EGN111522

Another Kaufmann emerges.  In all cases, bold font emphasis added. Never forget what Salter wrote in On Genetic Interests – for a majority being dispossessed, that the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does, allowing an easy and painless descent into minority status. Considering that, do you remember the part-Jewish Kaufmann and his agenda to convince Whites to accept their racial dispossession and to accept the widening of the concept of “White” to include mixed-race individuals as part of our new multiracial future?  Well, there seems to be a market for such types; behold Yascha Mounk , another Jewish mongrel pushing a similar agenda. See this. …the American mainstream will once again prove capable of expanding in ways that now seem difficult to fathom. The first groups to join this new American mainstream would likely include white Hispanics, Asian-Americans and those who are mixed race. But as the increasingly multiethnic culture of ...

Leadership needed. It is not enough for White ethnics to oppose Der Movement. It that is all there is, then, by default, White ethnics will find themselves on the same side as the anti-White Left, essentially confirming all of Humphrey Ireland’s ranting nonsense.  Not only would such an outcome be used to retroactively justify Nordicist attacks against White ethnics, but it would be a self-destructive catastrophe in its own right. White ethnics are White, they have the same interest in White survival as do other Whites and, let us be honest, “Da Left” hates White ethnics even more than does “Der Right.”  And why should White ethnics let themselves be forced out of pro-White activism that they have every right to be involved in? Principled opposition to Der Movement by White ethnics must ultimately come from the Right – from the racial nationalist Far Right , and not from the Left, the Center, or the Mainstream Right. White ethnics need to be involved in pro-White activism, but...

In der news. It is not clear to me why the HBD Nordicists tend to lump the same populations as being both egalitarian and individualistic, implying that the two traits are linked. It would seem the opposite would the case. Ever since the French Revolution, the Far Left has linked an egalitarian ideology with collectivism. Even on the Far Right, the collectivist folk communities of fascist movements were egalitarian at least in the sense of mitigating class differences to enhance the organic solidarity of the ethny. Never mind that some of Der Movement's favorite ethnies are no more individualistic then the allegedly ethnocentric collectivist (sic) Italians.   Also see this.  I also do not see a clear connection between late marriage and individualism. It would seem that the harsher ecologies that would lead to later marriage would also promote societies that are collectivist as well as egalitarian. I believe that this HBD Nordicist nonsense derives from the Eloi paradigm...

In der news. Happy Operation Barbarossa Day. As I've said before, if Der Movement was really serious about making real world progress, they would first identify the impediments to that progress, through quantitative and empirical methods, such as surveys and similar mechanisms. On one scale - what are the impediments to getting the message out and making Whites understand the reality of the racial crisis? Perhaps more importantly, on a more focused scale - for those Whites who are, or are close to being, racially aware, what are the impediments to them becoming pro-White activists and/or supporters of activists? I suspect the three biggest reasons for the latter are: 1) fear of social pricing, 2) a belief that aracial conservative civic nationalism can work without being too disruptive, and 3) disgust with or at least suspicion of Der Movement's freakishness and demented dogmas. But that is only my surmise; I can be completely wrong. That's why we need hard data. Sallisian ...

Endgame. All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. - T. E. Lawrence My critics may aver that I am always negative and do not do anything other than criticize the “movement.”  Long time readers of my work know that is not true.  Regardless, in this post, I will stress the positive, the constructive, and sketch an outline of what my endgame is. In other words, what is the Sallis vision?  What kind of state do I want to see come into being?  What kind of future do I envision for the White race? A starting point would be to read this. Let us proceed. Pan-Europeanism, Political structure Unlike the “movement” I support genuine pan-Europeanism, focusing on the interests of ALL peoples of European descent worldwide, not just some fraction thereof (i.e., Northwest Eu...

Holidays. Happy Father's Day! Happy Juneteenth! It's sort of ironic that these two holidays fall on the same day this year, as the former doesn't much affect the population focused on by the latter (note this population has two holidays all to themselves - this one and MLK, demonstrating Black Privilege), but, it is what it is.

