More Defense of the EGI Concept

More on Salterism.

Some critics of so-called “Salterism” and critics of me for defending the EGI concept (Lawrence of Alternative Right as one example) get offended when I mock their (repeatedly refuted) “critiques” and state that the EGI concept is “self-evident.”  That last part really seems to annoy them. But to understand why I say that let’s simply look at the basic premises underlying EGI. These are premises that any honest person, with an objective understanding of genetics, race, and evolutionary biology, must agree with. While we can understand mendacious race-denying leftists screeching incoherently against “racist” facts, one would assume that the allegedly more “race realist” Right would have no problem with the following:

• 1. There are genetic differences between population groups.
• 2. Members of these groups (at least at the racial level and in many, likely most, cases at lower levels as well) are more genetically similar to members of their own group than to other groups (this obvious fact was formally demonstrated at least by the year 2007).
• 3. According to evolutionary biology and the generally accepted neo-Darwinian understanding, it is adaptive to promote the interests of those more genetically similar to you than those more distant. Even academics like Brigandt – trotted out by anti-EGI HBDers in an attempt to refute ethnic nepotism – agree with this general premise.  Apart from hardcore ideological crazies, this really isn’t up for debate any more.
• 4. The concept of genetic relatedness and the pursuit of adaptive fitness (inclusive fitness) is context dependent. Thus, if the entire world was composed of just one ethnic group, there would be no ethnic genetic interests per se (since there is a common ethnic genetic background), but there would be personal and familial genetic interests, as some people within this population are more closely related than others (e.g., family kin).  But in a world of different and competing ethnic and racial groups, in the context of making choices between co-ethnics and others, there are ethnic genetic interests based on the genetic differences between groups (multiplied by their large numbers). Of course, in the latter scenario, personal and familial interests still count, but given ethnic conflict, higher level ethnic interests often must be prioritized. Also, the ever-inventive critics of EGI always come up with fanciful, unrealistic scenarios in which they claim adherence to EGI would not be adaptive. That approach is ludicrous because one can invent any number of bizarre scenarios to invalidate just about any normative behavior. Rational people deal with rules that apply to real-life scenarios that constitute some of the most serious problems of our time, including ethnic conflict and race replacement. Grasping frauds waste time trying to distract us from reality.

I say that EGI is self-evident because it is self-evident.  One can expect the crazed Left – that tells us that there are no differences between Europeans, Africans, and Asians, but that Europeans are uniquely evil and must be replaced – would reject the premises listed above. But the Right?

EGI is truth. That doesn’t change just because you endlessly cite HBD talking points that have been repeatedly refuted for the past twenty years. It also doesn’t change because you repeatedly quote, completely out of context, a single sentence from Salter’s On Genetic Interests. Those behaviors just make you look like a moronic contrarian, a retarded buffoon.

Some links to my various defenses of the EGI concept (“Salterism”) can be found here. Rather than repeat any of that, I’ll link to this piece by Salter. With respect to the free rider objection:

…members of bands and tribes can behave altruistically without being selected out by free riders. Eibl-Eibesfeldt (1982) argued from his field observations that mutual monitoring, ubiquitous in small-scale societies, is sufficient to suppress cheating. He pointed to the pronounced group identity and mutual support found in primitive societies, and argued that this originated in kinship bonds. The cohesion of band and tribal societies makes them units of selection, Eibl argued. This point was elaborated by Boyd and Richerson (1992), who argue that monitoring and punishment are so effective in small scale societies that they allow the evolution of cooperation, or any other characteristic that is promoted by a culturally-governed group strategy.

Whether or not one accept that group selection has figured in human evolution, the mechanisms advanced by group selectionists are sufficient to allow a more conservative process, extended kin selection, to occur. In fact this is what Eibl has always meant by his version of group selection.

A final mechanism deserving of mention is collective goods. A criticism of extended kin selection is that it is impossible for an individual effectively to invest in a kin group much larger than a family, because the benefit would be spread so thinly that the payoff would always be greater from investing in close kin, rather than distant ones. Goetze (1998) has dispelled this concern. He draws on economic theory to argue that by contributing to collective goods—such as hunting large game animals or defending the group—allows an individual to confer a large fitness benefit on a large number of individuals.

So there is no mechanical problem with the feasibility of individuals showing altruism to kin groups larger than the extended family. Indeed, all these mechanism—control of free-riders, bonding the group, and choosing or fashioning collective goods—are highly scalable. They can be increased in scale to accommodate a kin group of any size.

See here for a published analysis, using computer simulations, demonstrating the dominance of ethnocentric behavior over free riding and “humanitarianism.” Salter is of course correct, and his critics wrong. The evidence supporting EGI is so strong, and is repeated throughout so many different domains of analysis, that I believe I am justified is terming the concept self-evident.  I am also justified in ascribing either mendacity or stupidity to its critics.

With respect to inclusive fitness extending beyond the family into ethnic kin and moving beyond simple genealogical identity by descent to identity by state (that is a deeper level of identity by descent, after all, at least when talking about ethny) with respect to genetic similarity, see this from Salter:

The point that inclusive fitness processes can operate between individuals merely on the basis of genetic similarity, without any genealogical information, is critical, and I quote Hamilton’s commentary on this theoretical advance.

“Because of the way it was first explained [by Hamilton], the approach using inclusive fitness has often been identified with “kin selection” and presented strictly as an alternative to “group selection” as a way of establishing altruistic social behaviour by natural selection. But…kinship should be considered just one way of getting positive regression of genotype in the recipient, and that it is this positive regression that is vitally necessary for altruism. Thus the inclusive fitness concept is more general than “kin selection” ” (Hamilton 1975, pp. 140-41; [p. 337 in the 1996 reprint]).

This frees the analyst from the “identical by descent” clause in Hamilton’s original (1964) formulation, allowing the direct measurement of kinship processes using genetic assay data…

In response to HBD-inspired lies that kinship is not significant past immediate family, and is irrelevant to ethny, here is Harpending's paper describing the basic fundamentals Salter used (with Harpending's assistance) in On Genetic Interests.

