Unraveling the Thread.

Understanding the problem.

Read this.

I’ve been critical of Amren and also critical of the “movement’s” tin cup handling.  However, I strongly support Amren’s legal endeavors as described in the link, and I support activists contributing funding for these endeavors.  However, these endeavors, and writing and talking about them, is only a short term solution, only a superficial approach to the problem. It only deals with the surface manifestation of the underlying problem, it only attempts to deal with the end-of-the-line of a long thread that can be traced back to the ultimate cause of why groups like Amren are faced with suppression, deplatforming, and withdrawal of their basic constitutional rights. How to unravel this thread?

The basic problem is: WHY are these things happening?  Why does the state of Tennessee want to abrogate pro-White freedom of assembly?  Why does the entire governmental structure of the USA (federal, state, and local) – including the Trump administration and especially Sessions and the DOJ – support Antifa and oppose White activists?  Why are law-abiding pro-White activists jailed and indicted while leftist domestic terrorists operate with impunity?  Let’s trace the thread of the problem back to its beginning.

The elites – most of whom are White – are openly hostile to White interests.  The elites, the System, works hand-in-glove with Antifa and other terrorist groups to suppress free speech and free assembly. These elites – the ones who make their decisions at the governmental level * - are either elected officials, or non-elected official appointed by, or instructed by, elected officials.  Thus, the anti-White system has been in large part put into place by a majority White electorate. This can be traced back to a variety of factors.  First, some Whites openly support suppression of pro-White activists.  Many don’t care one way or another – they have no racial loyalty, no collectivist sense of race; they are individualists, many with pathological altruism and hyper-universalism (“high trust hunter gatherers,” I suppose).  Many Whites have a superficial “football team” view of politics, so that if “our guy” beats “their guy” that’s all that matters, and the fact that “our guy” believes and behaves in a manner exactly the same as “their guy” fazes these voters not one bit.  White voters are also swayed by, and gaslighted by, endless System propaganda.  Also, politicians lie, always feinting right for the election and then governing left, and the dumb and naïve voters, with short attention spans, never hold them to account (one has only to remember a squinty-eyed John McCain running for re-election with “build the danged fence” – and upon re-election once again started shamelessly shilling for open borders and amnesty). The System is controlled by special interests and wire-pullers, so that there typically ends up being no real choice at the polls, and then we get what I would call “Double Black Swan events” – first, someone like Trump getting elected on a wave of pro-White (albeit implicitly) right-wing populism, and then the second Black Swan – that both Trump and Sessions turn out to be frauds and traitors, “enforcing” the law as if they were radical left-wingers.  The election of someone like Trump was an unexpected Black Swan; that such a person would then preside over an administration on which his supporters have less rights, and are more persecuted, than before his election, that his own DOJ will indict his supporters and support his enemies, that’s a second Black Swan, even more unexpected and mystifying than the first. Thus, we have a complex web of problems that ultimately trace back to anti-White elites being in power, and being in power because Whites are too individualistic, dim-witted, naïve, and short-sighted to act, and vote, otherwise.

One can argue that it is because “the Jews” control the mass media and thus manipulate White voters, and through control of the media and control of voting, in addition to their vast wealth and power, control White politicians and impose their will on the body politic. So, we can add “easily manipulated” to the flaws of White folks, but it doesn’t change the ultimate problem and the ultimate outcome.  Let’s say your solution is to “expel the Jews.”  Very well.  You cannot do so without political power.  How do you obtain such power when you exist in a situation in which all of the above applies?  How do you obtain political power when you cannot even hold a meeting anywhere, where if any pro-White leader shows his face in public, that face can get punched (or elbowed) with impunity by an Antifa that is supported at the highest levels of our supposedly “God Emperor fascist” government?  All the big-talking Type Is will then talk darkly of “armed revolution” – how will this come off if, again, you can’t even hold a small meeting, when your “Proud Boys” get chased out of places of businesses by noodle-armed soyboys, when your private meetings are easily infiltrated by Swedish homosexual anti-racists or by snide alternative newspaper writers posing as curious “movie critics?”  How do you even begin to organize for such “armed revolution” when the very population you assert to be fighting for hates you, will not support you, and when the administration you voted for – the allegedly “right-wing populist” Trump administration – has pledged to use the entire force of the federal government against you, and is fulfilling that pledge, spearheaded by an allegedly “arch conservative” ex-Senator Attorney General who delights in indicting your followers for “hate crimes” for merely defending themselves from the leftist domestic terrorists that he so wholeheartedly supports.  Yes, all your fantasies of “armed revolution” are just hat – fantasies. Your spiel of “worse is better” is also nonsense and fantasy, since Whites have proven an ability to stomach any and all humiliations and abuse as long as the frog (Pepe?) is boiled slowly enough.  No – worse is simply worse.  Doing business as usual for Der Movement is doomed to failure.  You can win a legal battle and that’s great, and then in a year or two you’ll have to go through the whole thing again, this time with resources depleted from your last struggle, while the System as resources unlimited (most of which derived from feckless Whites).  This is a structural problem in large part due to “movement” ineptness, as chronicled and summarized at this blog endlessly. Nothing has been done correctly for decades, opportunity after opportunity squandered, potential recruits repulsed, failure piling up after failure.

