EGN111522

In der news. To paraphrase Sam Francis and his comments on Democrats and Republicans – Germans are the evil ethny and Italians are the stupid ethny. A practical argument for pan-Europeanism, even for people who would prefer ethnonationalism, is that each and every European ethny is so degenerate that it is impossible to assemble an effective cadre of effective people from any one ethny, or even from a subracial grouping of several ethnies. Instead, you will be lucky if you can scrape together sufficient qualified individuals from the entirety of the family of all European peoples. Even Michelangelo needed marble to make statues, if he'd had only clay, he would be nothing more than a potter. - Mussolini Guess what Benito was referring to there. He realized then what is painfully obvious to us all now. Clay, not marble. Christards and Trumptards didn't deliver - the practical message of the election (other than Sallis is always right). Re: the GOP's mid-term implosion: Tell ...

Riposte. Gaslighting Greg. First, many of those bland and/or unqualified candidates were pushed forward by your God Emperor, the "sincere man of genuine greatness," Trump. You have the "gridiron groid" Walker because he has a personal relationship with Trump. Trump endorsed the cosmopolitan socially liberal Muslim Turk Oz, who is literally less suited to appeal to PA White voters than Phil the groundhog, and I'm not joking - again, literally less suited. Second, if you want WN-oriented candidates, then you need to have a competent, rational, and constructive "movement" that produces ideas and people that can appeal to White "normies." So far, the best you get is Trump the Fraud, a conservative Italian-American who is an effective leader but far from being a racialist, and a High Trust "hillbilly" married to a brownster. Sorry, that's not a good record.  How about electable candidates who are explicitly pro-White?  How many more...

Thoughts. Many people think of courage or of heroic acts in the sense of instinctive physical courage – a scenario suddenly unfolds and the courageous hero springs into action, instantly and without a thought to the consequences to self, and performs some deed of self-sacrifice or, if not that, at least some risky action that has the potential for danger and self-sacrifice, benefitting others. That’s all well and good, but is that real courage? Is that real heroism?  Is an instinctive, reflex action, performed, as noted, “instantly and without a thought to the consequences to self,” really courageous?  It would seem to me that true courage, true heroism, contains within it a full understanding of the risks involved, of the consequences, and does not always have to be a physical action.  Indeed, it can be taking a political sand, speaking out even when at risk for doing so; the whole direction I’m thinking toward, whether the action is physical or not, is moral courage, ac...

In der news. Ultimately, my opposition to the Cofnas argument is summarized thus - it is not enough just to do a simple bean-counting of Jewish over-representation on the Left vs. the Right (that would favor the Left in any case, supporting MacDonald), but we must actually look at what all of these Jews are doing, what ideas, memes, paradigms, and policies they are promoting. If you look at actual sociopolitical behavior, rather than at superficial Left vs. Right labels, you will observe that Jews, even those ostensibly on the Right (even the Far Right), keep on pushing destructive, subversive, anti-White, anti-Western, leftist ideas. Hart's promotion of a multiracial "White separatist state" - multiracial diversity promoted within the context of Far Right White separatism! - is just the most egregious example of this trend. Then we have HBD, which prioritizes Jewish and Asian IQ over White interests and divides Whites based on hierarchies of traits, and in the mainstream...

More ethnography. In all cases, emphasis added. Some background. See this. See the table.   All consistent with popular national stereotypes. Abstract: We theorize that people’s perceptions of national hierarchy are aligned not only with longstanding cultural schemas of development but also with schemas of cultural wealth. We use data from the Nation Brands Index surveys to examine how European publics’ evaluate their own country and other European countries across many attributes. We find that European publics rank northwest European countries highest on developmental attributes and southwestern European nations highest on cultural attributes, while they rank eastern European countries lowest in both categorizations. Moreover, we show that publics’ rankings of countries load to two related yet distinct factors, the contents of which closely reflect schemas of development and cultural wealth. This evidence suggests that these two distinct schemas are simultaneously present in Europ...

In der news. IMPORTANT! The other shoe drops and Amren defends anti-KMacD (presumably Jewish) “race realist” Nathan Cofnas. Well, well, well...Is MacDonald going to be as aggressive pushing back against this as he was with that swarthoid spokesman for Southern Italian interests Sallis? Or will the High Truster good old boys network win out?  Let's all emerge from our hobbit holes and observe. I do not let personal feelings interfere with business, so in the MacDonald-Cofnas debate, I support MacDonald 100%.  What about you, "Hood?" Answer the question . I also like how "Hood" pretends that the MacDonald-Cofnas dust-up is in the best scholarly traditions of the West, as if it has been akin to a bunch of English gentlemen sitting in a nobleman's study smoking pipes and discussing the finer points of natural philosophy. In reality, the posts, comments, and tweets, particularly those involving or about Joyce, have reached almost Sallisian levels of disdain. As ...