The coefficient of kinship between two diploid organisms describes their overall genetic similarity to each other relative to some base population. For example, kinship between parent and offspring of 1/4 describes gene sharing in excess of random sharing in a random mating population. In a subdivided population the statistic Fst describes gene sharing within subdivisions in the same way. Since Fst among human populations on a world scale is reliably 10 to 15%, kinship between two individuals of the same human population is equivalent to kinship between grandparent and grandchild or between half siblings. The widespread assertion that this is small and insignificant should be reexamined.

Now, with respect to Brigandt-like arguments about “the evolution of…XYZ” I have stated many times that EGI is a rational prescriptive argument has no need for the “evolution” of anything – general domain behavior can be applied to pursuing ethnic interests (genetic or otherwise).  Just as humans did not have to evolve a specific ability to use a computer but rather just evolved the cognitive and behavioral traits that make such use possible, nor is it necessary to evolve specific behaviors to pursue particular approaches to the pursuit of personal and group interests.  Having said that, any reasonable look at human history does support the idea of a descriptive validity of EGI to a considerable extent, particularly when we understand that various proxies for genetic relatedness (e.g., national identity and loyalty) have been used to mobilize human behavior. Salter writes:

Thus the second problem in understand the evolution of ethnocentrism the second is already solved, or well on its way to being solved. It’s the first problem that remains; indeed, it has hardly been addressed. To reiterate, was the kinship between random members of bands and tribes large enough for altruism directed between them to have been adaptive?

Since, as stated, I don’t believe that the “evolution of…” argument has merit, I won’t reproduce any more of Salter’s riposte here; you can read what he wrote in the original article as well as, of course, in On Genetic Interests.

It is clear then that the EGI concept has survived repeated attempts at refutation. Again, the description of self-evident seems valid. Why then the opposition?  Well, it is quite clear why the Left would oppose the idea, people who deny the existence of race, who obfuscate genetic differences between groups, who object to Whites defending their group interests, and who promote an EGI-destroying multiracialism for White nations, will of course object to any paradigm that stands against their most fervent desires and most fundamental objectives. EGI is a threat to the entire globalist, multicultural experiment. But what about the Right?  Certainly, we can understand that the civic nationalists will also object to anything that disrupts the fictional “identity” of a multiracial nation and that stands against aracial constitutional patriotism. The religious Right tell us that all people are “children are God” and thus they would reject EGI for that reason. The Right is also anti-science, so that influences negative attitudes to EGI.  The Far Right has been infected by the HBD virus, so let’s look at why HBD opposes EGI and thus dissolves the natural affinity one would assume pro-White activists would have for EGI.

The idea that HBDers oppose Salterism because they sincerely believe it is wrong can be dismissed based on what is written above. HBDers may be mendacious, they may be evil, but they are not stupid. Obviously, they must know Salter is correct. When their own poster boy for opposition to ethnic nepotism – Brigandt – admitted in writing that favoring ethnic kin is adaptive (the essence of EGI), then, really, the mask is torn off. That leaves us to consider their motivation for lying to their followers by attacking an idea that they know is correct. 

The most charitable explanation is that they believe that their alternative view of society – aracial cognitive elitism – is the best option and they are willing to do anything, including engaging in the most outrageous fundamental dishonesty, in order to achieve their dream of “IQ nationalism” where “high IQ” Jews, Asians, and Whites (and whatever intelligent fractions of other groups) live in “Jeurasian” harmony.” A less charitable, but more realistic, interpretation is that HBD is a political movement of naked ethnic and personal self-interest by Jews, Asians, and Whites who have thrown in their lot with Jews and Asians for various reasons (intermarriage, “race realist” ideology, aesthetic preferences, or simply being traitors who help the enemy in exchange for something). Thus, the objective is a society dominated by “high IQ” Jews and Asians, with subaltern Whites as helots and a mixed-race Jeurasian managerial elite between the upper and lower strata of this “cognitive elitist” society. In essence, they want a society modeled after the family of a certain race-mixing White HBDer – ethnocentric Asians (and Jews) in charge, Whites engaging in “measured groveling” to their overlords, and Whites losing their racial integrity through “Jeuraisan” admixture, with of course Asians maintaining their racial integrity in their homogeneous homelands and a core of Jew maintaining themselves, in both Israel and in the Diaspora. Further, individuals (including Negroes – even though Negroes are typically denigrated by HBD) who have an agenda specifically against White nationalism, particularly the pan-European variety of White nationalism, will strategically support HBD in order to prevent the rise of “Whites only” kinship-based movements. 

Something else needs to be said. The same buffoons on the Right (Lawrence, for example) who attack EGI also attack MacDonald's term "group evolutionary strategies." That's interesting because the HBDers also attack that idea as well as EGI. Those with long memories recall Derbyshire's hit piece on MacDonald where Derbyshire mocked the idea of what a group evolutionary strategy is. After all, why would a White HBDer, married to a Chinese woman, and with half-Chinese children, have a problem with racial groups (like Whites and Asians, for example) being in competition, each with their own group evolutionary strategy?  A mystery it all is!  Just like it is a mystery why the South Asians of GNXP, and their White fellow travelers, would oppose the idea of Salter's EGI. All very mysterious indeed! Equally mysterious is why an ostensibly pro-White individual would follow the lead of transparently self-interested HBDers.

What about the potential accusation that I'm engaging in a logical fallacy by questioning the motivations of my opponents rather than engaging their ideas?  That is laughably false since I have been engaging with those ideas for the past twenty years, writing one long treatise after another defending EGI and group evolutionary strategies, and thoroughly refuting the criticisms of those paradigms. I think that after two decades of "engaging with their ideas" I'm now entitled to speculate on the motivations of those that continue to peddle the same nonsense (and for the most part refuse to engage with my ideas, by the way).

