Odds and Ends, 10/9/22

In der news.

If:

• 1. You work for an institution that promotes “equity” while having, as almost all institutions do, a standard administrative structure.
• 2. You want to be a “ball buster.”
• 3. You do not believe that doing this will get you fired.

Then you can ask why an institution that is devoted to equity has a hierarchical administrative structure, in which some people have higher status, more power and authority, and a much higher salary, than everyone else?  Why doesn’t the entity have a more equitable, egalitarian structure, in which everyone has the same status and authority, and the same salary (suggesting that will really make them burn), with decisions made by discussion, consensus, and voting?

And you can imagine how various excuses they may make can be torn apart.  Everyone had an equal opportunity to rise?  False!  How do they know? The current leadership benefitting from structural advantages, an invisible knapsack of privilege, and others never had the same opportunities and support to rise to the positions they deserve.  Why does leadership believe they should have more authority and a higher salary than others?  Do they think they are better than the rest of us?  And it is argued that they are being rewarded for hard work, effort, ambition, education, etc. – think of the fun you can have with that.  Why isn’t the same applied to society as a whole?  Etc. etc.  If you are a skilled debater, and believe you can aggressively argue the points without “getting canned” then you can eviscerate their hypocrisy.

The Coco Chow thing is funny and all (and HBDers gnash their teeth in fury) but it underscores the basic problem with Trump - all bark and no bite; he speaks loudly and carries a twig. When President, did he even attempt to do anything to limit Asian immigration, Asian birth tourism, or the Asian takeover of American STEM? Nothing that I am aware of. The optimal combination for a political figure of the authentic Right is calm talk coupled with radical action. Trump does the opposite. His big mouth triggers the Left into thinking "Fascist! Nazi! Racist!" but The God Emperor actually governed like John McCain on estrogen treatments.

This is how Cleary responds to a detailed refutation of his nonsense:

Collin ClearyOctober 2, 2022 at 4:31 am

TLDR

Of course. Der Right never addresses serious criticism. They ignore it, do childish TLDR posts, call you crazy, or like MacDonald engage in ad hominem ("it's a self-interested wop") and strawman arguments (talking about family structure instead of addressing my arguments about ethnocentrism and definitions of individualism).

These guys cannot even address arguments from the Right; how will they respond to the intellectual salvos from the Left?

Writing TLDR is not going to cut it, retards.

See this.

As a black resident said after the Supreme Court put a failed Kansas City school desegregation program out of its misery in 1995, “We’re tired of chasing white people."

Ah, but that's the point isn't it? On the one hand, we are told that Whites are evil, racist, harmful to "Black bodies," and Blacks have "fatigue" from Whites and need to "escape the White gaze." And here we have the honest admission that the history of race relations and integration in America is that of Blacks "chasing white people." Whites run away from Blacks, and then Blacks follow with the intensity of a parasite desperately clinging to its host, or a predator hunting prey - until such time that Blacks become "tired" and Whites live so far from their jobs that they need hours-long daily commutes. And think of the "diversity tax" that Whites pay in addition to the long commutes (and gas prices related to that) - the isolation from urban-cultural centers and from other family members who are scattered across America, the high home prices, the costs inherent in constantly moving again and again, etc. Whites are tired of running from Black people.

Listen to this.  With respect to the issue of whether Yockey was correct in favoring the USSR over the USA, with the latter being “The Enemy of Europe,” I don’t fall in with either side. I believe that Yockey’s pro-Soviet attitude and his reasoning behind that was one of the weakest aspects of his work, but, on the other hand, Yockey was prescient in the sense that Eastern Europe has ended up better, with respect to demographics and culture, than the Western Europe of liberal democracy and American control.  But Johnson is correct in his denunciation of communism. However, Johnson neglected an important argument (apart from his reasonable argument that the situation was more a result of WWII and consequent events rather than Soviet rule per se) – that the situation of Eastern Europe today exists after a situation in which the USSR was effectively opposed by the “West” and, eventually, lost the Cold War. Do we know for certain that Eastern Europe would have ended up as well if the USSR had won the Cold War, particularly if they successfully conquered Western Europe?  A victorious USSR would not have had to placate Eastern European nationalist sensibilities in order to keep those people in line (without having had to send in the tanks, like they did, for example, in Hungary and Czechoslovakia)?  Perhaps a victorious USSR would have been in a position of strength to indulge in internationalist Marxism, including Eurasian panmixia. Who knows? There is no guarantee that the situation in Eastern Europe would have been the same with a victorious USSR as compared to the history we actually experienced.

