Odds and Ends, 11/6/21

In der news.

In the past, racism was defined as discrimination against Coloreds to benefit Whites and anti-racism was defined as color-blind equality. Today, racism is defined as color-blind equality and anti-racism is defined as discrimination against Whites to benefit Coloreds. Fifty years of "movement" "metapolitics" really worked wonders, eh?

Premise: All of the negative things happening to Whites occur because Whites let it happen.

Premise: It are pathologically altruistic Whites responsible for letting this happen.

Premise: According to HBD-Nordicism, it are the High Trusters who are pathologically altruistic.

Conclusion: If you believe in HBD-Nordicism, then you must also believe that the High Trusters are responsible for the downfall of the White race (and that Outer Hajnal White ethnics must take up the mantle of White leadership).

See this.  That's a mixed bag. The criticism of Lawrence - a pompous retard - are all on point, and I agree with those. The positive comments about Lawrence are comically wrong, particularly the idea that his criticism of Salter's work is "really good." Lawrence does nothing but rehash HBD/GNXP-style talking points that have been REPEATEDLY debunked since 2003 (mostly by me, by the way), as well as dwell on points Salter discusses in his book, which leads me to believe Lawrence never read it, and is instead depending on the viewpoints of racially self-interested non-White HBDers as well as White HBDers who need to type on their keyboard lying down since the colonoscope-sized Chinatrix strap-on shoved up their rears makes sitting difficult. Lawrence offers nothing of value, which essentially sums up the entire Affirmative Right site.

Gee...I think the accusations of Quota Queens being grifters is hitting a bit too close to home. No, sorry, I don't buy the logic there. Whether or not someone believes in what they say is irrelevant to being a grifter - if they are essentially tricking people in giving them money by pretending to be, or achieve, something they are not - that is in my opinion grifting, regardless of their ideological beliefs. And I have already argued against the "why would they get involved in activism under their own names if they weren't sincere" trope. Look, maybe they originally got involved for sincere reasons, then decided things were hopeless and/or that they themselves were hopeless and incompetent, but then became "trapped" because they had no way back to a normie career. So, in order to survive, they peddle a "brand" to the gullible, sucking up "movement" money while contributing nothing equivalent of value. When someone earns $340K in one year just to maintain a website, don't tell me that they shouldn't be criticized for their greed.

Sallis definition of grifter - someone peddling a belief system who has as their main goal making money; the money is the end and the belief system is the means, as opposed to a genuine activist who merely uses money as a means to achieve the end of promoting beliefs.

Grifter warning signs - people who spend a large fraction of their time fundraising, people who use their own families - including young children - as props for fundraising, people who tell you to to write your will to leave them money when you drop dead, people who earn money out of all proportion to the value they provide, people who refer to their beliefs as a "brand," people who pose as friends of free thinking but censor critics from their sites, people who produce or promote content that attracts page views but achieves no ideological purpose - you get the picture.

You see, the FOX News/Gab "we're all children of God" types are sort of hamstrung if they oppose this. What are they going to say? That they don't want stupid, ugly, and violent feral Coloreds beating up their kids in school? That would be "un-Christian." Jesus is King!

In response to HBD-inspired flim-flam, lying to you that kinship is not significant past immediate family, and is irrelevant to ethny, here is Harpending's paper describing the basic fundamentals Salter used (with Harpending's assistance) in On Genetic Interests.

The coefficient of kinship between two diploid organisms describes their overall genetic similarity to each other relative to some base population. For example, kinship between parent and offspring of 1/4 describes gene sharing in excess of random sharing in a random mating population. In a subdivided population the statistic Fst describes gene sharing within subdivisions in the same way. Since Fst among human populations on a world scale is reliably 10 to 15%, kinship between two individuals of the same human population is equivalent to kinship between grandparent and grandchild or between half siblings. The widespread assertion that this is small and insignificant should be reexamined.

