Thursday, May 6, 2021

Odds and Ends, 5/6/21

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Maybe it’s not a good idea to associate with Negroids?  Di…di…diverseteee….

Against HBD lies.

Thanks, flubros.

Covid realities.

The high prevalence of diabetes in India is contributing to the crisis.  That prevalence is in part genetically determined.

India is facing an epidemic of type 2 diabetes, with high prevalence in urban areas. Urbanisation and associated life style changes adversely affect the risk factors for diabetes unmasking the high genetic tendency existing in the population. Various epidemiological studies in Indians have shown that the increasing prevalence of diabetes could be attributed to a high genetic risk and lower risk thresholds for acquired risk factors such as age, obesity, abdominal adiposity and a high percentage of body fat. Diabetes occurs at a younger age in Indians compared to Whites. The risk of diabetes increases with a body mass index (BMI) of >23 kg/m(2) and waist circumference of 85 cm for men and 80 cm for women in Asian Indians. For a given BMI, Asian Indians have higher central adiposity. There is also evidence of higher insulin resistance amongst Indians, and this is partly explained by higher body fat percentage. A large proportion of urban adults has the metabolic syndrome also which predisposes them to both diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Recognition of these conditions and institution of early preventive measures are urgently needed.

Napoleon miniseries. Typically, movies based on history use actors and actresses that are more phenotypically gracile than the real historical figure, but in this miniseries, the opposite holds – the real Napoleon was more gracile than the actor playing him in this miniseries. Perhaps they wanted to stress the Corsican distinctiveness of Napoleon vs. the ethnic French (even though the actor is French). In any case, it’s better than Der Movement casting Dolph Lundgren as Napoleon.

Umberto Bossi, if you recall, is/was the Kempian Italo-Super-hero of the North, standing firm against “the threat of the South.” Yes, the hero:

In 1998, Bossi received a one-year suspended prison sentence for incitement of violence after he uttered the following sentence at a Lega Nord meeting: "We must hunt down these rascals [neo-fascists], and if they take votes from us, then let's comb the area house by house, because we kicked the fascists out of here once before after the war."

Kick out the fascists!  Umberto Antifa!  

Sleeping with the enemy:

He is married to the Sicilian Manuela Marrone and has four sons (of whom one was from his first wife).

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement plays the fool. 

See this.  It seems like dem dere Lega Nord leaders liked dem dere Southern women.

Correct:

CTON 

Here we are 20 years later, nothing has change--in fact, things are worse, and so many of our own people have either become more self-hating and just buckled down harder with their liberalism and self hatred. White Americans and Western Europeans and the UK have become desensitized to our genocide.


See this. I agree with most of it, but I believe Liddell goes too far, likely due to his rampant Anglocentrism. Multiple attempts by Hitler in the 1930s to achieve an understanding with the UK were repeatedly rebuffed, and I note that the British (and French) declaration of war against Germany for invading Poland neglected to include the Soviet Union, which ended up attacking Poland as well.

So, yes, Hitler was an imperialistic Germanocentric jackass who should have stopped after the Munich agreement, but the “Western allies” had an attitude toward Stalin the same as that of HBDers toward Asiatrics – drop pants, bend over. Both sides are to blame, not just one.

The best way to restrain Hitler would have been to join him in to a pan-Western alliance against the USSR, with the absolute demand, backed up by British and French military might, that the alliance is NOT meant to dispossess the Slavs and resettle Russia and the Ukraine with German colonists, but to defend against Soviet expansionism (and, better still, crush the Soviet Union, destroy Bolshevism, and re-establish normal independent national states in the former USSR).

The problem is not that the UK was anti-Hitler, it was that they were also pro-Stalin. They made a choice – the wrong choice. If they had to choose an ally, they should have chosen Hitler.



See this. I wish someone would be investigating the HBDers in this regard.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home