Note all of the talk there about “ethnonationalism” not racial nationalism. Johnson and Counter-Currents having de facto control and influence over Yockey's work is extremely dangerous. The meaning of Yockey can be distorted to serve the Culture Retardation objectives of Counter-Currents. In that podcast, Johnson terms Yockey as an enemy and as an adversary, which proves my point. 

Correct:

DorfmannOctober 4, 2022 at 9:41 pm

Ironically, Yockey would view the ethnonationalists at Counter-Currents as enemies of Europe.

Delenda est Counter-Currents!

I more or less agree with this. However:

All of this can be added to the list of reasons why young white men should think twice before attending college.

Bullshit. I understand that mindset goes well with the downwardly mobile hobbit hole mentality of WN 3.0, where nice high IQ Jews and Asians can dominate the professions, and use their consequent power to suppress White ethnics, but according to Sallis 1.0, White men should not surrender academia and the professions to the other.

Should you be accused of sexual misconduct, your rights cannot be guaranteed. 

True, but you should sue, sue, sue, including leveraging Title IX against them. A process biased against men violates the letter of Title IX and you need to find appropriate rightist lawyers to wage lawfare against the college/university.

If you must go to college because your future line of work requires it, avoid socializing with female students.

Bingo! Avoid the yeastbucket. Of course, that will open up the White whores for Colored males, but that's their cup of tea anyway, eh?

Avoidance may not prevent all false accusations, however, only make them less likely. A malicious yeastbucket can still file a false accusation for any number of reasons. She may be bored. She may dislike a man for some reason, including if he has right-wing politics. She may, in her estrogenic fever dreams, imagine incidents that do not occur. Or, it may be directly related to avoidance. Imagine if Karen Tunasmell is infatuated with Chad Musclebound. Chad avoids/ignores/rejects her because he is MGTOW or she is grotesque. In revenge, she files a false charge, and milady must be always believed, right?

Gab correspondent Jack98 alerts us to this. That is entirely consistent with what I've been writing on my blogs for years - that much of the grand Chinese "scientific accomplishment," as measured by publications, that the HBDers rave about about and use to promote Chinese intellectual superiority, is based on fraud. Indeed, I have relayed over the years personal anecdotes with my own experiences with Chinese fraud (and incompetence, never mind extreme ethnocentrism) in American STEM. And yet, we have this.  Sallis right, Der Movement wrong.

Der Movement is always, always, ALWAYS wrong.

Who is White?

It seems that someone at Amren comments is rejecting "Coloreds Are Us" WN 3.0:

To me it is not "race realism" per se that is important, it is White Race Realism that is exclusively important to me. I don't care if Yellows, Blacks, Browns believe that race is important and then favor their own race over others. I only care if Whites believe that race is important and then favor Whites over others.

Excellent. Another Amren comment:

PanEuroFuturist

"Spanish people aren't really all that white"

Yes, they are. White means racially European. Last time I checked, Spain is in Europe. Does that mean all White ethnic groups are the same? No, of course not. But Europeans all cluster together genetically except for some of the North Asian and Central Asian types that exist in parts of Scandinavia and Russia. Nordicism is a cancer that has plagued our race for far too long. We can not afford to be divided and weak when all the non-White world stands against us. Nordicism is race treason which is why it is so often promoted by our enemies both from within and without.

The Snapshot Syndrome

A behavioral defect.

A behavioral problem many people have is what I call The Snapshot Syndrome – a tendency to focus on, and make judgments and decisions on, fixed “snapshots” of a given situation, instead of considering trends, projections of the future, reasons for which the situation exists, not to mention other more important issues than that current situation.