Even the GNXP superhero, the leftist academic Ingo Brigandt admitted that helping co-ethnics could be adaptive because they are genetically more similar, his moronic argument was that ethnic nepotism "could not have evolved" (despite every group except Whites doing it), thus it could not exist - a completely illogical statement.

Wow - we did not evolve to use computers, so obviously we cannot use computers. QED.

The fact that general domain mechanisms can be adapted to alter behavior in novel environments never occurs to these types (or they are simply mendacious) - never mind that there is no reason to assert non-evolving ethnic nepotism.

But, hey, if objective genetic reality, and neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory, means that a buck-toothed, flat-chested, greasy-haired, yellow-skinned, prognathous, broad-nosed, foul-breathed Chinatrix shouldn't live in America, then by golly the genetics and evolution just gotta go!

Please see this. "Fowler" cites and promotes the work of Greg Johnson about Savitri Devi - and of course Fowler IS Johnson.  But, hey, LeBlanc tells you that "movement" "leaders" are not grifters in any way, no siree! In fact, for me to mention that Fowler-Johnson incident is proof my insanity, and my paranoia and being an all-around piece of crap!

Laugh at this. After telling us how unfair it is to call people on the Right grifters, now it is that the “sincere man of genuine greatness” Trump is a grifter.

More:

There are also esoteric reasons why Trump is unfit to hold any position of responsibility

He was caught fondling Savitri Devi’s sari.

It may at first glance seem odd to extrapolate from myth to politics. However, my analysis is not the Right-wing equivalent of argument by analogy to Harry Potter. 

No, we’ll do Lord of the Rings instead.  To the hobbit hole!

…why the Holy Lance drips blood. 

Because a Chinatrix shoved it up a White male HBDer’s ass?

He will be unlike several prominent dissident movement leaders, too, who grew passive and squandered resources and opportunities instead of asking about what they could accomplish.

All of the Quota Queens.

Trump’s role is clearly that of the wounded Grail King, and he should not be confused with the victorious knight to come.

That’ll be Greg Johnson riding on the back of a gay brony “furry” dressed in a pink pony costume.

Who will be our avenging/restoring Grail Knight? It could be Barron Trump. He is preternaturally tall and is born of Melania, a mysterious Queen from a far-off land. 

Like Johnson and Spencer, he’s tall and not a manlet like that Hitler punk.

Today, there is room for something better to grow and to take the place of spent boomerism. Whoever successfully assumes Trump’s mantle must and will reject the silly Enlightenment worldview. Our chosen knight will be as radical as he is traditional, aristocratic instead of populist, and absolute instead of conditional.

Moronic generation warfare combined with bizarre traditionalism.  But, I don’t understand – doesn’t Herr Greggy tell us we must embrace big test populism?

Remember when Greg Johnson posted a picture of Friberg posing with some Swedish Antifa guy as part of his smearing of Friberg? Then what can we say about this?

The FOX News/Gab crowd should look at this., including the cited paper, and answer some questions:

• Are apes Children of God?
• Were australopithecines Children of God?
• Were Homo habilis and Homo erectus Children of God?

Erectus walks amongst us, indeed.

This is American Renaissance:

If it weren't for the Chinese and other professional immigrants, America would have long ago lost its superpower status and China would have become the dominant technological superpower.

Most of the research in the U.S. is done by the Chinese and other immigrants. Chinese and other immigrants are working hard and getting their PhDs in STEM while white people are whining that they no longer are the top dog.

"intellectual property theft and spying on a massive scale" is just an excuse used to put trade tariffs and sanctions on China to stop it from becoming the dominant superpower.

...the U.S. should allow the Chinese to immigrate. It's because Chinese immigrants are doing a large chunk of the research work in the U.S. Without them, the U.S. is very likely to lose its technological edge.

There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates...

Wherever you look, Asians outperform whites academically and financially...

...we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...

- Jared Taylor Interview

Someone sums it up:

Amren needs to decide if it is a pro-white website or just an anti-black website. Right now, it is the latter.

Let us face the facts: Amren is an anti-White, Asian supremacist hate site.