It should be obvious, however, that whatever the motivation of the HBDers, their anti-White ideology and agenda should be unalterably opposed by those who claim to be pro-White nationalists of one sort or another. That much of the “movement” supports HBD, and attacks EGI, clearly demonstrates how intellectually, politically, morally and spiritually bankrupt the “movement” really is.

Indeed, if one was to rationally criticize EGI, one could state that it does not go far enough – the original analysis depends on “beanbag genetics” – considering genes in an atomized fashion – and neglects genetic structure and genetic integration.  I’ve written about this previously and one can find that work on this blog so I need not get into that here, beyond repeating that the basic problem with EGI is not that it is wrong, but quite the opposite – it is so right that even its originator didn’t realize the full scope of its implications.

We should not let the critics of EGI off the hook by allowing them to simply regurgitate nonsense refuted years ago or quote individual Salter sentences out of context. If they believe EGI is wrong, they need to point out which of the four premises listed above are wrong. The Left no doubt would reject points one and two, demonstrating how they dabble in pseudoscientific "woke" nonsense. Those on the Right would (I hope) accept premises one and two. That leaves rightist EGI critics to target premises three and four. But if they say premises three and four are wrong, then they must believe that (a) making no distinction between genetically similar co-ethnics and genetically distant others is adaptive, or (b) it is more adaptive to favor genetically distant others than genetically similar co-ethnics.  Which is it? These idiots need to be held to account and they need to be put on the spot and tell us if they, like the Left, reject genetic science (premises one and two), or if they reject premises three and four and instead believe in (a) or (b). It has to be one of those choices. Being a contrarian buffoon or a gullible idiot who mindlessly swallows HBD swill is not sufficient. They have to make a stand about the four premises and point out what alternatives they support if they believe that those premises are wrong.

In any case, EGI-denial is, in my opinion, on par with Flat Earth, viruses don’t exist, and other example of rank stupidity. It is also equivalent to race denial, and is actually ideologically associated with that, since a denial of a biological basis for race would lead one to reject EGI as well. I have previously written that the “movement” attitude toward Salter’s work is perhaps my biggest disappointment in all my years of activism.  After all, I always knew that Nordicism was “baked into the cake” of the “movement,” but the idea that pro-White advocates would ignore and even attack an intellectual paradigm, produced by an academic, that is both manifestly true and also provides support for pro-White politics, is simply astonishing. If one thing demonstrates the utter depraved and retarded vacuity of the “movement,” well, that is it.

Odds and Ends, 11/6/21

In der news.

In the past, racism was defined as discrimination against Coloreds to benefit Whites and anti-racism was defined as color-blind equality. Today, racism is defined as color-blind equality and anti-racism is defined as discrimination against Whites to benefit Coloreds. Fifty years of "movement" "metapolitics" really worked wonders, eh?

Premise: All of the negative things happening to Whites occur because Whites let it happen.

Premise: It are pathologically altruistic Whites responsible for letting this happen.

Premise: According to HBD-Nordicism, it are the High Trusters who are pathologically altruistic.

Conclusion: If you believe in HBD-Nordicism, then you must also believe that the High Trusters are responsible for the downfall of the White race (and that Outer Hajnal White ethnics must take up the mantle of White leadership).

See this.  That's a mixed bag. The criticism of Lawrence - a pompous retard - are all on point, and I agree with those. The positive comments about Lawrence are comically wrong, particularly the idea that his criticism of Salter's work is "really good." Lawrence does nothing but rehash HBD/GNXP-style talking points that have been REPEATEDLY debunked since 2003 (mostly by me, by the way), as well as dwell on points Salter discusses in his book, which leads me to believe Lawrence never read it, and is instead depending on the viewpoints of racially self-interested non-White HBDers as well as White HBDers who need to type on their keyboard lying down since the colonoscope-sized Chinatrix strap-on shoved up their rears makes sitting difficult. Lawrence offers nothing of value, which essentially sums up the entire Affirmative Right site.

Gee...I think the accusations of Quota Queens being grifters is hitting a bit too close to home. No, sorry, I don't buy the logic there. Whether or not someone believes in what they say is irrelevant to being a grifter - if they are essentially tricking people in giving them money by pretending to be, or achieve, something they are not - that is in my opinion grifting, regardless of their ideological beliefs. And I have already argued against the "why would they get involved in activism under their own names if they weren't sincere" trope. Look, maybe they originally got involved for sincere reasons, then decided things were hopeless and/or that they themselves were hopeless and incompetent, but then became "trapped" because they had no way back to a normie career. So, in order to survive, they peddle a "brand" to the gullible, sucking up "movement" money while contributing nothing equivalent of value. When someone earns $340K in one year just to maintain a website, don't tell me that they shouldn't be criticized for their greed.

Sallis definition of grifter - someone peddling a belief system who has as their main goal making money; the money is the end and the belief system is the means, as opposed to a genuine activist who merely uses money as a means to achieve the end of promoting beliefs.

Grifter warning signs - people who spend a large fraction of their time fundraising, people who use their own families - including young children - as props for fundraising, people who tell you to to write your will to leave them money when you drop dead, people who earn money out of all proportion to the value they provide, people who refer to their beliefs as a "brand," people who pose as friends of free thinking but censor critics from their sites, people who produce or promote content that attracts page views but achieves no ideological purpose - you get the picture.

You see, the FOX News/Gab "we're all children of God" types are sort of hamstrung if they oppose this. What are they going to say? That they don't want stupid, ugly, and violent feral Coloreds beating up their kids in school? That would be "un-Christian." Jesus is King!

In response to HBD-inspired flim-flam, lying to you that kinship is not significant past immediate family, and is irrelevant to ethny, here is Harpending's paper describing the basic fundamentals Salter used (with Harpending's assistance) in On Genetic Interests.

