EGN111522

What is America? We are told that America is not defined by a core racial or ethnic group but is instead defined by an idea. We are told that Americans are not a particular ancestry group but people who agree with this idea. Putting aside the laughable assertion that all of the competing groups in America actually agree on anything fundamental, we can ask a more basic question – what’s the idea?  What actually IS the idea that defines America?  Can anyone tell me? Freedom? The current USA is defined by a social control apparatus that commands human behavior via myriad de jure and de facto mechanisms in order to manage the chaos of diversity and multiculturalism. We have numerous civil rights laws ( de jure ) and an endless array ( de facto ) of social pricing controls, as well as government-corporate cooperation, all in order to stifle dissent, particularly dissent from the disappearing White majority. Freedom of association does not exist, freedom of speech is being consta...

Sallis vs. the HBD Nordicists. Consider the competing hypotheses mentioned here – my own theory of intra-European behavioral differences contrasted to that of the HBD Nordicists.  How could one go about testing this, with an eye toward falsification? One could consider stress responses, particularly that of the amygdala, to different ethnic/racial images.  If Southern and Eastern Europeans simply have stronger responses to alien faces than do Northwest Europeans, and there are no other differences, that would support the HBD Nordicist theory. On the other hand, regardless of possible overall differences in responsiveness, if Northwest Europeans demonstrated  relatively greater responses to other Europeans and relatively lesser responses to non-Whites, as compared to Southern and Eastern Europeans who would be expected to exhibit the opposite relative pattern, then that would be more suggestive of my theory. Note that in the cases of intra-European response measurements,...

By Kerry Bolton. See this.   It was also reviewed here. While I disagree with him on a number of issues, I nevertheless have, at the current time, a generally positive view of Bolton, and appreciate his promotion of Yockey and Yockey’s work. I therefore approached this book with the hope that it would not be as bad as others I have recently reviewed.  Some chapter titles (in bold font) and excerpts, and my comments are as follows: With respect to Freudianism , the Frankfurt School and Critical Race Theory : …the doctrines he is describing are those of the Frankfurt School, where the therapeutic state is propounded as necessary to ensure the mental health of mass society, in need of freedom to express instincts that are repressed by the authoritarian patriarchal family. The focus of this neo-Freudianism is on the individual detached from society. It is therefore a means of deconstructing and fracturing the social organism, which is why the Marxian theorists who created the Fra...