For example, there is a subset of voters (*) who ignore deep ideological issues and broad long term sociopolitical trends and objectives, and instead base their support of a candidate based on the current, immediate, “snapshot” of some metric of personal (and/or national) (perceived) well-being, in some cases, metrics over which the given candidate(s) have limited to no control over. If the economy is booming on Election Day, the incumbent is favored; if the stock market just crashed and a recession has begun, the challenger is this empowered. Of course, not only is it possible that these events took place for reasons independent of government policy, but regardless, it is possible that they may become reversed after the election, even if government policy remains unchanged. Further, there are other more important issues; what benefit a “booming economy” if the current administration is promoting race replacement immigration? Or if outsourcing, high skilled immigration, and massive income inequality mean that others benefit from all of the “booming?’’ And even if this is not the case, there may be other issues and concerns, putting aside the issue of the very likely temporary nature of the “snapshot,” as I have already indicated. Another possibility is that a candidate can “trick” voters by pretending to support views that they have heretofore rejected, in order to influence the voters’ perception of the current “snapshot” of candidate stands on issues, without considering the broad context. Arizona Republican voters who were fooled by McCain’s squint-eyed steely assertion that “we’ll build that wall” had their “snapshot” of an immigration restrictionist McCain vanish from view once the election was over, and the reality of Open Borders Invade the World Invite the World McCain once again (and predictably) became painfully obvious. That stupidity could have been avoided by considering the whole context and using the past to predict the future, instead of depending on a fixed, situation-at-the-current time view of the political situation. Voting by “snapshot” is a highly irresponsible and superficial approach to the democratic political process.

Another example are fools who say “the native population of country A does not face any threats of demographic replacement since as of today the alien population percentage of A is only X” completely disregarding that X has been increasing, all projected trends suggest that X will continue to increase and increase markedly, and A has been increasingly the focus of legal and illegal immigration.  Any sensible view would be that A is indeed threatened, and one cannot assume that the “snapshot” on any given day will be fixed for all time. Indeed, looking at any nation suffering from race replacement, at one time in the past, that was not happening, and a “snapshot” at that past time would have resulted in a completely false picture of future possibilities. And, indeed, those morons who said that country A was demographically safe until the end of time saw their imbecilic assertions quickly disproven.

Yet another example of The Snapshot Syndrome is to consider the status of an ethny at one given time and project that endlessly in the future (and sometimes the past as well). Thus, if an ethny has been having a great “run” for the past several centuries, then that is asserted to be evidence of their permanent and innate superiority, ignoring that the ethny is now in decline, was at a lower status in the past, and that other groups were in higher status in the past. Indeed, one consequence of projecting the current “snapshot” backwards in time is the rewriting of history, so that the accomplishments of other groups are falsely ascribed to that group that has been more recently been “on top.”  I’m sure we can think of a certain example of this historically popular among Der Movement. Of course, in some cases, like the Negro, the current “snapshot” is actually an accurate predictor of the future and is accurately manifested in the past – when a “snapshot” is consistently supported over historical time and is explained by plausible mechanisms, then it may well be accurate. Not all “snapshots” are misleading. But many of them are, and the tendency to judge by “snapshot” alone is a behavioral defect we should all strive to overcome.

Footnote

*Another issue in the mainstream political sphere, albeit unrelated to the main topic of this post (but is related to the broader issue of behavioral defects), is people having campaign posters on their property and stickers on their cars. There’s a bit of need of a childish need of political self-expression and also the power of conformity – the idea being people are more likely to vote for a candidate of they see many other supporting the same candidate (and vice versa). Regardless, it is stupid.

Odds and Ends, 8/14/22

In der news.

See this. While I agree with all said there, Jew Maher is like a fat slob who doesn’t understand why they have Type II Diabetes.  He doesn’t understand that the “old school” liberalism he espouses led inexorably to all of the hysterical SJWism he mocks on his show. Liberalism is like cancer, it spreads; you can’t just have “a little bit of healthy cancer.” Maher’s liberal positivity is as delusional as the fat positivity he rightly ridicules. Or maybe he does know all of this, but is just a typical mendacious Levantine.

Someone left a comment at Counter-Currents labeling Bowery's GOD hypothesis as the Cuck hypothesis, "refuted" by the original idiot – the one asking Counter-Currents to promote GOD - quoting from Bowery.  Merely quoting from a work is not a refutation of criticism of it.

