Thursday, February 11, 2021

Superiority Must Be Earned

Another Type I pathology.

If you read Coogan’s Dreamer of the Day, you will find that some Type I activists of the immediate post-WWII period attacked Yockey – a man whose valise they were not fit to carry – in deeply personal and even racial (*) terms. These people, particularly one German described as living in a filthy hovel with his children torpidly lying in bed in the middle of the day, apparently had a Negro-like sense of inflated self-esteem, most likely derived from a Guntherite conception of themselves as being racially blessed at birth by an innate aura if superiority.

I’ve said this before, but, it seems, based on typical ongoing “movement” antics, it needs to be said again: Superiority is not something an individual has as a birthright, it is something that needs to be earned.  And by “earned” I mean earned by individual accomplishment and a clearly manifested actualization of achievement.

Certainly, one can compare groups and observe that some groups are, by various standards, superior or inferior to other groups by whatever criteria are being considered. Even more fundamentally, any individual’s interests in their group’s survival and well-bring are intrinsic and not dependent on any perceptions of superiority or inferiority; genetic interests are not dependent on rankings of phenotypic attributes.

Further, stating that claims of individual superiority must be based on individual accomplishment is not some sort of anti-collectivist hyper-individualism; this attitude is wholly compatible with an individual prizing collective interests over that of the individual. But the fundamental point remains: If this issue is one of claims of the superiority of a particular individual, then the claims must be based on the characteristics, achievements, and accomplishments of that individual, not any sort of automatic birthright bestowed by the mere fact of that individual belonging to a particular ethny.

The sooner all the Type I activists in Der Movement understand that, the better.

* Available genealogical evidence suggests that Yockey was of Northwest/Northcentral European ancestry. However, since he had a “darker” “paleo-Atlantid” appearance, he was subjected to racial jibes from the early day Beavis-and-Butthead peanut gallery. The spectacle of a man like Yockey having to defend his ancestry and physical appearance is a clear demonstration of how the utter pathological stupidity of Der Movement hasn’t changed one iota in the intervening ~70 years.  It was the same back then as it is today.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, November 22, 2020

The Same Old Story

The herrenvolk!

I have previously mentioned several times the habit of people like Duke and Spencer of continuously jumping from one failed project to another. But this post is about a more general problem than just those two individuals, and it is about a specific subset of the overall issue of constant, endless "movement" failure under affirmative action herrenvolk "leadership."

The specific subset of problems I refer to is the ongoing scenario in which various prominent "movement" figures are unable to successfully complete any particular project as (more or less) originally planned. All configurations of ineptness are observed. Projects may be pushed through but fail miserably - these are the failures that are most conspicuous to the general rank-and-file. But what the rank-and-file may not be aware of are the endless series of aborted projects. Ideas are conceived - some of them promising - and then are abandoned before beginning or, worse, abandoned after people (like me) have already invested time and energy in working on the project, producing initially promising results. Sometimes the projects are completely abandoned, sometimes the story is that the project is switched from one idea to another, with the new idea usually being less promising, less ambitious, less useful, and/or less feasible than the original. This secondary project typically fails and/or is abandoned as well.

Now, sometimes this is necessary and justified. After all, you do not want to reinforce error, throw bad money after good, and sometimes, yes, you have to accept a sunk cost and move on. But I am not talking about isolated cases of failure or isolated cases of abandoning certain projects or switching from one project to another. I instead am talking about an endlessly repeating series of the same sorts of errors and abandoned, failed projects. I am talking about having people like me wasting time again and again, sincerely working hard, with enthusiasm, on varied projects, only to have Quota Queens "pulling the plug" on the project, typically because they are not suitable for carrying it through, they are inept, they are unimaginative dullards who can't follow through on ideas thought up by others, they are impatient fools with apparent attention deficit defects, and they are the ones with faulty ideas and faulty "leadership." This wasting of time and energy because of the failed "leadership" of others has happened to me, and others, so many times that it is a constant disappointment, and, as alluded to above, the rank-and file only see the tip of the iceberg of failure; they typically do not know of all of these other failures and abandoned projects. 

And all of these people, the failed "leaders," cannot take any criticism, they become hysterical about any justified criticism of their ongoing ineptitude, and they are of course protected by Der Movement's ethnic affirmative action program.

Related to this, a Counter-Currents comment:

Francis XB

Posted November 11, 2020 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

Regardless of what happens between now and 20 January 2021, the Dissident Right needs an organized movement, an apparatus.

The dilemma for too many people on the Right during 2016-20 was an over-reliance on Donald Trump. But there was a lack of an effective organization which could mobilize:

* Legal defense

* Fund raising

* Pro-White info ops

* Counters against de-platforming

* Fronts for students, workers, etcetera

* Getting people out into the streets and into the boardrooms

Of course, all this means money, lawyers, specialists, media, alt-tech and (most importantly) a well known personality who could provide access to all of these things.

Is there a personality who fits this bill? Say, a billionaire who is fired up by being deprived of a public office to which he was rightfully elected? Who might be willing to provide a startup grant of several million dollars and perhaps some office space?

Even if the election is tossed to Team Deep State, the long game must be played here. It behooves the Dissident Right to maintain the impetus for Trump.

Apparatus 2021!

So, why wasn't the "Apparatus" built up during the Trump interregnum of 2017-2021?  Do we just blithely accept the incredible abrogation of duty, the complete lack of responsibility, the zero accountability, and the pitiful shocking ineptitude of the affirmative action Quota Queens?

Why don't the rank-and-file demand answers?

But, no.  Send in more "D'Nations."  After all, why not enjoy such wonderful victories such as that pictured here?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 9, 2020

Quota Queens on the March

Pathetic. In all cases, emphasis added.

Affirmative action at the Presidential level.

Trump was perplexed. 

A common occurrence, no doubt.

The economy was strong. 

Tax breaks for big business!  That’s what the working class Whites in the Rust Belt voted for in 2016, right?

The president had built an enormous political infrastructure and was raking in hundreds of millions of dollars. 

All squandered. Quota Queen!

That month, Trump’s campaign conducted a $1.1 million polling project showing him leading prospective Democratic challengers even in blue states such as Colorado, New Mexico, and New Hampshire.

Laughter commences.

“Sir, regardless, this is coming. It’s the only thing that could take down your presidency,” Parscale told the president.

Trump snapped.

“This fucking virus,” Trump asked dismissively, according to a person with direct knowledge of the exchange, “what does it have to do with me getting reelected?”

Trump would undoubtedly make a wonderful “movement” leader:

  • German-Scottish ancestry – check.
  • Dumb as a stone – check.
  • Piss-poor judgment – check.
  • Error after error after error – check.
  • Selfish grifter - check.
  • Flubro statements - check.
  • Treating your supporters with contempt while pandering to people who hate you – check. (*)

*E.g., Trump treating his White base with contempt while pandering to Blacks; Amren treating White ethnics with contempt while pandering to Jews (and East Asians).

