EGN111522

Surprise - Der Movement is always wrong. Sallis’ pessimism correct; McCulloch’s optimism wrong. Well, as we know, they are always, always  wrong. As is this. White Identity Politics argues that white identity politics is inevitable as a consequence of multiculturalism.. Very inevitable!  Is that why - after endless months of Colored/Far Left rioting and an explosion of anti-White sentiment and actions - the racial gap in voting is shrinking rather than growing?  Is the "inevitability" actually the "inevitability" of inept Quota Queens getting their "D'Nations" - at least until a leftist regime elected by Whites shuts down all access to payments? And what a rebuke the polling data are to Der Movement, whose affirmative action leadership utterly failed to take advantage of the Trump Presidency, what an indictment of Trump for betraying his base while pandering to Coloreds, and most of all, what an indictment of Whites for being a maladaptive patholog...

Disgusting anti-White racism. Read this nonsense. Posted on October 27, 2020End Minority Rule Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, New York Times, October 23, 2020 First, Levitsky is definitely a Jew . I can be forgiven for suspecting that “Daniel Ziblatt” is also a member of the tribe – if I am mistaken then I stand corrected, but the main idea here is that this anti-White tirade is to a large degree likely motivated by a concern for Jewish interests and by hostility toward America’s historic White Christian majority. But I suppose that, to Taylor, they are HuWhite – or (((HuWhite))). The hypocrisy of these academic scum is amazing. In the past, when America’s White Christian majority was more demographically prominent, and was giving landslide victories to the likes of Nixon and Reagan, we were warned about the “tyranny of the majority” – that was a danger to the rights of minorities.  Indeed, that alleged problem with majority dominance was one justification given for the gover...

Problems. Ethnocentrism, collectivism can outcompete atomized individualism, but free-riding is a problem.  Hence, someone can benefit from the altruism of co-ethnics while selfishly pursuing their own interests, not reciprocating the altruism not contributing to common co-ethnic social goods, and in some cases actually acting against the interests of the ethny if that action is of personal benefit. Thus, ethnocentrism is stable and adaptive if free-riding can be detected and punished. The problem is that Whites currently do not have policing of free riding. Thus, Whites who betray their race for personal advantage, or for whatever other reason, do so with complete impunity. Openly treasonous free riding is rampant among Whites, especially high status Whites, who see race treason as the path to career advancement, wealth, power, status, social praise, etc.  In the absence of a strong counter force, and given the tropism toward individualism of Whites, we can see how free ridin...

In der news. See this . “Japanese cinema.” With all of the things that could be discussed or debated (the “Jewish Question” for example), with all of the current events that could be analyzed, with the upcoming Presidential election and all it means for Whites and for Der Movement, these two prominent “movement” “leaders” conduct a livestream to primarily discuss… Japanese cinema.   Incredible. At least the questions brought the discussion back to reality, but should that have been necessary?  Johnson and Taylor should have dealt with “red meat” topics from the start – instead of waiting one hour and thirteen minutes into the livestream to bring up those issues themselves independent of the questions. Taylor had to control himself from making anti-Slavic comments; the Poles are not as polite as the British when they ban someone. For shame, all you Polack Hunkies!  And I'm sure the British were ever-so-polite-and-proper when they for years covered up the sexual abuse of En...

Analysis. See my comments about an electoral politics strategy.  Given recent events, there needs to be more analysis on this matter. Social media companies routinely censor conservative Republican politicians in America; even President Trump sometimes gets censored.  We have to play the cards we are dealt and make things as difficult as possible for the other side: If the System wants to shut down White advocacy, then make it as difficult and as painful and as potentially self-destructive for them as possible.  Force them into the position in which the only way to shut down White advocacy is to engage in blatant and public banana republic third world authoritarianism, force them to either accept White advocacy in the political arena or risk unmasking themselves to White America several decades too early. And yet, perhaps I was unrealistically naïve. The System unmasks itself and Whites do not react.  And yet, the electoral political approach is one important tool i...

What to do? I have been asking "movement" "leaders" to consider contingencies in case of different election outcomes, and, to his credit, Taylor has at least broached the issue. See this. Of course, we will support Senators and Congressmen who aren’t bootlickers, but our efforts will mainly be local. That's fine.  But we need to become involved in electoral politics ourselves, at the local level if that is what is possible, but at the state and national levels if opportunity arises. This doesn't have to be as all-out "White advocates" in all cases - Trump has shown there is a national-level niche for implicitly White right-wing populism.  For now, the probable formula would be - the lower the political level, the more explicitly White you can be (dependent upon local conditions). The bottom line is that "local efforts" will be for naught if there is no local political protection behind them. As the federal government and some local autho...

Missing the point.  And other news. Read this. OK, I essentially agree with McDonald’s points. But it is “same old, same old” and doesn’t address the main issues. Look, I was wrong with my election prediction in 2016.  I may be wrong again in 2020.  But still, even if Trump somehow pulls it off in 2020 – and I think that unlikely – that merely kicks the can down the road to 2024, when the demographics are going to be even worse than they are today. Perhaps Der Movement hopes that a Trump win in 2020 will so destabilize the country that 2024 will be moot – things will have progressed so far by then that the 2024 election will be irrelevant. That’s counting on two unlikely events – that Trump will win in 2020 and that following a Trump win and the inevitable violent Leftist reaction to that, Whites will get off their cuckified rear ends and fight back (and that the Trump DOJ won’t again start persecuting Trump’s supporters while coddling his enemies). Anything is possible, ...

In der news. Do the flubro retards have anything to say about this?   Those hardy Swedish Vikings will be wearing “face diapers” real soon, I suppose. Der Movement weeps.   Maximal corruption in Rome was at the times that the city was, relatively speaking, genetically “more northern and western.” Of course, the dishonest “movement” has been saying the opposite for endless decades. Basically, everything Der Movement tells you is a lie. The face of Dorian Johnson. Donald Trump – yet another affirmative action Herrenvolk incompetent. More affirmative action Quota Queen Trumpian incompetence. Read this. There are also, I believe, additional, yet related, reasons for the Jewish contempt for beauty. I think that Jews also oppose Western standards of beauty because Jews themselves are an unattractive and, on average, ugly people whose facial features are typically ill-proportioned, unrefined, and, in a word, harsh. Ugly people always resent beautiful people, a psychological trait t...

 In der news. Maybe he was tired of being married to a 12 year old boy?  Sexual dimorphism! Cheap laughs: Archie Bunker Posted October 15, 2020 at 2:13 pm | Permalink Admiration for Nietzsche… the only thing Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer have in common. Off topic, but I wonder why those two don’t get along. I think they are both erudite, well-spoken and offer a lot to the movement. Rewritten for accuracy: Admiration for Nietzsche… the only thing Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer have in common besides both being completely inept affirmative action Quota Queens with zero judgment. Off topic, but I wonder why those two don’t get along. I think they are both moronic, logically incoherent and offer nothing to the movement. An HBD nightmare – particularly from 1:50-2:10. No “measured groveling” there. MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!   Who was it who told you four years ago that Trump was a fraud with a Jewish family? A mafia democracy. This is true, but it doesn’t go far eno...