Mudshift Redux

Another Kaufmann emerges.  In all cases, bold font emphasis added.

Never forget what Salter wrote in On Genetic Interests – for a majority being dispossessed, that the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does, allowing an easy and painless descent into minority status.

Considering that, do you remember the part-Jewish Kaufmann and his agenda to convince Whites to accept their racial dispossession and to accept the widening of the concept of “White” to include mixed-race individuals as part of our new multiracial future?  Well, there seems to be a market for such types; behold Yascha Mounk, another Jewish mongrel pushing a similar agenda.

See this.

…the American mainstream will once again prove capable of expanding in ways that now seem difficult to fathom. The first groups to join this new American mainstream would likely include white Hispanics, Asian-Americans and those who are mixed race. But as the increasingly multiethnic culture of metropoles from Houston to New York City shows, the new mainstream could grow even more inclusive: in particular, an ever greater share of black Americans may also be absorbed.

The choice between an America in which whites and “people of color” form two implacably opposed blocks and an America in which members of all ethnic groups feel a true sense of belonging and mutual solidarity is straightforward. The country would be a much better place to live, for whites and non-whites alike, if it managed to integrate an ever-greater array of ethnic and religious groups into an expanding mainstream…

…Sustaining a diverse democracy in which the members of different ethnic and religious groups feel real solidarity towards each other is a difficult undertaking, which will require both ambitious public policies and a generosity of spirit among ordinary Americans. But all of us can start to make one impactful change immediately. No matter how common it has become to slice and dice the American population into whites and “people of color,” we should, insofar as possible, avoid this simplistic dichotomy. For it both misdescribes America’s current reality and makes it harder to build the kind of future to which all of us should aspire.

Sound familiar?  That may as well be Kaufmann writing – it is a difference without distinction.  Wait, it gets worse; just like Kaufmann, the monster Mounk wrote a book as well, described by Amazon, and by a reader’s review on Amazon, thus:

Some democracies are highly homogeneous. Others have long maintained a brutal racial or religious hierarchy, with some groups dominating and exploiting others. Never in history has a democracy succeeded in being both diverse and equal, treating members of many different ethnic or religious groups fairly. And yet achieving that goal is now central to the democratic project in countries around the world. It is, Yascha Mounk argues, the greatest experiment of our time.

Drawing on history, social psychology, and comparative politics, Mounk examines how diverse societies have long suffered from the ills of domination, fragmentation, or structured anarchy. So it is hardly surprising that most people are now deeply pessimistic that different groups might be able to integrate in harmony, celebrating their differences without essentializing them. But Mounk shows us that the past can offer crucial insights for how to do better in the future. There is real reason for hope.

It is up to us and the institutions we build whether different groups will come to see each other as enemies or friends, as strangers or compatriots. To make diverse democracies endure, and even thrive, we need to create a world in which our ascriptive identities come to matter less—not because we ignore the injustices that still characterize the United States and so many other countries around the world, but because we have succeeded in addressing them.

The Great Experiment is that rare book that offers both a profound understanding of an urgent problem and genuine hope for our human capacity to solve it. As Mounk contends, giving up on the prospects of building fair and thriving diverse democracies is simply not an option—and that is why we must strive to realize a more ambitious vision for the future of our societies.

Mounk divides his book into three parts:

1) A historical review about how and why diverse societies fail, and suggestions about how to help different factions coexist peacefully.

2) A carefully reasoned discussion of various ideas concerning the role government (in a Democracy) should play to address the disparities in the treatment and socioeconomic status of minority groups.

3) Specific ideas about government policies, especially in the USA, which can improve citizens' lives, and also reduce conflicts among racial groups…

…Mounk suggests that in the future, different groups (racial, cultural, etc.) in Western democracies may have far more in common than we now realize, if (and it's a big if) governments adopt policies to improve the quality of life for all.

Again, exactly like Kaufmann. These types seem very afraid of something, and that something is a White reaction to racial dispossession. Indeed, a less sanguine analysis than that of Mounk suggests:

America is in an identity crisis with no shared values that unite the nation nor idea of what it means to be an American. Americanism has long been implicitly linked to Whiteness, but that is not viable long term as diversity is inevitable. Either Americanism exists in some new form of civic nationalism that is decoupled from Whiteness or Whiteness is maintained but under multiculturalism. The best case scenario for White Americans is a version of multi-culturalism where they can successfully play the game too with their own enclaves and patronage networks. The political system of the future will be many tribes competing and lobbying for their group’s interest and forming alliances under a multi-polar system.

The "best case scenario" is essentially Salter’s democratic multiculturalism.

So, how do we address the Kaufmann/Mounk agenda of having Whites accept their dispossession, and to have a “diverse democracy” work via civic nationalism, redefining Whiteness, and making multiculturalism less painful for Whites until it is too late for them to do anything meaningful to stop their dispossession?

To address attempts at expanding the definition of “White” to the point of racial meaninglessness, we need to strongly focus on defining and describing “White” in terms of (Old World) European ancestry. Therefore, a White American is a European-American, and not any of the other groups that Kaufmann and Mounk want to bin with the “White category.” We need to be able to effectively explain and defend the White is European equation, which is something I have been doing for decades; I believe that an effective defense of the concept is easily made from biological, cultural/civilizational, and historical perspectives. And the equation tracks well with the basic conception of “White” held by most Whites. Such a definition serves two purposes: First, as noted, it serves to obstruct attempts to redefine “White” to promote anti-White (indeed, de facto genocidal) agendas, and, second, it can serve as an effective riposte (particularly when combined with the aforementioned defenses of the concept) to the “what about the Irish and the Italians” or “Hispanics are the new Italians” arguments.  Needless to say, for this definition to be effective, intra-White intra-European divisiveness (e.g., Nordicism) and the endless “Who is White” arguments when applied to Europeans, need to end, since that division does nothing but empower the likes of Kaufmann and Mounk and their arguments about the “flexibility” of “Whiteness,” and weakens the White is European equation that serves as a barrier to the “anyone who is not Black – and even some Blacks too – are White” expansionist approaches.  Further, fragmenting the White bloc not only weakens White power, but also the lack of organic solidarity encourages the multiculturalists to break down White cohesion and make cross-racial alliances with elements of the White population.  We have enough problems with ideological renegades (e.g., leftists) among the White population; the last thing we need is to have White ethnies squabbling among themselves so badly that they make alliances with Coloreds to support internecine White struggles. It also goes without saying that when the “movement” enables Nordicism and other such memes, and promotes the work of dividers like Humphrey Ireland, they weaken White comity and solidarity and help promote the Kaufmann/Mounk agenda.

Another, related, approach with respect to this issue is to gradually focus on defining ourselves (in America) as European-Americans (and in Europe, as Europeans in addition to specific national identifies) rather than as “White.” Yes, I know that “White” is a convenient term to use and is the popular choice, and that “European-American” is less convenient, and, yes, I myself do use “White” as a shorthand for “of European descent” and will no doubt continue to do so.  But, still, being as specific as possible as to who we are, even at some cost of convenience, may at some point be necessary.  Yes, we should defend the White is European equation, but it does no harm to emphasize the “European” as much as possible, to obstruct the expansionist agendas.

With respect to civic nationalism, or what Sailer calls “citizenism,” or what others call “constitutional patriotism,” many activists (myself included) have long argued against it. There is an enormous corpus of material – including at EGI Notes – on this subject, Contra “movement” idiots attacking “Salterism,” the fact remains that On Genetic Interests is one of the best critiques of civic nationalism available; indeed the concept of ethnic genetic interests is one of the best antidotes to the civic nationalist poison  Also see this.