Hey!  Maybe Trump can replace Spencer as the President of the NPI!  MAGA! Pepe!  Kek!

Griffin gets what eludes our “movement” “rock stars” – 

Donald Trump and his campaign team were cucked on race. They were too afraid to crackdown on Black Lives Matter and Antifa. They were gaslit by the “white supremacy” narrative. As a result, they pandered to minorities, demoralized their base and the White vote slipped and they lost.

Could it have easily turned out otherwise? Yes, Donald Trump’s campaign took the White vote for granted. It is what got him elected in the first place in 2016. In the final analysis, it was what undid him in 2020. They ran a different kind of campaign in 2020 than 2016 in which Joe Biden was able to improve on Hillary Clinton in 41 out of 50 states and all but two swing states...

See this.

I certainly don’t envy Trump if he has to leave office with prosecutors and others poised to attack.

That’s the “swamp” that the incredibly lazy and useless Trump forgot to “drain.”  Remember what the first thing Trump said after he was elected? He said that he did not want Hillary Clinton investigated in any way – "leave her alone, she’s suffered enough from losing."  So, all the “Lock Her Up” chants during the campaign were just more fraudulent Trumpian bluster. Unfortunately for Trump, it is unlikely that the other side is going to take such a forgiving attitude toward him. His charitable attitude toward Clinton was – rightfully – perceived as weakness by the Left, and like sharks smelling blood in the water, they went on the attack. And Trump, like the blundering hapless buffoon that he is, fell into all the traps set for him.

Biden’s speech on Saturday evening and the celebration, in the context of consensus support of liberal-left media and even foreign leaders despite recounts and court cases looming is an attempt to make it a fete accompli, a done deal that can’t be reversed. 

Note – “fete accompli.”  Let’s fete that accompli, guys!  Incredible.

But realize that if it is certified and given that the Senate could flip depending on the results in Georgia, all the consequences of a Biden presidency noted in my “Why It’s Important for Trump to Win” might happen. 

But, hey, Strom says don’t worry about electoral politics.

Of course, if there’s one thing Trump should have done it’s rein in the media monopolies. It’s been discussed quite a bit but Trump did nothing more than complain about it and say he was monitoring the situation. Too late now.

Yes, too late now. I suppose that’s the price to be paid for being an incredibly lazy blithering idiot play-acting as President. Now, the Republican establishment is “monitoring the situation” as Trump’s re-election was stolen from him.  

Democrat victories in Georgia would mean Dem control of the Senate and all that that implies in terms of statehood for Puerto Rico and DC (likely permanent Democrat majority), packing the Supreme Court with justices that would be happy to impose criminal penalties for “hate speech” and restrict gun ownership.

But, hey, let’s not have any, like, you know, plans for that or anything. Johnson tells us he’ll just do “more of the same” while Strom assures us that the National Alliance is above such petty political concerns.

70 million unhappy Trump voters who firmly and reasonably believe that the election was stolen (such allegations are all over mainstream conservative media) are going to be a serious force in the years ahead if not in the very near future.

If they have no leadership – and they currently do not – they are not going to do a damn thing.

Despite Biden’s high-flown rhetoric about all coming together and healing the divisions, things will be worse than ever. They should be careful what they wish for.

Yes, after all, it may all come true, and the Right will, as usual, do absolutely nothing to oppose it.

But still. I have to say that today I am very depressed.

No worries.  Jeff Bezos will recognize his Nordic ancestry and save us all!  High Trust!

todd hupp

todd huppsays:

November 7, 2020 at 4:52 pm

Any chance of the USA remaining a NW European nation may have evaporated.

NW European…like Trump, Spencer, Johnson, and all those Whites voting for Biden.

Aristo Boho

Aristo Bohosays:

November 7, 2020 at 5:18 pm

Dear Doctor MacDonald,

Yes, I too am very depressed. Let’s never forget that the Republicans are just as much at fault. When Mister Donald John Trump took office in 2017 as President Of The United States Of America, the Republican Party controlled both Houses of the Congress. 

Yes, let us not forget that for the first two years of Trump’s Presidency, the GOP controlled ALL branches of government and accomplished precisely nothing for Trump’s White base. Nada.  Zero.  Zilch. Nil.  The null set.  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!

In this of our Lord 2020: he should have immediately brought in the finest medical minds and come right out that the Coronavirus Disease-2019 was nothing but a shame, the biggest in world history.

Yes, I agree, it was and is a shame. Or did you mean to write something else, perhaps?  Like “fete accompli?”  Or, perhaps, let me guess here...sham. What a shame. Or is it sham? A shameful sham!

How about this – “it is a shame that the sham of Coronavirus Disease-2019 was a fete accompli.”  The sham is a shame and the shame is a sham.  Where is Jeff Bezos when you need him?  Working out and getting “jacked,” right Roissy?  Working that right bicep more than the left; leaning right, no doubt!

When people on the Right complain about "fifty years of affirmative action" they should be referring as much to Der Movement as they are to America as a whole. In both cases, I suppose it will just continue indefinitely.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, November 5, 2020

Nov 5 Election Update

News. 

Things are not going to well for the vulgar ignorant buffoon, Antifa Don Trump.

Counter-Currents

@NewRightAmerica

Trump was elected twice, once as a populist, once as a Republican, proving my thesis that he did not HAVE to go populist to win. He chose to, even though it put him at war with his own party as well as the Dems. 

But why did he go Republican this time? 

What are your thoughts?

My thoughts are that you are a fundamentally dishonest vile horror.

First, Trump officially has not been “elected twice.” True, the Democrats are trying to steal the 2020 election, and unofficially, you can say Trump was “elected twice,” but if the fat fraud hadn’t betrayed his base, he wouldn’t have lost White (male) vote percentages, and he could have won, officially, fairly easily, and all the chaos could have been avoided.

Second, and more importantly, you cannot compare 2016 to 2020. In 2016, Trump was one candidate among many in a crowded Republican field, and he needed to distinguish himself from the established Neocon Republicans. In 2020, he is the incumbent, with people desperate to avoid a Biden-Harris Presidency.

The uncertain chaos of 2020 with Trump trying to be re-elected as an incumbent in no way “proves” that Trump would have won the nomination, or the general election, in 2016 with the platform of 2020.

Indeed, what do we see?  A right-wing populist Trump – or at least a fraud pretending to be such a populist – emerges from the 2015-2016 Republican crowd, and, with a solid base of support from White men and married White women, wins the nomination and, in a stunning upset, the general election. In 2020, an incumbent President Trump, pandering to non-Whites, a Trump who has spit in the face of his base for four years, a Trump running as a more mainstream Republican, loses White male support, and is likely on track to LOSE the election, unless there is a miracle of Arizona flipping back “red” and the ballot fraud from Philadelphia and Atlanta not reversing Trump’s hold on PA and GA.  