Unfortunately, I don't have access to my old Legion Europa materials, but I once did a thorough counter-analysis of Bowery’s claims that Meds were routinely cuckolding Nords and stealing their women (via marriage, etc.). The former (re: cuckoldry) analysis was a logical examination based on Salter's "blank slate hypothesis"- that recessive traits were a cuckoldry detection mechanism. So, if Humphrey and McCulloch are correct and wops and other swarthoids are so dark and alien-looking, with dominant traits, then cuckoldry of Nords should be easily detected in the greasy and dark infants produced. On the other hand, if cuckoldry went undetected, then how phenotypically different could Nords and Meds really be? The second part (re: “stealing women” in general) was an analysis of ethnic intermarriage data.

Interesting that the Boweryites mention Oz - a show that was not only relentlessly anti-White but anti-Italian as well. The fact that Fontana was writing actually supports rather than refutes my contention, as (American) wops typically have acted the buffoon for the amusement of others, being court jesters for WASPs and Jews. What was The Sopranos other than a wopish minstrel show? And Jersey Shore (half the cast not even being Italian) was even worse. Then one reads Italian-American magazines and interspersed among the endless inane articles about "My Nanna's (*) meatball recipe" are commentaries about how Italians are not White and that the wops should make common cause with Negroes and other minorities. Wops are their own worst enemy and Oz fits into that pattern and proves nothing except that the minstrel show plays on.

*What the hell is this "nanna" shit? I knew lots of wops as a youth and no one ever muttered that word. In fact, I never heard the word "nanna" until I was in my 40s and some ethnic hybrid used it to describe his Italian-American grandmother and I didn't know what he was talking about.

Similar to Todd Grande, I'll say that I'm not diagnosing anyone, just explaining what could be happening in a situation like this. Let's consider three hypothetical - hypothetical I say! - examples of how a desire for personal vengeance can inform anti-White policies.

• 1. Imagine a navy pilot, with a military bigwig father, who becomes a POW in Vietnam and experiences torture and has to refuse early release from that torment because of the political ramifications. Might not such a person secretly blame America and the American people for his plight and thus develop a deep, secret, festering hatred for America and for the White American population? Such a person might, say, become a US Senator, and push for endless wars and for race replacement immigration as methods to punish America and the American people.
• 2. Consider a "Hungarian" Jew, who experiences and survives WWII and the Nazi occupation of Hungary. This Jew then becomes an extremely wealthy financier. Might he not use his money to push policies to cause untold suffering and misery for the European-derived White Gentiles that he's learned to hate? Might such a person do more damage to White interests than saturation bombing with thermonuclear weapons?
• 3. Consider young females "of Color" who are embittered that they are not White and are not as attractive as are White women. Image such enraged female hominids getting elected to Congress and pushing policies to "stick it to Whitey," to revenge themselves against the Whites they wish they could be but never can be, and to gain some relief from the anguished rage they feel every time they look at themselves in the mirror.

Taylor:

They are without shame, without honor, without decency, without a shred of gratitude. Because we let them get away with it.

I agree, Jared, "movement" "leaders" fit that description exactly.

[Spoilers ahead]

The choice facing Whites is akin to that faced by Severian (and humanity) in Gene Wolfe’s New Sun series – a choice between a slow but inevitable slide into oblivion that is somewhat unpleasant but bearable in the slow-boiling-frog sense so most people around at the time of the choice could live out their lives; OR choose a radical change solution that will ensure the future, but at the cost of mass destruction and suffering for those in the present.

In the books, the choice was between accepting a slowly dying dim red sun being eaten away by a black hole at its core – prematurely reducing the Earth ("Urth") to a frozen dead world; OR restoring the sun with a white hole, but at the cost of a cataclysm that would sink existing continents, raise new ones, and wipe out almost all (but not all) of humanity. The second scenario occurs; seemingly, that was Wolfe’s moral choice.

For Whites – the choice to accept The Great Replacement and make the best of their inevitable decline and try to live in the moment the best you can and put up with the abuse and humiliations and try to hold onto a First World lifestyle for as long as it lasts; OR induce radical change that would destabilize the System, possibly leading to mass upheaval and an end to whatever comfortable life – or for many, any life at all – for most Whites, but solving the race crisis and ensuring a bright future for surviving Whites going forward.

Holding Whites Accountable

It didn’t “just happen.”

See this.

But here’s the problem with this complaint – which by the way I can 100% identify with, having lived through similar times myself (in that case, mostly with various types of Negroes and of mulatto Hispanics, rather than Mexicans) – how did this state of affairs come to pass?