The coefficient of kinship between two diploid organisms describes their overall genetic similarity to each other relative to some base population. For example, kinship between parent and offspring of 1/4 describes gene sharing in excess of random sharing in a random mating population. In a subdivided population the statistic Fst describes gene sharing within subdivisions in the same way. Since Fst among human populations on a world scale is reliably 10 to 15%, kinship between two individuals of the same human population is equivalent to kinship between grandparent and grandchild or between half siblings. The widespread assertion that this is small and insignificant should be reexamined.

Even the GNXP superhero, the leftist academic Ingo Brigandt admitted that helping co-ethnics could be adaptive because they are genetically more similar, his moronic argument was that ethnic nepotism "could not have evolved" (despite every group except Whites doing it), thus it could not exist - a completely illogical statement.

Wow - we did not evolve to use computers, so obviously we cannot use computers. QED.

The fact that general domain mechanisms can be adapted to alter behavior in novel environments never occurs to these types (or they are simply mendacious) - never mind that there is no reason to assert non-evolving ethnic nepotism.

But, hey, if objective genetic reality, and neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory, means that a buck-toothed, flat-chested, greasy-haired, yellow-skinned, prognathous, broad-nosed, foul-breathed Chinatrix shouldn't live in America, then by golly the genetics and evolution just gotta go!

Please see this. "Fowler" cites and promotes the work of Greg Johnson about Savitri Devi - and of course Fowler IS Johnson.  But, hey, LeBlanc tells you that "movement" "leaders" are not grifters in any way, no siree! In fact, for me to mention that Fowler-Johnson incident is proof my insanity, and my paranoia and being an all-around piece of crap!

Laugh at this. After telling us how unfair it is to call people on the Right grifters, now it is that the “sincere man of genuine greatness” Trump is a grifter.

More:

There are also esoteric reasons why Trump is unfit to hold any position of responsibility

He was caught fondling Savitri Devi’s sari.

It may at first glance seem odd to extrapolate from myth to politics. However, my analysis is not the Right-wing equivalent of argument by analogy to Harry Potter. 

No, we’ll do Lord of the Rings instead.  To the hobbit hole!

…why the Holy Lance drips blood. 

Because a Chinatrix shoved it up a White male HBDer’s ass?

He will be unlike several prominent dissident movement leaders, too, who grew passive and squandered resources and opportunities instead of asking about what they could accomplish.

All of the Quota Queens.

Trump’s role is clearly that of the wounded Grail King, and he should not be confused with the victorious knight to come.

That’ll be Greg Johnson riding on the back of a gay brony “furry” dressed in a pink pony costume.

Who will be our avenging/restoring Grail Knight? It could be Barron Trump. He is preternaturally tall and is born of Melania, a mysterious Queen from a far-off land. 

Like Johnson and Spencer, he’s tall and not a manlet like that Hitler punk.

Today, there is room for something better to grow and to take the place of spent boomerism. Whoever successfully assumes Trump’s mantle must and will reject the silly Enlightenment worldview. Our chosen knight will be as radical as he is traditional, aristocratic instead of populist, and absolute instead of conditional.

Moronic generation warfare combined with bizarre traditionalism.  But, I don’t understand – doesn’t Herr Greggy tell us we must embrace big test populism?

Remember when Greg Johnson posted a picture of Friberg posing with some Swedish Antifa guy as part of his smearing of Friberg? Then what can we say about this?

The FOX News/Gab crowd should look at this., including the cited paper, and answer some questions:

• Are apes Children of God?
• Were australopithecines Children of God?
• Were Homo habilis and Homo erectus Children of God?

Erectus walks amongst us, indeed.

This is American Renaissance:

If it weren't for the Chinese and other professional immigrants, America would have long ago lost its superpower status and China would have become the dominant technological superpower.

Most of the research in the U.S. is done by the Chinese and other immigrants. Chinese and other immigrants are working hard and getting their PhDs in STEM while white people are whining that they no longer are the top dog.

"intellectual property theft and spying on a massive scale" is just an excuse used to put trade tariffs and sanctions on China to stop it from becoming the dominant superpower.

...the U.S. should allow the Chinese to immigrate. It's because Chinese immigrants are doing a large chunk of the research work in the U.S. Without them, the U.S. is very likely to lose its technological edge.

There are dramatic race differences in crime rates. Asians have the lowest rates...

Wherever you look, Asians outperform whites academically and financially...

...we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...

- Jared Taylor Interview

Someone sums it up:

Amren needs to decide if it is a pro-white website or just an anti-black website. Right now, it is the latter.

Let us face the facts: Amren is an anti-White, Asian supremacist hate site.

Trump Declares a National Nothingburger

Der Movement: Wrong, wrong, as usual, always wrong.

Trump tests negative. That’s for coronavirus, not brain cells. In all seriousness though, the media’s attacks on Trump these days are disgusting.  Trump may be an idiot, but he’s doing many things correct now.  Dementia Joe, in contrast, is merely mirroring HBD talking points by telling us the most important thing is not to be racist against Asians.  I would much rather have Trump in charge during this crisis than a wild-eyed pony soldier Alzheimer’s patient

This here has to rank as one of the most absolutely retarded things ever written. What would Zturd have us do?  Sit back, let the disease spread, and have 15% of the infected with severe cases overwhelm the health care system?  That’s what the retards don’t understand. Health care resources, including hospital beds, ventilators, etc. are fixed in number. If there is a peak in the infection curve, the resources will be strained. And that’s not only for China Plague victims, but what about folks with heart attacks and strokes and car accidents and crime victims – when there are not enough available resources?  One has to multiply the severity percentage for The China Plague by the pool of infectious people. In Italy, they were lackadaisical at the start, and the epicenters there are now charnel houses.  