If Trump had run as a populist in 2020, and had a record to back him up, he would have  won in such an obvious fashion as to make ballot fraud irrelevant. Therefore, being a populist is a key to Trump’s success, it was definitely absolutely required when he was a “political nobody” in 2015-2016, and his abandonment of his populist pretense lost him White support and has endangered his Presidency.

So – of course and we cannot be surprised – Johnson is wrong (after all, they are always, always wrong) and Sallis is correct.

Once again, let us consider Trump.  It is entirely possible that the man has some vague civic nationalist law and order impulses. Thus, illegal immigration offends him precisely because it is illegal and lawbreakers are being allowed to break the law with impunity and in fact are being rewarded for it. His taste in women reflects some innate preference with respect to racial aesthetics. He may prefer the racial status quo he grew up with – a majority White America with a large Black minority and other prominent minority groups. He may well also have a very general sense of “America First.” But, that is as far as it goes. He has no real underlying ideology or commitment to a cause. He is certainly not going to sacrifice his own interests to any cause. His attachment to even a milquetoast civic nationalism is so weak that it can be easily misdirected or forgotten whenever Jared or Lindsey or Mitch or a wealthy Jewish donor whispers something in his ear.  He is a New York billionaire whose entire life, entire career, has been one of elite connections and celebrity associations; he is at heart no populist, never was one, and the pretense of 2015-2016 was a sham, easily discarded. 

In essence Trump is an elitist with certain weak and vague civic nationalist preferences but with no real ideology and who hoodwinked Red State White America into thinking he was something he is not.

I was talking recently to a Trump supporter, someone who voted for Trump in both 2016 and 2020 and they told me that they hate Trump more than they do Biden.  Why?  Because Trump is, to them (and to me), a fraud and an idiot, someone who squandered a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and spent four years tweeting, eating junk food, betraying his base, and pandering to people who did not vote for him – a complete disaster. That is the ultimate Trumpian legacy.

Interesting comments from Irish readers in response to another Anglocentric article from Der Movement.  Who was it who is always saying that Der Movement has nothing – absolutely nothing – to offer to White ethnics?  The micks obviously haven’t learned yet if they still believe that debating on “movement” blogs is going to get them anywhere – and if the go too far, they’ll be “banned” and called “insane.”  Watch it, Paddy, watch it. Don’t get too uppity to your Anglo betters!

See this. OK, when that happens, we’ll see what occurs. Meanwhile, in the real world, the Democrats are stealing the election, with the full support of establishment Republicans.

But, hey, no worries. Jeff Bezos is going to realize his “Nordic ancestry,” put on a horned helmet, and, wielding Thor’s hammer, come to our rescue.  Expecting that is the sort of sober “movement” “leadership” that has led us to our current state.

There is some truth here.  But it has one majestic flaw.  Whatever opportunities that may emerge from this election will be utterly squandered by the incompetent “movement” and its failed affirmative action “leadership.”  People like Hood who enable this “leadership” are also to blame. The only justifiable reason to do a podcast or livestream with, say, Johnson, is to debate, challenge, and refute him. But to go online with him and go along with the gaslighting and stupidity is simply unforgiveable. So Hood can write his long “white pill” essays, but as long as we have the likes of Johnson in charge, nothing lasting of use will get accomplished.

Incompetents, gaslighters, grifters, and clowns - that is not the stuff of dissident leadership.


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 9, 2020

Handbags at Dawn

And other news.

Johnson is getting upset!  Handbags at dawn! The pink purses are flying!  

Note the question about “affirmative action” – with Johnson saying that I am a “disgruntled embittered former writer” – “paranoid” – “obnoxious" - "paranoid nasty piece of crap.” The vulgar ad hominem is found in the comments ranging from around 1:28:15-1:30:25, including the question about affirmative action (the exact boundaries of the clip varies slightly whether you listen online or download it).

First reaction – laughter (not like this) and satisfaction that someone (assuming it was not a ringer) took the opportunity to use the livestream format to force Johnson to address certain issues (but it would have been better to bring up some of the other issues discussed here, such as his ethnonationalist hypocrisy, his changing dogmatic 2020 election predictions, his constant bad judgment, the Polignano incident as relayed by Friberg, his refusal to debate critics, etc.).

Second reaction – sharing that clip with associates, who also reacted with hilarity.

Third reaction – I, naturally, will respond to the main point of the comments. Thus, let’s forget Johnson’s hysteria and tackle the question of affirmative action. Johnson argues against that he’s an affirmative action case by citing that he got his initial “movement” editing job since he has a PhD (as if he’s the only person in racial activism with a PhD or some other post-graduate degree), that he founded Counter-Currents and did the work (let’s forget Friberg’s and Forney’s accusations, re: Polignano), etc. (as if other people haven’t done the same sort of work).

But I never claimed that Johnson had no credentials or never accomplished anything.  That’s a strawman argument – typical Johnsonian gaslighting argumentation. Look, when a less qualified Black is admitted to college, that doesn’t mean they never took the SAT. An unqualified Black hired at a university will still have a PhD. An unqualified Black promoted at a business will have some minimal qualifications. That’s not the point. The point is whether the person has been elevated above and beyond their qualifications, whether they have been given additional promotion over more qualified people based on demographics and not merit.

Johnson very quickly was given a top position in the “movement” (e.g.,TOQ) while others with equal credentials were not. Johnson was immediately accepted as a “movement” “mover and shaker” while others were rejected solely on the basis of (perceived or known) ethnicity. Johnson’s myriad flaws, errors, hypocrisies, bad behaviors, disasters, feuds, misrepresentations, and asinine “arguments” are overlooked by his sycophantic supporters, while others are not given the same “wiggle room” for their errors.

I realize that the “movement” is so bereft of any quality that even someone as defective as Johnson stands out as “impressive” and “educated” and “articulate” by comparison, but still…Johnson’s level of attainment in the “movement” is out of all proportion to his actual abilities and accomplishments.  Especially if you balance the books and weigh all of his disasters against his accomplishments, then it just doesn’t add up. Compared to others, there isn’t justification for Johnson’s status - based purely on merit.

Here is a thought experiment – imagine everything about Johnson is exactly the same except that he’s some American White ethnic Italian named Vito Woperino or a Balkan Slav named Boratislav Hunknic or a Greek named Graecalus Greggilos – do you really believe he would have the same status in the “movement” that he has now? That he would have been given the same opportunities? Have had all his disasters overlooked? Been so easily accepted as a “movement” bigwig?  Come on now, be serious.

