Really Understanding the New Zealand Mosque Massacre

Realism.

Read this.

I wish I could erect a wall between myself and the kind of unstable, undisciplined people who go on killing sprees, but you can’t change the world from a bunker.

Or from a hobbit hole.

Today’s Old Right scene is rife with fantasies of race war, lone wolf attacks on non-whites, and heroic last stands that end in a hail of police bullets. 

As opposed to the New Right that gives you a choice between going to Charlottesville dressed up like Batman or Captain America, obsessing over a cartoon frog, screaming “Kek!,” worshipping Trump, or reading Tolkien “snug in your hobbit hole.”

Intelligent and honorable people have emerged from this milieu. 

Ted Sallis?

But there have been more than a few spree-killers as well.

And more than a few frauds, grifters, and weirdos.

Moreover, killing innocent people (at a place of worship!) has entirely predictable results. First, such violence creates sympathy for the victims. (Even I feel sympathy for them…

I do not.

According to his manifesto, Tarrant actually wanted his attack to trigger the denial of First and Second Amendment rights halfway around the globe in the United States, in the hope that the resulting tensions will spark some sort of revolution. Every spree killer has the same fantasy. But the results are always the same. We lose more freedoms. But the revolution never comes. 

Actually, Tarrant is correct in that the real purpose (or one of them at least) of terrorism is to provoke the System to undertake repressive measures and thus alienate the population. Johnson is correct that this strategy simply does not work with Whites (as they currently are).  Whites are such a pathetic, weak, mewling, pansified, omega race of leucosa freaks that they’ll eagerly accept even more repression and thank the System for “stopping hate.”

Anyone who supports the further erosion of our freedom to change minds is my enemy. I don’t care what side he claims to be on.

Well, yes, after all, the “D’ Nations” may dry up, and we can’t have that!

So much for the “movement” take on this. The Left will get this all wrong by saying the incident was due to the pernicious and powerful underworld of “White supremacy.” It’s the exact opposite in fact.  It is precisely because Der Movement is so pathetically weak and useless that these things happen. Men understandably upset about their race’s demographic replacement have nowhere to turn – no real leaders, no real political parties, and no real organizations, no anything.  Racial activism is a wasteland of pontificating Quota Queens, incompetent retardates, panhandling grifters, defectives, etc. So, the easy way out is to lash out with violence. What else do they see as a possible outlet for their activist energies?  Didn’t Tarrant claim in his writings that he donated to rightist groups?  Obviously, he didn’t believe his “D’Nations” did any good, did he?

While one cannot disagree with the main points Greg Johnson makes, my riposte would be – do you think perhaps that people want real solutions and on-the-ground political organizing, and not rambling about The Age of Aluminum and reading Savitri Devi and Guenon while “snug in your hobbit hole?”  Maybe people want real leaders, and not feuding gossips who air the most atrocious dirty laundry for all the world to see.  Maybe people need hope that things can be turned around by slow, careful, prudent metapolitical and political activism.

Der Movement is to blame for this not because it is so dangerous and seductively proselyting, but for the exact opposite reason. Desperate people have nowhere to turn, abandoned by their elites and alienated from the circus freak show of “movement activism.”  So they end up becoming freaks themselves - so-called “fascists” who worship China (hello, HBD) and who have no other solution than to shoot up a mosque.

More Der Movement competence.

And again.

That’s your affirmative action “leadership.”  Then you wonder why folks snap and start doing the Rambo bit.

Thanks a bunch, “movement.”

Wonderful and Wild Wednesday Weirdness

More “movement.”  In all cases, emphasis added.

What just happened?

Yet Johnson and McCulloch debate on the timing of our eventual victory.  Delusional.

I agree 100% with Taylor here.

Yet Johnson and McCulloch debate on the timing of our eventual victory.  Delusional.

I’ll give credit to Roissy for this:

Heritage America has no representation anymore.

424-1 in favor of condemning those who would entertain the thought that Whites have an identity.

The one nay vote was from a black Dem who thought the resolution didn’t go far enough.

lol america is finished.

The Two Minutes Hate directed against Steve King is symptomatic of a mind disease that has gripped the Western consciousness and won’t let go. Even otherwise normal, level-headed Americans are slave to the illness. What a shame. The craven prostration and groveling is what’s so disgusting about the whole spectacle.

Why do men like Crenshaw bend the knee to a puppet master who mocks them to their faces? Why make a show of his groveling on Twatter? Just vote “cuck” to appease the weasels and move on. Don’t hit up twatter to preen grotesquely about how bad Whites are for noticing their Whiteness.