That is not a rhetorical question, nor am I being facetious.  Let’s answer the question.  Whites have been – and continue to be – a majority of the American population, a majority of voters, and a majority of the population of places like Iowa.  Whites used to be a clear majority of the population of California.  Whites vote.  What happened?  Who elected the politicians who enabled this disaster to occur?  Who looked the other way for decades?  Who ignored the problem as long as it was in someone else’s backyard and not their own?  Who ignored the plight of urban Whites (particularly if those were “White ethnics”)?

All of this didn’t “just happen.”

Please study this video, and pay particular attention to the 40 seconds from 3:20-4:00 – McCain’s infamous “build the danged fence” campaign video, made when Amnesty John was facing some heat from his right on immigration.  I remember noting that video at the time, and thinking to myself: “the GOP voters of Arizona can’t be that stupid, can they?  I mean, it’s obvious – obvious – that McCain’s lying to them, and he’ll go back to shilling for amnesty, and against any enforcement, once elected.  I mean, he’s being playing that game for a long time; surely, they are wise to him now, right?  Indeed, the GOP as a whole does this, feinting right for elections, and then governing like liberal Democrats.”

Well, no, the GOP voters of Arizona were fooled once again, and even though they howled their betrayal, they still continued to support the evil scum McCain, and are crying bitter tears over his death.  

This has been the Republican playbook for decades.  They dog whistle implicitly on race - VERY implicitly – to gather White support for Necon agendas and for the same big business interests bringing in the hordes to begin with.  And the rubes fall for the scam time and again.

Here’s where I part company with Bowery and all the rest: Whites need to be held accountable for their stupidity, fecklessness, and painful naiveté.  

The key part of that man’s lament, from the short essay Bowery presented:

Am I racist? Jesus, am I becoming one of those guys. I sure sound like one of those guys.

“Those guys.”  You see, the only people who have a solution to the problem (let’s ignore for the moment that Der Movement, Inc. is a fraud; I’m referring to racial nationalism in general) are considered “those people,” as alien as the Latinos, freaks to be dismissed and despised.  This fellow sounds like he considers being one of “those people” just as bad – nay, even worse! – than what has happened to his town, his community, his nation.  “Jesus,” indeed.

One wonders who this fellow voted for.  McCain?  Romney?  Maybe even Obama?

Accountability?

Every time I read, or hear, a lament like this, every time some anti-White outrage occurs, every time the borders are opened even more, what I do – and what I suggest we all do – is trace things back to the beginning.  Why are these things allowed to happen?  Answer: Those in a position of leadership allow it to happen; in many cases, they support and promote it.  

Well, then, how and why are they in this position of power to begin with?  If elected, it is because an electorate that is majority White elected them (and the same applies overseas – who elected Merkel?).  If they are in a position  of power economically, it is because a consumer base that is majority White continues to purchase their goods and services; Whites being incapable of organizing boycotts on the basis of racial interests like any other group.  If the power derives from fame and celebrity, it is because a majority White population provides that fame and celebrity.

Oh, you will cry – “It’s the Jews!  The Jews!”   Trace that back.  Who let the Jews into America?  Who let the Jews rise to prominence and seize the media?  Who kowtows to Jewish interests?  Who serves as the Shabbos goy traitor class?  We’re back again to the White elites – the politicians elected by Whites, the moguls funded by White consumers, the celebrities whose fame derives from White fan worship.

The same applies if you want to scream about “moneyed interests” or “the managerial class” or “The Federal Reserve” or “the SJWs” or whatever pet peeve you have: these things didn’t “just happen.”  To paraphrase Pareto: if a wolf is eating you, it is because you chose to be a sheep.  If Whites choose to be a race of sheep, they should not be surprised about all the wolves gorging themselves on the white-flocked sheeple.

Trace things back to first principles.  Things do not “just happen.”  And screaming about “the Jews” is a crutch to avoid dealing with the need to hold Whites accountable for their own lowly position.

And I have to laugh at the Roissyite HBD Nordicist gamesters getting all hot and bothered about a single German (of course) rally – yes sir, “the Saxon begins to hate!”  How about “the Saxon” voting for even the milquetoast moderate right-wing Alternative For Germany (never mind the NPD), instead of putting Merkel in power over and over again?  Another example of Der Movement’s victory psychosis, and their Germans on White Horse Syndrome.