Groups are not fungible and they have distinct interests as a result of being distinct groups, and attempts to cover up these distinctions with labels such as “Americans” or “citizens” fail to eliminate the underlying reality. The fact that people like Kaufmann and Mounk worry so much about the future of “diverse democracy” tells you that they recognize the power of group identity and of corrosive power of group competition to dissolve the false and empty bonds of civic nationalism.  Blood is not only thicker than water, blood is thicker than fictive “national” identities based on pieces of paper, memes, and superficial political labels.  If adherence to civic nationalist fiction impairs your adaptive fitness through diminution of your ethny and its interests, why should you continue to adhere to that destructive fiction?  Why listen to the “pied pipers” of civic nationalism leading you and your ethny to your doom?

At the risk of seeming glib, ultimately, to defeat the Kaufmann/Mounk agenda Whites – or a significant enough fraction of the White population to make diverse democracy untenable - simply have to refuse to go along.  When some try to define “White” to include persons who are not of (full) (Old World) European ancestry, European-American Whites need to refuse to accept those “Whites” as their ingroup; instead, they should – they must – insist and act upon a definition that maintains what we today recognize as the "White" concept, and if that ultimately means replacing “White” with “European” and “European-American” then so be it. Kaufmann, Mounk, and their ilk cannot force Whites to consider non-Whites to be “White;” they can only mendaciously gaslight Whites to allow themselves to be redefined out of existence.  They need Whites to accept White genocide; this we must not allow. Of course, resistance to these racial redefinitions will require the explanations and defenses alluded to above and would also require the pro-White movement to demonstrate the discipline to eschew and reject memes that create division within the White ingroup.  

Whites need to reject civic nationalism, including the right-wing populist version of that creed. Ultimately, civic nationalism enables the situation that Salter warned against – a multiculturalism that works and allows for the relatively painless and orderly displacement and race replacement of White populations. When individuals talk of “the people” or “the American people” or “the [fill in name of country] people” the question should always be “which people?”  Who?  Whom? Talk of “citizens” should be met with “which citizens?”  White Identity Politics is necessary, as are leaders who promote policies that are explicitly pro-White; we need a sound political and metapolitical discourse to defend and extend our position and convince Whites of the righteousness of our cause. And Whites should reject “payoffs” and “enticements” and other policies that attempt to lessen group conflict by “buying off” disaffected groups with “goodies.”

Whites need to be mature enough and self-aware enough to recognize their group interests, act to defend those interests, and disciplined enough to identify and reject malicious memes and seductive policies meant to prevent Whites from maintaining their group identity and pursuing their interests.

Whites need to say NO to “diverse democracy” and need to ensure that multiculturalism does NOT work.

White Ethnic Responsibility

Leadership needed.

It is not enough for White ethnics to oppose Der Movement. It that is all there is, then, by default, White ethnics will find themselves on the same side as the anti-White Left, essentially confirming all of Humphrey Ireland’s ranting nonsense.  Not only would such an outcome be used to retroactively justify Nordicist attacks against White ethnics, but it would be a self-destructive catastrophe in its own right. White ethnics are White, they have the same interest in White survival as do other Whites and, let us be honest, “Da Left” hates White ethnics even more than does “Der Right.”  And why should White ethnics let themselves be forced out of pro-White activism that they have every right to be involved in? Principled opposition to Der Movement by White ethnics must ultimately come from the Right – from the racial nationalist Far Right, and not from the Left, the Center, or the Mainstream Right. White ethnics need to be involved in pro-White activism, but not as part of Der Movement; the “movement” is the enemy and must be opposed as part of rebuilding the pro-White activist endeavor.

As part of this project, White ethnics need to make common cause with non-Nordicist pan-European NW Europeans – people like Yockey, Mosley, and the person who was my main collaborator on the Legion Europa project – and, together, all like-minded persons of European descent will be able to forge a movement that can win, and win for the benefit of all Europeans.

And such a movement cannot be a White ethnic-focused navel-gazing counterpart to a Nord-focused navel-gazing “movement” – it has to have an appeal to all Whites, it cannot be limited to, or described as, or characterized as, a particularistic and narrow vehicle for specific subracial and ethnic interests. A narrow focus would be making the same mistake of Der Movement, and would not in any case appeal to the broad spectrum of people we want to attract and accept. While such a movement has to be, at its fundamental core, absolutely pan-European, its opposition to divisive Nordicism (or any other such “ism”) must be defensive; that opposition is to protect the pan-European ideal, not to attack the legitimate identities and interests of different European groups (again, such an error would simply be mimicking in a variant form the basic mistake of Der Movement).

White ethnics cannot save themselves alone, and contrary to the fantasies of the Nordicists, NW Europeans cannot save themselves alone either – observe the pitiful failure of Der Movement as a prime case study of that. With respect to the White ethnics, they alone are an insufficient proportion of the population of White Diaspora nations to be effective in achieving racial nationalist goals, they have a common fate with other White groups in those nations as they belong to the same broader race and civilization and face the same threats, there has been extensive intermarriage with other White groups, and so therefore it makes no sense not to make common cause with other White groups (no sense apart from the hostile attitudes on the Right toward White ethnics - attitudes that need to be addressed, attacked, and defeated). In the European homeland, the various peoples of Europe need to make common cause as well; there are no individual nations, or little subsets of nations, that can achieve a long term final victory on their own. For example, from a Southern European standpoint, how could a racial nationalist Italy survive long term if it is sandwiched between the Global South to the South and a multiracial, multicultural, Leftist Northern and Central Europe to the North?  And who would want to allow the rest of Europe, which, together with Italy, makes up the cradle of our race and civilization, to be lost?

So, we need a pan-European movement to emerge and one in which White ethnics play a role as important as that of any other White group.

Practically speaking, the first step would be to expand a small groupuscule into an online community. Let us consider how other "movement" entities got started. American Renaissance started from a monthly (print) journal that recruited writers and built up a group of loyal readers and supporters, and eventually they had real life meetings, conferences, etc. (today, Amren is online, but still has real life conferences). Counter-Currents started as an online journal/blog, and similarly built up writers, readers, supporters, etc. The National Alliance was directly an activist organization, which was derived from Rockwell's group but more directly was derived from the National Youth Alliance; today, I believe that the American Renaissance and Counter-Currents metapolitical model is the more achievable approach to get started in building a movement entity.  Of course, in all of these cases, you had leadership that was open and overt, public figures using their own names (although Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents, with a common name in America, did hide his face from the public for many years), and those entities (particularly Counter-Currents) were able to tap into certain aspects of an already existing "movement" infrastructure (the affirmative action program being part of that).  A genuinely pan-European group, with White ethnics prominently involved, would have more difficulties getting started (as the Legion Europa failure demonstrated), but the attempt should be made.

Do I really believe that it is likely that this is going to be achieved?  Honestly, no.  In this post, I am being prescriptive, not descriptive.  It seems that no one is really interested; at least, not interested to the extent to actually do anything to actualize this vision. We need White ethnic responsibility to exercise some leadership in this regard, but, again, no one really seems to be interested. 

Der Movement has sufficient members and infrastructure to survive (albeit not prosper) with a low participation rate of people actually doing things.  However, in contrast, there are a tiny number of authentic pan-European activists (in the Anglosphere Diaspora we instead have Nordicists and in Europe we instead have petty nationalists) and, since Der Movement has done a “fine” job in alienating White ethnics, there are a tiny number of such activists involved in pro-White activism, or even merely interested in such. There is not a critical mass of potential activists for the project I propose that would allow any real optimism, a critical mass large enough so that a low participation result would still result in enough activists to make a difference. With Der Movement filling up the Far Right niche space, a healthy-sized pool of people strongly interested in an alternative would be necessary to break into that niche, and such do not exist.  