But the greatest humiliation was reserved for Steve King, who had the temerity to insinuate that Whites are a collective identity with a glorious history of achievement who don’t deserve to be displaced from their own countries by third world rabble. One of those yea votes for the resolution condemning Steve King was from….Steve King.

As symbolism of a dying, weak, self-abasing race goes, that is hard to beat. Steve King condemning Steve King for crimes against the Diversity Orthodoxy he didn’t even commit.

Yet Johnson and McCulloch debate on the timing of our eventual victory.  Delusional.

Oh yes, all the “angels” will fulfill their “destiny.” No, the reality is what we see that happened to King and Watson…all at the same time!

Let's consider this once again - the destiny-fulfilling angel, the "based" Steve King:

One of those yea votes for the resolution condemning Steve King was from….Steve King.  As symbolism of a dying, weak, self-abasing race goes, that is hard to beat. Steve King condemning Steve King for crimes against the Diversity Orthodoxy he didn’t even commit.

I go back to my old label as Whites as the “leucosa race” – a status even lower than omega.  There simply isn’t any “floor” to White self-abasement and masochistic pitiful weakness and self-destruction.  No floor.  The abyss beckons.

Song for Ted Sallis.

This is the retarded buffoon who has to be pointed out to foreign observers as the President of the United States. 

The Alt Right in one picture.

In general, Spencer sounds credible here, and I have sympathy for his situation, particularly as there are children involved and he is trying to be a father to them. I did read the Huffpost article (Spencer should not have talked to that woman, regardless of the circumstances), which was poorly written.  Look, I do not know the full facts here, maybe he did do some of what he has been accused of - or maybe not; I can only make a preliminary judgment based on what I do know, but the article was outrageously stupid, and clearly demonstrative of the lack of agency (hello, Greg) and insipidness of women.  Yegads!  Spencer was eating a sandwich and had mustard on his face!  Horrors!  Did he have spinach between his teeth as well?  Women have no business being writers or reporters or, really, being much about anything, other than housewives and mothers – if they can even handle that, and many of them cannot.

It's amusing that the the soon-to-be-ex-wife (henceforth, "ex-wife") claims she really didn't know the direction of Spencer' s politics from the beginning and implies that she was sort of carried along for the ride, while Johnson previously suggested that Spencer "is basically being dominated by Nina Nogoodnik, his Russian-Georgian wife." 

The hypocrisy over the Spencer ex-wife situation is astounding as well.  The Far Right should reflect over their admiration for Saint Adolf and his ill-fated obsession with his half niece.  The Left should reflect on their lovefest with Saint Martin King and his philandering, womanizing, and plagiarism. The Left justifies this by saying that everyone has “personal flaws” and we should instead focus on King’s “dream.”  Fair enough.  So Spencer has flaws and we should instead focus on his “dream.”

"Alcohol is like throwing gasoline on fire."  So – no more drunken podcasts?

Who does Spencer think was behind the Huffpost article?  Following the crumbs to where?  Someone in Der Movement?  Who?

And why do so many men in Der Movement have serious problems with their choice of women?  Strom is another one.  Consider MGTOW, guys.

Who can be a vice presidential candidate for Richard Spencer?  Answer: Greg Johnson.

Spencer/Johnson 2020!  A Pepe in every pot and a hobbit in every hole!  To the stars and to the shire! A Eurosiberian Imperium in the capital and de facto anarchy in the provinces!

And Spencer supports being “earnest and serious” and is against “nihilistic humor.”  Is he finally learning?

On the one hand, the call for standards is good, but the mendacious labeling of critics as a “peanut gallery” with “no real lives outside the Internet”  is just ad hominem excuse-making.

The comments about Greg Johnson in the podcast were interesting – as I assume that Johnson would say the same thing in return.  

But…they’re HuWhite!  I urge readers to go to the YouTube video and downvote. And,of course, boycott. These companies need to be held accountable for their behavior.

Again, they’re HuWhite.

Hey, guys, when will YOU oppose the Alt Wrong?  Delenda Est HBD!

“Based” Italy.

And who elected the current German government?

Zman:

The tougher question is what sorts of immigrants would we accept, even in limited numbers. In the Mid-Atlantic, where a large Korean community exists, most people would be fine with Korean immigration. Unlike the Chinese, Koreans are not fleeing political oppression or economic uncertainty. Koreans come here for lifestyle reasons, so they assimilate rapidly. They also take pride in being the model minority, despite what what some lefty advocates claim. Koreans came here to be Americans.

That’s HBD – supporting Asian colonization of the United States, pathetic “measured groveling” to the Altar of Asia, all Asia all the time.

White Privilege is Leftist/Colored Bullying

Lessons of the schoolyard.

