The Once and Future Year: 2021-2022

Predictions - past and present.

See this.

As I always try to be fair and honest, it would seem that a number of my predictions from last year either didn’t come to pass or that the situation is uncertain. 2021 was a strange year of “stasis” for Der Movement, where fundraising was the major concern. Let us fisk my predictions from last December:

Will Nick Fuentes begin to replace Richard Spencer as the bogeyman for Greg Johnson?

Mixed - LeBlanc is pro-Fuentes, some Counter-Currents commentators are critical, and Johnson himself has been mostly silent on the subject.

Spencer leaving Der Movement, again 50:50 for 2021; I would say 80:20 for the next five years.

His status is murky, but it is looking more and more that he's functionally out. Another interpretation is that he just was saying he regrets his time in the Alt Right and some of his more stupid actions, but regardless, looking at his behavior over the last year or so, there is a pattern of distancing himself from Der Movement.  Now, one could say that's a good thing and is similar to my own disgust with Der Movement. Two differences: First, I was never a "leader," someone handpicked by older Quota Queens to be groomed as a replacement; second, it is hard to take seriously someone on the Far Right who non-ironically (as he claimed) endorsed and voted for Joe Biden because "liberals are more competent." We will no doubt eventually observe the next installment of the Richard Spencer saga.

If and when crackdowns on the Right commences, will important moles and infiltrators be revealed?

Not yet.

Likely another archaeogenetics disaster for Der Movement will occur – Ancient Egypt?

No, not in 2021, maybe in 2022. The Etruscan paper in 2021 was a mixed bag for Der Movement, with most of the dubious positives for fetishists coming solely from the overt bias of the authors and not from the raw data. For another view, see this.

The decline of Groyperism?

As chronicled at Counter-Currents, there are definitely cracks in the façade, with all of the infighting, but, unfortunately, it is still going strong.

Chances of a Trump indictment in 2021, state and/or federal: 60:40; over the next four years, 80:20

Not yet.

It is likely that some unpleasant “dirt” on the Trump Presidency will come out that will be disturbing to Der Movement – evidence of Trump’s insincerity, or perhaps an illumination as to the degree of power Kushner has had over the Trump Presidency.

Nothing much yet.

We will continue to see more evidence of the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance, including, but not limited to, the declining Counter Currents exhibiting a “woke” “White nationalism" comfortable for “Rosie and the kids.” And more dogmatic Nordicism, no doubt, regardless of Johnson's claims to the contrary in a livestream. The Johnsonian ethnostate: Nordics, East Asians, Jews, and homosexuals of all types.

Well, that was the one prediction that hit the bullseye. 100% on target!  See this. If the Alt-Right was “Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism” then the current fiasco that is emerging can be termed “Rosie and the Kids White Nationalism.”

But, on the other hand, what to make of the brief burst of fervid anti-MacDonaldism that erupted at Counter-Currents in December? Was it a brief passing storm signifying nothing or the portent of more to come? It could be simply tit-for-tat: MacDonald allows Joyce to do his thing and in response Johnson lets "Hamilton" (and fellow-traveler commentators) do his thing. It is something to keep on eye on, but one cannot read too much into it; after all, the Quota Queens tend to remember that they need to "circle the wagons" to protect their mutual affirmative action advantages (although Johnson's hatred of Spencer is too much to overcome, even to protect their shared quota benefits).

For the most part, Counter-Currents/Johnson and TOO/MacDonald have gone their separate ways, without much interaction, positive or negative.

The “movement” grifters will keep on grifting.

That’s right on the money (no pun intended?), but that’s not really much of a prediction, is it?

Will Jim Goad finish out 2021 still affiliated with Counter-Currents? I’d say a better than even chance, but no way is it 100%. Assuming Counter-Currents is still around by the time of the next Presidential election – chances that Goad is still affiliated - no more than 40%.

He’s still around. We’ll see how long it lasts.

I would like to point out that my general prediction of the past few years that the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance will be more and more obvious, with Counter-Currents playing an ever-more-important role, has been, of course, shown to be accurate. With Goad’s anti-Italianism, the emergence of anti-Italian commentators, and the return of the hyper-Nordicist plagiarist "Andrew Hamilton," Counter-Currents is (with respect to on the ground reality, as opposed to brief livestream comments) increasingly throwing its lot in with Nordicism, and abandoning any pretense of being for all Whites.

This has continued. James O' Meara has contributed a homosexual Nordicist component (not too surprising given rumors about some other prominent Nordicists).

It is very likely that if the System/Left starts cracking down on Der Movement, the Quota Queens with their “more of the same” will be woefully unprepared and we’ll all hear and read the equivalent of “wha’ happen?”

Not yet – see next item, below.

Relating that to the Counter-Currents comments above, one prediction that can be made is that as Der Movement comes under increasing pressure from the Left, it will “contract” and become narrower in scope, both ideologically and as far as its outreach efforts.  One can say it will become more “groupuscular” and “rhizome”-like.  

This has not happened yet. Quite the opposite. One reason is that the Left, so far, has been more focused on the Mainstream Right and so the Quota Queens – inept failures as they are – have been slipping under the radar.  So, not much pressure.

Thus, various “movement” factions will contract to what they consider their real core constituency, which should be very revealing. This would have the effect of accelerating Counter-Currents’ focus on HBD-Nordicism and petty nationalist ethnonationalism, and its abandonment of a “big tent” approach to all Whites. 

Not completely true, they still on the surface support "big tent," but it does seem they’ve given up on White ethnics, while embracing a 10% non-White population. So, it would seem we've altered the people included under the test. Wops out, Malkin and Kumar in.

The homosexualism of Counter-Currents would be expected to increase as well, that being a core component of the blog’s identity.  When under stress, the inner self is unmasked.

There wasn’t much stress on these people in 2021, so this is deferred to the future.

One thing I failed to predict for 2021 was the extent of Der Movement's (and Der Right's in general) insane hysteria over the covid vaccine, the level of infiltration of rightist politics by the anti--vaxx crazies (heretofore more associated with left-leaning, spoiled, ignorant White women [or, more succinctly, White women]), and the overall covid denialism (that was already extant in 2020). Contra the Quota Queens and their assertion that I'm "paranoid" and suffering from "insanity" based on my critiques of Der Movement, in truth I continuously underestimate "movement" stupidity, irrationality, and overall craziness. I'm not going to make any predictions for 2022 about this issue because it is so obvious that "movement" madness about covid will continue that "predicting" that will be like "predicting" tomorrow's sunrise.

Predictions for 2022:

In one sense, some of the predictions for 2021 need to be moved to 2022. Spencer out of Der Movement? Trump indicted? More Ancient Egypt archaeogenetic studies (certainly, some type of ancient DNA study is probable)?  No doubt "movement" grifting will continue.

One major prediction is that the battle for the future of Der Movement will continue and intensify, with the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist-Amnat alliance pushing multiracialist mainstreaming and remnants of the WN 1.0 Old Guard and the more hardcore WN 2.0 folks resisting this direction. Perhaps Michelle Malkin will become the standard bearer of the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist-Amnat alliance’s mainstreaming and its multiracial Rosie and the Kids White nationalism.