The giraffe and garden gnome analogy is especially stupid. There’s no plausible casual connection there. On the other hand, social distancing will decrease infectivity. So, Zturd and his brainless acolytes are completely wrong – if lockdowns are instituted and the disease ends up not being as bad as the initial predictions then it would be reasonable to make the connection there.  Of course, that’s not “absolute proof.” We cannot do a properly controlled experiment comparing the two scenarios. However, there is sufficient epidemiological evidence, as well as theoretical support, for a causal connection between social distancing and viral spread to make that association. There is also a well-known connection – an inverse relationship – between transmissibility and virulence (although I admit that long incubation times coupled with infectivity during incubation and/or asymptomatic carriers could to some extent obviate that relationship, as the virus could evolve in other ways than just decreased direct virulence); thus, impeding transmission would favor, all else being equal, lessened virulence. That’s all established science. There is no established science linking garden gnomes and giraffes. There are no runaway giraffes in America. On the other hand, there is The China Plague in America.

Only if the entire thing suddenly fizzles out do the “health experts” need to explain anything. Otherwise, the case can be made that the steps taken actually repressed the exponential surge of infection. The hysteria of “traditionalist” Type I nitwits does not change that reality.

The “ethnic dimension?”  Skepticism about this is not “race denial” – it is just a reasonable request for sufficient evidence that doesn’t consist of n = eight (or one).  Or of hand-waving about "The Fertile Crescent."  Now, maybe there is a racial and ethnic component to this. I do not deny the possibility.  That does not imply that it is not a threat or problem for other populations. I assume that Welton and Zturd think all of these infected Germans are actually Turks and Arabs (or wops)?  We'll see soon enough.  Regardless of this, given the rapid spread in Europe, does it not make sense to take precautions in America? And who cares what Mangan “thinks?” Do we need to recall all of his past errors?

And the stupidity about toilet paper – look, it’s non-perishable.  You’ll use it eventually, even if there’s no crisis. If you are locked down for a long period, having plenty of toilet paper is a good idea. I assume that Zturd, being full of shit, will need toilet paper at some point. Although no doubt Zturd can rip pages out of his HBD books instead – I can’t think of a better use for Richard Lynn’s work than to use it to wipe one’s ass with.

There's an “out” for the HBDers if they want to continue to be mendacious. Even if the virus spreads in Northern Europe, and even as people die, the Zturd and Welton types will simply say all those infected and dying are non-natives.  The System and HBD – which are two sides of the same coin – feed off of each other.  By not breaking down victims by race, the System enables HBD.  By inventing and spreading new excuses for China, HBD supports the System. HBD is not falsifiable; it is not science.  No matter what the evidence, they’ll twist and turn to explain it away.

Hmm…must be all the migrants.

Italians no doubt.

The Fertile Crescent!

It’s Iran, right? Or Italy? Oh, wait, at least Ireland also starts with an “I.”

Nothing to worry about, according to Zturd. Demanding explanations cuts both ways. Perhaps Der Movement itself will be asked to provide explanations once this is all over.  Der Retarded Right is too clueless to understand how they have painted themselves into a corner on this. If the disease turns out to be not a very serious problem in America, then the health experts can state - with some justification - that the lockdowns and other measures worked, while Der Retards will make fools of themselves countering with laughable comments about giraffes and garden gnomes. If, on the other hand, The China Plague hits America hard, then the health experts can claim that they were right to be alarmist and that the “extreme” measures taken were not extreme enough. In that scenario, all of the conspiracy-mongering Type I retards on the Right will have been completely discredited. By being typically stupid and short-sighted, Der Right has once again put itself in a lose-lose situation. And that’s not even getting into the more complex scenario that even if the virus fizzles out in warmer weather it still can return next Fall and Winter.

Read this.

Read this.

President Trump declared a national emergency in order to free up $50 billion in federal aid. 

Deaths from coronavirus have now topped 5,000, with more than 132,000 cases worldwide. 

Europe has been declared the new epicenter.

Why Italy?  Zerohedge comment (emphasis added):

1 -300k Chinese live in Italy mostly in the north2- the new year brought 10 million tourists from China to Milan ( they didn’t close the flights until way too late) 3 - all migrant trash that is   crossing the borders ,  with Islamic UN blessing to destroy the west,  goes thru Italy 4 Italians live in close quarters with several generations of families found in the sAME  house 5 they greet by kissing 4 times6 their govt is incompetent under liberal puppet idiot , they listened to WHO that did not raise alarm till they were sure it has spread as it was designed to do so 7 unlike Trump who  banned flights which he is being criticized for by satanic left , EU did nothing , masking the virus with flu season it spread freely 8 the death rate is still around 1% it’s the infection rate that is a thousand times higher ( mostly asymptomatic)

The anvil of history degrades itself even further.  Just throw in some hysterical gesticulating and Schettino jumping into a lifeboat and you’ll be all set. Dago is as dago does. The Chinese are engaging in a genocidal war of extermination against the Italian people, and all the Italians can do is "sing on balconies."

My proposal for a new Italian national anthem:

La Dolce Vita!
La Dolce Vita!

The anthem of Nietzsche’s Last Man
La Dolce Vita!
The cry of feckless milksops

Other nations struggle and strive
Achieving lasting greatness
While we sit in the sun
With wine, women, and song

A history of military humiliations
We can’t even defeat Ethiopia
Schettino jumps in the lifeboat
Oh my La Dolce Vita!

Hail to thee Italy
Land of retarded buffoons
Hail to thee Italy
Drop your pants and bend over for your Chinese masters

La Dolce Vita!
La Dolce Vita!

Hail to thee Italy
Laughingstock of Europe
Hail to thee Italy
Battered anvil of history

Pass the plate of pasta and sauce
La Dolce Vita!
The gold chain bounces against my hollow, heart-less chest

La Dolce Vita!
La Dolce Vita!

I don’t think I can sing any more
I have a fever and cough
With the grim reaper knocking at my door

La Dolce Vita!
La Dolce Vita!

With the grim reaper knocking at my door

Note: It should go without saying that I am NOT "anti-Italian" - I am no more "anti-Italian" than I am "anti-German" if I critique the Krauts. Italians need to be told how the rest of the world views them. You may think it is tactless to do so at the current time, but this is precisely the time for Italians to stand up and show the world that they are not the anvil of history.

