The Meaning of D-Day

Refuting leftist lies.

June 6 brought us the usual leftist paradigms about how WWII means that physical violence committed against anyone to the right of Jeb Bush is justified.  We read comments like:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of the greatest gathering of anti-fascists in history.

From the perspective of American involvement in D-Day, let’s rephrase that for accuracy:

June 6 was the 75th anniversary of a large group of men, involuntarily drafted from the population of a racially segregated nation, invading a European colonial power that was occupied by an European nation, the invasion setting forth from the territory of yet another European colonial power, led by a general who, upon later becoming US President, instituted “Operation Wetback” to deport Mexican illegals, and which had as its best general an Anglo-supremacist borderline racialist noted for making pro-German comments.

Apparently, that’s “anti-fascism,” 1944-style.

2019-style “anti-fascism” is, on the other hand, a bunch of smelly, masked, noodle-armed, wanna-be Marxist-Anarchist, middle-class and upper-class soyboys, with poor personal hygiene, allied with global capitalism and working hand-in-glove with the political establishment, sucker-punching genuine dissidents and then running away like hysterical menstruating schoolgirls.

Question: If WWII means that it's OK to “punch Nazis,” do the Korean and Vietnam wars mean that it's OK to “punch Commies?’’  Just pointing out the hypocrisy - EGI Notes is, of course, a militantly pacifist blog, oozing with the milk of human kindness, and this blog unalterably rejects and denounces any and all forms of hatred and violence. And don’t you forget it!