I’m not going to make mainstream political predictions for the 2022 American mid-terms election – anything can happen before then and one should never underestimate the ability of the “count your chickens before they’re hatched declare victory and go home” Right to self-destruct and ruin the election.

Chances are good that Johnson will either engage in a new feud or intensify an existing one; however, I admit that is sort of in the "the sun will rise tomorrow" category.

Der Movement's foray into anti-vaxxism suggests the high probability that it will hitch its wagon to some other absurd nonsense gurgling up from the fetid sewers of mainstream pop culture - something essentially and irrelevant to core White interests that the Quota Queens will nevertheless insist is "part of the fight against Globalism."

I can again repeat my prediction about the revealing of moles and infiltrators.

While one can always expect some prominent person to drop out of Der Movement, the Burdi case suggests we can expect the opposite as well - previous drop-outs and apostates trying to get back in. Whether these "returns" are genuine or are people who have been "turned" and are trying to infiltrate may differ on a case-by-case basis. One thing that is difficult to discern is whether dropouts and returns are more likely during a period of apparent "movement" popularity (like the Alt Right stupidity) or during a period of apparent decline (I use the word "apparent" because I see continuous real decline in both periods, not to say there was much of a level to decline from in the first place).

Just like I predicted that the Alt Right would end up as a disaster, I now do the same for America First and the Amnats. With all of my differences with Pierce - and believe me they are many - it is clear that Der Movement never recovered from his death. The current crop of "leaders" are not fit to have cleaned Hadley's litterbox.

Social Disruption, Social Change

Opportunities and failures.

See this. The topic of that essay can considered in two ways, re: pro-White activism.  First, we can consider how racial nationalist dissident politics can contribute to and/or take advantage of societal disruption to lead to revolutionary change in society favoring White nationalism.  Second, we can consider how anti-Der Movement forces within racial nationalist dissident politics can contribute to and/or take advantage of intra-“movement’” “societal disruption" to lead to revolutionary change within White nationalism itself.

The core characteristics of the kind of disruption I’m describing, as we’ll see in the historical episodes that follow, are that it: 1) stems from a loss of faith in a society’s central institutions…

It is quite clear that there is an increasing loss of faith in the System’s “central institutions.” Indeed, this David Potter essay is warning about precisely that, from a mainstream leftist perspective. From a rightist perspective, Der Movement often takes a triumphalist tone about the decay in the System’s institutions and decreased public trust in those institutions. Indeed, there is, across the political spectrum, much talk about this, much discussion about a sense of malaise in “Western liberal democracy.” However, one wonders how much of this talk is cynical play-acting, a need to look “tough, realistic, and pragmatic” and not “naïve,” and how much of it actually is genuine skepticism about the System. There is no doubt some genuine uneasiness in the mainstream, and no doubt that Der Movement always preaches about an “imminent collapse” (we’ve been hearing about that for the last 50-60 years), but one wonders what the top elites really believe. The masses tend to always be dissatisfied, but will almost always never act on their own. Hence, elite opinion and dissident leadership are typically crucial in determining the outcome of these processes.

What about the internal situation within the “movement?”  Obviously, the Sallis Groupuscule and those will similar views exhibit a loss of faith in the “movement’s “central institutions.” Some others on the Far Right are critical as well, although these tend to have different reasons for their dissatisfaction and suggest different solutions. “Movement” leadership for the most part – if out of self-interest if for no other reason – takes a more positive view of the situation within Der Movement, and “double down” on their support for Der Movement’s “central institutions,” even if they criticize certain actions of their competitors. The attitude of the “movement” rank-and-file mirrors that of the masses in the general society – some grumbling and dissatisfaction, but also much conformist inertia, and a willingness to support their chosen leader. They have not yet lost faith, although, objectively, after decades of endless failures and humiliations, they should have already done so.

…2) establishes a set of ideas from what was once the fringe of the intellectual world, placing them at the centre of a revamped political order…

Der Movement believes that this is happening; they look at Trumpian right-wing populism and the occasional comment by Tucker Carlson about race replacement, and they believe that “the Overton window” is moving in their direction and that their beliefs are becoming the center of a “revamped political order.”  As chronicled at my blog, this belief is an unfounded delusion. Der Movement has failed to significantly move their ideas from the (lunatic) fringe to the mainstream because the ideas themselves are flawed and "movement" leadership is inept.  True enough, we dissidents within pro-White activism have also so far failed to move our ideas into the center of the “movement” – but unlike "movement" leaders we haven’t had decades of time nor millions of dollars to work with.  

…and 3) involves a coherent leadership group committed to the change. 

Besides “movement” leadership being inept, it is not very coherent either, and that’s even when only considering the American situation (international leadership is completely fragmented). The various leaders often feud and have competing strategies and tactics. Similarly, those within the “movement” who are dissatisfied also do not constitute any sort of “coherent leadership group,” as they cannot even agree on what about the “movement” they find objectionable, why these problems exist, and what to do about them. So, while these people are (allegedly) “committed to...change” they are not in any way organized as a “coherent leadership group” that can effect the desired change.

These disruptions are apparent in, but not synonymous with, some of the events commonly called revolutions. Disruptions don’t always change who is in charge – they are, in fact, sometimes necessary to preserve a government that is on the verge of failure. But they will at the very least change the way that a governing group thinks and acts.

OK, that is straightforward.

…when a political system is undermined by events such as economic failure, defeat in war or environmental catastrophe, that political system is going to have to change or fail. Success or failure depends on the choices that leaders make, and the ability to give people a fresh set of ideas that will help them see a new way forward.

Der Movement has leaders that make terrible choices, demonstrate bad judgment, and, as stated above, provide bad ideas that do not provide “a new way forward.” The internal dissidents have also not succeeded; whether or not “movement” failures have risen to the level to assure a high probability of success for dissidents such as the Sallis Groupuscule is unclear. There have been a number of “movement” catastrophes, but its members continue to support failed leaders and failed ideas.

The outcome of a disruption is often completely unexpected to contemporaries, and that is precisely because ideas from outside the mainstream were used to shape the solutions to the problems of the time. 

Does that mean that the dissidents vs. the System and the dissidents vs. Der Movement cannot predict what will occur, which also means that their desired outcomes – that they would seem to expect – will not occur?  Or is it too early to tell?  Or, to look at it from the opposite, dominant perspective, is it that the System does not expect the victory of pro-White activism and that the Quota Queens do not expect “movement” dissidents to succeed?  It all depends who are the “contemporaries” who cannot understand what the “outside the mainstream” ideas are that will eventually succeed.  Note that, in both cases, the current leaders hate and oppose the dissidents and that may blind them to the possibilities of dissident success.  The System hates and opposes pro-White activism and the Quota Queens hate and oppose dissidents such as myself.  These attitudes may bias and prevent them from recognizing the possible outcomes.

We can’t know in advance exactly how a disruption will end. What history can teach us is what the circumstances are that lead to a disruption. It can make us realise what we might be facing as a result of the situation we are in today.

It would seem that the System is well advanced to a disruption, but perhaps not as advanced as the “collapse is imminent” “movement” hopes for. Apparently, disruption within the “movement” itself has not yet reached the level where revolutionary change against the Quota Queens and their ideology can be successful.