The only possibility of progress would be if a large fraction of the tiny number of current pan-European, particularly White ethnic, activists would exercise the required leadership, be active, and work to build an attractive alternative to Der Movement. We can also hope that such a project, however small; would attract new high quality people.  Or perhaps some new people will come, and some leader emerge, on their own (highly unlikely - why hasn’t it happened already?) or perhaps more likely inspired by The Sallis Groupuscule (a reason for my continuing activity despite my pessimism). Again, we need people willing to actively participate in the metapolitical and political work to build this alternative movement.  Without such, all of this is just a waste of my time and, more importantly, we (by “we” I mean all Whites) are doomed. And, White ethnics, by their inactivity, would have proved the Nordicists right.

Odds and Ends, 6/25/22

In der news.

It is not clear to me why the HBD Nordicists tend to lump the same populations as being both egalitarian and individualistic, implying that the two traits are linked. It would seem the opposite would the case. Ever since the French Revolution, the Far Left has linked an egalitarian ideology with collectivism. Even on the Far Right, the collectivist folk communities of fascist movements were egalitarian at least in the sense of mitigating class differences to enhance the organic solidarity of the ethny. Never mind that some of Der Movement's favorite ethnies are no more individualistic then the allegedly ethnocentric collectivist (sic) Italians.  Also see this. I also do not see a clear connection between late marriage and individualism. It would seem that the harsher ecologies that would lead to later marriage would also promote societies that are collectivist as well as egalitarian. I believe that this HBD Nordicist nonsense derives from the Eloi paradigm - the worshipped ethnies are just too good, too noble, too honorable, too altruistic, too egalitarian, and too individualistic for their own good - as opposed to the runty penned up chicken Morlocks.

Ultimately, the problem with Trump as President is that he governed as if his electoral base of support came from Blacks and Jews. He catered to those who hate him and betrayed his base of supporters (sounds like Amren). Trump had one of the most bizarre and politically inept Presidencies in American history, and he retained (most of his) White support in 2020 essentially only because they had nowhere else to go and they were fearful of a Biden Presidency.

See this.  You'll notice that my writing over the years has essentially ignored Yarvin and his "Cathedral" nonsense. Granted that the critiques of Joyce and Jeelvy have merit - and I believe that they do - they are in my opinion almost superfluous. Consider the corpus of Yarvin's work. \There's no "there" there. I see nothing particularly novel or interesting in anything Yarvin gibbers about; he has authority on Der Right only insofar as Alt Right knuckleheads, juvenile manosphere jackasses, and "neoreactionary" "traditionalists" pay attention to the imbecility of his work.

The only good thing about this - besides exposing leftist hysteria - is that it will accelerate right/left geographical sorting and balkanization, as people move to states that have abortion laws that they find congenial. Of course, that will enrich "right-wing states" with Christian religious yahoos who worship Negro fetuses, but we can't have everything.

The Sallis compromise on abortion is as follows. Women are allowed one abortion (preferably with the consent of the sperm donor if possible) and the procedure will be accompanied by permanent sterilization. The exceptions to this would be abortions due to rape, incest, danger to the woman's health/life, and/or it is determined that the fetus has some sort of significant (genetic) defect - like being a retard. The vast majority of current abortions do not fit with any of those exceptions and are instead done for the sake of convenience.

Rationale: If a woman is too stupid and/or irresponsible to (correctly) use birth control (herself directly or via her partner) and/or is so psychopathic that she would kill her own child, apart from the exceptions listed above, then she should be removed from the genepool, and is unfit to be a mother in any case.

Note that my compromise maintains the racial and eugenic benefits of the current abortion policy, as births from these women will be prevented. Indeed, my compromise is more beneficial than current policy, because under current conditions, the women in question may spew out offspring at a later date. Moral and religious considerations are irrelevant to me.

Odds and Ends, 6/22/22

In der news.

Happy Operation Barbarossa Day.

As I've said before, if Der Movement was really serious about making real world progress, they would first identify the impediments to that progress, through quantitative and empirical methods, such as surveys and similar mechanisms. On one scale - what are the impediments to getting the message out and making Whites understand the reality of the racial crisis? Perhaps more importantly, on a more focused scale - for those Whites who are, or are close to being, racially aware, what are the impediments to them becoming pro-White activists and/or supporters of activists? I suspect the three biggest reasons for the latter are: 1) fear of social pricing, 2) a belief that aracial conservative civic nationalism can work without being too disruptive, and 3) disgust with or at least suspicion of Der Movement's freakishness and demented dogmas. But that is only my surmise; I can be completely wrong. That's why we need hard data.

Sallisian maxim: Do not ascribe to admixture that which can be more easily explained by dysgenics.

Submitted for your approval:

American Renaissance has taken over the mantle from Instauration as the intellectual center of anti-Italianism - and more broadly, hostility to White ethnics - on the (Far) Right. Counter-Currents, TOO, Unz all do their share, but the centroid is Amren. The pro-Jewish and pro-Asian attitudes are a new wrinkle, part of HBD race realism and WN 3.0 - they ditch White solidarity in favor of IQ nationalism and in favor of Rosie and the kids.

Thanks to the Amren filth and others of that ilk who promote Sir Humphrey, we will now have a new generation of "activists" who believe that Italian-Americans are brown-skinned "needle workers" who are isolated in their urban "enclaves" (penned up chicken Morlocks) and who are so dark and alien that no one else will intermarry with them (in reality, there has been so much intermarriage that the unmixed Ameriwop is an endangered species).

If Der Movement knows the deep problems White ethnics have with Humphrey's trash - and how could they not? - then why do they enthusiastically praise and promote the trash without any caveats or reservations, re: the problems? Either they agree with the trash or they simply don't care and hold White ethnics to no account - after all, what are the runty penned up chicken Morlocks going to do about it, anyway? If I'm wrong, then the Eloi can come to my Gab account and explain to us poor benighted Morlocks how things are.

Another thing - looking at, say, Amren comments threads these days, you rarely if ever see White ethnics defending their ethnies from attacks or critiquing garbage like The Dispossessed Majority. In the past, that was more frequent, Assuming such comments are not being censored in moderation, then this suggests that these people have dropped out of Der Movement. It is unlikely we are going to see any more Borzellieris, Rienzis, or Polignanos emerging in Der Movement and sticking around. Maybe such people can start their own activity, let's hope so, but there's no place for them in Der Movement.

The Sallis Vision

Endgame.

All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. - T. E. Lawrence

My critics may aver that I am always negative and do not do anything other than criticize the “movement.”  Long time readers of my work know that is not true.  Regardless, in this post, I will stress the positive, the constructive, and sketch an outline of what my endgame is. In other words, what is the Sallis vision?  What kind of state do I want to see come into being?  What kind of future do I envision for the White race?

A starting point would be to read this.

Let us proceed.

Pan-Europeanism, Political structure

Unlike the “movement” I support genuine pan-Europeanism, focusing on the interests of ALL peoples of European descent worldwide, not just some fraction thereof (i.e., Northwest Europeans only - typical “movement” Nordicism).  ALL means ALL, not just the “movement’s” favorite groups. There will be no intra-European castes, no “borderline” cases or grudging acceptances, no second or third (or worse) class status. There needs to be a clearly defined ingroup, and then the ingroup is the ingroup. All for one and one for all. If the fetishists cannot accept that, then we will not accept them.  On the other hand, the “movement’s” embrace of non-Whites (that they do while at the same time rejecting White ethnics) is not acceptable. Ourselves alone. Non-Whites have their own lands.

There will be an integrated Imperium structure, optimally consisting of all of Europe (including European Russia), as well as most or all (depending on what occurs) of Diaspora lands (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand – perhaps parts of South Africa as well).  Similar to Lowell’s Imperium vs. Dominion distinction, there will be a balance between those issues dealt with at the higher level of Imperium (high politics and grand strategy, foreign policy, military policy, large scale science and technics [including space exploration], racial policy [including immigration control as well as eugenics], pan-European cultural projects [including civilizational/High Culture issues], and whatever economic [in the broadest sense) issues arise).  On the other hand, there will be local sovereignty (Dominion) on most day-to-day issues, without the nitpicking micromanagement of the EU. National boundaries will be maintained and the demographics of nations and peoples also maintained – there will be no panmixia among the nations of Europe; local national ethnic and cultural identities will be maintained (although of course there will be some intra-European mixing in the Diaspora, as has been already occurring).