In der news. The unfortunate and frustrating thing is that I completely agree with Robert Wallace that we need White identity politics and about what the dire consequences will be if this does not come to pass. The problem is that I see his "movement" as (1) clearly and repeatedly exhibiting endless failure and utter incompetence, and (2) being openly and aggressively hostile to White ethnics and their interests. Since those two points are fundamental characteristics of the "movement," I'm not sanguine that it is capable of changing any of that. I'm sure if challenged about the hostility to White ethnics on their sites, "movement" "leaders" would mumble something about "free speech" and the "importance of hearing all views." That's coming from sites that moderate comments, ban commentators they don't like, and wouldn't allow their writers to attack other groups. Am I calling for censorship? Not at all. Thos...

Der Movement wrong again. In all cases, emphasis added. Gab correspondent Gaston alerts me to two new papers, which I will briefly comment on. See this. See this figure and note that these European groups essentially are derived from different proportions of the same basic ancestral components. Abstract Southern Italy was characterised by a complex prehistory that started with different Palaeolithic cultures, later followed by the Neolithic transition and the demic dispersal from the Pontic-Caspian Steppe during the Bronze Age. Archaeological and historical evidence points to demic and cultural influences between Southern Italians and the Balkans, starting with the initial Palaeolithic occupation until historical and modern times. To shed light on the dynamics of these contacts, we analysed a genome-wide SNP dataset of more than 700 individuals from the South Mediterranean area (102 from Southern Italy), combined with ancient DNA from neighbouring areas. Our findings revealed high af...

In der news. Remember this?   Then laugh at this. To celebrate Year Twelve, we have some new incentives to give, in the form of monthly Giving Circles. You can see what all of that is in the “Laugh at this” link. I should thank the Counter-Currents crew for proving my point in such a clear and precise manner. How are those childish "Giving Circles" anything other than pay-for-view and pay-to-play hobbyism? Counter-Currents is nothing but a cash cow, a money-making enterprise. Any doubt? Look at the Counter-Currents link. I've been involved in pro-White activism a long time, and before that, paleo-conservatism, and in all of that time, I've never observed the level of absolutely shameless money-grubbing tin cup panhandling as I've seen Counter-Currents morph into. The NRA comes close. But the NRA fails to equal Counter-Currents' impressively imaginative ways of separating fools from their money. If you donate 100 criticisms of Der Movement per month, the Sa...

Face reality. Someone else gets it! Melanie I don't understand the Slant eyed oriental phillia on Amren. Dear ladies and gentlemen, East and South Asians are not your friends or brothers in the struggle just because you share certain traits or are attacked by the same groups. If anything Asians (especially the Han Chinese) are far more ruthless and efficient than blacks when it comes to their covert hatred for whites. They are also definitely not white adjacent. They are our enemies and rivals. Europeans/ Whites have our own culture, religion and trajectory. Asians are not part of it. Period. A response to that good sense:  Dear Melanie, For your understanding, consider the possibility that Amren is motivated by aesthetic preferences for high IQ Asians who play the violin and are “law abiding” and for high IQ erudite cosmopolitan Jews who are ever-so-charming at cocktail parties, and also motivated by crude ethnic resentments against “uncouth” White ethnics. That would explain much...

Evostrat = evolutionary strategy. Nietzsche was correct when he suggested that the uncanniness of Jews derives from their dedication to survive at any price.   The Jews are the most remarkable people in the history of the world, for when they were confronted with the question, to be or not to be, they chose, with perfectly unearthly deliberation, to be at any price: this price involved a radical falsification of all nature, of all naturalness, of all reality, of the whole inner world, as well as of the outer. They put themselves against all those conditions under which, hitherto, a people had been able to live, or had even been permitted to live; out of themselves they evolved an idea which stood in direct opposition to natural conditions—one by one they distorted religion, civilization, morality, history and psychology until each became a contradiction of its natural significance. That summarizes what the Jewish group evostrat essentially is: A dedication to survive as an id...

In der news. There are some interesting subtexts to the movie First Blood , particularly when looked at through the lens of Der Movement. An insular High Truster group telling a White ethnic "we don't want your kind around here" despite that person's service to the broader group (America in the movie, pro-White activism for Der Movement) and using harassment (police tactics in the movie, who is White games and Sallis' Law in Der Movement) to try and force out the "intrusive" element. Then when the targeted person reacts, they're "crazy" and "criminal." The old GNXP argument - any opposition to an influx of "high IQ" racially and culturally alien types is due solely to a personal selfish "fear of competition." God forbid that one doesn't want to see one's people race replaced, or that one is concerned with EGI, or is fearful of a hostile alien elite, or doesn't want cultural change. No, no, a thousa...