I suppose it’s another example of White fecklessness that they are “represented” by a “racial movement” composed of retards and fetishistic morons.

Not Dead Yet

Still around.

As what will no doubt be a disappointment to “movement” ”leaders,” the “crazy” and “bitter” Ted Sallis is not dead; the lack of recent activity here has been due to digital problems, stemming from the decaying infrastructure of Third World America.

Never forget: America is a dead country with no future.

And, no, voting for the likes of Trump is not “going to save us all.”  Even if Trump was really an “American Caesar who is going to save White demographics” the fact remains that a subsequent President could undo all that good; further, a significant change in the political representation in Congress could very well lead to a Trump impeachment.  Thus, even if a pro-White President was elected, but with the rest of the System in place, do you really believe anything racially useful could get done – and stay done?

No; instead, electoral politics are for three main purposes:

1. Propaganda, education, and recruitment, as well as a focal point around which to build infrastructures that could also be used for other, more fundamental, purposes.

2. Promoting chaos and balkanization – heightening the contradictions.

3. If any Far Rightists get elected, they can use whatever power and status they have to provide some support and “cover” for more “vanguardist” metapolitical activism.

Meanwhile, getting back to the main point of the post – I’ve been away, but I’ve still been around.  This enforced break has been useful to get away from “movement” stupidity for a while, and some reorientation hopefully can result, a “silver lining” so to speak.

One last note: Burn in hell, John McCain, rot in hell for all eternity.

A Magnificent John McCain Portrait and Another Item

An excellent and accurate representation – for both items discussed.

This has to be the best likeness of a public figure ever drawn.  

Then we have from TOO:

Alt-Gradient says:

August 6, 2018 at 12:18 pm

“If anyone should have racial pride, it is Europeans, the more northern and western the more so.”

>Not sure what kind of purity signalling is behind such a needlessly crass statement, but if that is supposed to be a highlight of Herr Faulk’s contribution, I’ll know to blitz right through to the next chapter. 

There sure can’t be many worldly statements that simultaneously make the Irish and the Greeks red in the face (for different reasons).

Alt-Gradient just doesn’t get it.  The “needlessly crass statement” actually represents the most fundamental aspect of the ideology of Der Movement Inc. (albeit the Irish are typically not what is meant by “more northern and western”).   So, if Alt-Gradient has a problem with this, he/she needs to ditch Der Movement Inc. (including TOO, which is strongly in agreement with the statement in question) and look elsewhere.  

Further, “more northern and western the better” (excluding the micks) fairly well sums up Der Movement’s “leadership” requirements as well.

Ryan Faulk:

Faulk describes himself as "homosexual", "mildly autistic", and "1/16th Negro"

Actually, then, not a bad representative of the Alt Right at all.  Some Alt Righters would no doubt claim that they can’t control who identifies as “Alt Right.”  That may be true, but they certainly can control who is included in a book that purports to represent the “best” (sic) of Alt Right “thinking” (sic) – and that has as its purpose to give the Alt Right a “fair hearing” in “their own words.”  Including Faulk while excluding Johnson is just as petty as Johnson ignoring Bolton’s Yockey biography.

And, by the way, long time readers of Counter-Currents are aware that the allegedly “crazy and bitter” Sallis – such a troublemaker and all – strongly suggested on that forum that Johnson and Spencer end their feud and come to some sort of rapprochement.  That suggestion was immediately shot down and I was eventually “banned” from that site.

My conclusion is that these guys actually enjoy feuding.  I really think that, deep down, they prefer to battle fellow Alt Righters than they do the Left.  Sort of analogous to how Der Movement saves its most extreme animus for Southern and Eastern Europeans, rather than for the Guks.

Of Cucks and Men

Something positive about the Alt Right.

I have been critical of the Alt Right, including Spencer, when called for, and will continue to do so (something about the latest Jorjani fiasco will be out soon).  But the converse is true as well: when these guys do something right, I’ll support them.

Even though the Florida speech didn’t go down in an optimal fashion, nevertheless, giving these speeches – or attempting to – is a good idea, and I have to give Richard Spencer credit for putting himself out there, physically, taking risks, speaking truth to power, and defending his people.  