When we look at one of the first major disruptions, one that is still influencing the world in which we live – the Roman emperor Constantine’s conversion to Christianity in the 4th century CE – we have a case where change had been in the air for a while. In the half-century before Constantine staged the coup that set him on the path to unifying the Roman Empire under his own control, the empire had suffered through plague, massive inflation and a series of military disasters, but the tendency of leadership had been simply to try to make old systems work better.

I won’t directly comment here about Christianity and whether it was good or bad for Rome, but I will say that this example is currently not too relevant as the dominant entities are not ready or willing to compromise with the belief system of the dissidents, even if they believe such would strengthen their position.  Eventually they may get desperate enough to try.

Constantine sent a completely different message when his regime imported concepts from a fringe movement, Christianity, to support its own legitimacy. In doing so, Constantine made use of a small number of Christian advisers, who shaped a new relationship between the Church and Roman society, and joined the closely knit group upon which he depended to run the empire.

Der Movement may believe they could have such influence, but the Alt Right/Trump fiasco underscores how much of that is delusion. And it is unlikely that Der Movement will “import concepts” from the dissidents to its orthodoxy in the near future. Of course, that may all change in time.

This early example exhibits the key characteristics of a disruption: a loss of faith in central institutions (the imperial system of government), the establishment of previously fringe ideas (those of Christianity) at the centre of the political order, and a cohesive, committed leadership group that initiated the change. In elevating Christianity’s role in the empire, Constantine altered patterns of thought, replacing old ideas about imperial authority with a fresh, obviously different model of authority that told people they were moving in a new direction.

That all does not currently exist in either the System-Der Movement situation nor in the Der Movement-dissidents to the “movement” situation.  

I discuss Suvorov’s Law below, in regard to the topic of Potter’s essay; what I can say now is that the Christian Rome scenario illustrates this law. Constantine compromised with Christianity in the thought it would strengthen Rome.  In reality, the church became dominant, to the point that the emperor Theodosius groveled to the bishop Ambrose when the latter excommunicated the former. Just like the humiliation at Canossa much later. Weakening repression, making compromises to the point of embracing aspects of the other side, is what eventually leads to revolutionary change and the victory of that other side.

One thing that helped…in spreading previously marginal ideas was that they could effectively control the available media for mass communication…

Der Movement lacks access to mass communication apart from limited use of the Internet; likewise for intra-“movement” dissidents.  The “word” is not effectively getting out.

…a sign that one of the crucial aspects of a successful disruption is that it creates space in which people can discuss new ideas.

Sure. But the ideas need to be sound and need to be propagated by effective activists.

…Louis could have survived if he had allowed that becoming a constitutional rather than absolute monarch was a reasonable option. But he didn’t. He conspired with other monarchs to overthrow the reform movement in France, thereby undermining centrists who would have allowed him to retain his throne. In so doing, he opened the door to Maximilien Robespierre and other radicals with bold ideas, who claimed that moderation was undermining the revolution – that it could succeed only if traitors were removed and a new state, founded upon the promotion of virtue, replaced the dysfunctional civic constitutions favoured by moderates.

Currently, the System won’t compromise to Der Movement and Der Movement won’t compromise to its dissidents.  This may change in the future if these dominant entities become desperate enough due to  "societal disruption." But I disagree with Potter here; given Suvorov’s Law, Louis’ fate may have been sealed with the first compromise…the Estates General led inexorably to the Terror. Moderation weakens the dam holding back extremism.

The French example stands as a disruption that succeeded in destroying previous institutions without succeeding in building a lasting alternative. It underscores the importance of having political leadership with a clear vision at the moment an existing system of government is overthrown.

Der Movement has utterly failed in this regard.

Lenin’s successor, Joseph Stalin, destroyed the New Economic Policy with his programme of forced collectivisation. His homicidal regime ensured that the Soviet Union could never offer a viable alternative to Western capitalism.

So, what? Lenin would have succeeded?  Why not describe that potential success as “lies” as right-wing beliefs are so described by Potter below?

Another profoundly violent 20th-century disruption, the rise of Nazism, had roots in a theory that implied that nations must inevitably be in competition. Just as within each nation there was an ongoing contest for survival, and government should be geared towards supporting ‘winners’ over ‘losers’ in this struggle, so too there could only be ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in foreign affairs. 

That seems to be more or less correct, and in accordance with the historical record, but it not always nations in conflict but could be religions, or, races and civilizations.

This view, promulgated by Herbert Spencer, became known as social Darwinism, and it was supported by the pseudoscience of eugenics…

It is not a pseudoscience. One may agree or disagree with eugenics, but it is based on the selection of heritable traits.  One could argue that the development of, say, dog breeds, was a result of “canine eugenics” to select traits of use or other interest to humans. The same could apply to human development.  Whether that would be good or bad is another question, but it is not a “pseudoscience.”  That’s the moralistic fallacy.

…developed by Spencer’s contemporary Francis Galton. Although he was English, Spencer’s theories gained greater currency in the US, where Galton’s eugenic theories were taken up to support restrictive immigration policies and the state-sponsored sterilisation of prisoners on the grounds of ‘mental deficiency’. One person who found such laws appealing was Adolf Hitler.

So?  It’s ad hominem to attack ideas by stating that someone designated as “bad” found those ideas appealing.

Hitler’s political success stemmed in large part from the fact that his assertions about Germany’s path – that it could have won the First World War, that it had been stabbed in the back, and that its problems could be solved by undoing the treaty that had ended the war – were familiar to the electorate from other sources. These positions were lies…

The “stab in the back” apparently was not true.  But who is to say that it was impossible for Germany to have won WWI?  Or that reversing the Treaty of Versailles would be helpful to Germany?  Why were that all “lies?”

…but the lies were popular. Hitler’s extreme version of racist social Darwinism was initially on the fringe of German thought but, linked to his anticommunism, it was tolerated outside Nazi circles.

So?

Yet an anticommunist message backed by lies…

Labelling all of Hitler’s beliefs as “lies” is simplistic thinking bordering on childish.

…would not be sufficient to explain Hitler’s rise to power. Echoing previous disruptions, this required the disintegration of faith in government.

So?  This seems obvious.

The value of history is that it enables us to detect patterns of behaviour in the present that have had serious consequences in the past.

Like oppressing majority populations?

Today, there are signs that the US and European liberal democratic systems are under threat. The most obvious of these is a loss of trust in public institutions.

See above. This perception is present throughout the political spectrum and thus reflects some degree of reality.

Factors such as the willingness of Western governments to allow widespread impoverishment, the weakening of labour organisations, and the failure to provide adequate healthcare and other necessities, feed into powerful movements seeking to undercut the mainstream political system.

What an oblivious, self-unaware jackass David Potter is.  He’s focusing only on those issues that he, and his leftist associates, find distressing.  The rise of right-wing populism, which is the danger that Potter is really agonizing about, derives from completely different sets of dissatisfactions. If Potter represents the degree of analysis by the System, then maybe that System really is doomed.

So too we see ideas from the intellectual fringe informing these increasingly powerful political movements. Some of these movements use social Darwinist ideas to claim, for instance, that public welfare is undercut by immigration. 