Do this:

1. Reject the "Chinese aid."  They've given you quite enough already, don't you think?
2. Every person of Chinese descent - regardless of place of birth or citizenship - should be immediately expelled from Italy.
3. Switch diplomatic recognition from the PRC to Taiwan.

Then follow up on this after the crisis by:

4. Leaving the EU - Wopexit.
5, Expelling all people of non-Italian descent - regardless of place of birth or citizenship - from Italy, including Farrell.

Read this.  No offense to the Italian man who lived through this unfortunate series of events, but I must say his phenotype matches Der Movement’s afrowop stereotype - he looks like he could most comfortably blend in walking around Baghdad.

Why Italy? Italian SJWs guilty of murder? Should the mayor of Florence be indicted for murder?  

Read this.  

A historical perspective.  Murderers then, murderers now. The Chinese people need to be indicted in an international court for ongoing mass murder, for the genocide of humanity. Guilty as charged.

The only thing useful here is this (emphasis added):

Some academics have touched the third rail, one of them being Henry Harpending. He was repeatedly told to stop, subtly at first and then not so subtly. In 2015, the Southern Poverty Law Center added his name to its published list of “extremists.” A year later, he died of an MRSA infection while in hospital. An accident, I suppose.

I did not know that there was a possibility that Harpending was murdered.  Note: Possibility, I am NOT accusing anyone or anything, merely stating that the possibility exists, which is exactly what the passive aggressive “An accident, I suppose” implies. If you think about it, it’s very easy for a hospital bed-ridden person to be intentionally infected by MRSA or C. diff.  Also note that this implies nothing about hospital staff.  It could just as easily have been done by an outsider posing as staff. In fact, the latter scenario is overwhelmingly more likely, particularly if we are talking about Utah here.  Again, I am NOT stating this occurred and am NOT accusing anyone or anything – merely citing the possibility. Indeed, overt members of Der Movement being hospitalized for coronavirus have to be concerned.  Will there be any other instances of “an accident, I suppose?”

This is HBD:

JohnEngelman  

Antisemitism is based on jealousy and resentment of Jewish intelligence, success, and prosperity by Gentiles who lack the first of those qualities, and who have failed to achieve the last two. With antisemites the hate comes first; the excuses come later.

Sallis – always, always right.

And those alleged WNs who claim to be opposed to “the Jewish power establishment” are a bunch of phony grifters if they do not publicly oppose HBD. How can we trust them to fight Jewish power in the broader society if they are unable or unwilling to fight at power in their own “movement?”

Those superior Inner Hajnal stocks!  If you remember that these are the types leading the American “movement,” the last 50 years of complete failure make more sense.

Watch this.

Johnson gets it right here (but, but, but…Joan of Arc), while MacDonald continues to act the buffoon.

Look, here’s my take – let’s be fair.  If there’s enough “evidence” against Harvey Gnomestein, then there’s plenty of evidence to indict the “victims” for prostitution.  They exchanged sex for “goodies.”  Of course, then you’d have to indict the vast majority of heterosexual women for same, and that’ll be a bit uncomfortable, no?

If Weinstein “raped” the women, they should have reported him to the police then, and stopped being friends with him and stopped have consensual sex with him and stopped communicating with him as if they were bosom buddies.  

Now, I have no doubt that Weinstein may have behaved badly.  But if it was consensual, then it is not – or should not be – a crime.  An analogy would be helpful.  If you go out into the street and beat some random stranger to a pulp, that’s a crime.  If, on the other hand, a White male HBDer humbly requests – with measured groveling – that a Chinatrix beat him to a pulp, then that’s consensual and therefore not a crime. The fact that these “women” can describe Weinstein’s body tells us nothing about the consensual nature of the activity.

Johnson was of course influenced in his opinion by a woman.  Joan of Arc!

Not quite applicable indeed.  That was my laugh for today. Thanks, Greg.

In related news, The China Plague is hurting the female economy.  A stimulus package is needed for milady, which, I suppose, will also stimulate male customers.

Sallis right one again.  Der Movement cries “Hail China” as it drops its pants and bends over for the Chinatrix and “her” phallic attachment.  Let’s cry about “anon” attacks now…after all, overt chronic failures are ever-so-successful. That’s why Der Movement has had such unprecedented success for the last four years.

Ted Sallis: White Tribal Leader

A racialist shaman.

Based Anglo' Uber

@URefollow

 Gonna start referring to every old white person as "white tribal elders"

Ted Sallis: White tribal elder.  My new byline!  Get used to it!

Read this.

Sarah Beattie, a writer for Saturday Night Life, tweeted, “I will blow whoever manages to punch that maga kid in the face.”

They got a lawyer!  Whitepill, as the Alt Right jackasses would say. Suing is great but not enough. All the folks who are/were calling for these children to be punched – including yeastbucket Sarah Beattie offering a blowjob to anyone who’d punch that boy in the face - they are, it seems to me, all obviously guilty of incitement to violence. They are publicly calling for a teenager to be physically attacked, and in some cases are offering sexual services in exchange. Press charges.  Force the police to make arrests.   And isn’t offering a sex act in exchange for goods or services (in this case, solicitation for assault and battery) prostitution?  Two publicly declared illegal acts in one tweet. Time to send New York’s finest to raid SNL offices. Perpwalk time for Sarah Beattie.  Incitement to violence. Solicitation to prostitution.

Zman:

The great Greg Cochran will often point out that a smart person is someone who says smart things, but more important, they don’t say many dumb things.

By that criterion, Greg Cochran is an idiot.  As is Zman.  If you want any evidence that the universe is a random place, with merciless indifference to what is right and wrong, consider that a good man and real scientist like Harpending is dead, while Cochran is very much still with us.  Yes, I know, Harpending collaborated with Cochran.  No one is perfect; everyone makes errors.  Look at all the “movement” “leaders” I collaborated with in the past and for which I now regret.  All that doesn’t alter the fact that in a just universe, the “today who is alive or dead pattern” would be altered.