Johnson’s enemy Spencer is another perfect example of an affirmative action case.  On the other hand, there are other extant “movement” leaders who – while I do often criticize them and it is true that their ancestries do in fact help them greatly – cannot be truly said to be affirmative action cases.  Jared Taylor has obviously earned his status in the “movement” by starting the entire American Renaissance enterprise from scratch (besides his initial book on race); Kevin MacDonald has obviously earned his status through his Jewish trilogy, his various forms of activism, and for speaking out as a university professor (albeit one with the protection of tenure); Kevin Strom’s status certainly has more to do with his intellectual abilities and decades of activism than with his Norwegian ancestry; and Will Williams also has had a decades-long career in pro-White activism and his military record deserves respect. So, yes, I have differences with those gentlemen and they may well resent my criticism and yes, as stated, their ancestries have benefitted them to an extent, but those individuals have real accomplishments in the “movement” - unlike the WN 2.0 nitwits who have been propped up by some of those elder statesmen and who have careened from one disaster to another.

Presumably the individual who asked the question to Johnson is someone who reads EGI Notes.  So, the answer to your question, in my opinion, is YES, Johnson is an affirmative action case.  Note well that Johnson refuses to debate critics and that he, unlike me, has a financial interest in protecting his “movement” status.

I have to laugh at Johnson pointing the finger at anyone else as being bitter and paranoid, given his feuds with people like Spencer and Friberg, and I have to laugh at him accusing others of exhibiting abnormal behavior, given (a) the Pilleater tape, and (b) Friberg’s accusations that have not been denied or refuted.

Listen to this. Of particular interest with respect to the issue of character and the promotion of ethnoimperialism are the following clips:

59:40-1:01:00

1:08:50-1:10:20

1:11:00-1:13:30

If those accusations are false, then I invite Johnson to publicly refute them; optimally, he should engage with Friberg on a podcast or livestream to discuss these issues.

Assuming for a moment Friberg is correct, then what do we see? Keep Europe atomized, fragmented, and confused so as to allow “racial aristocrats” free reign to do what they wish in their “feudal properties?”  A form of droit du seigneur that can be homosexual as well as heterosexual?  Indeed, in response to this, we can all be disgusted by other types of people as well.

Indeed, Johnson is such a wonderful person that he ends up feuding and becoming bitter enemies with, or at least falling out with, many people he had previously had cordial relations and/or worked with. Of course, there’s Sallis. What happened with Polignano? We’ve already mentioned Spencer and Friberg.  Then there’s Colin Liddell.  And Matt Forney.  What about Pilleater? Johnson has had an on-again-and-off-again association with Hunter Wallace. First he hated Dickson, now they’re buddies again. I read somewhere that Gariepy is upset with him; I don’t know if that is true. I’m sure there’s others. Then there are others he's feuded with, people that he may not have had previous cordial relations with, people like Andrew Joyce (*).

Some may respond - hey, Sallis, you’ve had “falling outs” with people too.  Correct – but, hey, according to Johnson, that’s because I’m some sort of really unpleasant, nasty, and paranoid person - so what does it say about Johnson that his feuds have been a lot more prominent than mine?  Can we describe him the same?  Or does he argue that his constant feuds and falling outs were all justified – all “the other people’s fault?”  Very convenient, eh?  Sort of like Jews blaming all the other peoples of the Earth for the fact that the Jews have been despised and “persecuted” in every nation that they’ve lived in. And remember - I’m no “movement leader” after all, just some guy blogging. I'm just a crazed loon, gibbering in my madness. What’s Johnson’s excuse?

Getting back to the livestream, of course Dickson promotes the work of the execrable scum Humphrey Ireland (“Wilmot Robertson”).  And Stoddard and Grant. Surprise!  Der Movement has nothing to offer White ethnics. As far as books that Dickson values - nothing from Salter; nothing from Yockey.  On Genetic Interests?  Not important, it seems, to Dickson.  Imperium?  Obviously not important as well. But Ireland's mumbling about Italian-American "needle workers" (obviously all five feet tall or less), and his fear that the dastardly John Marchi was tainting Anglo-conservatism, by golly, that's important!

Are we surprised that Der Movement has been a complete failure for decades? A memorable experience for Johnson – meeting Humphrey and getting his book signed.  That does tell you all you need to know about the HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance.  Funny though how Johnson – right out of the gate – was meeting with people like Dickson and Ireland.  No doubt if Johnson had been a five foot tall afrowop, old Humphrey would have welcomed him with open arms. Right?  Now, don’t be paranoid and believe otherwise!

Then again, given how quickly Hermansson was given “the keys to the kingdom” (and to who knows what else, eh?), the rapid acceptance of Johnson can come as no surprise – and both incidents reinforce the affirmative action narrative.

“Shoestring budgets” – right…having someone compensated for $180,000 in a year for running a website is indicative of “shoestring budgets.”  Laughable.

Dickson’s arguments that the best people in the “movement” have the most to lose and therefore do not get involved in leadership positions, leaving the worst elements to come to the fore - that's correct. Johnson on the other hand pushes the absolute absurd falsehood that activists today are of a higher quality than in the past and are more normal. I’ve been involved in racial activism longer than Johnson and I vehemently disagree with that assessment. Johnson himself is an example of the problem people extant in the “movement” today - a problem that is greater than any time in the past; look at Spencer; look at the whole Alt Right; look at the Pilleater Chronicles. I can tell you that the "movement" has never been worse off than today with respect to quality - unless of course you believe this here represents quality.

Taylor and Hood.  That was a decent podcast.  Taylor’s “libertarian leanings” – no surprise there.  Libertarianism is a curse upon the "movement." I also enjoy how they re-write history to make believe they never thought Trump was the second coming.  But those are minor issues, 99% of the podcast was excellent and on point.

A useful post.  Obviously, the woman inherited her appearance from her maternal line – good old Herrenvolk mixing it up with the Negro.  And then it is blamed on the wops.  Incredible.

Blame the vulgar retard.

A hilarious coincidence.  The universe does indeed work in mysterious ways. Wait, there’s more. How many Greg Johnson clones are there out there?

Counter-Currents comments on Bill Clinton.

Kolya Krassotkin 

Posted September 8, 2020 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

When Bill Clinton and his wife first slithered onto the national stage almost 30 years ago now, we should have known our republic’s days were numbered.

Reply

Alex

Posted September 8, 2020 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

Exactly correct, I was barely 20 at that time but I knew the country was done after Clinton was elected. During that campaign I donated to Pat Buchanan which was my first and last political campaign contribution.

Counter-Currents essay on Bill Clinton.  Apparently, the commentators there are wiser than the "writers."

* Of interest:

It was argued that homosexuals “possessed an inordinate amount of psychopathology and character flaws such as instability, illegal conduct, dishonesty, untrustworthiness, poor teamwork, and relationship forming skills. Gay men were described as being highly strung and neurotic.” Combining an understanding of homosexual personality traits with homosexual apologetics produced within White Nationalism, it becomes clear that dishonesty (“homosexuality is beside the point, let’s not discuss it”) and manipulative behaviors (“hostility to homosexuality is Jewish”), and an exaggerated sense of self-esteem/importance are at least primary concerns to those wanting to steer the cause of Whites in the right direction...The fact that an ostensibly nationalist writer can openly praise a pederastic author who denigrated the reproductive relationships of normal, healthy families is a sign of a degenerative rot that has developed in the corners of this movement.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, September 6, 2020

Fisking Commune

A thorough fisking.