Err, that diversity damages social cohesion has been shown by academics on both the Left (e.g., Putnam) and the Right (e.g., Salter). It has nothing to do with “social Darwinism” you insufferable pompous jackass.

In Europe, the normalisation of nationalist groups such as the one supporting Éric Zemmour’s bid for the French presidency, or Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz Party in Hungary, is threatening established political norms. 

Ah yes, the crazy idea that demographic majorities (particularly indigenous ones!) have the right to resist dispossession is what is threatening established political norms. Well, if true, then those established political norms” deserve to be threatened.

In the United Kingdom, some advocates of Brexit have translated traditional English exceptionalism into a form of hypernationalism in terms that, like those of the former US president Donald Trump’s supporters, echo social Darwinist doctrines. 

Huh?  Brexit has essentially replaced Polish plumbers with more Paki and Negro immigrants, so I’m not sure what kind of “hypernationalism” exists in a country in which indigenous British are jailed for mean tweets about Colored invaders.

The prevalence of belief in lies, such as the lie…

Lie?

…that Trump won the 2020 election, is evocative of the universe of false assumptions that spread in Germany during Hitler’s rise to power. 

What false assumptions?

To combat the fissures that election lies…

Lies?

…immigration fantasies…

Fantasies? I suppose demographic change is a “fantasy” except when the Left wants to celebrate it and/or use the resultant “diversity” as an excuse to pass more Orwellian laws to suppress majority rights.

…or antivaccination movements…

I oppose such movements, but the lack of faith in the System over other issues (e.g., immigration) helps empower that nonsense.

…represent, Western governments should recognise that the prevalence of fringe thinking is a sign that they are failing.

True.

The path to restoring faith – which could lead through the sort of disruption that has preserved societies in the past – will offer real help to those who have been left behind. 

Yes, except when those “left behind” are White majority members “left behind” because of mass immigration and multiculturalism – then we should label that as “lies” and instead “restore faith” by focusing on relatively irrelevant issues that are NOT the prime concern leading to the loss of faith, right, Potter, you mendacious hypocrite?  Again, Potter fails miserably. He is so blinded by his political biases that his analysis is worthless.

On the other hand, a sane and effective Far Right could restore faith by replacing the failed System with something different. Within dissident rightist politics, particularly in America, those left behind – sane and rational people, White ethnics, STEM people, pan-Europeanists, Futurists, etc. – could find new faith in a New Movement, and the Sallis Groupuscle exists to help find the way to that New Movement. In order to solve a problem, one has to properly identify that problem, and have the will and ability to do it.  Potter cannot even identify the real problems.  We must do better.

The underlying principle of liberal democracy is the contract between government and the governed. 

Does “the governed” include White people?

Government has a responsibility to reign in corporate power that undermines public welfare and spreads falsehood, just as it has a responsibility to ensure that people have access to the goods and services they need. 

Government also has a responsibility to safeguard ethnic genetic (and other) interests, particularly for majority members.  What does Potter have to say about that?

This will require practices very different from ‘politics as normal’. It is a critical lesson from history that, when normality fails, change will come.

Yes, my dear Potter, but one must identify WHY “normality fails.” You, so blinded by your prejudices, so immersed in your leftist milieu, are unable to do so.

The signs are that we’re in a time that is ripe for disruption. But what sort will it be?

The signs demonstrate that there are unprecedented opportunities for Der Movement, which makes its unending manifest failures even more stark and pathetic. What about changes within White racial nationalism?  The same may apply eventually, but Der Movement and its followers are so used to failure, that it would take something radically catastrophic to open up the possibility of change. In both cases, the dissident forces need to develop ideas that can step in to replace those that others have lost faith it, need effective coherent leadership, and need to exacerbate disruption to open niche space for the new ideas and leaders. Given Suvorov’s Law, making the dominant entities believe that they can survive through moderation and compromise will be helpful in eventually overthrowing those entities. Given the current hostility of the dominant entities for the dissidents, the dominant entities will need to get more desperate before they are willing to take the chance. Dissidents can promote that desperation by causing as much societal disruption as possible while maintaining themselves as a viable ideological alternative.  Eventually, the temptation to try and save themselves by importing aspects of that alternative may prove too much for the dominant entities to resist. Then - contra Potter - that will destroy them.

Later essays here will explore how a dissident Far Right Groupuscule can form a nucleus to effectively take on Der Movement.

Russia, Ukraine, and America

Some thoughts.

I am going to consider this situation in its broadest terms, without getting sidelined with petty details.

Both America and Russia are to blame for the degeneration of relations over the past 20-25 years, and the lost opportunity to forge a real, positive, friendly working relationship between the two nations, a lost opportunity that is a world historical tragedy. We must admit that America is more to blame for this than is Russia. America made promises to the end-stage USSR and to Russia, understandings both direct and indirect, and Russia was betrayed by American mendacity. NATO was not to be expanded eastward. There was the understanding that NATO would no longer be defined as an anti-Russian alliance, that America would not exploit Russia’s post-USSR weakness, that Russia would be a genuine partner and would not be economically pillaged. There was also the understanding that America would not interfere with the internal politics of Russia or in Russia’s sphere of influence. All of these promises and understandings were broken and betrayed. Russia has legitimate grievances with respect to this. America also made promises to Ukraine, to guarantee Ukrainian territorial sovereignty and integrity in exchange for them giving up the nuclear weapons on their territory (a big mistake on Ukraine's part and a lesson to other nations with respect to these weapons).

Russia is not guiltless, however. Just as there have been elements in the American Establishment wanting to rekindle the Cold War, similar elements exist in Russia as well. There are those in Russia who lament the break-up of the USSR and wish to reverse this to the extent possible.  Russia must be willfully ignorant if they fail to realize that the anti-Russian hostility in America comes from the Jewish power structure (both Neocon Jewboys and the Jewish Left) who have an undying ethnic animus against Russians (and against Ukrainians and against Slavs in general), coupled to their junior partners of the Anglo-American elites. The American people themselves are not anti-Russian. Trump, I believe, genuinely desired better relations with Russia, but to the extent Russia interfered with the 2016 election, and gave ammunition to anti-Russian forces in America, they sabotaged that possibility (one wonders if anti-American elements in Russia did that intentionally). Russian antics in targeting dissidents and defectors in the UK and their activities vs. Ukraine obviously do not inspire confidence abroad.

Russia has legitimate interests in keeping Ukraine out of NATO.  Ukraine, with good reasons to fear Russia, has equally legitimate reasons to want to be in NATO (although I’m skeptical how much support Ukraine would get even then). How these seemingly intractable set of interests could be resolved is something beyond the scope of this essay, but if Salterian governments were in charge of both nations, it could be worked out. In the current circumstances, a reasonable accommodation that meets the interests of both parties does not seem likely.  Ukraine’s unfortunate history in the 20th century, which informs in part its attitude toward Russia, is in large part due to Jewish crimes, just as Russia’s equally unfortunate history is. The Ukrainians seem as willfully ignorant, or even more so, about this than are the Russians, even to the point of electing Jews to rule over them. On the other hand, one can argue that both peoples know the score, but are just being pragmatic, given the realities of Jewish power and the need to try to leverage that power in their national interests. If so, they still don’t have a real understanding, as, in the end, Jews care only about themselves and hate both Russians and Ukrainians, and so no good will ultimately come from Slavs kowtowing to Jews.

