Worse is Better Reconsidered
Thoughts.
Long time readers of this blog know that I am opposed to the paradigm of "worse is better" with respect to pro-White activism and with respect to prompting Whites to defend their own racial interests. Whites seem to be able to take abuse unlimited; in addition, ever-increasing repression leaves little room for dissidents to maneuver. Instead, I believe that Suvorov's Law has more validity and historical support - typically, revolutions do not occur during the time of greatest repression, but when that repression is suddenly relaxed.
However, using Suvorov's Law, I can see one scenario in which "worse is better" could work out - the specific case in which a time of worsening repression is followed by a period of a relaxation of that repression.
Thus:
First, there would be a period of worsening conditions, increased repression, that would make even "we can take more and more abuse" Whites angry and frustrated, and then, following this, a period in which the repression is suddenly relaxed, allowing all of that pent-up anger and racial rage to boil over and find avenues for release.
If worse conditions are simply followed by further worsening conditions, with no end in sight for the constant, and often increasing, repression, then worse is simply worse and it is doubtful that Whites would stand up in the teeth of that repression and fight back. But worse can be better if the worse period is followed by a better period that allows the energies built up during the worse period to be released in the direction of "game-changing" racial activism.
Right now, we are in a worsening situation. If the above analysis is correct, then we need to get to the better period at some point so as to productively use the anger being generated today. Too much constant repression can wear our people down and induce despair. We need to apply pressure, such as democratic multiculturalism, to get to the next phase, allowing for Suvorov's Law to come into play. Repression creates the conditions for revolution, but the (sudden) relaxation of repression allows the revolution to actually take place.
In summary, I continue to be an opponent of the general idea of "worse is better." I merely note here that the one scenario where that approach could work out is when "worse is better" is coupled to Suvorov's Law, as described above.
The canaille never breaks loose until the ruling elements permit it...
Now, Whites are hardly the canaille of America, but the basic principle still holds, a version of Suvorov's Law - revolutionary forces succeed when the established elites become too weak to prevent it, and thus permit it. The anger of the canaille is generated during their "worse" period and the ruling elements permit the expression of that anger during the canaille's "better" period.
Comments
Post a Comment