Blackpill Thursday

Alt Right terminology to mock the Alt Right.

The Turd Alliance. I can’t help notice how the HBD low-life scum all support each other and pat each other on the back: Derbyshire, Zman, Cochran…Cochran may in fact be the worst of the bunch.  Harpending’s biggest error in judgment was getting involved in with that thing to begin with.  And, oh yes, let’s all get so very excited about Cochran’s “physics” background – as if he’s the only one who has ever written about race from the “Right” with a STEM background.

Another example of a network supporting their own:

Sessions has accomplished quite a lot as Attorney General.

And what link was provided to support that ludicrous contention?  This one, I kid you not. So, one justifies lickspittle support for Quota Queen Antifa Jeff Sessions by linking to exactly the same unfounded lickspittle support, this time coming from Quota King Mudshark Annie.

You just can’t make this stuff up.

Yes, a legend.  So, let’s all worship Trump based on his offhand comments, tweets, and “negs” – not for actually doing anything to help White Americans.  No, instead we get pardoning of Negro criminals, bragging about “the low Black and Hispanic unemployment rate,” Neocon foreign policy, and, of course, no “Wall” or any other kind of real immigration enforcement.  We also get Trump signing legislation targeting pro-White activists, while his Attorney General is de facto legal counsel for Antifa.

Roissy:

pps antitrust, ag sessions. Stop sitting on your southern gentleman hands

Don’t worry.  If Sessions can in some way invoke antitrust to harm White interests, he’ll do so.  Go after anti-White tech companies?  Nah…what would his friends at Antifa think?

And why shouldn’t pink-frilled Republican Graham be a Trump ally, especially since the “God Emperor’s” actual actions are converging on the Graham/McCain worldview?

To answer this question: NO.  

Hmmm…who is in charge of federal law enforcement these days?

Yeah…they’re “waking up.”  Germans put Merkel back into power and in Sweden, the milquetoast “Far Right” gets less than 20% of the vote.  But, hey, there were some isolated marches in the former East Germany, so it’s all OK!  Let’s all declare victory and go home…after all, I’m sure there’s some articles to write about that high, high, high Jewish and Chinese IQ, and about dumb Afrowops and Romanians.

A Counter-Currents commentator gets it:

An Gal Gréine

Posted September 12, 2018 at 11:51 am | Permalink

Seriously? The EU parliament is a toothless joke, and this is the same Nigel Farage who labeled a sizable chunk of his own party membership ‘nazis’ over their — entirely well founded — concerns on Islam, promoted that clown Bolton, and split UKIP. The man is the very model of a modern politician. And this whole farce with Hungary is a dog and pony show which suits both Orbán and the leftists twats attempting to Article 7 Hungary. It’s all self-promotion on both sides.

The growing attachment between Russia and China should upset both the Putin fanboys in Der Movement, as well as the Russian-hating, anti-White Silker filth.

No doubt half-Tuvan Shoigu would like close relations with China, what with his own close genetic relations with East Asia.

Oh, and Putin is speaking out these days against “protectionism” and in favor of the “global economy.”

Now, who has been skeptical about Trad Vlad?

Der Movement (including the Silkers): always wrong

Sallis: always right

And you can count on that

Rushton, Roissy, and Bezos Oh My

Another installment in the endless series of examples of why I despise Der Movement, Inc. and its fundamental dishonesty.  

In all cases, emphasis added.

Read this.

In 1997, Rushton met graduate student Elizabeth Weiss—half-Jewish, half-German, and thirty years his junior—at a Human Behavior and Evolution Society conference. The following year, he filed for divorce from his second wife. He and Weiss were married the day the divorce was granted, in 2000.

“Half”-Jewish.  An HBDer marries a Jew.  Surprise!  It is going to be either that or an Oriental, eh, Brand, another HBD scum burning in hell.

According to Weiss, during their relationship, Rushton was very concerned it would be revealed that he had fathered a half-black child out of wedlock through an affair he had engaged in with a married black woman. ‘Phil told me that this son looked like him and he had behavioural issues,’ explains Weiss, ‘but that the mother did not leave her husband and, thus, the child’s last name was not Rushton.’

Dear God.  Gee…by the standards of the “great man” Pierce and his Turner Diaries, if Rushton were alive during Der Tag, he would have had to be strung up in the Day of the Rope, no? 

Dutton comments: “Obviously, cuckolding another man—passing on your genes while someone else does the investment—is an extreme r-strategy, as is attraction to those who are strongly genetically different from yourself.” One wonders whether this affair of Rushton’s might not improve his reputation in an age when disliking blacks is considered a more serious moral failing than adultery.

No, one wonders whether this affair might not damage his reputation among the Type I scum who worship at the HBD altar.  Rushton: oil-drilling race-mixer.  Rushton: inter-racial adulterer and cuckolder.  Rushton: hypocritical immoral scum of the first order.

Weiss also recalls that “one of Rushton’s ex-girlfriends, who spoke with an English accent, got in touch, remonstrating about the fact that he had ‘forced her’ to have an abortion, decades earlier. She left multiple phone messages on our machine.

That’s right – produce a mulatto, marry a Jew, but make your English girlfriend have an abortion.  Hey, “movement” – your hero Blackjack Phil is looking better and better, eh?

In 2001, Rushton’s estranged daughter Katherine tracked him down and got back in touch.

Weiss felt Rushton became obsessed with his daughter and assisted her in various ways which, for Weiss, put pressure on their relationship. In 2003, ‘We got into a huge argument, in which he threw me off a chair, and I left and had him served with divorce papers. After I filed, he emptied out our bank account (which is actually not allowed).’ Rushton attempted to use academic grant money, claims Weiss, to pay for the divorce.

If true: Theft and fraud.

However, Dutton also found evidence that Rushton incorrectly reported the data on testicle size, ignoring at least two sources which indicated that not only East Asians, but also Africans, have smaller testicles than whites. In a coauthored paper from 1987, Rushton even blithely dismissed the evidence that Africans have smaller testicles than Europeans as “contrary to the general trend.”