Whatever else one can say about him, Spencer is a man, contrasted to mewling pathetic cucks like John McCain or George W. Bush (whose wife, in my opinion, should be indicted for murder for what she did in high school).

As for the scum in the Florida crowd, shouting Spencer down, I say this: Like it or not, the Far Right is here to stay. I don’t like the Alt Right nor the “movement” as a whole, but I do acknowledge that we are, broadly speaking, on the same side, and I certainly fully support Spencer in his quest to get racial nationalist ideas a fair hearing.

Now, I think he’d be more successful if he’d cut ties with the juvenile jackassery of the Alt Right, and not deal with the likes of Jorjani again, but I realize that when I give advice to the “movement” it goes in one ear and out the other.

Regardless, I’ll give credit where credit is due.

McCain: Genocidal Lunatic

Note to a lunatic.

Note to John McCain: Those who do not care about “blood and soil” will be replaced by those who do.  And those new people could care less about your “ideals.”

From the perspective of European EGI, McCain is a monster.  Optimally, he should be put on trial for crimes against humanity for both his anti-White genocidal politics (e.g., immigration) as well as his relentless warmongering. The man simply cannot be allowed to die from his disease with dignity; instead he must end his life in disgrace, humiliated and ruined.

The Despicable McCain

Sociopathic butcher.

I have written about John McCain a number of times, including linking to the excellent “ode to joy” post.  Here’s the latest about this filthy scum (emphasis added)

The Occupation Government in Washington has presided over the Death of the West. The world order McCain defends is, quite explicitly, built on the dispossession of the European-Americans who actually created the American polity. If our civilization or country is to survive in any meaningful sense, that order must be destroyed.

And that means replacing the political class, the enemy collaborators, exemplified by the likes of Senator McCain. His warmongering against a nuclear armed Russia is unhinged. His desire to hurt our own nation is so unrelenting and energetic one wonders if he is working under duress or threat of blackmail. I almost hope so. To think he actually believes these ideas is a terrifying possibility.

It is not polite to speak ill of the terminally ill. Yet this cruel, murderous and thoroughly despicable character poses a threat not just to the existence of the American nation, but to the very lives of people all over the world.

I wish the Senator no harm. I only offer a desperate prayer in self-defense that his retirement will be forthcoming and his media megaphone removed.

The political life not just of our country, but of the world, must be rid of this Man of Blood, this sociopathic butcher—who, shuffling to his grave, seems determined to drag us all down with him.

As Roissy continues to agonize about those nasty White ethnics, McCain’s ancestry is discussed here.

Ode To Joy: Meet John McCain

A useful summary of the legacy of US Senator John McCain.

Read here.  I must say, I didn't know about this incident.  Is there a statute of limitations for criminally negligent homicide?   Now would be as good a time as any to put  McCain on trial for that "accident."

Alt Right, Rotten Orange, and Silk Road News

Several items.

I can't really disagree with certain elements of the Alt Right on this, although I would express it differently.  McCain is a despicable subhuman. But it is not "godly justice" or any other sort of justice.  McCain is old, and he's had cancer (skin cancer in that case) before. These things happen. Illness happens, accidents happens, bad things happen to people.  I'm not going to celebrate McCain's illness, but I'm not going to be a phony and pretend that I wish him well.  I do not wish him well.

Interesting that the leftist cuck Trump is so hostile to the most right-wing, anti-immigration member of his cabinet - oh, yes, ostensibly for the recusal.  Also, some "alpha male" Trump is, using womanly passive aggressive techniques to humiliate Sessions into resigning, rather than just firing him and/or demanding a resignation.  Trump treats "dreamers" better than Jeff "Howdy Doody" Sessions - that should tell you something.

And let us not forget Roissy stating that Sessions as Attorney General by itself was sufficient to justify Trump's election.  That's not working too well, is it?  In more ways than one, since Sessions has been an absolute mediocrity, so far, in his position. Sessions would have been a better choice for VP - that wouldn't have changed the election outcome, but would have provided Trump some impeachment insurance.  By analogy, Sessions could have been to Trump what Agnew was to Nixon, while Pence is to Trump what Ford ended up being to Nixon - an acceptable alternative for the Establishment.

Asians again.  Surprise!  Of course they support flooding America with the flotsam and jetsam of the world - it's an implicitly anti-White agenda, and as is so often discussed here, the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.