Laugh at this leftist stupidity.  Excerpts (emphasis added) and responses:

The alt right is irrelevant now, because its ideas are entirely mainstream.

Nonsense. The Alt Right is irrelevant now because it was an utter (and entirely predictable) failure, which left the “movement” worse off than before.  What’s “entirely mainstream” is BLM and Antifa.  Pro-White activism is even more marginalized than before.

“Some women are simply aroused by the image of a penis.”

Some men in the Alt Right are as well, apparently.  Beware at the urinal!

In this particular episode, Spencer and his nameless interlocutor got into an argument about whether or not women enjoy “dick pics.” Spencer argued that they do not because of the innately reclusive nature of female sexuality. The cohost disagreed vehemently, saying that Richard may not understand because it is a “generational” thing.

Such is the content of The Richard Spencer Show, which launched in 2018.

That is what I term “Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism” and encapsulates what the Alt Right was really about.  

It isn’t the white supremacist’s first podcast-style talk program. Spencer began Vanguard Radio back in 2010, around the same time he launched AlternativeRight.com. But now that his notoriety has grown and he has pissed off all of his former cohosts, his show now boasts only his name, his face, and an anonymous cohost, and is livestreamed over the course of hours. On another episode published within the last year, he responded to allegations from his ex-wife that he physically and verbally abused her (she had documentary evidence), and his cohost commented on how much more attractive he thought Spencer’s new girlfriend was than his former wife.

Why should anyone be surprised by any of that?  What else was the Alt Right ever about?  It was an asinine, insipid, moronic, iteration of “movement” stupidity, putting a leering “youth culture” face on tired, fossilized “movement” dogma.

In earlier incarnations of his podcast persona, Spencer would wax pseudo-philosophically, trying to resurrect the German Conservative Revolution, praising the European New Right of the late 1960s, cherry-picking from Heidegger and Nietzsche. He would interview the fascist celebrities he was hoping to cultivate into a powerful milieu: Jack Donovan, Tomislav Sunić, Greg Johnson, Matt Heimbach, and even Pat Buchanan. They would talk about the future, their dreams, how they saw the world, where they came from, and where they were going.

Sunic is a good guy, but the rest of them? Two homosexuals, the hero of a trailer park cuckoldry triangle, and an elderly paleoconservative who time has passed by.

Now Spencer is defending himself against his abused ex-wife and debating dick pics. 

The Peter Principle. Spencer rose to the level of his incompetence (not too far) and has slipped back into “defending himself against his abused ex-wife and debating dick pics.”

In early November, far-right troll Milo Yiannopoulos released an audio recording from 2017 on YouTube, in which Spencer can be heard spewing racist bile in the aftermath of the deadly Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. “Little fucking kikes. They get ruled by people like me. Little fucking octaroons. My ancestors fucking enslaved those little pieces of fucking shit,” Spencer raged. “Those pieces of shit get ruled by people like me. They look up and see a face like mine looking down at them.” It’s hardly headline news for anyone aware of Spencer and his ilk—Hold the presses! Neo-Nazi is a racist!—yet, until a few months ago, mainstream news networks like CNN continued to invite Spencer on as a guest.

What about all the “elder statesman” of the American Far Right who jumped on the Alt Right bandwagon and who enabled Spencer up until the point that Hailgate offended Jewish moneybags?  Let’s take a look at those heroes as well.  And as regards CNN – should we surprised that an anti-White outfit like that would promote Spencer as a spokesman for the Far Right?

THEY FELL HARD

Predicted here by early 2017 at the latest.

When his trademarked Alt-Right movement went off the rails, losing all forward momentum and ideological consistency…

What was the “ideological constituency?”  Pepe?  People drinking gallons of milk while screaming “Kek?”  What?  Juvenile podcasts?  Writing “Arthur Kemp was right” with respect to a published paper that was in fact a perfect refutation of Kemp?  What?

…there was nothing he could do but alternate between enraged fist pounding and nihilistic humor. 

That’s what it ALWAYS was, you idiot.

Spencer had creeped around the edges of the white nationalist movement when he was a graduate student studying European intellectual history at Duke University. He became an assistant arts editor at the American Conservative in 2008 after then-editor Scott McConnell liked a presentation he gave defending the Duke lacrosse players accused of sexually assaulting a black sex worker. McConnell eventually suggested that Spencer would be a better fit at Taki’s Magazine, the far-right paleoconservative outlet resembling the early Breitbart.com—though with fancier words and a sleeker typeface. He was meeting new people, like far-right philosophy professor Paul Gottfried, paleocon-turned-white-identitarian Sam Francis, “human biodiversity” proponent Steve Sailer, as well as open white nationalists, romanticist pagans, and “traditionalists.”…Although the name originated with Gottfried, Spencer then decided to call his cadre the Alternative Right and built a website (AlternativeRight.com, which went offline in 2014) to bring them all together to talk. 

Reading between the lines of the above – the “Anglo” “old boys network”(that includes on its periphery some "high IQ Jews") pushed Spencer forward and upward, propelled by elder co-ethnics grooming the next generation of (failed) affirmative action leaders.

What’s ironic is that no matter how much Spencer and Johnson may dislike each other, they have a fundamental “movement” trajectory in common. Both are archetypical affirmative action cases, both are stereotypical Quota Queens.  Both rapidly rose within the “movement,” pushed up by elder co-ethnics, when neither of them demonstrated the requisite merit or competence to justify their rapid rise.

That is when the Alt Right 2.0 came together; this time, bloggers and podcasters who had their own loose affinities gathered in message-board subcultures like the Manosphere and Neoreaction, and there began to memeify the Alternative Right’s talking points. 

Talking points: Pepe, Kek, drinking milk, drunken podcasts, juvenile sniggering, etc.

Neoreaction birthed the “cuckservative” meme, which criticized conservative politicians who argued for anything less than border militarization. 

No, it justifiably criticized “conservative” politicians who, only a few decades earlier, would be considered far-left radicals and are, today, virtually indistinguishable from liberal Democrats in all issues other than “capital gains tax cuts.”

The Alt Right 2.0 used the banner and hashtag #AltRight to describe themselves. They were not quite as academic as the alt-right’s first iteration, their ideas less formed. 

What ideas?

Their praxis was little more than trolling. 

Precisely.

Their turn toward activism was awkward, not the least because most of the key figures, like Mike Enoch, Greg Johnson, and Eli Mosley, were clueless as to how organizing works. 

The problem is having failures like that as “key figures.”