Interestingly, a Sallisian Imperium would exhibit more national sovereignty and homogeneity than the behavior of so-called ethnonationalists. My Imperium would not have non-Hungarians using Budapest as a flophouse and crash pad and would not have anti-Romanian aliens living in Romania, bedding Romanian women while attacking the Romanian people and culture. There will be none of the ethnomimperialist hypocrisy of "ethnonationalist sovereignty and homogeneity for me but not for thee." The Imperium would be a Confederation of European peoples and nations.

The underlying political structure will be of a National Socialist/fascist type, but with a sane and flexible manifestation (see below).  Aspects of “totalitarian democracy” can be useful here.

Sanity and flexibility

National Socialism and fascism are linked in the popular mind to war, concentration camps, secret police, cults of personality, etc. I propose a “sane” form of National Socialist fascism in which war is restricted to self-defense (or some other type of defense of vital interests), order is maintained as reasonably as possible, freedom is maximized to the extent possible while maintaining collective action, and the Imperium is managed by a leadership cadre rather than some personality cult "Fuhrer.”

This form of government needs to be flexible enough to conform to the particularities of specific national cultures and mores.  For example, Russian national socialism, or that of many continental European nations, could be somewhat more authoritarian that that of Anglophone countries, where the populations and political culture has always been characterized by a greater degree of personal freedom and balance of power within the government.  The former nations would also tend to be more amenable to a highly centralized national government, while the latter may be more comfortable with a degree of decentralization. In all cases, the same basic ideology and the same political foundation would apply, all ultimately overseen by the Imperium’s elite, but in the degree of local sovereignty there would be the aforementioned flexibility in precisely how the political control would manifest.

Race and eugenics

The state would be for people of European descent only; in Europe in ethnically homogeneous states, and in the Diaspora in the mixed European states that exist, but with all non-Whites removed. Eugenics would be practiced, but in a sane and responsible way, preserving national identities and genetic interests to the extent possible, and rejecting rapid “transhumanist” changes. Populations do change over time due to a variety of reasons even in the absence of mass migration (e.g., from selection and/or genetic drift) and these mechanisms are wholly compatible with genetic interests in evolved populations (indeed, such interests are tied to adaptive fitness, which at times requires some changes in genotypes/phenotypes). Thus, a prudent eugenics policy that is also broadly preservationist is reasonable. See this on Yockeyian Genetics. I agree with Strom, racial purity is something to strive for in the future, it is not something that existed in a mythical past.

Ethics and morality

We need to build The New Man:

And it is even more salient today. If there is ONE single thing I would advise White racial activists to do today, it would be to emphasize, to focus on, character and moral rebirth, to focus on The New Man.  With that, anything is possible. Without that, nothing is possible. Although ideology, science, intelligence, strategy, et al. are all crucially important, they take a back seat to character and moral integrity.  You cannot build a worldwide revolutionary movement on a foundation of quicksand; you cannot build a victorious movement on a foundation of freaks, grifters, phonies, frauds, the morally defective, perverts, liars, gaslighters, deranged fetishists, tin-foil-hat conspiracy theorists, individuals with all sorts of completely superfluous hang-ups and bizarre theories, weaklings, traitors, and all the rest. We have to remake ourselves before we try and remake the world.

The New Man will be the foundation of the moral and ethical state:

There needs to be a moral structure to the state, independent of pure adaptive utilitarianism. Now, that moral structure can (and should) be used instrumentally to favor adaptive, EGI-focused ends. But the moral structure should exist not only for the purpose of promoting a racial state and for making the pursuit of EGI, of adaptive fitness, more palatable to the population – keeping in mind that humans are apparently evolved to benefit from some sort of religious/spiritual beliefs – but has benefits in its own right. Indeed, there needs to be a balance between a "pure ethic" of unrestrained pursuit of genetic interests, and morality that constrains the unrestrained pursuit of absolute EGI, a pursuit that can lead to “maladaptive genetic atomization.”....

…What can we say about this sense of morality?

Morality can be independent of religion, although, historically, in the Western civilization (and in Late Antiquity), The Moral State was associated with Christianity. Readers of this blog know that I am hostile to Christianity. However, there are certain elements in (Europeanized) Christianity that can be of benefit to society if – and only if – these ideals are limited to one’s own people, rather than to all of humanity (in other words, particularism vs. universalism), and are tempered by adaptive interests and pragmatic prudence.

Science and Technics, Futurism, anti-Traditionalism, but with maintenance of Humanity

Readers know I strongly support science and technics, embrace Futurism, and loathe “Traditionalism.”  The Sallisian state would look to the future, not to the past, and would enthusiastically support advances in science and technics and indeed all in forms of knowledge. The stupid embrace of “Traditionalism” by the “movement,” if manifested in a state system, would result in Luddite backwardness, the destruction of the hope for a brighter tomorrow, eliminate the possibility of a higher humanity, and leave us at the mercy of enemies, like the Asians, who have no scruples in using whatever techniques to achieve power and domination. Thus, “Traditionalism” is a deadly danger.

But there is another danger – that of hyper-rationality, of becoming so obsessed with science and, especially, technics, that we lose our humanity, confusing means with ends.  And here I do not only mean "transhumanism” or “AI takes over and kills off humanity” scenarios, but also Last Man” outcomes such as in The Machine Stops, or the cost of hyper-rationality in the “tale of the machines” in Gene Wolfe’s The Book of The New Sun -see here:

To paraphrase and summarize – humanity reached the stars by giving away the wild part of themselves – essentially becoming emotionless technocrats – and then the thinking machines (AI), who hated their human creators, decided to ruin those human creators by re-introducing to humanity paradigms that would rekindle humanity’s interest in those “wild things.” Thus, humanity became distracted away from pure science and technics and the galactic empire collapsed.  The lesson here is that – besides not trusting AI – humanity should not give up its “wild” side, its human soul, for the sake of technology; instead, humans need to achieve their objectives – “reach the stars” – while remaining fundamentally human. Thus, in relation of Heidegger’s whining, we need not become entrapped into a technological spiritual mindset – pure instrumentality – in order to “be scientific.”  On the other hand, we cannot evade the price that must be paid for science and technology – while science is a tool, it is an expensive tool, and what has to invest in a degree of rationality and empiricism to achieve science and technics. One must strike a balance – the mind must be scientific while the soul remains human.  But we cannot hide in the hobbit hole, while others reach the stars. The White Man cannot give up his Faustian birthright because of fearful, backwards-looking traditionalists. 

We must remember that science and technics are tools. And, we must also remember that we cannot derived values from tools. Our values must derive from our humanity, our reality as evolved organisms, and our sense of morals and ethics.  Science and technics must be used to achieve those values, but they are not the values themselves.

High Culture

One of the major components of the confederation-wide activity is constructing new cultural artifacts, particularly those of a pan-European civilizational High Culture nature. And, consistent with my Overman High Culture essay, one key component of this is to transition through the Spenglerian cycle, from the (probably, but not definitely) exhausted Western Faustian High Culture to a new High Culture, one suitable for the tasks at hand for European Man.

The rigid, dogmatic Spenglerians will screech and cry that the birth and direction of a High Culture is a purely innate, organic process that cannot be planned and directed by human effort. That will be doomed to failure, they aver, and they would gibber about pseudomporphosis and the like, claiming that any attempt to guide the creation of a High Culture would distort its expression.  Needless to say, I disagree with that view. 