I have written on this topic before, but it is useful to set down a brief but comprehensive summary of the problem.  Therefore, here I make three arguments:

1. White Privilege, as defined by the Left as racially-specific advantages possessed by Whites, does not exist.

2. Even if White Privilege existed, it would be justified.

3. Attacks against Whites, re: White Privilege, are simply bullying against Whites because Whites, as a race, are a bunch of pathetic, mewling, cowardly weaklings.

1. The argument that White Privilege does not exist can be briefly subdivided into three parts.

A. A people being demographically dispossessed in their own nations – even in their ancestral homelands of Europe – are obviously not privileged.  Mass immigration into White nations, against the wishes of the populace and imposed by a hostile elite, is not “privilege.”  It is genocide. Declining White birthrates and increasing White suicide rates are not signs of “privilege” – they are signs of oppression and despair.  The opioid crisis among White Americans is not “privilege” – it is hopelessness and despair.  The fact that most politicians in White nations are racially White means nothing, as most of them are openly hardcore anti-White.  The question should be – whose interests do those politicians represent?

B. A people discriminated against de jure by law (affirmative action, hate speech laws in Europe that criminalize natives speaking up in defense of their own group interests) and de facto by political correctness, pop culture, and social pricing, is not “privileged.”

A people not allowed to organize on the basis of their own identity and in defense of that identity and its interests are hardly “privileged” – it is the complete opposite.  A people whose racial spokesmen are attacked in the streets with impunity, mocked by the leftist establishment, ridiculed in their own nation by aliens, deplatformed by corporations, and selectively targeted by the legal system – such a people are the opposite of “privileged.”  The English in Rotherham were, and are, not “privileged.”  White Americans and Europeans who cannot safely walk the streets of their own cities are not “privileged.”  Compare James Watson – reduced to selling his Nobel Prize after being “unpersoned” for merely suggesting the possibility of racial differences in intelligence – to Al Sharpton – whose activist career is summarized here – who was a friend of Presidents (Obama), speaker at political conventions (Democrat), a mainstream political commentator (MSNBC) – and we see the reality of Colored Privilege vs. the fantasy of White Privilege.

C. Although I disagree with Sailer about the census, he is correct about “The Flight from White.”  You see, Whites are so privileged that groups petition to NOT officially be counted as White.  South Asians previously successfully removed themselves from the White category, and the MENA group wants to do the same now.  People with any hint of “Indian Princess” ancestry in their family trees are desperate to be seen as non-White.  Whites pose as non-White, trying to “pass” in the other direction.  It is a strange sort of “privilege” indeed that people are so very eager NOT to partake of; it seems that the “invisible backpack” is a burden too heavy for anyone to want to carry.

2. Even if it did really exist, White Privilege would be justified, because it would not be “privilege” at all, in the sense of an undeserved largess (which actually describes Colored Privilege).  One would not call Bill Gates “privileged” at Microsoft – it is his company.  The Chinese are not “privileged” in China – it is their own country.  Likewise, Whites are not “privileged” in their own nations – instead, it are the alien peoples given advantages in White countries who are the ones truly privileged.  And if White Americans are “privileged” because they have a higher per capita net worth than Blacks and Hispanics, then Jews and Asians are privileged even more.  Oh, the latter have their goodies because of “intelligence” and “hard work.”   Yeah, and Whites are pretty smart and hard-working too, by the way – building nations that Jews and Asians want to migrate to.  

3. If accusations of White Privilege are absurd - and they are – why do they exist?  It is the lesson of the schoolyard: those who are weak and allow themselves to be bullied will continue to suffer so.  Accusations of White Privilege made in the context of White Oppression and White Powerlessness are a form of bullying from the Left/Colored Alliance.  Because Whites are a race of pathetic mewling cowards and never push back against this bullying they can expect more of it, just like the boy who allows himself to be pushed around in the schoolyard can expect nothing but more abuse.  If the boy fights back, even if he loses, the bullying will likely stop, especially if he gets some good “licks” in; bullies do not like victims who fight back, since they prefer the meek and powerless.  The abusive bullying of Whites as a race will decline in proportion to the extent that Whites actively and explicitly defend their interests as a race.

Ironically, it is precisely because Whites are not privileged that they are accused of being so.  If Whites had true privilege no one would dare bring it up in fear of the consequences.  It is only because Whites are a subaltern low-caste group that they can be bullied and gaslighted by being accused of having “privilege” while they are in reality a vilified powerless group losing their nations and their future.

I suppose that the real, hidden meaning of "White Privilege" is the privilege of being born as someone of European descent, and all that means racially, and with respect to being a legitimate heir to the Classical and Western/Faustian High Cultures.  There's racial envy and resentment involved, and a desire to tear down those that the Guks view, at least subconsciously, as better than themselves.