Planned events usually amounted to purposeless flash mobs, high-profile public speeches marked by violence…

Err, you mendacious scum, how are they responsible for the fact that leftists that you support are intolerant violent thugs, domestic terrorists who break up legal gatherings?  Gee…”civil rights" marches of the 1960s sometimes ended with violence, so….

The Alt Right is a movement separate from its creator, but Richard Spencer is still its soul. The movement was crafted in his image and around his ideas. The Alt Right is, in large part, just a fascist aesthetics: collared shirts, swooped hair, academic rhetoric, millennial cultural tropes, and Internet meanness.

Exactly. I agree.  What does it say about the “movement’s” elder statesmen that they eagerly jumped on the Alt Right bandwagon?  Only Sallis and Strom were properly skeptical.  All the rest – poor judgment conformist weaklings.

Spencer publicly tried to fashion himself as an intellectual aristocrat. He mimicked the Northeastern parlor accent of his white supremacist forerunner, Jared Taylor…

That is defamation. Taylor is not a “white supremacist.” If I recall correctly, he identified Amren with “yellow supremacy" as well as with "white advocacy."

Spencer admired the figure of the Troll, suggesting at NPI conferences that since the Troll was the soul of the Internet, maybe the Alt Right was the soul of the Troll. 

And now you wonder why the Alt Right collapsed.  What – with such a firm ideological core, why were any of us ever skeptical?

He used to publish books of pseudo-academic racist prose lamenting the decline of the white race, but now he was holding ever-shrinking press events, continually shut down by the anti-fascist opposition. 

This turd is exactly like Roger Griffin. That legal meetings by the Right are “continually shut down” by violent leftist thugs is submitted as evidence as flaws of the Right.  Let’s turn that around and cite Nazi persecution of Jews as evidence of the flaws of the latter.

And then there was the alcohol. He usually drank a stiff bourbon to complement his brand as a rich American, nostalgic for the South. 

According to Pilleater, it wasn’t only alcohol.

His rampant public racism made him an easier target to organize around for antifascists…

Spencer is White, these days apparently the only criterion to be “easier target to organize around for antifascists…”

Spencer was increasingly incapable of playing the role of both racist conference speaker and shock jock. The former image of the Alt Right and its paper-thin veil of refinement was replaced by a movement more openly rabid and raging, and more at home with the white nationalist movement at large. 

Exactly the opposite. The Alt Right was always “more openly rabid and raging” than “the white nationalist movement at large.”

Heather Heyer was murdered…

More accurate: Fat land whale Heyer, participating in a violent suppression of the free speech of others, died while a rightist attempted to escape in his car from being attacked by a weapon-wielding violent crowd.

….and the Alt Right devolved into infighting, private message boards, and in-jokes.

It didn’t “devolve” into “infighting, private message boards, and in-jokes” – that was always its core.

They were into racist paganism, esoteric German philosophers, discredited race science…

Real racial science is not “discredited.”  Having leftist academics critique truth does not make the truth any less true.

The Alt Right’s methodology is informed by the European New Right’s conception of meta-politics, the cultural influences that form pre-political ideas, identities, and values. By this logic, if you can affect what people think of themselves and about right and wrong, you can change political reality down the line. For several years, white nationalism was in search of effective meta-politics, since practical politics— going out in the streets or running candidates—was off the table. 

Hey!  I thought we lived in a “White supremacist society” in which “White supremacy” and “White privilege” were inherent.  So why is pro-White politics “off the table?”

“We like to assume that the arc of history will bend inexorably toward justice, but this is wishful thinking,” writes Andrew Marantz in his book Antisocial, on the Alt Right’s growth via social media. “The arc of history bends the way people bend it. In the early years of the twenty-first century, the internet was full of nihilists and masculinists and ironic neo-Nazis and nonironic neo-Nazis, all working to bend the arc of history in some extremely disturbing directions.”

Wishful thinking is also manifest in arrogant leftists believing that their destructive worldview – that resulted in more death and suffering than any other in human history – is defined by “justice.”

This is why deplatforming, meaning removing certain figures and groups from the mass platforms that they share with the rest of us, was a death sentence for key players in the Alt Right. 

So…how is the deplatforming of the Alt Right – with the radical Left still enjoying full access to those mass platforms – consistent with the “mainstreaming” of Alt Right views and the existence of a “White supremacist” society?  More to the point – how is rightist deplatforming evidence of rightist failure, rather than as evidence of a leftist failure to fairly contest the Right in the marketplace of ideas?

Outside of the social media and Web 2.0 framework they lost the ability to stay in the conversation, their “hot takes” returned to the cooler world of private mailing lists and subscription newsletters. The Alt Right are, once again, a fringe white nationalist movement. It is now difficult for the uninitiated to simply stumble across the Alt Right while scrolling. Nothing could make them more insular.

How are they to blame for the censorship by woke capital?

See, for example, the trajectory of the Daily Shoah. It was once the largest podcast in the Alt Right scene, so large, in fact, that it spurred an entire podcast network with dozens of shows, a lively message board, and enough paid subscribers that a couple of hosts were full time employees. Their hosts and guests used the platform to freely wax genocidal; cohost Jayoh de le Ray argued, for example, that all black people should be exterminated. Now, the Daily Shoah is all but invisible. They have been veritably kicked off of the web, podcasts, and blog-hosting platforms like iTunes, Twitter, and Facebook. You can’t find them in a Google search, they are absent from almost all social media, and the listener has to have already been acquainted with the content before they can join in on their conversation. They used to speak both to the converted and to new recruits, now it is only the existing echo chamber that tunes in for their twice weekly, three-hour invective. They have returned to where they started, and they weren’t prepared for that.

Der Movement is never prepared for anything.

Some of these fascist media figures had given up their old lives completely, banking on the idea that the Alt Right would become established enough to stop being a professional liability. The Daily Shoah’s cohost Mike Enoch even divorced his Jewish wife and left behind a six-figure career as a computer programmer to live in a trailer in upstate New York. It was a bad bet: his subscriber list continues to shrink, and fewer and fewer people tune in to hear his “hate facts.” Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer now lives a life on the run, escaping the lawsuits his harassment provoked. 

I’m no fan of Anglin, but that’s blaming the victim.

The entire media empire of the Alt Right is, with few exceptions, desolate and underattended. The website AltRight.com hasn’t added new content in over a year; the work of painstaking brand development was seemingly for nothing. 

All predicted here, years ago.

When the Alternative Right, with all of its intellectual posturing, turned out to be the Alt Right, just neo-Nazism in a dinner jacket (as so many of us had long pointed out), the movement lost its earlier mystique, and with it much of its access to new converts.

The Alt Right was Nutzism in a drunken podcast, and if it has lost “access” that is due to censorship and violent leftist thuggery.

And then there is Richard Spencer.

