Vicious Cycle

The White ethnic question revisited.

White ethnics face animus in the “movement.”  There are a number of reasons for this (e.g., the origin of the “movement” with the 1920s Klan, Nordicism, and the dominance of Northwest Europeans in the White American population, etc.), and this post is not meant to be a comprehensive analysis of these reasons. What this post is concerned with is the vicious cycle of how the White ethnic question is approached by Der Movement.

There is a deep hatred of White ethnics in the “movement” and White ethnics are de facto banned from "movement" leadership positions. This situation naturally alienates White ethnics and inhibits their involvement in “movement” activism. Subsequently, the underrepresentation of White ethnics, their absence among the leadership cadre, and their overall alienation from pro-White activism, creates a milieu favorable to even more hostility toward White ethnics, leading to yet more alienation and more underrepresentation and more hostility, on and on, with each cycle reinforcing the anti-White ethnic animus. This vicious cycle therefore cements hatred toward White ethnics as a continuing, fundamental part of the "movement."

What to do about this?  Well, as the above description suggests, many in the “movement” hate White ethnics, so they would think the current situation is fine and should be continued and encouraged. But what if someone in the “movement” thinks this situation is unacceptable and should be reversed?

Some suggestions are as follows. Be explicitly pan-European. Do not exhibit Sallis’ Law, continuously questioning the “Whiteness” of certain groups, and endlessly discussing “admixture” in the “mongrelized” group. Stop promoting Nordicism, HBD-Nordicism, and the lies of Lynn and others. Do not be smugly condescending, pontificating that you allow that certain groups are, maybe, could be, “somewhat White.”  Groups and people are either in your ingroup or they are not.  Make up your mind. Do not create castes within your ingroup, with some being “Whiter” and “superior” to others. Whoever is part of your ingroup should equally be able to rise to positions of authority and influence; leadership within the group should be based on merit and not some sort of affirmative action. Most important of all, do not endlessly revisit the question of “Who is White” and of who is in your ingroup – do not tell people, “well, several years ago I thought you were White, but I’ve changed my mind, so thank you for all your time, money, and work for our benefit, but you’re not White anymore, so goodbye and good riddance." You would think that should all be obvious, but given “movement” behavior, obviously it is not.

I could add that you should also avoid activities that indirectly alienate White ethnics, such as praising “movement” figures and others who are, or have been, hostile to White ethnics. Assertions of being “pan-European” are not so convincing when you are constantly praising, say, the work of Humphrey Ireland (“Wilmot Robertson”) or Madison Grant.

Now, some will say that I’m promoting “censorship.” However, we have been told that the “movement” is composed of “brands,” each with its own dogmas and taboos, so I fail to see how my suggestions fall outside of that tradition.  Further, if there is such a strong interest in “freely speaking on any topic” then perhaps we can observe:

• Nordicists discussing Asian/Siberian admixture in “mongrelized” Northern Europeans, and that the behavioral defects of Northern Europeans results in the xenophilia and SJWism wrecking the White world.
• American Renaissance discussing that Jews are non-European destroyers of Western civilization.
• Counter-Currents running Andrew Joyce articles that critique homosexuality and homosexuals.

But, no. You see, when the sacred cows of “brands” are poked at, the “say anything” paradigm evaporates. Thus, probably the number one thing to do to end the vicious cycle described here is to stop "movement" hypocrisy and mendacity.

But, never fear, the "movement" will never give up on their hostility toward White ethnics. An American Renaissance essay about a Mafia movie results in the usual stream of comments, such as: 

Virtually 100% of the American population left Newark by WWI. Even compared to a city like NYC, Newark was almost 100% foreign long before when the blacks came in large number. You can't talk about racial issues in America without talking about the replacement level European immigration that came in that era that displaced the entire American white population from East Coast cities. Violence and corruption from the European immigrants forced real Americans out. There was no fight back whatsoever until after it was too late (ie after WWI, and that was very short lived). Any culture that would allow its cities to be taken over by foreign hordes like that would allow anything. The battle was really lost by 1910.

Today, Italians Americans are just as liberal on racial issues as white Protestants, perhaps more so, since they live in more liberal areas of the country. Anyone who imagines that "tough ethnic whites" still exist in meaningful numbers is delusional.

If I like Northern Italians but bad-mouth Southern Italians, do I hate Italians?

However, just as conservatism is not the same as the Republican Party, which currently serves as a faulty vehicle for conservatism, so is White racial nationalism not the same as Der Movement, which currently serves as a very faulty, and inherently flawed, vehicle for White nationalist beliefs. Even its own activists admit that Der Movement is composed of "brands"; indeed, the entire "movement" is a "brand." White ethnics should not conflate White nationalism with Der Movement and abandon the former just because the latter is hostile to them, besides it being a complete failure. Indeed, the same types that have made Der Movement into a "brand" characterized by hatred of White ethnics have also made that same "movement" into an unmitigated disaster that demonstrates endless failure. Thus, there is the possibility of change, the need for a New Movement, and White ethnics should be, and must be, among the foundational pillars of that New Movement.  

White ethnics should abandon Der Movement, but must not let themselves be pushed out of a White nationalism that they have the same right to be in as any other people of European descent.