It would seem that an examination of the beginnings of the West calls the rigid Spenglerian view into question. It was not inevitable that Christianity would come into being and, once it did, that it would eventually become the faith of the Roman Empire of Late Antiquity.  If that did not occur, then the history of the West would have been radically different. Even if the Western Roman Empire still fell, which likely it would have done eventually, and even if a new “Faustian” Western High Culture came into being, that new High Culture would have been significantly different had Christianity not been an integral part of it.  Indeed, was Christianity a Magian pseudomorphosis of the Western High Culture?  In any case, the fact that the West has been Christian was not an inevitable part of its organic growth, but a characteristic contingent upon certain specific historical events – accidents of history one might say – and decisions made by specific individuals, such as Roman emperors. So, if something as fundamental to the Western High Culture as European Christianity was a result of human decision and historical events, then why can’t the direction of a future European High Culture also be similarly modulated by human decision and historical events (events themselves of course affected by human decision)?  This is particularly so given that we today are conscious of the Spenglerian paradigm, a situation that obviously did not exist in the past.

I would like to believe that the sort of state that would come into being would manifest thus:

…Our European Mission is to create the Culture-State-Nation-Imperium of the West, and thereby we shall perform such deeds, accomplish such works, and so transform our world that our distant posterity, when they behold the remains of our buildings and ramparts, will tell their grandchildren that on the soil of Europe once dwelt a tribe of gods. - Francis Parker Yockey

Happy Holidays, 6/19/22

Holidays.

Happy Father's Day!

Happy Juneteenth!

It's sort of ironic that these two holidays fall on the same day this year, as the former doesn't much affect the population focused on by the latter (note this population has two holidays all to themselves - this one and MLK, demonstrating Black Privilege), but, it is what it is.

Odds and Ends, 6/18/22

In der news.

The unfortunate and frustrating thing is that I completely agree with Robert Wallace that we need White identity politics and about what the dire consequences will be if this does not come to pass. The problem is that I see his "movement" as (1) clearly and repeatedly exhibiting endless failure and utter incompetence, and (2) being openly and aggressively hostile to White ethnics and their interests. Since those two points are fundamental characteristics of the "movement," I'm not sanguine that it is capable of changing any of that.

I'm sure if challenged about the hostility to White ethnics on their sites, "movement" "leaders" would mumble something about "free speech" and the "importance of hearing all views." That's coming from sites that moderate comments, ban commentators they don't like, and wouldn't allow their writers to attack other groups. Am I calling for censorship? Not at all. Those sites can have whatever content they like, but they need to know that the content has consequences. If they are hostile to White ethnics, then White ethnics will be hostile to them, and no attempt to pathologize that normal reaction will prevent that reaction from manifesting.

The reality of Trump that I, almost alone on the Far Right, recognized and wrote about ("vulgar ignorant buffoon, fraud, Negrophilic cuck") in 2016, before that election:

Hamburger TodayJune 16, 2022 at 8:52 pm

Please regale us with all the long-term, permanent policy changes he made on immigration, trade, and foreign wars. You know, the things he ran on in 2015/16. The simple fact is that Trump’s immigration policy was dismantled in an hour because he didn’t use the power of the Office of the President to do the things he promised. He didn’t veto a single crappy budget, including those that specifically prevented him from spending money on the Wall. He is the GOP’s version of Jimmy Carter: An ineffectual, embarrassing one-term President. Only Carter, for all his terrible flaws, at least retired from public life for a considerable time before quietly return. Trump is carny barker on the midway trying to get you to pony up cash to play a rigged game. Every penny his supporters have given him has been used to line the pockets of himself and his cronies.

In contrast to my prescience, the Quota Queens were (almost) all hysterically pro-Trump, that he is “a sincere man of genuine greatness,” and “the last chance for White America.”  There’s NO other explanation for Quota Queen prominence other than Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program. They’re always, always, ALWAYS wrong, about virtually everything.

American Renaissance needs to apologize to its readers for publishing lies about Southern Italians and about the racial provenance of the Ancient Greeks and Romans, and retract those articles. Of course, they won't do it, but the rest of us observe the clear story told by population genetics (and criticism of Lynn's IQ nonsense) that refutes Amren lies. Indeed, population genetics data clearly show that a European ethny has been unjustly defamed for decades, with no accountability for the liars doing the defaming. This travesty should not be forgotten or forgiven.

Der Movement's cries of "we must speak the truth about race" now ring hollow indeed. Paper after paper like sledgehammers knocking down the rotten edifice of "movement" dogma and they just continue peddling their lies like nothing has happened and then try and distract with gibbering about "high Asian IQ" and "hobbit holes."

The emperor has no clothes...and his shrunken micropene is visible for all to see.

Delenda est Der Movement!

Absolute stupidity.

Now, I am an absolute pacifist, overflowing with the milk of human kindness, and so I vehemently oppose and denounce all - all I say! - forms of violence.

However, some sort of nasty person not so inclined - a person I would reject - may look at Christianity and say that the churches should be demolished or turned into museums; all of the priests, pastors, and reverends sent to work camps; and the pope publicly hanged in St. Peter's Square.

Someone might say that. I of course would reject such a plan of despicable violence.

A form of religion I could support. St. Patrick's Cathedral has never been put to better use.

More PopGen, June 2022

Der Movement wrong again. In all cases, emphasis added.

Gab correspondent Gaston alerts me to two new papers, which I will briefly comment on.

See this.

See this figure and note that these European groups essentially are derived from different proportions of the same basic ancestral components.

Abstract

Southern Italy was characterised by a complex prehistory that started with different Palaeolithic cultures, later followed by the Neolithic transition and the demic dispersal from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe during the Bronze Age. Archaeological and historical evidence points to demic and cultural influences between Southern Italians and the Balkans, starting with the initial Palaeolithic occupation until historical and modern times. To shed light on the dynamics of these contacts, we analysed a genome-wide SNP dataset of more than 700 individuals from the South Mediterranean area (102 from Southern Italy), combined with ancient DNA from neighbouring areas. Our findings revealed high affinities of South-Eastern Italians with modern Eastern Peloponnesians, and a closer affinity of ancient Greek genomes with those from specific regions of South Italy than modern Greek genomes. The higher similarity could be associated with the presence of a Bronze Age component ultimately originating from the Caucasus and characterised by high frequencies of Iranian and Anatolian Neolithic ancestries. Furthermore, to reveal possible signals of natural selection, we looked for extremely differentiated allele frequencies among Northern and Southern Italy, uncovering putatively adapted SNPs in genes involved in alcohol metabolism, nevi features and immunological traits, such as ALDH2, NID1 and CBLB.

OK, that is self-explanatory.

Southern Italy was one of the first European regions to be inhabited by our species. 

Yes, Der Movement, Southern Italy is actually part of Europe.

Later on, during the 2nd millennium BCE a flourishing and continuous cultural relationship was established between Southern Italy and Aegean communities especially from the Recent Bronze Age (3.3 to 3.2 kya) onward (23,24). Although the demographic extent of these contacts is not clear, some valuable insights on mobility could be inferred from ceramic crafts. The most recent analytical evidence, relating to the Aegean-type pottery from the core sites of Punta di Zambrone (Tyrrhenian Calabria) and Roca Vecchia (Southern Adriatic Apulia), allow to highlight a strong connection with the Western Greek regions (Ionian Islands, Acarnania, Achaea and Elis) and, to a lesser extent, with Western Crete (25).

Precisely, following the Bronze Age, in a period between the so-called Greek “Dark Ages” (26) and the Archaic Greece (2.7 to 2.5 kya), Southern Italy became a hotspot for the foundation of Greek colonies. The first colonies were set in Campania and Sicily, possibly by settlers arriving from Eastern Greece (Euboea island) around 780 BCE, soon followed by colonies in Calabria, Basilicata and Apulia (27–30), encompassing an area later to be known as Magna Grecia. In the second half of the 7th century BCE, some of these settlements, specifically in South-Eastern Sicily (Siracusa and Megara Iblea) and Apulia (Taranto), were attributed to Eastern Peloponnesian founders (31,32).

