Odds and Ends, 10/16/22

In der news.

Hood is at it again. One of the best pieces of advice I ever heard - and, surprisingly enough, it was from a woman - was that if you are going to bring up a problem then you should offer a solution. Hood and Amren do not do this. That site - and especially all of Hood's "verified hate" posts - is an endless litany of racial and cultural woe, and their only "solutions" are to attend their conference to hear more woe and to listen to Taylor state that Asians are superior to Whites by every standard.

Laugh at this:

Istvan

As if we should be surprised by this. Two brown eyed parents could conceivably have a blue-eyed child, rare though that might be.

Conceivably? Rare? These Amren commentators are incredibly stupid. It's a common occurrence among Europeans as many dark-eyed Europeans are heterozygotes.

Another pathologically self-obsessed navel-gazing essay by Jeelvy.

Italians cause many of their own problems.

In general, I agree with this, and when MacDonald writes about Jews, it is more or less sound (of course, my opinion here can be ascribed to bias; nevertheless, that is my opinion). The problem here is that much of what MacDonald writes about disguised ethnocentrism and deception/self-deception with respect to Jews can apply to certain other groups that pretend that they are disinterested altruists while ruthlessly pursuing group goals (the John Lindsay syndrome).

I have noted several times that the human mind was not designed to seek truth but rather to attain evolutionary goals.

Indeed - like HBD and HBD-Nordicism.

Consider Quota Queens who give a litany of woe without ever providing concrete examples of what to do about it, or, more generally, all those Quota Queens living off of their supporters. We will do a thought experiment. Odin rides down from Asgard on a lightning bolt, with Viking horns blaring, and tells the Quota Queens that if they push this button right here, the race problem will be solved, all will be well, and they don’t need to be activists any more.  However, that means they need to go back to be ordinary people, with no special privileges or positions, they need to support themselves and make their own way in life, independent of supporters and donations.  Do they push that button?

The same holds for the Mainstream Right.  Ronnie Raygun rides a MX missile down from The Great Supply Side Economy in the sky, and tells the conservative politician/activist that the Left can be defeated by pushing that button over there, but then that means no more phony political careers, no more think tanks and foundations, no more lobbyist jobs, none of it.  Do they push the button?

I think they would not push the button and would rationalize that decision by stating that they don’t want the easy way out and that victory needs to be achieved through struggle – but that’s all deception and self-deception. The reality is that they are addicted to grifting and don’t want to work like ordinary people. They want to be parasites instead – and all of that applies to both cases, Odin and Raygun.

The litany of woe approach delegitimizes the Quota Queens who practice it and are too stupid to realize that people will ask - if things are so bad for Whites, then why aren't they flocking to you and your "movement?"  And there are two basic possible answers:

• 1. Whites are useless and hopeless, and/or
• 2. Der Movement is useless and hopeless

In either case, there is no reason to support Der Movement and send them money. If #1 is true then nothing will help and if #2 is true then Der Movement is the problem and needs to be replaced.

White men inclined to MGTOW may try and do the right thing, and marry (intra-racially) and have children for the race and for personal genetic continuity.  They try and raise the children right and at least the children don’t end up with Color, but they then announce that they don’t want any children of their own, and the White man ends up with “grandchildren” that are dogs and cats. You’ve been played, sucker!

Gaslighting Greg Johnson was misrepresenting the meaning of White nationalism once again here in the YouTube discussion, and once again "debates" midwits who are unable to mount any sort of effective challenge. What a despicable coward. Defining White nationalism in terms of ethnonationalism is not only dishonest (and Johnson and dishonesty go together like peanut butter and jelly or like a homosexual's ravaged anal sphincter and KY Jelly) but it is also logically superfluous. A constellation of ethnic nationalisms can be subsumed under a doctrine of ethnic nationalism itself or as universal nationalism if you want to stress the "everyone deserves a homeland" angle. To give a specifically racial designation to nationalism means - to any sane and honest individual - that the "nation" in question encompasses the entire race as a whole, not merely all of that race's constituent ethnicities individually and separately in turn.