EGN111522

In der news. A Gab correspondent gives us the following interesting phenotypic comparison: Emperor Hirohito. Heinrich Himmler. It seems Himmler fits in well with Bromstad and Bjork.  Grab dem chopsticks! See this.  Well, the one positive from all of that is that maybe, just maybe, this latest massive humiliation, after all of the others (Rotherham apparently was not enough), is enough to make Britons lose their arrogant "the wogs begin at Calais" attitude toward the rest of Europe, stop thinking that they are still on top of the world, stop the idea that they still have an empire and the dead hag was "Queen of the World," and they will finally start having a bit of humility and work with other Europeans to build a New European Order. Or...we'll just have more Anglomanic Anachronisms like Andrew Fraser behaving as if it was the year 1890. The UK now has King Tampon, Prince Peggster, Prince Old Driller, Gunga Din as Prime Minister, and Paki Din as mayor of Lond...

Thoughts. If women want the "right to choose" then they must also have the responsibility for raising the child if they want it and not demand that the father pay "child support." A exclusive right to choose obligates an equally exclusive responsibility to support. On the other hand, if fathers are to be obligated to pay child support, at least in certain circumstances, then they must have the right to contribute to the decisions about pregnancy. What if there are conflicting views? If the woman wants the child and the man does not, then she can go ahead and have the child but with no support, economic or otherwise, whatsoever from the father. If the woman wants an abortion and the man objects, the woman can have the abortion but must pay the man reparations equal to whatever child support payments he would have been obligated to pay for the child until that child's independence. It is time for men to take a stand on this issue. Milady weeps.

A disturbing possibility. Genetics vs. epigenetics.  To briefly summarize, genetics deals with the actual DNA sequences - the genome - while epigenetics deals with factors (e.g., DNA methylation, histone modifications, and other mechanisms cited in the linked article) that affect how the genetic information in the genome is expressed. Epigenetic changes can be heritable , at least for several generations (including being stable for a time after the environmental stimulus causing the epigenetic alteration is no longer present). Readers of my work know that I prioritize genetics over epigenetics. After all, it are the DNA sequences, particularly the autosomal genome, that are the focus of ethnic genetic interests; further, genetics is the basic foundation of the phenotype, the fundamental instructions, the essential blueprint, while epigenetic influences are in the secondary role of modulating those basic instructions. Having said that, secondary importance is still important. Epigen...

In all cases, emphasis added. Please see this. The paper. Authors: Da-Yuan Chen , Devin Kenney, Chue Vin Chin , Alexander H. Tavares, Nazimuddin Khan , Hasahn L. Conway, GuanQun Liu, Manish C. Choudhary , Hans P. Gertje, Aoife K. O’Connell, Darrell N. Kotton, Alexandra Herrmann,  View ORCID ProfileArmin Ensser, John H. Connor, Markus Bosmann, Jonathan Z. Li , Michaela U. Gack, Susan C. Baker, Robert N. Kirchdoerfer, Yachana Kataria, Nicholas A. Crossland, Florian Douam, Mohsan Saeed First author. Corresponding author. Abstract: The recently identified, globally predominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.1) is highly transmissible, even in fully vaccinated individuals, and causes attenuated disease compared with other major viral variants recognized to date1–7. The Omicron spike (S) protein, with an unusually large number of mutations, is considered the major driver of these phenotypes3,8. We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of...

In der news. I notice that since the end of WWII, every time the High Trusters get racially threatened by Coloreds, the High Trusters become more Nordicist and start attacking White ethnics, particularly Southern Europeans, who not only did not cause the Colored problems, but in most cases also suffered from it. In America, the “civil rights movement,” integration, and the post-1965 mass Colored immigration triggered Nordicism, leading to Sir Humphrey, McCulloch, Pearce, and Duke, etc. Then, after the election of Obama and continued mass immigration and out-of-control illegal immigration, we now have the revival of more Nordicism in Der Movement, including HBD-Nordicism. The end of apartheid in South Africa led to the radical Nordicist gibbering of Arthur Kemp. The pattern is clear.  Afraid of dealing with Coloreds, the High Trusters look to White ethnics as easy outlets for their racial fears and frustrations. Consider - a long period of outrages against native Britons by Colored ...

Book review. See here for the Western Destiny book review of Irrational Man. The book is a summary of existentialist thought, written in the late 1950s, and it is still relevant today, as existentialism as a philosophy has not significantly progressed over the past sixty years, having been replaced as a leading philosophical school of thought in what used to be the West by "critical theory" "deconstructionism."