Christmas 2021

Christmas.

Merry Christmas!  Enjoy the warm and loving family relations!

Other news:

A fundamental difference between the Quota Queens and I is that they are willing to tolerate and even support/enable lies, wild conspiracy theories, irrational ideas, bizarre behavior, etc. in order to promote a "big tent" wide layer of paper-thin superficial support and influence (with an eye on D'Nations, of course), while I refuse to accept lies and irrational stupidity, and am willing to forego short-term inflated growth in favor of long-term stability and solid but slow growth. Their high time preference approach creates a "mile wide, inch deep" support that is like a house of cards ready to collapse, or an overinflated balloon ready to pop. In contrast, I support "inch wide, mile deep" rational, fact-based, scientific, and ideologically committed support that can grow, albeit slowly, organically and provide a strong foundation for whatever comes in the future.

Counter-Currents once again unburdens itself, re: White ethnics:

James J. O'MearaDecember 23, 2021 at 10:18 am

” ‪#JoeManchin and his whole family are a criminal enterprise.”

What a weird phrase. And why bring his family into it? Is she channeling Sen. Geary from The Godfather II? ” I despise your masquerade, the dishonest way you pose yourself. You and your whole fucking family. ”

It’s ironic, since Geary, though admittedly a corrupt hypocrite, is bluntly making the case for keeping out those dirty Ellis Island criminal types; read the right way, the whole movie makes that case, from Vito’s arrival onward. Based!"

White ethnic readers of EGI Notes - remember that Der Movement despises you and has contempt for you. What you should do every time you come across an example of this from Counter-Currents, American Renaissance, or anywhere else in Der Movement, is to please spread it far and wide across the Internet, and make as many White ethnics as possible aware of it as possible. Make Der Movement be fully accountable for its attitude.

Most ancestry testing companies have “Ashkenazi Jewish” as a category and as a reference population (typically very well represented), so a Jew can get a result of close to, or at, “100% Ashkenazi Jewish “(and according to 23andMe, that would be close to, or at, “100% European!”).  However, we know from population genetics that Ashkenazi Jews are a mix of Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Eastern European (with possibly a bit of Germanic mixed in as well). This is a perfect example of the problems with supervised admixture analysis and the retards who take the results at face value without understanding how it works. If Ashkenazi Jewish is a (well represented) reference population, a Jew can be “100% Ashkenazi Jewish” (“100% European”) on the test. What if the reference populations were restricted to, say, Palestinians, Italians, and Russians? Then that same Jew may be, say, 45% Palestinian, 40% Italian, and 15% Russian. And that latter result could change significantly based on how well represented each of those parental populations are as references and/or what other populations are included. The results are completely dependent on how the test is done and how the categories are labeled. Remember that the next time breathless “movement” retardates discuss test results online without considering context. 

Bring on the Meds!

Let us consider together.

I first want to thank one of my Gab correspondents, a friend of this blog, for bringing this matter to my attention (and providing a transcript of Johnson's comments). Before I proceed, I need to note that I am using the term “Med” as a shorthand for “Southern European” (similar to the way I use “White” as a shorthand for “of indigenous European ancestry"); I have a long record of opposing the term “Mediterranean” in a racial sense, since Nordicists and other fetishists (as well as “Med” fools like Sergi) postulate a trans-continental “Mediterranean race” consisting of people ranging from Portugal to Bangladesh. My old essay The Mediterranean Myth (that I do not have a copy of anymore) outlined my opinions on that. Having that out of the way, let’s get to the main point.

Let’s consider Johnson’s comments here, at approximately one hour thirty minutes.

Jews are a people of passionate neuroticism. They are high intensity people. You just can't have them in a society with laid back Aryan types, especially the more Nordic and uh you know I think Jews have met their match with other people around the Mediterranean right uh you know the gesticulating Mediterranean in your face types they could pretty much argue Jews to a standstill uh its the Nordics who want to avoid unpleasantness and don’t want to talk about these things they are the ones who are just not psychologically capable of allowing these people in their societies because of the difference in psychological intensity means that these people are just going to constantly push they’re pushing and pushing and pushing their way into positions of power until they have the ability to completely debauche and destroy society and guess what we are already there. They have the keys were in the back seat... and they don’t have any breaks they don’t know how to put on the breaks, right.

Note: “...the gesticulating Mediterranean in your face types...” Really, Johnson, you elitist effeminate jackass - do we need any more evidence of your contempt for White ethnics?

So, anyway, Johnson believes that Meds may be better than Nords in resisting Jews and, thus, by implication, better in making certain pro-White arguments. That is consistent with my repeated refrain that if the HBD Nordicists really believe all they state about intra-European differences in individualism vs. collectivism, “high trust” altruism vs. ethnocentrism, Hajnal lines, etc. then they should promote recruiting White ethnics and having more of the ethnocentric Outer Hajnal Whites of Southern and Eastern European descent in prominent positions, including leadership, in pro-White activism. The same applies in a more general sense for the entire “movement” as compared to just the HBD Nordicist faction. If elements of the “movement” believe that White ethnics like Meds can be valuable, then why not make a good faith effort to recruit and retain these people?

The trouble is the “movement” does everything possible to alienate and reject (gesticulating, in your face) Meds; in fact, it almost seems that the major thrust of the “movement” is anti-Med rather than anti-Black, anti-Jew, anti-Colored etc. Indeed, comments like “...the gesticulating Mediterranean in your face types...” seem designed to alienate and disgust "Med" White ethnics. The “movement” practices a rigid form of ethnic affirmative action in which Northern Europeans, particularly Celto-Germanic Northwest Europeans (e.g., British, Germans, Scandinavians; in America, “WASPs” most of all), are elevated to leadership independent of merit while the ethnics are held back. That’s exactly the opposite of what you’d expect from a consistent application of HBD Nordicist ideas – why have leadership solely consisting of the least ethnocentric, most trusting, and most pathologically altruist "not psychologically capable" groups while shutting out racially aware ethnocentric White ethnics? 

Now, the Quota Queens may claim (whether we believe them is another issue) that they are genuinely not anti-Med and they really want all Whites in their “movement.”  If so, let us consider this comment I left at Gab:

If we assume that some of the Quota Queens sincerely believe that they are not anti-Med, then they are delusional. They simply do not seem to understand that their toxic brew of Nordicism, HBD Nordicism, ethnic fetishism, Anglocentrism, Germanocentrism, Sallis’ Law, Humphrey hagiography, HBD race realism, etc. alienates Meds. The problem is that even if they do not politically align with Nordicism, they have internalized its belief and memes. Since they believe (even if unconsciously) that Meds are inferior, they don’t, or can’t, grasp that Meds don’t see themselves as inferior and therefore will reject Der Movement for reasons that the Quota Queens don’t see. The Quota Queens, whether they admit it or not, see Meds as second-class, subaltern, borderline Whites (if White at all) and therefore do not understand why Meds react negatively to that “truth.”

