Morgan and Other News

"Movement" stupidity.

The Type Is are doing their best to destroy whatever little is left of a credible racialist “movement” in America.

But, hey, don’t listen to the criticisms of this blog.  Keep on supporting Type I retardation, sweaty fetishism, fossilized dogma, and send those “D’Nations” to “leaders” for their European travels, gym memberships, movie nights out, and comfy lawn chairs for their homes in blue state suburbs.  Money well spent!

The fundamentally dishonest John Morgan:

I realize this is beside your main point, but legally speaking I am a Hungarian, as my mother’s ancestors, although Transylvania Saxons (ethnic Germans), were citizens of the Hungarian Kingdom for 800 years, and moreover my mother’s parents were born in Transylvania before the Trianon Treaty, which ceded Transylvania to Romania from Hungary, so under the law I am just as Hungarian as anyone else, even if I’m not ethnically Magyar. If I tell most Hungarians I am Transylvania Saxon, they just say, “That’s Hungarian.”

Yeah, that’s great.  Uh…you are of Anglo-Germanic ancestry, and are living in a country whose majority is ethnic Hungarian (that the origins of that ethny are “mixed” is irrelevant to the present existence of their ethnic identity).  “Legally speaking” you are Hungarian!  Great!  Legally speaking a ghetto Negro is an “American.”  And their ancestors were here for centuries. Legally speaking a Turk in Berlin is “German.” And you can find White Americans who will look at a Negro and say – “That’s American.” What nonsense.  And even if you want to call Morgan’s maternal line “Hungarian,” what about the paternal line? Or are “halfsies” now acceptable to ethnonationalists?  Something to debate about snug in your hobbit holes.

The reality: Morgan is an ethnonationalist living in someone else’s country – “legally” or not.  A hypocrite.

And as regards Morgan’s contention that Hungarians are “undeniably” of “Central Asian origin” – at most perhaps a few percentage points of their ancestry is such. For the most part, they are not that much different from their Central European neighbors.

I have no idea what percentage of the American radical Right has pan-Europeanist sentiments…

Superficially and dishonestly, some reasonable fraction. Honestly and authentically, maybe 1% - or less.

TOO Retard:

 , , and Richard McCulloch all take me to task for excluding indigenous (ethnic) Russians from the White race.  This is not a major issue for me, and I have no serious objection to including them.  

I’m sure they’re relieved.  After all, it’s up to you to decide on the racial provenance of Russians.

My primary rational for excluding them was that, even though they may have some Scandinavian blood…

The only important thing of course. But not enough such blood to qualify for automatic passing of “extreme vetting.”

…that Russians are not truly Europeans…

Stating that makes it true.  “Movement” solipsism in action.

…and have not contributed to human intellectual and cultural life to the extent that Europeans have.  

We can name any number of groups that this author would worship that have contributed less than Russians have.

Also, there is so much racial admixture there that I wonder how White they truly are—a point nicely made by later in the comment chain.  

A comment made by some random fetishist is obviously solid evidence.

This is certainly an area ripe for more research and study.

Crack open your copy of March of the Titans!

But if we want to include 110 million ethnic Russians, along with some 35 million Ukrainians and around 8 million Byelorussians, I have no major objection.  This, though, makes the ‘genocide’ theme even less tenable, because there are now some 950 million Whites globally.  Do , Andrew, and Richard really want to go there?

Definitely evidence of the non-“Whiteness” of Russians right there!