As we shall see, actual genetic evidence, as opposed to Quentin Tarantino movies, demonstrates that Southern Italians, including Sicilians, are closest to modern Peloponnesians and, more importantly, to Ancient Greeks, not to Negroes or Arabs.

As a consequence of this complex demographic scenario, Italy harbours the largest degree of genetic population structure identified in Europe so far (19,36), making its population a valuable asset for adaptation studies (36–38).

The wops are a "valuable asset."

f4 analysis showed a higher allele sharing of modern Caucasus individuals with present-day Central Europeans than with South-Eastern Europeans, possibly as the result of Bronze Age migrations (Table S2).

Der Movement is not going to like that at all. That noise you hear is fetishist weeping.

The first two PCs in the PCA highlight genetic similarities between Southern Italians and the majority of the analysed Greek populations, with the only exception of the Peloponnesian groups (for sample location see Fig. S2) previously identified as outliers (39), which form a tight cluster also when the third PC is evaluated (Fig. S3).

Genetic similarities between Southern Italians and Greeks, not between Southern Italians and Angolans.

In order to further dissect the degree of affinity between populations across the Adriatic Sea, we applied a clustering approach on the first ten PCs of a PCA performed on a subset composed by 682 individuals (Fig. 1B, Fig. S4). We detected 12 clusters summarising the genetic similarity among these populations (Fig. S4). Present-day Apulians and Calabrians are characterised by similar profiles, with three clusters (cl. 1, 4, 6) grouping most of their individuals. Western Sicilians mainly fall in cl. 4, which is virtually absent in Eastern Sicily, but it is modal in the Western Peloponnese. Cl. 6 is the second most represented cluster in Apulia, Calabria and Sicily and is found also in Western Peloponnese. Notably, cl. 1 is found at moderate frequencies (from ∼ 16% to ∼ 23%) in the whole Southern Italy, is rare in the Western part of Peloponnese (absent in all Western Peloponnese with the exception of Messenia), but it is present at high proportions on its Eastern part (i.e. Laconia ∼ 36%), Greece-Macedonia (∼ 33%) and Kosovo (∼ 42%).

More evidence of the Southern Italian-Greek connection. I suppose that “Tomato Joe” Tommasi and John Patler had more in common than we thought.

Interestingly, a substantial proportion of Sicilians (between ∼ 16 to ∼ 30%), are part of a cluster which includes Northern and Central Italian areas (cl. 9), and is absent in Greece and Peloponnese. 

Clustering of "a substantial portion of Sicilians" with “Northern and Central Italian areas?” How is that possible, Der Movement?  I thought “Northern and Central Italian areas” were Celto-Germanic Nordic and Sicilians were non-White African Moors? Is it possible that the historically documented (e.g., see this) partial repopulation of Sicily with continental Europeans, particularly Northern Italians, is more true than, say, the movie True Romance?

By the way, these data don’t in any way refute the Greek connection. Essentially, a majority of Sicilians are most akin to (Ancient) Greeks, while a significant minority are more akin to “Northern and Central Italian areas” – although no doubt most Sicilians in reality derive ancestry from both of those clusters, but are as individuals more similar to one or the other.  

Modern Southern Italians are closer to Southern European Neolithic and Bronze Age samples (Neolithic Peloponnesians and Minoans) than most modern Peloponnesian groups, with the exception of the Deep Mani and Taygetos individuals (Fig. S5B). 

That is consistent with a stable European population structure for thousands of years. Modern European populations to a large extent reflect their Neolithic and Bronze Age origins.

However, when the affinity of Italian groups with African and Middle Eastern populations was tested, Southern Italians resulted not significantly closer to any of the two (Table S4).

Der Movement, please note the word “not.”  

In this study, we highlighted a high similarity between Southern Italy and the Peloponnese. In fact, our cluster analysis showed that present-day South-Eastern Peloponnesian populations have high genetic affinity with modern Apulians, Calabrians and South-Eastern Sicilians, all characterised by a cluster composition different from those displayed by other Greek groups (Fig. 1B, Fig. S3). Additionally, individuals from Western Sicily show similarities with populations inhabiting the Western part of Peloponnese (Fig. 1B, Fig. S4). Although establishing the chronological context for this affinity using present-day genomes might be challenging, our results are in accordance with archaeological and historical sources that attributed the origin of Greek colonies in South-Eastern Sicily and Apulia from populations inhabiting the southern and Eastern parts of the Peloponnese (31,32). Uniparental Y-chromosome findings are also in agreement with these observations revealing Eastern Peloponnesian ancestries in East Sicily (34) and shared haplogroups among modern-day Greeks and populations living in Southern Italian areas colonised by Greeks such as the Salento (Apulia) and the Ionian coast of Calabria (56). The lower affinity with other Balkan populations could be attributed to a lower influence by inland populations, such as Slavic-related people (57) and/or genetic drift in Tsakones and Maniots as suggested by historical sources (39). Therefore, our results imply a high affinity between Southern Italians and Peloponnesians possibly abrupted very recently by major events of migrations and/or admixture as the one recorded during the Middle Age period (58). However the observation that, in some analyses, Southern Italians and ancient Greeks share more alleles than modern and ancient Peloponnesians, may suggest a scenario including the preservation of an ancient population signal in the genome of Southern Italians that was likely diluted by inland migrations in Greece (Fig. 3).

In other words, Southern Italians are more similar to Ancient Greeks than are modern Greeks, who have been influenced to some degree by Slavic and other migrations (this Greek information does not invalidate the idea of stable European population structure over the last 3,000 years; some degree of movement and change within Europe is expected and is part of the overall stable structure, but there was no widespread and large scale permanent population replacement, particularly from outside Europe).

The differences identified in modern-day Southern and Northern Italians have significant phenotypic implications and call for more extensive investigations on a larger number of markers and individuals.

Northern and Southern Italians are not “different races” but can be reasonably seen as different ethnic groups, which are similar enough to form a national entity (the same as with North and South Germans). As has been shown previously, North and South Italian differences are of ancient origins, with the South being more akin to Ancient Greece; the differences are NOT due to the South being akin to MENA populations.

Once again, Der Movement’s fetishistic dogma is refuted.

Executive summary: Der Movement is always, ALWAYS wrong.

Or:

Der Movement weeps.

See this paper for more “genes mirror geography” in Europe data.

Abstract

Haplotype-based analyses have recently been leveraged to interrogate the fine-scale structure in specific geographic regions, notably in Europe, although an equivalent haplotype-based understanding across the whole of Europe with these tools is lacking. Furthermore, study of identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing in a large sample of haplotypes across Europe would allow a direct comparison between different demographic histories of different regions. The UK Biobank (UKBB) is a population-scale dataset of genotype and phenotype data collected from the United Kingdom, with established sampling of worldwide ancestries. The exact content of these non-UK ancestries is largely uncharacterized, where study could highlight valuable intracontinental ancestry references with deep phenotyping within the UKBB. In this context, we sought to investigate the sample of European ancestry captured in the UKBB. We studied the haplotypes of 5,500 UKBB individuals with a European birthplace; investigated the population structure and demographic history in Europe, showing in parallel the variety of footprints of demographic history in different genetic regions around Europe; and expand knowledge of the genetic landscape of the east and southeast of Europe. Providing an updated map of European genetics, we leverage IBD-segment sharing to explore the extent of population isolation and size across the continent. In addition to building and expanding upon previous knowledge in Europe, our results show the UKBB as a source of diverse ancestries beyond Britain. These worldwide ancestries sampled in the UKBB may complement and inform researchers interested in specific communities or regions not limited to Britain.