The historical truth. I make no claims that the ideas presented here are original with me.  Most of this has come from others, much of it form people like E. Michael Jones , as well as comments by some Gab correspondents and others. Some of it are my ideas and/or my extension of the ideas of others. “White Flight” is a euphemism for ethnic cleansing. Among the various reasons for racial integration was the use of Blacks (and Brown Hispanics) as biological weapons to use against certain Whites – with the ones wielding these weapons of ethnoracial warfare being the WASP-Jewish alliance.  In the South, racial integration was another step in the long civil war between the Yankee WASPs of the North and the Southron WASPs of the South, a war that started before 1861 and continued past 1865. Of more relevance to this post, in the Northeast, racial integration was a weapon used by the WASP-Jewish alliance against the growing demographic-political power of White ethnic Catholics (Iri...

In der news. Hood is at it again.  One of the best pieces of advice I ever heard - and, surprisingly enough, it was from a woman - was that if you are going to bring up a problem then you should offer a solution. Hood and Amren do not do this. That site - and especially all of Hood's "verified hate" posts - is an endless litany of racial and cultural woe, and their only "solutions" are to attend their conference to hear more woe and to listen to Taylor state that Asians are superior to Whites by every standard. Laugh at this: Istvan As if we should be surprised by this. Two brown eyed parents could conceivably have a blue-eyed child, rare though that might be. Conceivably? Rare? These Amren commentators are incredibly stupid. It's a common occurrence among Europeans as many dark-eyed Europeans are heterozygotes. Another pathologically self-obsessed navel-gazing essay by Jeelvy. Italians cause many of their own problems. In general, I agree with this , and ...

My tropes. See this. In response, I can make Sallis Tropes with respect to popular culture. There's always the wise, noble, and helpful Negro - after all, that's how Negroes are in real life, eh? Then there's the White alpha male type, typically with unshaven stubble, since over the last several decades the definition of rugged manliness is forgetting how to use a razor for several days (a definition no doubt meant as a counter-balance to plummeting testosterone levels). Then we have the angular flat-chested woman who is presented as the paragon of beauty and desirability (see Tokyo Vice and Banshee for perfect examples of this trope), but in fact appeals only to Hollywood homosexuals who see in her a dickless and ballless pre-adolescent boy. An associated trope is the man-jawed, cleft-chinned woman who is also presented as a beauty, although one whose T-levels are higher than the unshaven male star. Then we have the overweight landwhale who dumps her needy nerd boyfriend...

In der news. If: 1. You work for an institution that promotes “equity” while having, as almost all institutions do, a standard administrative structure. 2. You want to be a “ball buster.” 3. You do not believe that doing this will get you fired. Then you can ask why an institution that is devoted to equity has a hierarchical administrative structure, in which some people have higher status, more power and authority, and a much higher salary, than everyone else?  Why doesn’t the entity have a more equitable, egalitarian structure, in which everyone has the same status and authority, and the same salary (suggesting that will really make them burn), with decisions made by discussion, consensus, and voting? And you can imagine how various excuses they may make can be torn apart.  Everyone had an equal opportunity to rise?  False!  How do they know? The current leadership benefitting from structural advantages, an invisible knapsack of privilege, and others never had the ...

A behavioral defect. A behavioral problem many people have is what I call The Snapshot Syndrome – a tendency to focus on, and make judgments and decisions on, fixed “snapshots” of a given situation, instead of considering trends, projections of the future, reasons for which the situation exists, not to mention other more important issues than that current situation. For example, there is a subset of voters (*) who ignore deep ideological issues and broad long term sociopolitical trends and objectives, and instead base their support of a candidate based on the current, immediate, “snapshot” of some metric of personal (and/or national) (perceived) well-being, in some cases, metrics over which the given candidate(s) have limited to no control over. If the economy is booming on Election Day, the incumbent is favored; if the stock market just crashed and a recession has begun, the challenger is this empowered. Of course, not only is it possible that these events took place for reasons inde...

Salter’s Blank Slate Hypothesis. Back in my Legion Europa days I discussed Salter’s “Sender Males Carrier Females” “Blank Slate Hypothesis,” also mentioning how underlying issues in that hypothesis illuminate inconsistencies in certain Nordicist paradigms at that time. I will revisit the Salter paper in this post. See here.   Abstract: The article introduces and elaborates the hypothesis of carrier features, characteristics which in females are attractive to males as mate-choice cues. Female carrier features increase paternal resemblance and are ultimately attractive because they help pair-bonded males distinguish genetic offspring from those conceived by mates in extra-pair copulations. The proposed kin recognition mechanism, whether culturally evolved or innate, facilitates discriminatory paternal investment, and hence male fitness. Carrier features would be attractive to males in monogamous species where paternal investment is high, and cuckoldry represents a significant risk t...