His conferences have been canceled… now he is lucky to keep a social media account up…

Again, the Roger Griffin School of logic.  If the System, working hand-in-glove with leftist thugs, censors and deplatforms the Right, then the Right are just a bunch of losers.  By that logic, the Left should also mock the Jewish “losers” persecuted by the Nazis.

The story of Spencer is, in a clichéd sense, the story of American celebrity. White liberal media loved (to hate) him because white supremacy was an oddity, not a threat. 

So you admit that “white supremacy” is not a threat.  Thank you.

His brand of ethnic cleansing was discussed as if it was rowdy, every apology was made for his rhetoric, and the microphones were always open. And this apologist approach made sense: how could Spencer’s rhetoric be differentiated when the Republican Party (GOP) was advocating a ban on immigration from primarily Muslim countries?

Trump advocated that, not the GOP. The GOP, along with the other wing of America’s one party system, the Democrats, have supported increased Muslim immigration after 9/11.

Spencer wanted an intellectual movement.

He had a funny way of showing it, then.  Admiring the Troll?

Alt Right mainstay and neo-Nazi Greg Johnson once said, “Alt Right means white nationalism or it means nothing.” 

Proving Johnson is a horribly destructive force in the “movement.”

About a year ago I was working on an essay about a moment of decline in the Alt Right when an editor asked me how, since the Republican Party has moved so far right, it can make sense to talk about the Alt Right’s failure.

Yeah, under Trump, the GOP has moved to the immigration position held by that Nazi lunatic Dwight Eisenhower, while Trump spends his political capital on pro-Black “criminal justice reform,” a radically pro-Israel foreign policy, while having his DOJ persecute his own supporters.  And the GOP establishment is just itching to get back to the good old days of unabashed neo-Marxist neoconservatism.

The Alt Right leaders and followers wanted to make space for their positions in the culture, and they did. 

Which we can see with the triumph of BLM and the descent of America into a neo-puritan hysterical far-left spasm of anti-Whiteness.

But the mainstreaming of white supremacist politics…

Delusion.  What has become mainstreamed is BLM and Antifa.

A decline of the Alt Right is not a decline in the threat of fascism, in fact, it could simply be momentary projection of what is to come.

What is to come – BLM and Antifa burning down American cities (with the approval of the establishment) and the assassination of White rightists in the streets (ditto).

But of greater concern still is the way white nationalism informs and will inform the state…

Gee, it has to wait in line for that, behind BLM and Antifa.

The Alt Right gave the state extra license to resort to racist violence as a solution to its problems…

Huh?  The only “racist violence” is of BLM and Antifa against Whites.

…and just as in fascist movements past the state found the relationship with extra-state groups synergistic. 

Relationship between the state and extra-state groups – like the present synergistic relationship between the System and BLM/Antifa.

This means struggle cannot silo itself between issues and targets, but has to grow to confront the expanding network of white violence.

As Blacks and their allies burn down America, we’ll talk about non-existent “white violence.”

Richard Spencer definitely got punched…

The only actual manifestation of White violence.

…but he left his fingerprints on the world that rejected him.

He left his fingerprints on a ruined “movement,” no doubt.

There is a certain impetus from people writing about the far-right to extend its reach beyond its boundaries. Perhaps this comes from having your head in that world too much, and therefore it seems more significant than it is. Is the world racist because of the Alt Right, or is the Alt Right possible because the world is racist? 

The only “racism” in the world is against Whites – the only people not allowed to have their own homelands, the only people not allowed to organize in defense of group interests, the only people whose own governments criminalize racial self-defense.

…it is because their movements are the externalization of a social consciousness that runs through every distinct element, every building, and every institution in Western life.

You know, all the institutions of Western life that bring mass alien immigration and White displacement, criminalization of White dissent, deplatforming of White dissidents, etc.

The Alt Right was able to identify the burgeoning “white identity” politics and give it a name, a language, to bridge the gap between the reality of white supremacy…

Reality? We live in a state in which BLM is praised by politicians, funded by woke capital, while the allegedly “mainstreamed” “fascists” are censored, deplatformed, and attacked in the streets with impunity. The anti-White Left has been allowed to engage in open insurrection, open domestic terrorism, for months now, burning down American cities, with no charges pressed against anyone, while Trump's DOJ persecutes his own supporters. Whites are not allowed to express an identity or defend their group interests, while Blacks run wild and everyone smiles benignly.  Racial groups like MENA stridently press the government to be removed from the “White” category on the census – the “flight from White” manifests everywhere.  If this is “White supremacy” I shudder to think what “equality” will bring.

…and the mythology and playbook of white nationalism.

Ad hominem.

The fingerprints that Spencer left on the world are now part of the world.

As a source of laughter, yes.  Otherwise, no.

On November 12, 2019, Michael Edison Hayden released a story through the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch project chronicling the role that White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller had on influencing far-right media coverage of issues like immigration, particularly at Breitbart. 

Miller has accomplished absolutely zero at the Trump administration.  Kushner on the other hand…

Leaked emails show that he was propping up a number of canards about immigrant crime and violence…

“Canards” being another word for “facts.”

…particularly using Alt Right favorites American Renaissance, known for its race and IQ banter…

“Banter?”  Why does the Left always use snide asides rather than engaging on the issues?

…and the anti-immigration website VDare, as sources. In discussions it was clear that Miller’s public persona is the tip of the iceberg, and below the surface lies the murky world of the Alt Right, mixed together pseudo-science…

HBD is pseudoscience, but real racial science is not. The worst pseudoscience is the race denial from the Left.

…white replacement conspiracy theories…

White replacement is certainly a conspiracy, but it is not a theory; it is a reality.

…and panicked white anxiety about slipping hegemony. 

So you admit Whites are in decline and exhibit “slipping hegemony?”

Of course Stephen Miller is a white nationalist. 

He’s not.  He’s a paleoconservative Jew.

Fascists have certainly had an effect on the organs of power, but only in the way that white nationalism has been normalized as a political identity, which gives capital the ability to harness the violent energies generated by our era of mass crisis. 

Crazed delusion. “Capital” is 100% on the side of the author of this piece.  It is “Capital” that supports BLM and Antifa, while deplatforming and censoring the Right.  

White supremacy is the method by which capital splits the working class and uses the crisis it created to its advantage rather than its detriment. 

If you replace “White” by “Colored” maybe that would be true.

The Alt Right is then a part of that process, a useful vanguard…

Yes, it I such a “useful vanguard” that it has been censored and deplatformed, and “Capital” works hand-in-glove with Antifa to violently suppress the Right.  That’s why the writing of this author is widely available, while that of the Right is being censored and deplatformed.

…the symptom rather than the disease. What we can say with certainty about the symbiosis between systemic and insurgent white supremacy is that you cannot unseat one without confronting the other. 

As both do not exist, you don’t need to worry about “unseating” them.  Worry more about your own worrisome propensity for delusion.