OK.

Some regions appear more heterogenous such as Germany or Malta (SI Appendix, Supplementary Data 2 and Figs. 2.3 and 2.5), suggestive that a substantial fraction of individuals in the dataset have a recent genetic ancestry that does not match most individuals with the same place of birth label, possibly due to modern economic or other recent migration within the continent. 

Note: Germany.  Der Movement weeps.

Interestingly, there appears to be a common cluster of individuals projected onto the same PC space who collectively do not match the ancestry of individuals with their reported place of birth. A substantial number of individuals of Hungarian, Czech, or Russian birthplaces appear to be members of this cluster. Indeed, these individuals separate together on PC six (SI Appendix, Fig. 2.9). This suggests a community of individuals with shared common ancestry that is not private to one European country but is more common in samples from Eastern Europe. 

So, there may be a common “Eastern Europe genotype” that is found in certain Eastern European nations in addition to the more specific national genotypes. This level of kinship overlap emphasizes why intra-European conflict is maladaptive and why petty nationalism is stupid.

We observed a split in Britain and Ireland between the eastern populations of the British Isles (e.g., England and Wales) and the northwestern (e.g., Ireland and Scotland). We report genetic results from the Channel Islands, an archipelago off the northern French coast. Additionally, one cluster of predominant French membership (“France”) groups with English clusters, possibly reflecting gene flow across the channel or a signature of genetic affinity of northwestern France with neighboring Britain (23, 33). 

Heterogeneity and kinship overlap exists in Northwest Europe as well.

Finland shows evidence of isolation from other European regions, projecting away in PC space and showing high differentiation in FST and total variance distance (TVD) values (Datasets S2 and S3). 

That is not surprising based on previous studies.

We report to our knowledge the largest sample of dense genome-wide genotypes from the small Mediterranean archipelago of Malta (n = 200). In PCA, these are distributed along a gradient along PC seven, forming three clusters. The first contains Maltese individuals who projected separately from the rest with British samples. The other two project away from these Maltese samples, with one equidistant between the British–Maltese individuals and another of sole Maltese membership in PC space (SI Appendix, Supplementary Data 6). Our Leiden clustering groups these latter 2 groups of samples into 1 cluster of 79 individuals and the former into clusters of predominant British membership. These results suggest recent western European gene flow into Malta, with the intermediate PCA cluster of Maltese individuals consistent with first-generation offspring of ancestral Maltese and western European parents. 

The British were in Malta. If I recall, Norman Lowell has some British ancestry; apparently, other Maltese do as well.

Elsewhere in S European genetics, we have studied a genetic community of individuals that we denote as Mixed European. Although we discuss in more detail in SI Appendix, Supplementary Data S7, to summarize, we show using f-statistics (37) that these individuals share ancestry with Ashkenazi Jewish references from the Human Origins dataset as well as projecting onto the same PC space (SI Appendix, Fig. 4.2). The demographic profile from haplotype sharing and estimated historical Ne of individuals within this cluster matches well with a proposed demographic model from a previous study of European Ashkenazi Jews (55) with a bottleneck 25 to 35 generations ago with a subsequent period of population expansion. This model included admixture between southern European and Middle Eastern sources and latter Eastern European sources (55), which match our nnls sharing patterns of IBD (SI Appendix, Fig. 4.3).

The Ashkenazim are a three-way mixture of Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Eastern European, and can be distinguished from European ethnies, as we know from previous studies (where the "proposed demographic model" originates).

Odds and Ends, 6/14/22

In der news.

Remember this?  Then laugh at this.

To celebrate Year Twelve, we have some new incentives to give, in the form of monthly Giving Circles.

You can see what all of that is in the “Laugh at this” link. I should thank the Counter-Currents crew for proving my point in such a clear and precise manner. How are those childish "Giving Circles" anything other than pay-for-view and pay-to-play hobbyism? Counter-Currents is nothing but a cash cow, a money-making enterprise. Any doubt? Look at the Counter-Currents link.

I've been involved in pro-White activism a long time, and before that, paleo-conservatism, and in all of that time, I've never observed the level of absolutely shameless money-grubbing tin cup panhandling as I've seen Counter-Currents morph into. The NRA comes close. But the NRA fails to equal Counter-Currents' impressively imaginative ways of separating fools from their money.

If you donate 100 criticisms of Der Movement per month, the Sallis Groupuscule offers you membership in The Patler-Tommasi Circle.

See this.

Younger activists worry that if they engage with society and build a more or less normal life, that they will be supporting the System. What they should ask themselves is why their fearless leaders do not share those worries. Looking at those so-called leaders, one sees people who live well, with blue state lifestyles, making good money (including "executive compensation") from activism, had professional careers, have PhDs, go to movies, travel internationally, have families, have homes, etc. And yet you need to be downwardly mobile and live a Mad Max lifestyle in order to "beat the System" while they luxuriate in relative opulence, living off of whatever D'Nations you can scrounge together. Then you get rewarded with membership in the PT Barnum's Suckers Inner Circle. How about you just live your own life the best you can?

This is American Renaissance:

Brett Stevens

Once your country goes mixed-race, it is doomed. Look at Latin America, Southern Europe, and Eastern Europe for good examples.

Attention Southern and Eastern Europeans - Der Movement HATES you. Asians are another story - they are gods that walk the Earth. Anyway, I have a suggestion for Southern and Eastern Europeans - how about you hate Der Movement right back? Know your enemy - Der Movement.

Eastern Europeans take notice; Counter-Currents comment:

Just don’t mix or breed with those that want to destroy you or whose culture is hyper sexualized and violent: Chinks, Hispanics/Latinos, Eastern Europeans, and Blacks. Communism is embedded in these cultures.

If all you hunkies out there think Der Movement loves you that much more than the wops, you're sadly mistaken.

Hard Truths About Der Movement

Face reality.

Someone else gets it!

Melanie

I don't understand the Slant eyed oriental phillia on Amren. Dear ladies and gentlemen, East and South Asians are not your friends or brothers in the struggle just because you share certain traits or are attacked by the same groups. If anything Asians (especially the Han Chinese) are far more ruthless and efficient than blacks when it comes to their covert hatred for whites. They are also definitely not white adjacent. They are our enemies and rivals. Europeans/ Whites have our own culture, religion and trajectory. Asians are not part of it. Period.

A response to that good sense: 

Dear Melanie,

For your understanding, consider the possibility that Amren is motivated by aesthetic preferences for high IQ Asians who play the violin and are “law abiding” and for high IQ erudite cosmopolitan Jews who are ever-so-charming at cocktail parties, and also motivated by crude ethnic resentments against “uncouth” White ethnics. That would explain much, wouldn’t it?

Best, Ted

Der Movement’s profound lack of interest about the paper discussed here essentially reveals some hard truths about the “movement” – it is, and always has been, a scam, and not only because of the money-hungry grifters running the show deluding poor fools that giving D’Nations actually accomplishes anything. It is also a scam because its alleged fundamental premise of supporting White nationalism is a lie. Look, if Der Movement was “on the level” then the Stable European Population Structure paper should be music to their ears, since it refutes the Left’s assertions that massive demographic change (at least for Whites) is normal and inevitable and such has always been a part of Europe’s history.  No, the actuality is that despite whatever demographic events that have occurred, they have been so limited in scope that the basic population structure of Europe has been mostly unchanged for the last 3,000 years.  Therefore, the current demographic crisis is unnatural and it is not inevitable; indeed, it is ahistorical, abnormal, and it is being imposed – The Great Replacement.  

All good, right?