If that is all so difficult to understand on their own, and they really want to recruit and retain Meds and other White ethnics, then why don’t they just ask those people what the problem is?  But, alas, I’ve been banging this drum for all of the time I’ve been an activist – both analog and digital – and you can see all the good it has done. I’m a “paranoid piece of crap” suffering from “insanity” don’t you know – which proves that the Quota Queens are not sincere in whatever statements they make about wanting Meds and other ethnics.

In summary, to the extent that Johnson believes what he said in that livestream, then his body of activity, and that of his fellow Quota Queens, has the net effect of alienating those that he believes would be of benefit to the pro-White cause, while resulting in a situation in which pro-White leadership consists solely of those least resistant to, and least capable of resisting, Jewish memetic influence. Good work!

Now, if there are people who genuinely and sincerely want to recruit and retain Meds and other White ethnics one place they can begin is to actually listen to long-time pro-White activists who belong to such groups and who have been discussing these issues for many years.  Otherwise, people are just guessing, or making assumptions, about what the problems are in their recruitment and retaining strategies. A riposte would be that the opinions of a few activists are anecdotal and non-quantitative, but in the absence of quantitative data (e.g., surveys), you need to use whatever is available.  And if what is available are the opinions of people like myself, then that is what you can and should use.  At least you’ll get some ideas to consider and to test.

A Huge Tolerance for Unreality

Indeed. Excerpts, emphasis added.

SPLC material: Laugh at this. I usually don’t link to scum like the SPLC, but this is just too good to pass up.

Hatewatch identified and compiled over 600 cryptocurrency addresses associated with white supremacists and other prominent far-right extremists for this essay and then probed their transaction histories through blockchain analysis software. 

These people have every right to earn money and to use cryptocurrency if such is necessary in today’s climate of ideological intolerance that filth like the SPLC promote. My own objections to these activities are summarized at the end of this post.

What we found is striking: White supremacists such as Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents, race pseudoscience pundit Stefan Molyneux, Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer and Andrew Anglin of the Daily Stormer, and Don Black of the racist forum Stormfront, all bought into Bitcoin early in its history and turned a substantial profit from it. The estimated tens of millions of dollars’ worth of value…

Then they cry poverty and engage in continuous fundraising.  How about earning this largesse through productive activism instead?

…extreme far-right figures generated represents a sum that would almost certainly be unavailable to them without cryptocurrency, and it gave them a chance to live comfortable lives while promoting hate and authoritarianism.

That’s a good thing if – and only if – they were actually earning the money through work that advances the cause, which unfortunately is not the case.

Extremist Early Adopters of Bitcoin

Less than a quarter of Americans presently own some form of cryptocurrency as of May 2021. But those numbers increase substantially within fringe right-wing spaces, according to Hatewatch’s findings, approaching something much closer to universal adoption. 

That demonstrates how limited “Hatewatch’s” understanding of the “fringe right-wing space” is, said ignorance being a good thing.

Hatewatch struggled to find any prominent player in the global far right who hasn’t yet embraced cryptocurrency to at least some degree. 

By “prominent player” do they specifically mean a High Trust Quota Queen grifter?  

The average age of a cryptocurrency investor is 38, but even senior citizens in the white supremacist movement, such as Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, 69, and Peter Brimelow of VDARE, 73, have moved tens of thousands of dollars of the asset in recent years.

How come I’m not surprised by that?  Cue “Gregory Hood” crying “movement” poverty.

Cryptocurrency, or a group of digital moneys maintained through decentralized systems, has grown into a billion-dollar industry. A growing swath of Americans embrace the technology. Nothing is inherently criminal or extreme about it, and most of its users have no connections to the extreme far right. 

Excuse me, you filthy scum, there’s nothing “inherently criminal or extreme” in holding opinions that the SPLC disagrees with.

…‘Who are these people?’ there’s evidence that a lot of them are not the people you would want to support.

Obviously they do have support, moron. Where do they get their money from?

‘A huge tolerance for unreality’

Johnson of Counter-Currents, an influential figure in the white nationalist movement due to his outspoken support for the creation of an “ethnostate” serving only white, non-Jewish people, first picked up Bitcoin on Jan. 19, 2012, Hatewatch found, making him the first known figure in the movement to invest.

Of course. If it has to do with earning money, one can expect Gaslighting Greg to be at the forefront.

Johnson obtained the 29.82 Bitcoin on a date when prices for the asset sat between five and 10 dollars. Hatewatch found that Johnson flipped the Bitcoin from that first transaction and additional ones into over $800,000 worth of value. 

But, hey, all you guys living in your parents’ basement, you send in your few shekels to Counter-Currents, so you can live in The Golden Age today!  And make sure to do “estate planning” to leave whatever little you have to Greggy, rather than to your own family.

He has turned his website Counter-Currents into a hub for cryptocurrency discussion in the movement and solicits donations in digital tokens, or cryptocurrency “coins,” such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Monero, Bitcoin Cash, Tether, Cardano, Ripple, Dash, Neo, Stellar Lumens and Basic Attention Token. Hatewatch reached out to him for a comment on this essay, but he did not respond.

He’s too busy fundraising.

“If any of you haters out there have any Bitcoin and you just want to get rid of it, send it to Counter-Currents, we have a Bitcoin address,” Johnson said on a Jan. 5 edition of his livestream, referring to those who perceive cryptocurrency as lacking in real world value. “I’ll hold it, I’ll stack it, I’ll keep it...

Indeed.

…I have a huge tolerance for unreality.”

Well, I see that Johnson and I can agree on that at least.

Johnson often platforms on his site an antisemitic white nationalist personality who goes by the pseudonym Karl Thorburn. As Thorburn, the author advises people in the movement to purchase and hold Bitcoin as an investment. 

Hold it?  No, no, a thousand times no!  You must donate it to Johnson.

Matt Gebert, a State Department official Hatewatch identified as a white nationalist organizer in 2019 (the government suspended him after we published the story), also has contributed material to Johnson’s Counter-Currents.

Counter-Currents is fighting the System! If you have any doubts, donate to their tax exempt 501c3 foundation.

“Bitcoin started in right-wing libertarianism,” Gerard said in an email. “This is not at all the same as being a neo-Nazi subculture. 

You’re behind the times, Gerard. With WN 3.0, what’s the difference?

‘At the expense of the parasites’

Molyneux, a self-described moral philosopher who started his career as a libertarian pundit, denies being a white supremacist despite repeatedly and falsely claiming that non-white people are predisposed to be of lower intelligence. 

That’s not “false” – at least with respect to Negroes and many Hispanic types. The evidence is overwhelming.

Molyneux generated million-dollar profits in less than a decade through his donations, flipping $1.67 million worth of value into at least $3.28 million. 

Cry poverty!

In February 2021, he described the value of cryptocurrency using tropes commonly associated with antisemitism.

“Bitcoin is a currency that serves the people at the expense of the parasites, rather than the currency which serves the parasites at the expense of the people”…

I suppose that by “parasites” he is not including “movement” “leaders.”  Why not?

‘The dollar is going to collapse’

Neo-Nazis promote propaganda claiming that Jewish people control the banking industry for the purpose of deliberately harming or undermining the ambitions of non-Jewish white men. 

