Odds and Ends, 10/30/22

In der news.

A Gab correspondent gives us the following interesting phenotypic comparison:

Emperor Hirohito.

Heinrich Himmler.

It seems Himmler fits in well with Bromstad and Bjork.  Grab dem chopsticks!

See this. Well, the one positive from all of that is that maybe, just maybe, this latest massive humiliation, after all of the others (Rotherham apparently was not enough), is enough to make Britons lose their arrogant "the wogs begin at Calais" attitude toward the rest of Europe, stop thinking that they are still on top of the world, stop the idea that they still have an empire and the dead hag was "Queen of the World," and they will finally start having a bit of humility and work with other Europeans to build a New European Order.

Or...we'll just have more Anglomanic Anachronisms like Andrew Fraser behaving as if it was the year 1890.

The UK now has King Tampon, Prince Peggster, Prince Old Driller, Gunga Din as Prime Minister, and Paki Din as mayor of London, while in the USA, WASPs are junior partners to the Jews, Australia is becoming a colony of China, Canada is a frozen dystopia, and New Zealand is ruled by SJW hysterics - and people still take the likes of Andrew Fraser seriously.

From FOX:

notsopolite

The fun fact is that UK now is an Indian colony. How ironic is it?

It is not the fault of micks, wops, or hunkies that the UK is now ruled by Gunga Din. The British did it to themselves.

Rule Britannia!

Some European nations had a temporary pre-eminence for several centuries and now they (and their overseas Diaspora) do not want to believe it is over. That's why they promote HBD-Nordicism so as to suggest that their temporary pre-eminence is a sign of innate permanent superiority. The reality is that today's Britain is in an analogous condition as post-Roman Italy under the Ostrogoths and Lombards.

Eraserhead is a classic of pro-MGTOW propaganda. Lynch likely did not intend it to be so, but in retrospect it is.

How small town High Trusters treat Italian-Americans - see here. How they treat non-Whites:

But Mr. Jetton, who is Korean American, noted that forward-looking Republicans in many places were competing for minority voters. 

Mr. LeTulle used to lead the county party’s outreach to minority voters, courting culturally conservative Asian American business owners and professionals. He said he often visited the local Hindu temple in his cowboy hat and boots with a kurta over his Wranglers. And he cited some success, like persuading a Black Democrat who had lost her primary to switch parties.

Mr. Nehls called immigrants an asset to the community.

“If you go to the Sugar Land memorial hospital and try to read the names of the doctors, we can’t pronounce them or spell them, right?” the congressman said in an interview at his book signing.

“But those are the same guys who are going to be putting in my stent in a few years!” he continued, trying to sound out the name of his own cardiologist from a business card. “I think he is from Pakistan, and I think he is a Muslim,” Mr. Nehls said, “and I love him!”

Racial Proximity Theory marches on. Yes, there are some High Trusters who don’t like non-Whites, as indicated in the article, but given the Burr Ridge example, no doubt they would be much more hostile to White ethnics.

A Gab correspondent alerts me to this. Sailer is despicable. Note he uses the Left's term of "White supremacy." What about White nationalism? I don't care if Disraeli is "fabulous" or supreme or whatever. I don't want him as my leader and I don't want to live in the same polity.

There's a reason I call Sailer "Breezy Steve" - he has to rate as the most damnably superficial commentator on Der Right. I challenge Sailer to name one well-known, prominent "White supremacist" who denies the cognitive capabilities of Jews as well as that of elite Asian immigrant stock.  Sailer is disgustingly mendacious - in other words, a HBDer.

See this argument here.  OK, fair enough. But...remember this?

For blacks in the United States to make their presence felt on the state and national stages, they need one thing more than anything else: space. They need to completely dominate entire cities, or portions of or precincts of cities, in order to be able to elect their own as representatives. These people then go to the state capital or to Washington, DC to represent them, as well as to push whitey around as best they can. Blacks come to do this not by fighting crime or reducing unemployment, but by doing as little as possible to stop their own misbehavior in their own neighborhoods. That way, non-blacks stay away. Nobody wants to live with them, and as a result, blacks have spaces to call their own. They may not be very nice spaces, but that doesn’t matter when they are tallying votes in the House of Representatives, does it?”

Something VERY strange is going on with Amren and Counter-Currents. I'm not sure yet what it is, but eventually all these things come out, whatever they are, whether it is just plain plagiarism, people writing under different names at both forums, some other sort of deep communication, or is possible that these types are such dogmatic conformists that such perfectly overlapping theses are actually independent coincidences?

If MacDonald his right, then his favorite ethnoracial groups are unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics, because of their innate high-trusting, individualistic, pathological altruism that results in groveling to non-Whites. If MacDonald is wrong, and Sallis is right, then those same ethnoracial groups are still unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics because of Racial Proximity Theory that results in their groveling to non-Whites. If both are wrong, it still doesn't matter, because whatever the explanation, those groups are prone to grovel to non-Whites and therefore are unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics. So, in all circumstances, the High Trusters are unsuitable for leadership in pro-White politics.

