must never forget that HBD is nothing more or less than a political movement to elevate Jewish and Asian interests above those of Whites. When considered thus, the juxtaposition of these two articles at major HBD websites should not be surprising. In the HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance, HBD is in charge, just like Jews and Asians will be in charge of the “Arctic Alliance.” Sit down, shut up, and obey your masters, White man. Moshe Finkelstein and Wei Fuk Yu are giving you your marching orders. Obedience and obeisance!
Labels: American Renaissance, crimes of the Jews, HBD, HBD as a political movement, HBD realities, Jews, Jews are not White, mendacity, miscegenation, Occidental Observer, population genetics, TOO
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home