That’s objectively true, isn’t it?

They also often openly cheer for the destruction of the U.S. as we know it – portraying the collapse of the government and financial system as an inevitability. 

Well, maybe eventually, who knows?  But Der Movement has been preaching “the System is about to collapse; it is imminent” for the past 50 years.

Daily Stormer editor Andrew Anglin, who in recent posts to his site advocated for the legalization of gang rape and called the COVID-19 pandemic a hoax…

Greg Johnson’s “WN 3.0.”

“We know as an absolute matter of fact that the dollar is going to collapse, and presumably every other fiat currency on the planet is going to get dragged down with it. Maybe property or metals are better than crypto. 

Here is a basic economic truth – the value of something is only what someone else is willing to pay for it or exchange for it, and, of course, the inherent value of that something to its owner.  You can’t eat gold. Gold has no intrinsic value (well, it does have some practical uses, but those uses are not the reason for gold's value) other than it is considered desirable; but in a Mad Max scenario, it will be as worthless as “fiat currency” unless it somehow is accepted as a medium of exchange – and there is no guarantee that it will. Property at least can be lived in. And only an idiot will say that a prediction of a sociopolitical/economic event is a "absolute matter of fact." How many times have we heard something like that about things that still have not occurred decades later?

The Associated Press and PBS Frontline collaborated on a report in September showing that Anglin supporters have sent him at least $4.8 million in Bitcoin, based upon data pulled from Chainalysis, a cryptocurrency analytics firm. 

Can he pay off legal judgments then?

The criminal underworld has reportedly employed Monero at a growing rate. The Financial Times noted in June that Monero has become “an increasingly sought-after-tool for criminals such as ransomware gangs.” In August, when comedian John Oliver ran a segment on his show depicting Monero’s advertising as subtly winking at criminals, an outreach organizer for the token defended their technology on grounds that it fights back against “a society of ever-growing mass surveillance.” Monero has elsewhere argued that it enables commerce and does not promote secrecy, or crime, any more than cash.

The SPLC, in a not-so-subtle fashion, tries to equate ideological opponents to “the criminal underworld.” They’re absolutely despicable. Want to see folks worse than the Quota Queens?  Try the SPLC.

Fuentes has not received or spent any Bitcoin at that address since Dec. 16, 2020, when he withdrew all 13.73371697 Bitcoin in his account, worth $266,392.40. 

Cry poverty!

‘A place that doesn’t hate us’

In the aftermath of the violence on Jan. 6, a gaming video livestreaming site called DLive banned Fuentes. Their decision further isolated the 23-year-old extremist, who had up to that date used nightly live video appearances on the site to influence crowds of young men to attend Stop the Steal rallies. People donated to white supremacists and neofascist livestreamers in substantial amounts on DLive, as Hatewatch has previously reported. The company permanently removed a number of extremists beyond Fuentes after Hatewatch reported on them, including the antisemitic performer Owen Benjamin and Jan. 6 participant Tim “Baked Alaska” Gionet.

Freaks aplenty.

‘The music will eventually stop’

When the Australian bank Westpac cut ties with Hitlerite, anti-Muslim extremist Blair Cottrell, his supporters, and many libertarians who may feel ambivalent about his hateful beliefs and simply love cryptocurrency, hyped his situation as an ideal reason for Bitcoin’s existence. These advocates suggested that if banks agree to cut ties with far-right extremists, those who are affected should respond by converting their fiat money (money issued by a government) entirely into cryptocurrency. This way of seeing the world, layered with dreams of big payoffs in passive income and understandable fears of government intrusion, has taken hold on the far-right fringe. But converting your money entirely into cryptocurrency carries undeniable risks.

So, on the one hand, scum like the SPLC support banking deplatforming of “far-right extremists,” and then, on the other hand, they crow about how unstable the alternatives are.  What low-life filth the SPLC scum are.

“Regulators want to crack down on fraud,” financial analyst Jacob King told Hatewatch of the cryptocurrency space. “While this is great news in the long run, it will have a disastrous impact on the price of Bitcoin and many altcoins as they are dependent on price manipulators like Tether and Binance.

Just the sort of unstable esoteric nuttiness that is grist for the mill for Quota Queen incompetents.

The feds are also allegedly probing Binance, cryptocurrency’s most trafficked exchange, in an investigation led by government officials who investigate money laundering and tax evasion…

Euphemisms for politically motivated harassment.

“Neo-Nazis have mainly used cryptocurrencies to escape the traditional financial system,” King added. “While that may have worked for the last few years, we’re seeing a huge pushback from regulators. The crypto markets are like a giant game of musical chairs. The music will eventually stop, and millions will be subjected to major losses as the prices tank back to their true values.”

That’s OK. The Quota Queens will use that as an excuse for more rounds of shameless tin cup rattling fundraising.

In addition to concerns about crashes, investors sometimes lose access to their cryptocurrency due to missing passwords or other blunders, rendering millions of dollars of value useless. 

Der Movement and “blunders” go together like peanut butter and jelly.

‘More valuable than gold’ or ‘close to nothing’

The “true values” of cryptocurrencies, as King put it, depends on who you are asking, and opinions vary in the extreme. What happens to digital currencies from here is likely to have a profound impact on the far right due to the degree to which extremists have adopted the technology relative to the population as a whole.

Given the established record of continuous failure for the Quota Queens, one can surmise that an inevitable disaster is waiting to unfold.  Time will tell.

For the risk analyst and author Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the true value of Bitcoin may be zero. He opined about its value in a recent paper:

Few assets in financial history have been more fragile than bitcoin. 

Makes sense then that inept Quota Queens would plunge right in.

Either way, those who invest in cryptocurrency have already experienced price volatility in the extreme, demonstrating the degree to which funds can evaporate overnight. 

More great judgment from Der Movement.

As I have previously written, I have no problem with activists making money to support genuine activism. What I do have a problem is with people crying poverty while raking in large sums of money, and then not earning that money by engaging in useful, positive work that significantly advances the cause. Money in activism is supposed to be a means to an end, not an end in itself. Unfortunately, I see people who seem to me to be engaging in activism to make money, rather than making money so as to be able to engage in activism. What I observe is endless fundraising and people who create “brands” to cater to the worst instincts of their supporters, with the objective to maximize D’Nations. I see people earning $340,000 in “executive compensation” in a year for doing what other people, like myself, do for nothing. That is in my opinion completely unacceptable and I will continue to oppose it.

Of course, if the SPLC was really opposed to White nationalism, then they would (indirectly of course) support the careers of the inept Quota Queens mentioned in this article, whose net contribution to the cause is best represented by a negative sign, and who stand in the way of a new and authentic pro-White movement. I suppose that all of the accusations are true that aver that the watchdog groups are themselves grifters (the mirror images of those they allegedly oppose) who create bogeymen out of pitiful failures in order to scare leftist suckers into contributing money. On the other hand, perhaps, by giving these “movement” idiots publicity as “dangerous extremists” and thus legitimizing them to their followers, the watchdog groups are indeed supporting the Quota Queens and thereby damaging White nationalism, a “win-win” situation for the watchdogs when coupled with the fundraising successes that the scare tactics enable.