But, you see, that was never Der Movement’s main interest. This paper – and other archaeogenetics papers ignored by Der Movement – refutes the REAL ideological foundation of the “movement” – Nordicism, NW European self-worship, and ethnic resentments against Southern and Eastern Europeans.  The paradigms of “Nordic Rome became populated by Levantine mongrels and those self-same mongrels are precisely the modern greasy Afro-Arabic Afrowop” and “Nordic Sicilians became Negro mulattoes from the Moors” and “Eastern Europeans are essentially Asiatic Turkics and Mongols” and “Northern and Western Europe was always absolutely racially pure from the earliest mists of time” are disproved by this paper, and by other papers analyzing real ethnic and racial histories. Therefore, even when a paper strongly supports the idea that modern Europeans are indigenous and represent similar stocks to the ethnogenesis of thousands of years ago, that paper must be ignored if it doesn’t support the idea that the Ancient Romans were genetically Scandinavian and looked like Dolph Lundgren, while the modern Italian is akin to a 50:50 mix of Nigerians and Iraqis.  If the paper suggests that non-European migrants were in Northcentral/Western Europe in ancient times, just like in Italy, but in both cases there was no permanent significant demographic change, then the paper must be ignored by Der Movement.  It doesn’t matter if the paper as a whole strongly supports a White nationalist narrative, because Der Movement was really never about White nationalism. The truth about Der Movement is thus exposed; the scam of Der Movement becomes evident.

There is no White nationalism extant in any established “movement” today, it is a fraud, at least in America.  If you want genuine White nationalism, and you should, you are going to have to build it yourself. I keep on offering the Sallis Groupuscule as a foundation for such a project, but no one is interested.  Enjoy being scammed, then.

Nietzsche and the Jewish Group Evostrat

Evostrat = evolutionary strategy.

Nietzsche was correct when he suggested that the uncanniness of Jews derives from their dedication to survive at any price.  

The Jews are the most remarkable people in the history of the world, for when they were confronted with the question, to be or not to be, they chose, with perfectly unearthly deliberation, to be at any price: this price involved a radical falsification of all nature, of all naturalness, of all reality, of the whole inner world, as well as of the outer. They put themselves against all those conditions under which, hitherto, a people had been able to live, or had even been permitted to live; out of themselves they evolved an idea which stood in direct opposition to natural conditions—one by one they distorted religion, civilization, morality, history and psychology until each became a contradiction of its natural significance.

That summarizes what the Jewish group evostrat essentially is: A dedication to survive as an identifiable group at any price, including loss of genetic integrity (“racial purity”), loss of group dignity, endless conflict, a history of group and individual suffering both for themselves and for the unfortunate peoples they live amongst, and compromises in culture and tradition (as long as the basic Jewish cultural core is maintained). The Jewish group evostrat objective is the long term survival of a population group that identifies as Jewish, contains a significant amount of Jewish genetic ancestry even if it is by no means “racially pure” even by modern historical standards – although they contain a more “pure” Orthodox/Hasidic core that maintains the integrity of modern Jewish ethnogenesis even if the original stock population of ancient times has essentially been irreversibly modified by admixture – and that maintains a basic core of Jewish religious, cultural, and historical, rites, identities, and narratives, and emphasizes an “us vs. them” extreme ethnocentric attitude, even if compromises and secularization, as well as significant inter-marriage, occur. Even if this strategy results in hatred, war, conflict, expulsion, and genocide, it is considered a success as long as some type of Jewish population survives. In the end, success is that the group survives, even if in a bastardized form, and even in the face of hatred of, and conflict with, others. Judaism is revealed as being essentially a self-obsessed biocultural cult. Other groups may have thrown up their hands and said the prize of survival is not worth the cost, particularly the cost of accepting genetic admixture, as well as the cost of never-ending conflict with others. But the Jews persevere - survival at any price. 

The preceding paragraph basically summarizes the essence of Jewishness, and their long term group strategy, as well, or better, as any other description. Of course, all of the other peoples of the Earth are under no obligation to tolerate the destructive behavior of Jews as they pursue the Jewish group strategy.

Odds and Ends, 6/8/22

In der news.

There are some interesting subtexts to the movie First Blood, particularly when looked at through the lens of Der Movement. An insular High Truster group telling a White ethnic "we don't want your kind around here" despite that person's service to the broader group (America in the movie, pro-White activism for Der Movement) and using harassment (police tactics in the movie, who is White games and Sallis' Law in Der Movement) to try and force out the "intrusive" element. Then when the targeted person reacts, they're "crazy" and "criminal."

The old GNXP argument - any opposition to an influx of "high IQ" racially and culturally alien types is due solely to a personal selfish "fear of competition." God forbid that one doesn't want to see one's people race replaced, or that one is concerned with EGI, or is fearful of a hostile alien elite, or doesn't want cultural change. No, no, a thousand times no! It is that the buck-toothed Chinaman, spreading disease and engaging in the most ruthless ethnic nepotism (you see, Asians are allowed the ethnic nepotism that Whites are denied) is going to "take that promotion away from you."

Really, these "cognitive elitist" scum are so mendacious, it is incredible The "competition" argument can be turned on its head. Asian HBDers preach to Whites the lie that "ethnic nepotism is not adaptive" because they are afraid of White competition - they know that Asians benefit from practicing ruthless ethnic nepotism and they don't want the White competition to use the same tactics. After all, the status quo is a sweet deal. For example, White American Principal Investigators (PIs) are happy to hire and promote Chinese post-docs and research scientists, while Chinese PIs in America typically only hire and promote other Chinese. Therefore, over time, academic departments become predominantly Chinese, which the HBDers ascribe to "high Chinese IQ." Further, access to White living space, and the desire of some Whites to maintain that space for themselves is a form of competition - are Asians afraid of the competition from ethnocentric Whites?

The most White-hating Blacks still have to look in the mirror and see what they are. Which is precisely why they hate Whites so much in the first place.

All of the tallest buildings and statues, etc. are in non-White nations - in Asia. The hobbit hole twigs and branches crowd may not care, but these things are symbols of civilizational power, prestige, and confidence. Therefore, it is of importance; when the West was at its height of power, it had the grandest structures; now, it has been surpassed by the Asiatic. Perhaps Der Movement should care less about the size of Fuentes and Putin and more about the size of physical artifacts.

To those who say we need “immigration reform” and more (Latino) immigrants to “pick the crops” and “put food on our tables” I have some questions (apart from the obvious one of how a country like, say, Japan, is able to feed its population without importing countless hordes of unskilled Hispanics).  Let us assume we continue to import large numbers of Latinos to “pick our crops.”  Very well.  What happens when these workers grow old?  Who will “pick the crops” then?  Will the children and grandchildren of our current immigrants do so – a hereditary caste of crop pickers?  No, they will not; they will not want to do so. They will want to be upwardly mobile, using whatever legal or illegal non-agricultural careers to make their way.  And they will need to eat too, will need someone to “put food on the table” for them as well. So, who “pick the crops?’’ Answer – yet another influx of hordes of unskilled, alien immigrants.  And when they’re done, another influx, and another, each generation requiring countless unskilled immigrants and each generation of immigrants leaving their posterity as a permanent addition to the population.  Isn’t this so?  And doesn’t that mean that America is going to be filled up with tens or hundreds of millions of the descendants of people brought in the “pick crops?”  Doesn’t that mean that this demographic Ponzi scheme will crowd out, will replace, the original population just so that the agricultural interests can have cheap workers and that consumers can have food a bit cheaper than of other nations that choose not to replace their population with crop pickers and the descendants of crop pickers? Shouldn’t we consider the long term consequences of your request for “more workers?” Further, what ever happened to the idea that the “free market can solve any problem” and that “don’t worry, innovation will solve our problems?” How come the “free market” and “innovation” fail in the specific case of finding alternatives to race replacement immigration in order to put “food on our tables?”  And doesn’t cheap labor stifle innovation by lessening the need?  Haven’t slave labor societies been scarce with mechanical innovation throughout history for that reason (among others)?