Monday, January 13, 2020

Ethnoimperialist Filth Exposed

Counter-Currents: The home of ethnoimperialist hypocrisy.

Read this, emphasis added:
As a person of proud Danish ancestry…
Please compare that to this (emphasis added)
Being in Eastern Europe for the past two years, I’ve spent a lot of time at various European airports. In regards to my personal life, I’ve found myself in a revolving cycle of meeting Eastern European women on Tinder, taking them on dates to the local IKEA, and then breaking up and saying goodbye to them at the airport. Would I recommend any of this to my fellow white men? Let’s find out!
Would we recommend that you spend two years in Denmark, finding yourself in a revolving cycle of meeting Danish women on Tinder, taking them on dates to the local IKEA, and then breaking up and saying goodbye to them at the airport?  Let's find out!

Wouldn’t that be the “ethnonationalist” thing to do?

Once again, Sallis is proven to be 100% correct – all of these “ethnonationalists” are thinly disguised ethnoimperialists, who consider themselves to be racial aristocrats who go where they want, exercising their droit du seigneur with native women.


Comments:
Nick Adams
Immigrants that don't speak the language and refuse to integrate - where have we heard that one before? 
Maarten van dam
Not expats. Immigrants. These people are immigrants. Nothing wrong with that, they're welcome here. But it's typical of the British that they call people that come live in their country immigrants, but when they move abroad they're expats. British, or perhaps more accurately , English exceptionalism in one word. Expats. Ha! 
williemacdonald72
Stop calling them expats, they are immigrants in their country of residence. 
Manuel Castillo
hahaha Funny how they want free medical care in other countries but complain the NSH is full of immigrants!
You’ll always find folks in Der Movement complaining about Poles and Romanians, etc. living in the UK, but nary a word about British neo-colonialism in Southern and Eastern Europe.  After all, the racial aristocrats go where they damn please!

Joyce answers Johnson thus:
Andrew Joyce says:
January 11, 2020 at 11:01 pm
“Devastating” remarks that agree with an essay, and say it was necessary.
The rest of your comment is just queer coping.
I would like to see Joyce write a more comprehensive riposte to Johnson than merely a couple of brief throw-away lines. Interesting though that MacDonald allowed this personal attack against Johnson in the comments section.  

He’s a sincere man of genuine greatness!  There absolutely must be calls, from throughout the “movement," for Greg Johnson to resign from activism.



Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, August 2, 2019

Calling Out Der Movement’s Yang Gang

And the whole Man on White Horse Syndrome.


We have to endure this mangy Oriental preaching to us how grateful we have to be that his scabrous yellow family moved to the USA and blessed us all with their high, high-IQ.

Yang supports amnesty (with citizenship!), he supports the “Dreamers,” and he wants to increase the H-1B influx of Asiatics.  Yang is the GNXP dream come true, Asian cognitive elitists displacing Whites from the professions. Yang, an anti-White Asian (is there any other kind?), wants to pay off Whitey at the cheap, cheap price of $1,000 per month so as to convince Whitey to accept dispossession and a place at the bottom of the racial hierarchy, begging for handouts from inscrutable Orientals. And the moronic “movement” just loves Yang,  joins the “Yang Gang,” praises this piece of Asiatic filth, and they endorse him.

After all, he’ll give them a paltry handout each month – assuming that White “haters” are not specifically excluded.  Deplatformed from UBI – say it ain’t so!  The Eggroll disappoints!

Then you have the other hero, Duke, endorsing Princess Tulsi “Reparations for Negroes” Coconut.  I don’t know guys, you think that maybe anti-White non-White liberal Democrats with an axe to grind against Euro-Americans may not be the optimal candidates to endorse for the Presidency? Think hard now. Take your time; I wouldn’t want you to strain your brain cell (singular).

And that’s after the Trump humiliation, which they’ve apparently learned nothing from.  What next?  Maybe they’ll endorse Sharpton for President; after all, the good “reverend” really stood up to those “Zionist Jews” in Crown Heights, huh?
You can take a random collection of retards from your local Special Olympics and they would have more insight and judgment than the affirmative action misfits masquerading as “movement leaders.”

Keep on enabling them, you rank-and-file.  Rally to their aid when they have that tin cup a’rattlin’ – such as:
Realistically, that means that if Counter-Currents is going to continue to grow, we must cultivate a smaller circle of high-commitment, high-dollar patrons. I know you are out there. Until now, you have been part of a much larger donor pool, and you could take that into account when calculating your support. Now, we can no longer take that for granted. So I would like to talk to you about increasing your support to make Counter-Currents less vulnerable to deplatforming.
Open dem dere checkbooks, suckers!

