EGN111522

Why does it seem that Northwest Europeans are less ethnocentric? My hypothesis, in contrast to MacDonald’s thesis about “primordialist individualism,” is something I have written about before, and will summarize again here. Northwest Europe is that part of Europe most geographically distant from non-Europe. Therefore, in the ethnogenesis of Northwest European ethnies, and throughout most of the histories of those peoples, group conflicts were almost always with other Europeans; in contrast, in the ethnogenesis and histories of Southern and Eastern European ethnies, conflicts occurred not only with other Europeans but frequently with Afro-Asiatic, non-European peoples. Thus, Northwest European ethnoracial evolution and ethnocultural identity occurred in the context of viewing other Europeans as “the other,” while for Southern and Eastern Europeans, group evolution and identity occurred primarily in the context of Afro-Asiatic aliens, peoples from other continents, other races, and other...

Sallis is der sane. What about the other side of the equation? See this important Western Destiny essay. Very cognitive, very elite. Behold the female – intelligent medical care. More raging retardation and pseudoscientific nonsense from the ludicrous Right. Anglin is a turd: Any of you people who want to accuse me of being a Chinese shill need to explain, specifically, where I am wrong. I am sick and tired of it. This is the biggest issue on planet earth right now, and I’m going to tell the truth about it. I’m not going to be silenced by a bunch of Jew-lovers who claim that China is a threat to America, while our entire country is literally run by Jews who are trying to go to war with China. Yes – I do like Asian people. I’m not a fetishist, but in general, I like Asian people. I’ve never tried to hide that fact. That's the Silk Road White nationalism ploy – if you don’t want to be doing “measured groveling” to Asians with a Chinatrix strap-on shoved up your ass, then you are a “...

Let's take a look. Readers of this blog know I admit when I'm wrong. So, my previous characterization of McCulloch as dishonest and/or incompetent, re: Johnson's embrace of multiracialism, was wrong (assuming that the second part of his essay was written in its present form before my post of earlier today). If that assumption is correct, then I do apologize for "jumping the gun" so to speak, and this is a lesson to wait for the entirety of a work to be published before commenting.  That said, my criticism of McCulloch's lack of understanding of population genetics methodology and interpretation still stands, and, as we shall see, he ends his essay in such a way as to mostly invalidate what good he does in critiquing Johnson. Here's some of McCulloch's criticism of Johnson: This is where Johnson seems to falter and backstep on the program he advocates elsewhere. That is, he accepts “multiculturalism” (by which he means multiracialism, the real object...

More “movement” dishonesty?  In all cases, emphasis added. First, before we get to the main points of this post, read this.   Haven’t I always told you that Asians are bizarre aliens, virtually akin to a different species? Comment: HT  Races are different in more ways than just IQ. Asians are like little calculators but do not exhibit the independence or creativity to develop what whites have done in terms of discovery and inventions. Negros? Not sure what they have to offer. Now to the main events: Laugh at this: Vagrant RightistMarch 28, 2021 at 4:20 am I do have some questions and concerns about this and other recent changes. Rather than writing everything I could, I’ll stick to one question and ask, why is this is necessary? The last fundraiser was a success as you’ve said and asking for donations did in fact work. You’ve made a case that nationalism, and nationalist publications needed to be supported and people listened. Reply Greg JohnsonMarch 28, 2021 at 5:28 am...

In der news. See this. Growing up, I never thought about race. I was raised in a small, almost 100 percent white, town. My parents rarely talked about politics, but if you had asked me in my early twenties what political affiliation I had, I would have told you I was liberal. The only non-whites I saw when I was in elementary school were on television, and the blacks portrayed were likable, not dangerous. My parents never spoke to me about race, and I wasn’t curious about it. Yes, I do believe that there is a correlation between  "I was raised in a small, almost 100 percent white, town” and “if you had asked me in my early twenties what political affiliation I had, I would have told you I was liberal.”  A causative correlation, I would think. My own life experiences would never have allowed such naivete. It’s a shame – on the one hand, exposure of White children to significant numbers of non-Whites, particularly Blacks and non-White Hispanics, is a form of child abuse; on the...

What else is new? In all cases, emphasis added. Pathetic money grubbing.   Even people who support Counter-Currents should oppose that, which is the naked commercialization of “movement” material. If you are pro- Counter-Currents , ask yourself – if the paywall material is not important then why must you pay to see it, and if it is important, then why is it being hidden for financial reasons, instead of being immediately widely disseminated for the good of our people? Yes, full time activists need to be supported, but not by holding important and useful (in theory, but perhaps not in practice, eh?) material hostage to “D’Nations.” If Der Movement had been doing what it should have been doing all along to build infrastructure, and if millions of dollars were not wasted, then we could have a scenario in which productive and useful efforts (if such exist) are rewarded by consistent support. One would not need have paywalls for online material, like some sort of cheap huckster. W...

Thoughts. Long time readers of this blog know that I am opposed to the paradigm of "worse is better" with respect to pro-White activism and with respect to prompting Whites to defend their own racial interests. Whites seem to be able to take abuse unlimited; in addition, ever-increasing repression leaves little room for dissidents to maneuver. Instead, I believe that Suvorov's Law has more validity and historical support - typically, revolutions do not occur during the time of greatest repression, but when that repression is suddenly relaxed. However, using Suvorov's Law, I can see one scenario in which "worse is better" could work out - the specific case in which a time of worsening repression is followed by a period of a relaxation of that repression. T hus: First, there would be a period of worsening conditions, increased repression, that would make even "we can take more and more abuse" Whites angry and frustrated, and then, following this, a p...