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, July 16, 2020

The Wages of Affirmative Action

In Der Movement.  In all cases, emphasis added.

How to finish such a pessimistic essay? It’s true that the information presented here is disturbing, infuriating, confusing, and heartbreaking. Can any practical lessons be derived from it?
One clear pattern observed in this essay is the overwhelming reliance on “think tanks” and similar bureaucratic vehicles for the intrusion of harmful Jewish influence into our “democracy.” Jews, even with their very significant financial power, rely on the magnification of their rhetoric, interests, and grievances through such bodies in order to accomplish their goals. This is where they can and should be challenged. Who is granting access and power to these groups? Can existing legislation be used to prevent the intrusion of these bodies into the democratic process and, if not, can new legislation be proposed to do so? The closest the dissident right ever came to a think tank was the National Policy Institute (NPI), which despite its name, and while fulfilling an important movement function, didn’t really produce any policies. 
Considering who has been running the show there, are you surprised? How much failure and uselessness will you rank-and-file types tolerate before you reject the affirmative action policy?
At the present time, our movement clearly needs talented legal minds
Unfortunately, we have none.  Worse, I see no strategy for acquiring any.  Even worse than that, apart from Joyce and I, there seems to be no one else on the Far Right who believes that this should be a priority.  Building a legal support infrastructure is in fact priority number one - not "metapolitics" or "Kali Yuga" or chugging gallons of milk while screaming "Kek!"
…and institutions…
Ditto.
…to unpack existing legislation, and develop new legislative proposals that, even if not explicitly racial, can seriously hinder the movement of harmful Jewish groups through the political body of the West. There is a serious lack of infrastructure of even the most basic kind, and we simply aren’t going to make any progress until this problem is addressed.
I agree.  Readers of EGI Notes know that I have been harping for years about the need to build infrastructure, and have been advocating an overall strategy in which infrastructure building is one of the three main legs  of the activist tripod  (besides the over-used and over-emphasized “metapolitics” leg and the completely withered electoral politics leg).  Indeed, I’ve stated, ever since November 2016, that the four years of Trump should have been used to quietly build an infrastructure behind the scenes.  But, no.  Instead we got screeching lunatics, Beavis-and-Butthead podcasts, street brawls, Unite the Right, retarded Nutzis chugging gallons of milk as a “racial statement,” Pepe and Kek, nitwits in shorts and their “extreme vetting” of “are you Swedish?,” moronic feuds, homosexual harassment, poor judgment, defeat after defeat after defeat - FOR GODSSAKES WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO HOLD THE QUOTA QUEENS ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ENDLESS FAILURE?
The second lesson from this survey of developments is that social media is likely to become an increasingly compromised and dangerous place for activists. In Europe, new laws are probably a few years away, but the broader plan will almost certainly eventually envelop Canada, Australia, and, despite apparent belief that the Constitution is invulnerable, even the United States. Already American legal scholars have developed arguments for curtailing the First Amendment in the case of “hate speech” (see, e.g., Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), and it is widely believed that a liberal Supreme Court majority would adopt such reasoning. The clock is probably already ticking on internet anonymity, and the example of Germany indicates that direct police involvement in “speech crime” is on the horizon. 
But one reason this is all happening is the utter uselessness of the Right. They got their “God Emperor” elected, they get millions of dollars in “D’Nations,” they have followers, they have their NPI, they’ve had DECADES of opportunity – with people like me crying in the wilderness for sane activity and infrastructure building – all wasted. All wasted by affirmative action cases and shameless grifters. The situation that exists today didn’t “just happen.”  The Right LET IT HAPPEN.
Off-line activist methodologies should be increasingly explored. 
Another thing I’ve been saying for years.  The Internet, and the over-reliance on digital activism, has been a double-edged sword.  Unfortunately, the WN 2.0 Quota Queens have wrecked every analog IRL activity they’ve touched.  WN 1.0 was much better.  Essentially we need new people involved, with more sense and better judgment.
Failing that, radically alternative modes of using internet networking should be considered. For example, even if someone uses a completely outrageous Twitter handle, complete with comic book avatar, most people still have their entire lives online (job, home town, friends, likes, hobbies, vacations). Don’t forget who ultimately has all of this information, and the organizations that will increasingly be able to access it.
How to do it?
It’s becoming very apparent that social media is itself a form of social control. 
I don’t use Twitter or Facebook.  Notice that?
We now have the ability to identify someone in a crowd simply by cross-referencing a photo of their face with available internet information. In seconds they can be identified, their employer can be contacted, and their loved ones can be harassed. In a strange way, despite the atomized condition of postmodernity, we have social control levels approaching those of the middle ages. We have new forms of social shaming, and new forms of the public pillory. Dissident activists who face overwhelming costs if they are doxxed would be well-advised to reduce their internet presence to the bare minimum, in effect, deliberately fading themselves into obscurity, thus making their life harder for the Zionist-Globalist panopticon to search for and penetrate. Remember who you were before you became an employee number, a Facebook profile, or a Twitter handle, and protect that person like you’d protect your child or other loved ones.
And how?

Andrew Joyce can do us all a service by emphasizing more in the future on practical things activists can do to navigate the situation we find ourselves in. Essays about Jewish power and the dangers we face are, of course, important, but they are also a dime-a-dozen and, in the absence of real actionable approaches, induce despair and inaction, despite whatever brief “inspiring” quotes are added as a coda. We need actionable strategies and we need infrastructure building. Whoever does that will deserve the hundreds of thousands of dollars per year that are currently being flushed down the grifter toilet.


First:
Some in the Dissident Right think the way to overcome these moral communities is to encourage whites to exhibit stronger ethnic identities just like blacks and other minorities. But this message would go against the central thesis of MacDonald’s book, which is that white individualism has a genetic basis.
And then, second:
MacDonald’s answer is that whites do have an implicit inclination to favor their own race, to be ethnocentric…MacDonald anticipates that as whites become aware of their “impending minority status” this will trigger white ethnocentrism.
That’s from the same essay, separated by several paragraphs. Then you wonder why I can’t take any of these guys seriously.

And again, if these HBD-Nordicists really believed their own work, then why don’t they at least support the idea of “modestly collectivist” Southern and Eastern Europeans having some positions of leadership in pro-White activism, instead of the rigidly stringent ethnic affirmative action program for Anglo-Germanics that currently exists?

Virtually all possible answers to that question would not reflect well on Der Movement, would it?



Gee – who was it in 2016 who told you that Trump was a fraud and a buffoon?  Think real hard now.

While this is in essence a good idea, how would the “movement” implement it in practice?  Put Patrik Hermansson in charge?

Remember – you reward a sterling record of consistent success by giving yet even more money!   "D’NATIONS!"

All of this - everything - in this post demonstrates the wages of affirmative action in Der Movement.

WE ARE NEVER GOING TO MAKE ANY PROGRESS AS LONG AS THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY EXISTS.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,