We are told that High Truster societies would be orderly, productive, safe, and well-run if only there weren't all of those Colored migrants and their posterity around to ruin it all. OK, fair enough. But what if the presence of all of those Colored migrants and their posterity is an innate part of High Trustism? What if the wonderfully high trust cognitive suite that creates those orderly societies also makes the native majority crave the presence of Coloreds and makes them crave to debase themselves before those Coloreds? What if "diversity" is a feature and not a bug of High Trustism? That is in fact one area of agreement between the MacDonald and Sallis views - that High Trusters will inevitably grovel to Color. MacDonald says that it is from high trust altruistic individualism and Sallis says it is from Racial Proximity Theory, but the end result is the same. In a world of rapid international travel of movement of peoples, there will inevitably be Color with High Trusters. And because of the recent historical preeminence of High Trusters and their political domination of the "West" that means that Color will infiltrate into the South and East of Europe as well, as it is doing. High Trusters not only wreck their own societies with Color, but force others to do the same.

Long time readers may wonder why I now mock Brexit when I originally supported it. That's because how it turned out. Brexit would have been worth it if the UK had stopped all Colored immigration and had moved to the Right on issues like law and order and free speech. But, no. Instead they did the opposite, flooding the country with more Coloreds and being more hysterically "woke." That strongly suggests that the real motivation for Brexit was Racial Proximity Theory all along, and not a principled opposition to globalism and mass immigration as I so naively believed at the time.

See this. Typical Johnson. First, note that he only engages with and debates mediocre midwits. Second, as outlined here he has in fact endorsed Europeans waging war against each other and engaging in ethnic cleansing. Thus, he's a hypocrite pretending he's against such in his latest screed. Third, ethnonationalism is such a potent force that some of its adherents can't even practice it in their own lives, colonizing other people's countries, and that includes past and present Counter-Currents writers.

I can give my take on the war and can be brief. While I have sympathy for the Ukrainian people's struggle for independence, and their rightful distrust of Russia, I see both sides as wrong. The war is between Trad Vlad's Hapa Eurasianism vs. Ukrainian nationalists being hoodwinked yet again (as in 2014) to serve Jewish-Globalist interests. The war is a catastrophe for everyone and needs to be settled via diplomacy. My opinion of Trad Vlad is well known, but I just can't wrap my head around Ukrainians having a Jew President after what was done to them in the Holodomor. Russia has legitimate grievances and was ill-treated by the West after the collapse of the Soviet Union. On the other hand, Eastern Europeans, including and especially Ukrainians, have strong reasons to want to be outside the Russian orbit. Russia should have been allowed to join NATO 30 years ago. Russia should be looking to the East and South for their real enemies, not West.

I got some bad news for Der Retard Right who believe that a possible Supreme Court decision, re: affirmative action (in school admissions, focused on Asians, because who cares about Whites?) will actually change anything. The schools (and other pro-quota entities) will just do a work around (as they've been doing even now to get around restrictions on using race-only). Ever hear of "holistic review?" All you got to do is destress, or eliminate, objective academic metrics, and instead stress "life experiences" and "a commitment to DEI" and you can fill your class up with ignorant apes. Problem solved.

Read the comments to this utterly moronic Counter-Currents article (yes I know that description is redundant). A few isolated glimmers of sanity in a sea of Dunphy-Stronza madness. The WN 3.0 mantra:

• Downward mobility is good. Let Jews and Asians dominate the professions. Counter-Currents can still get its D'Nations of course - why save for retirement? Everyone over 40 should just die anyway.
• The enemy of Whites under 40 are Whites over 40 (no doubt older White ethnics are the worst). Generational Solidarity! Youngsters like Neil and Lipton are your allies against the White gerontocracy!
• We need to live at a 14th century standard of medical care. If you die of an "Infectious" (scare quotes - viruses don't exist) disease that means you are weak and deserve to die.

Der Movement is BY FAR the greatest enemy of Whites in existence because Der Movement will utterly repulse the types of normal, sane, and rational Whites required to actually achieve pro-White goals.

Of course, if your real goal is to be a grifter living off the D'Nations of followers because you've realized you threw away your life and career and you have no other options, then I suppose being a "movement" "leader" among such unfettered madness makes sense. You might even be a middle-aged person who knows better, and you will still let your blog descend into a whirlpool of insanity as long as the moolah keeps rolling in.

Proof positive that Dunphy is full of shit - Mophead is an old White guy whose second wife is a much younger woman (what Jeelvy would term "mate poaching") and who has received hundreds of thousands of dollars/year in "executive compensation" from supporters for "running an Internet publication" (you know, more or less what I do for nothing). Greggy Tincup is in his early 50s, while Sammy Flanders and Kevin MacTruster are old enough to be Tincup's father, all three dominating Der Movement. And yet the cowardly little worm turd Dunphy has no criticism for any of that, no siree, but instead focuses his ire on regular older White folk who have worked hard for decades and now have a little bit of savings to show for it. What a hypocritical pathetic piece of shit this Dunphy is.

By the way, Dunphy will always be White but will one day be old (that is, if he unfortunately lives that long). I suppose that realization has not yet occurred to the single neuron bouncing around his skull that he mistakenly calls a "brain."