Thoughts.  People comment about how the System says that people can arbitrarily choose their sex (“gender”), but when it comes to race, that is taboo.  Thus, a man can suddenly decide he is a “woman,” and we all must accept that self-identification, but if a White decides they are Black, then that is an unacceptable appropriation and a scandal. I see bioleninism explaining this. The “most bioleninist” categories jealously guard their freakish uniqueness, and, in the bioleninist pecking order, the more “other” you are, then the more priority you get with your identity. Thus, trans freaks are more “other,” higher on the bioleninist freak hierarchy, than are women; thus the trans get to choose whether or not they want to be women (or men, or whatever) and we must all accept it.  On the other hand, non-Whites, particularly Blacks, are the highest “other” in the racial category, and are highest on the bioleninist freak-ressentiment category, so they get priority, and Whites, a...

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added. To be fair to Counter-Currents , this is a good essay.  What it should also include is that Matthews is being promoted by Amren.   Why is that I wonder?  Why promote the idea of non-Whites in a pseudo-White “ethnostate?”  Rosie and the kids, perhaps? This is generally useful.   But, see this: I’ve wondered how much of the notorious backbiting from our (?) side is the usual jealousy, gossip-mongering, and purity spiraling by armchair dictators, and how much is deliberate sabotage and disinformation by various opposition sources. Either way, don’t do the enemy’s work for them! It seems that anyone on our side who rises to prominence and starts doing something effective will get buckets of “friendly fire” criticism. Sadly, some of it comes from major figures on our side. It’s time to cut that out! One thing I have to say for Leftists is that they do a fairly decent job of settling disagreements outside of public view and...

Odds and Ends. In all cases, emphasis added Counter-Currents advocating violence and illegality: Nicholas R. JeelvyMarch 21, 2021 at 1:50 am Women, whether they’re wives or daughters, will test your patriarchal resolve until the choice is between abdicating mastery of the house or beating the woman. You don’t have to enjoy it, but yeah, at some point, beatings may become necessary. Is it really necessary to point out all of the problems with that, not only on its own merits as an idea, but also with respect to "optics" and the status of a Far Right website in today's sociopolitical climate? The deeper problem here is not so much Jeelvy's absolute stupidity and immaturity (already well established) but Johnson's horrifically poor judgment (I suppose that is also already well established). I view these comments from Jeelvy to be akin to Derbyshire's comments about child porn - a line has been crossed, after which anyone who associates themselves with Counter-Cu...

Food for thought. We know that politicians are known for lying and that “dark triad” traits are said to be a benefit – nay, even a prerequisite – for leadership. I know many examples IRL of leaders in business and academia who constantly lie, lie freely, lie without shame or remorse; therefore, complete dishonesty seems to be a characteristic of leadership in many fields. I see the same in Der Movement as well. What can we say about fundamentally dishonest leadership? One argument would be that if these lies are deception to benefit the leader’s group, then the lying is justified. Fine - but many of the lies are purely self-serving for the leader’s personal interests, and sometimes harm the group. Another, more sophisticated argument, would be that while those lies may be sometimes harmful, they’re characteristic of a personality type which is otherwise a net benefit for the leader’s group. Perhaps - but those lies have a cost, a significant cost, and maybe the "net benefit" ...

Comments. Some readers may wonder about my criticism of Jeelvy yesterday, given my own frequent negative comments about milady. Was that just knee-jerk criticism of Counter-Currents from the “insane” and “paranoid piece of crap” Sallis?  No.  First, Jeelvy is one of the pitiful current crew of Counter-Currents writers who I find childish and stupid, and so this is just another example of his juvenile jackassery. Second, and more importantly, I see Jeelvy’s post as a form of Bunkerism, which I oppose. Bunkerism I define as politically irrelevant and ultimately futile or counter-productive expressions of racial, ethnic, religious, etc. bigotry by a White right-winger, conducted as an atomized individual or as part of a group of private citizens, which has no positive effect in advancing the views of the “Bunker” in the real world. Jeelvy’s comments about women are sexual Bunkerism, all sound and fury signifying nothing. Only political action that accomplishes the attainment of...

In all cases, emphasis added. Welcome to Spring! All of the Winter-loving, cold-weather-is-in-the-(Northern)European-soul-pontificating, "movement" "activists" are mourning, as they weep bitter tears - weeping in their places of residence in California, Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, Arizona, Washington, Virginia, Maryland, etc. Not one in, say, Alaska or North Dakota. Mysterious, it all is! See this.   The following is a sample of the juvenile Boratism that passes for intellectual discourse at Counter-Currents.   After all, we’ve transcended the era of housewives and we simply love conservative women with big tits in MAGA hats , brandishing guns and spouting libertarian boilerplate.  The reality, however, is that Simone de Beauvoir is right.  Female gender roles are manufactured by society and imposed upon females, thereby making them women, the second sex. Natural woman isn’t, as the conservative would have you believe, a mother or a loyal wife, nurturing, submiss...