…Wilmot Robertson argued that “demoralization” is a dire threat to populations. “If you are not permitted to utter or hear one good word about your own people,” he wrote, “then no matter how great your capabilities, you will be hard put to overcome the mental and physical paralysis imposed by demoralization.”
How about folks like "Robertson" demoralizing Southern Europeans?  Have dem dere swarthoids ever heard “one good word” about their “people” from Der Movement?  Or are we to agonize over those five foot tall superstitious greasers scurrying around like roaches?

By the way, anyone in Der Movement who is getting all excited over Reagan’s “monkeys” comments are morons – those comments were just blustering “Bunkerism;” Reagan did nothing positive for his White voting base (sound familiar?).

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Sigh and Move On

More negativism.

Race and ethnicity as cancer factors.

Some of it may be genetic – hence the Asiatic link between Asians, Amerindians, and Hispanics having relatively low cancer risk factors in America despite differences in culture, lifestyle, and socioeconomic status.  However, building upon the arguments here, I believe that the anti-White System contributes to Whites being second behind Blacks.  Given the horrific lifestyles, diets, and incredible female obesity among Blacks, it is no surprise they are first, despite being coddled, and catered to, by the Establishment.  But the high White cancer risk fits in well with the whole spectrum of declining White lifespans, the opioid crisis, and other factors reflecting the degeneration of the White position in America.

And the “God Emperor” contributes to this.  Thus: Donald Trump - anti-White, pro-immigration, far left, subhuman animal.
In a tweet, Trump said those who hold the temporary H1-B visas can "rest assured" because changes were coming that will bring "both simplicity and certainty to your stay, including a potential path to citizenship."
More, more, more Asian cognitive elitists to displace native born White Americans!  Forget about dem dere IT jobs now, Whitey!  Just train your brownster replacement, and humbly prostate yourself before the Altar of Asia!

Hey!  I think we have a shortage of real estate moguls and reality TV personalities.  Let’s bring a bunch in via H1-B visas and give them citizenship.  Why not?

Consider this from Trump’s TV address:
America proudly welcomes millions of lawful immigrants who enrich our society and contribute to our nation.  But all Americans are hurt by uncontrolled, illegal migration.  It strains public resources and drives down jobs and wages.  Among those hardest hit are African Americans and Hispanic Americans.
Thus – illegal aliens who displace African Americans and Hispanic Americans are bad, bad, bad, and we need to stop that.  Legal immigrants from Asia who displace European Americans are good, good, good, and we need more of them.

Is Donald J. Trump the absolute worst person on Earth?


Yahoo commentator:
Chinese are already "easing" into Russia's depopulated Russian Far East. A treasure house of resources China desperately needs and the Russian's suicidal demographics is leaving the region wide open. And yet Putin obsesses over the west, which is the least of Russia's worries and possibly its only salvation.
Is Putin an HBDer?  Or is Derbyshire his advisor?

It is fascinating, but not surprising, that an anti-WN Jew uses the same talking points as do Nordicists. Divide and conquer.

Newsflash to Middle Easterner Podhoretz – it is 2019 and not 1919, and most Americans (unfortunately) even consider Jews to be “White” (although they may have hesitation about the Jews’ minority status and Middle Eastern antecedents).  Given that, does anyone other than “movement” Nutzis consider actual European groups like Italians, Russians, and Central Europeans (Central Europeans!) to be “non-White?”  

Do Americans believe that Antonin Scalia, Natalie Wood, Wayne Gretzky, and Larry Csonka were/are non-White?  Is Podhoretz mad?

And if Russians are “non-White,” then what does Pushkin’s African ancestry matter?  Wouldn’t he be “non-White” even he had been a pure Slav?  This hallux-headed Jew really is stupid and inconsistent, isn’t he?

If you are going to go down that road, then there was a time that the Irish were hated, and Germans as well.  Those are groups that Podjewretz would comfortably put in the “White” category.  So, what’s the point?  Obviously the point is playing the divide and conquer game, a game for which Jews and other anti-White leftists find willing useful idiots in Der Movement.

And, whatever one may think about Berbers, even Stoddard considered them a “White stock” and thought that French-Berber intermarriage in North Africa would cement that area as part of the “White world.”  We do not necessarily have to agree with those sentiments to understand that Berbers are a NEC group much more “White” than “Black” and St. Augustine would likely be considered to be phenotypically “White” if alive today.  Further, there is no strong evidence that Alexander Hamilton had any other ancestry than British and French.  And even if he had trace amounts of non-White ancestry, so what?  Does it mean anything?


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,