EGN111522

Notice they cannot admit being wrong. A symbol, not substance.   Not bad, although it could have mentioned the A$AP Rocky fiasco as another example of Trump’s feckless buffoonery. Two further points. Are any of these fellows EVER going to publicly admit to being wrong about their hysterical “Trump is the last chance for White America” nonsense, as well as admit that Strom and I were right about Trump?  And is Johnson going to consider this brief Amren video as an example of “small-minded” “movement” whining about Trump?   But, but, but …I thought Trump was “the last chance for White America.”   Listen to the whole thing, concentrating on the criticisms about Trump. Once again, note how these people are unable to admit how horribly wrong they were about Antifa Don Trump, and how EGI Notes was right.  Also, once again – will Johnson criticize his buddies at Amren for “small-minded” complaining about Trump? And then the other shoe drops . MAGA! Pepe! Kek! Th...

“We charge you in the name of God, take heed.” This essay is about the oft-ignored and much-neglected final third of Dr. Frank Salter’s classic work On Genetic Interests , a book that, in my opinion, is of such import that Salter should win a Nobel Prize for this work. The book is divided into three major sections. The first described what genetic interests and ethnic genetic interests (EGI) are, how they can be measured, and what their import is, and how some objections to these concepts can be answered. The second section studies the political and social ramifications of genetic interests and the EGI concept, and how these concepts could be incorporated into practical biopolitics. The last third of the book deals with the ethics of pursuing genetic interests in opposition to the genetic interests of others and in opposition to the proximate interests (genetic interests being ultimate interests for evolved organisms) of others. The ethical component of Salter’s work has been ignored b...

The usual failures and humiliations. What happened?  Answer: David Duke is a fool. So is Spencer. So is anyone in Der Movement who endorsed or otherwise supported or promoted Princess Tulsi Coconut.  It’s not even primary season yet, and the Quota Queens are already being humiliated by their Man on White Horse Syndrome (or in this case, Woman on Samoan Surfboard Syndrome) candidates. Keep on enabling your “leaders” though, because, well, you know…. Meanwhile, Trump’s DOJ is hard at work.   Is Trump going to plan an Otto Skorzeny-style operation (a la Mussolini) to rescue A$AP Rocky?  MAGA! Pepe!  Kek! Meanwhile, again, Trump is monitoring the situation.  What is there to “consider?”  Just do it or don’t do it.  You see, this way, Trump has all the MAGA yokels excited about the “impeding action” – without having to actually do anything except producing another blustering tweet.  MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek! A perfect inversion of reality (fro...

The second half of this discussion. Here, we will take a look at Andrew Joyce’s comments on the matter of homosexuality, and I will determine if my views as outlined here in Part I require modification. Several points. First, I am not going to comment on every single argument Joyce made, only those I believe are most relevant to a critical examination of my views (and his) and/or those comments of his that I wish to comment on even if they are not directly relevant to the main issue. Second, in general, much of Joyce's work (insofar as I am familiar with it) is in my opinion good; however, there are points of disagreement and criticism which come into play here, which should become apparent below. Third, my overall personal attitude toward homosexuality is similar to that of Joyce; however, I am here attempting to view the issue from the perspective of what is best for the pro-White movement as a whole rather than my private aesthetic preferences.  Fourth and finally, although Part...