Instead of attacking the beliefs of others, can the SPLC articulate a positive view of a society they would like to see, and convince others of it? That’s doubtful, as the multiracial, multicultural consensus slowly collapses and people don’t take that crap seriously anymore. On the other hand, Der Grifter Right is intellectually and morally bankrupt, so what we have is an ideological vacuum, leading to nihilism.

Der Movement with the Mask Off

Derangement revealed.

One positive outcome of the covid pandemic is that is has ripped the mask off of Der Movement and we can all observe the deranged, retarded, drooling face of utter intellectual and moral vacuity thus revealed.  If the Nordicism, ethnic fetishism, esoteric traditionalism, Hitler worship, HBD, conspiracy theorizing, and all the rest wasn't enough, Der Movement's response to covid, and, in particular, the covid vaccination, has exposed the degenerated rot of the "movement" for all to see. "Normies" are repulsed, STEM people alienated, and the asocial Luddite derangement of "movement" "leaders" and "activists" can now be adequately studied with proper and focused scrutiny.

Imagine if an asteroid or comet is discovered on a collision course with the Earth. What would be Der Movement's "take" on that? Let's see. It is all a hoax, a conspiracy to take away our freedoms (e.g., the freedom to have Negro drug dealers move next door). Any plan to divert the impact with a nuclear weapon would be to poison us and change our DNA with radioactive toxins; alternatively we'll be told that outer space does not exist and that nuclear weapons are actually napalm and mustard gas. Anyone who objects to "movement" derangement would be labeled as "naive" and a "tool of the System." As the asteroid or comet is entering the Earth's atmosphere and collision is imminent, the last moments of "activists" would be to type away on Gab, or at Counter-Currents, that the big thing in the sky is actually a hologram, devised by dastardly "Jew astronomers."

Der Movement is the Dunning-Kruger effect writ large.  Maybe "movement" heroes should understand what they are talking about before gibbering stupidities.

Der Movement must be utterly destroyed. It has unmasked itself as a pernicious blot, a festering stain, on White racial nationalism. A New Movement requires the niche space that will be opened by Der Movement's necessary obliteration.

The mainstream Right has, of course, discredited itself in equal measure - now they cry "my body my choice" against the vaccine.

Great. My body my choice - so, we can have physician assisted suicide for people with incurable diseases? Or is that against Christianity?

Can I choose who I associate with? Or do I have to be forced to live amongst Coloreds?

Can I choose who I go to school with? Or are the schools integrated by law?

If there's a military draft, can men refuse?

Can the mendacity and hypocrisy of Der Right be believed?

On Leadership Redux

Thoughts.

Anyone with experience with corporate politics in the business world, or with departmental/institutional politics in the academic world, understands certain power realities that can inform a better understanding of, on a larger scale, how America (or any other nation) really works, and, how, on a smaller scale, Der Movement really operates.

In reality, in most cases, laws, regulations, documents, principles, ideologies count for little.  Personalities, and the struggles of these personalities, are paramount. What is most important are the aggressive psychopaths with dark triad traits who strive for power and prestige (and money); individuals who use entities for their personal aggrandizement, who use networking, lies, force, deception, amoral and immoral actions of all sorts to achieve their goals. Now, these individuals may have beliefs, and they may actually believe in these beliefs, but in most cases that is secondary to, again, power and prestige, and the struggles between individual personalities for such.

If an entity is lucky, the dark triad leaders will choose competent and moral people to actualize some good for the entity (if for no other reason than to help the leaders maintain power); in rare cases, leaders themselves are competent and moral and are not the psychopaths so described.  America’s founding fathers were such competent and moral leaders. More often, leaders feel threatened by subordinates who are too competent, particularly when they are moral; so you often get corrupt subordinates actualizing evil, who turn out to be convenient scapegoats to assuage popular anger – sacrificed by the leaders to win popular favor (see The Prince for more on that).

While the ethnic affirmative action program of Der Movement certainly distorts some of this (as such policies do with other entities), and helps prop up people inept even in their personal leadership, in general some of the harm done by “movement” “leaders” derives from the mechanisms described above.  Even if there was no quota system, there will always be a struggle between psychopaths and moralpaths with the former typically, but not always, coming out on top.

And those on the side of the right cannot depend on “laws, regulations, documents, principles, ideologies” to help them in this struggle.

Counter-Covid

More retardation from Der Right.

Another right-wing lie. The influenza vaccine typically is not very highly effective, some years worse than others due to a poor match of vaccine to circulating strain, so it is perfectly rational to worry about being infected by someone regardless of vaccination status. The other vaccines mentioned are much more effective, but no vaccine I know of works 100% in 100% of people, which is why herd immunity is desirable. So, in totality, that Gab comment is, as usual, wrong and illogical.

Why does Der Right always have to be ignorant?

When will Der Movement stop lying?  They can't stop. The entire "movement" is based on lies.

The comments section  here proves once and for all that Der Movement is beyond saving. It is full of repulsive, ignorant Luddite lunatics who are easy prey for Russian and Chinese disinformation.

You know, Morgan, saying that the vaccine "causes the creation of new variants" is as logical from a public health perspective as saying that chemotherapy "causes the creation of resistant cancer cells." First of all, if you are so ignorant of basic evolutionary science that you cannot understand the difference between creation and selection, then you have no business commenting. Second, these decisions are not made in a vacuum. Yes, if you don't give the cancer patient chemotherapy, you won't select for resistant cells, but the patient will just die all the faster, and any hope of a cure or remission would not exist. Yes, we could not vaccinate and any selection of variants due to the vaccine (if such exists) would not occur. How many more people who have died then? More to the point, how do you know that even worse variants wouldn't emerge in the non-vaccine context?  See this.

Summary: John Morgan should (metaphorically) shut his filthy mouth.

I am also bemused by the hand-waving “explanation” that Israel has poisoned its precious Jews with the covid “killshot” because Jews are neurotic hypochondriacs in fear of covid. But if they are so neurotic and hypochondriac wouldn’t they be even more fearful of the deadly toxin killshot that, according to Der Right, is killing more people than is covid itself? I suppose that logic is not a strong point of Counter-Currents commentators.

I would have no problem with the anti-covid vaxxers if they would take responsibility for the consequences of their decision; for example, if they became seriously ill with covid, they should not utilize medical resources and should just stay home and either recover or die. But what I do strongly object to is their constant stream of lies and retarded misrepresentations about covid and the vaccine.

Hey Greg Johnson, for the sake of full disclosure:

1. Are you vaccinated against Covid-19?

2. Do you in general support the vaccine?

3. Do you think the vaccine is a "toxic killshot?"

4. Do you think that Israel is killing its population with the "killshot" because they are neurotic hypochondriacs?

I'll answer for myself:

1. Yes

2. Yes

3. No

4. No

That wasn't so hard. Now you do it, you despicable coward.

The good news is that Der Movement is so repulsive to Whites, including highly educated Nutzis like me, that it is highly unlikely that they will ever achieve their goals.

The bad news is that Der Movement is filling the activist niche space, preventing the flourishing of an rational alternative.

I renounce and denounce Der Movement totally and without reservation. Der Movement must be destroyed - one of my life's missions.

Der Movement must be mercilessly destroyed.