Disgusting scientific fraud.  Anyone who continues to peddle Rushton’s absolute trash is perpetuating scientific fraud.  If they didn’t know before, they know now.  “Contrary to the general trend,” my ass.  Disgusting liar.  Pathetic excuse for a scientist and for a man.

Dutton also produces evidence that Rushton misstates the case for a correlation between general intelligence (g) and slow life history (K). Such a correlation does indeed exist when species or subspecies are compared, but not when comparing individuals…

Misstates…intentional?

Another questionable aspect of Race, Evolution, and Behavior was its limitation to just three races. Although there is no unequivocal number of distinct human races, Dutton argues that, at a minimum, Australian Aborigines and Amerindians ought to have been included as well: Amerindians, e.g., are nearly as genetically distinct from Northeast Asians as are Europeans. Such an extension of Rushton’s study would have revealed further anomalies, however:

Rushton himself concedes that Native Americans are seemingly higher in Conscientiousness and lower in Extraversion than Europeans. Lynn finds that Native Americans are higher in psychopathic personality—in this context meaning very low Agreeableness—than African Americans. Native American life expectancy is about a year lower than that of African Americans.

In other words, Amerindians exhibit higher K than Europeans according to some measures, but lower K than Africans according to others.

Even within the framework of Rushton’s three-race model, East Asians are more often a poor fit than one would gather from reading his book. Neuroticism, e.g., is a form of ‘mental instability,’ so on the basis of Rushton’s theory we would expect Northeast Asians to be lowest in it. In fact, they are highest in it, and Africans are lowest.

Note that Brand and Ray made a big deal of the high “neuroticism” of Afrowops after the Schettino incident, and how it unfavorably compared to some of their favorite European groups.  While it is true that being neurotic is not good, it is also true that high neuroticism is associated with the East Asian HBD gods, while being low on the scale is a Negroid trait.

The reason for this appears to be the importance of social anxiety – a trait which comes under the umbrella of Neuroticism – in high K societies. In such societies, in their harsh ecology, you are more likely to survive if you can form a highly cooperative group and you will die quickly if you are cast out of this group. So it pays to be socially anxious.

Social anxiety seems to be a special form of neuroticism.  After all, aren’t the neurotic Afrowops stereotyped as gesticulating and gregarious, loud-mouthed and aggressive?

Another anomaly is that Asians have been greatly outdone by Europeans on measures of cultural achievement despite their higher average intelligence. Dutton cites a Japanese scholar who attributes this to Asians’ high levels of social anxiety, which allows them to develop cooperative groups, but also “renders them very low in inquisitiveness, openness to new ideas, curiosity . . . indeed any behavioural tendency that might ‘rock the boat.’”

No, the Asians are simply robots. Or insects.

Negative ethnocentrism, or distrust of foreigners, is another area where Asians fail to match the pattern predicted by Rushton’s theory. One would expect that K-strategists, being more trusting, would be the less hostile to foreigners. However, Northeast Asians are more negatively ethnocentric than either Africans or Europeans.

How about Jews?  Rushton could have asked his wife.

The examples of Rushton’s dishonesty he cites appear motivated either by bias in favor of his theory or a desire to conceal the less creditable aspects of his personal life or family history.

The reader needs to understand several things here:

1. After Rushton died, Counter-Currents invited people to write comments about Rushton and my critical comments – all basically saying the same things as suggested by the above evidence – was rejected by Johnson.  After all, the good old boys club have to protect each other, even after death.

2. Rushton was a prime HBDer and these revelations completely and 100% support my long-stated contention that HBD is a pseudoscience full of liars and cherry pickers, and that HBDers fudge the evidence, and always refuse to engage in the Popperian scientific method of rigorous hypothesis testing.  Instead, they are the “true believers” castigated by Harpending here – starting around the 8:00 mark.  (For those of you who would say that Harpending considered himself an HBDer – that may be true, but he really wasn’t.  He was an honest scientist and thus, regardless of how he self-labelled, was not an HBDer).

3. Der Movement will continue protecting the likes of Rushton and Lynn because their pseudoscientific garbage reinforces moronic “movement” garbage.

This is from race-mixing gamester Roissy:

And how fucking Orwellian is “Amazonians”? Krist, the hair is standing on the back of my neck. Jeff Bezos is a creep! And his company is staffed by sociopaths. Citizens of Amazonia thank you for your leadership on this cheap Indian H-1B labor open borders issue. Lord Bezos is feeling poor today! Your sacrifice lifts his spirits! Pay no attention to the wastage of your once high trust nation, a pittance to pay for His Lord Bezos’ Prime Happiness and your buttplug instant deliveries.

Right…..

A year ago, Roissy wrote:

And now we can add a very big name to the list of those men who have become transformed by the Trump Effect:

Jeff Bezos.

GAYASSERICA Bezos: [picture of Bezos]

Trumperica Bezos: [picture of a muscular Bezos]

Cinco Jotas theorizes based on this and other details of his personal life that Jeff Bezos is about to take a turn to the hard right. Physiognomy doesn’t lie, and it’s a proven fact that masculinity via the testosterone pathway predisposes a man to see the world through swole-colored glasses. Maybe we’ll read the cheesy nümale header at the Washington Post Op change from “democracy dies in darkness” to “from russia, with love, losers!”.

(IMO, I think Bezos is warming up to Trump, or warming himself up to out-alpha Trump, because he fears a bigly anti-trust Trump-led crackdown on his empire of SCALE.)

Here’s the thing - these quota queens are characterized by two basic traits:

1. They are always wrong

2. They never admit they are wrong and their cult-like followers never hold them responsible and accountable for being wrong time and again

Ultimate take home points:

1. Sallis is (almost) always right

2. Der Movement is (almost) always wrong
3. All you guys nevertheless support the “movement” and disdain Sallis, because, well, you know…