White activists are facing and well-integrated power structure that has the ability to check almost any approach against itself, leading to the “movement” being checkmated.  It’s a self-reinforcing problem.  Some want to make an “end-run” around the problem by appealing directly to elites and having them impose “the program” top down; it is difficult to see how this can be achieved, as virtually all these elites are not only openly hostile to the White Cause, but their very status of elites are tied into maintaining this hostility.  Further, “movement” leaders are so undesirable and incompetent, and “movement” dogma is often so irrational  and repulsive, that it is hard to understand what will attract any open-minded elites (if any exist) to give the White Cause a fair hearing.  How would they defend themselves against the majority of their fellow elites who are the enemy?  And it was so easy, the “turning” of the elites, why hasn’t there been pone single (overt) success after endless decades of “movement” “activism?”  No, you are still checkmated, and your Man on White Horse hopes are always misplaced.

There are no easy answers to deal with this.  There may in fact be no solution if we are dealing with traits “hard-wired” into the White psyche, traits that did not manifest to this negative extent in other contexts, but are obviously self-destructive now.  Unlike the quota queens, who need to project optimism so as to keep the shekels flowing in (how many people would fill the tin cup for a cause destined to fail?), I’m deeply pessimistic.  By best guess is that we’re doomed, but we may as well go down fighting, as there is always a slim chance of success as long as you try.  If we do have success, it will be due to a variety of approaches done in tandem, not some single “magic bullet.”  I’ve written on these things before, but a summary would be:

Merit, accountability, and division of labor.  The affirmative action program for leadership in White activism needs to end.  Among those that belong to the ingroup (however you wish to define it – different people may have different definitions), merit, ability, and a record of success should be the defining characteristics of leadership.  There must be accountability: there must be consequences for failure due to bad judgment, weakness, stupidity, dysfunction, etc. Increasing the pool of prospective leaders through an end to affirmative action will allow for an effective division of labor, with people filling those roles for which they are best suited.  That would in turn make the issue of accountability less onerous; with people filling roles for which they are suited, and chosen based on merit and not ethnic fetishism, success will be more frequent and failure less frequent.  There will be fewer marked disasters and less need to have to impose accountability since there would be fewer instances requiring people needs to be held to account.

Drop the fossilized “movement” dogma.

Infiltrate the System.  Plant supporters among the elites, among the cogs in the machine.

I have written before of the urgent need to get involved in real-world politics, in electoral politics, in reaching out to people in the analog world, in campaigns, in governing, in concrete accomplishment to exert force on political reality.  I have explained why this is necessary, and hoe activist have political to maneuver even though the System has us checked.  The System’s controls has its limitations, particularly when one dives into the belly of the beast. Attacking dissidents outside of the System is safer, attacking dissidents acting within the System risks an “auto-immune” reaction in which System reaction begins to harm itself.

Probably the most important practical thing that can, and should, be done right now is gathering data. I’m a STEM person, a “quant,” and I want empiricism and data to inform the course to be taken. We need to find out WHY Whites are unmoved by racialist propaganda and memes, WHY we are not “winning hearts and minds,” and WHY Whites are unconcerned about racial interests or, if they are concerned, WHY they do not act. Then we need to find out WHAT (if anything) would motivate them, WHAT types of propaganda and memes would be effective, and then we need to determine HOW this can be implemented, and WHO is best to do it.  As regards WHEN: ASAP.

This would require opinion poling, market analysis, input from political scientists, ethnologists, advertising specialists, and the like. Money?  STOP FLUSHING MONEY DOWN THE PROVERBIAL TOILET SUPPORTING THE HAPPY PENGUINS SUBURBAN LIFESTYLE, STOP FUNDING “LEADERS” LIVING THE GOOD LIFE, STOP FUNDING INEPTNESS, STOP FUNDING “RADIO DERB’ AND OTHER DAMN NONSENSE.  GOT IT?

Think of all the good that could be done if a fraction of the wasted tin cup panhandling actually went to projects with real payoffs. Consider this: Salter is an ethnologist.  Ethnology is the study of human behavior.  Salter is an adviser for One Nation, so apparently he’s willing to put his expertise to work helping patriotic parties and groups.  What if the Happy Penguin money was funneled to him instead, to be a full time analyst and adviser for the cause? What’s better: funding an established academic ethnologist who wrote On Genetic Interests and who produces useful analysis on political nationalist, OR funding Brimelow and Derbyshire to sit around on lawn chairs in the CT suburbs? 

We need to look to the Legionary movement for guidance. Activists are flawed, activists are too often dregs, activists are embarrassments, and activists are pure dysfunction.  We need to create the “New Man,” creating better activists, being better people, will go a long way to make us more attractive as alternative o the System, make us more effective and ethical, make us more ready to withstand persecution, steel us for the struggles ahead.  The idea that the drunken Millennial Pepe-ites of the Alt Right can in any way be the vanguard of anything but absolute failure is a delusion.  We need better.  We must demand better.  

The Legionary Movement aimed to create a New Man (Omul Nou), to transform the entire nation through Legionary education by transforming each individual into a person of quality. The New Man would be more honest and moral, more intelligent, industrious, courageous, willing to sacrifice, and completely free of materialism. His view of the world would be centered around spirituality, service to his nation, and love of his fellow countrymen. This new and improved form of human being would transform history, setting the foundations of a new era never before seen in Romanian history.  

Codreanu wrote, “We shall create an atmosphere, a moral medium in which the heroic man can be born and can grow. This medium must be isolated from the rest of the world by the highest possible spiritual fortifications. It must be defended from all the dangerous winds of cowardice, corruption, licentiousness, and of all the passions which entomb nations and murder individuals. Once the Legionary will have developed in such a milieu… he shall be sent into the world… He will be an example; will turn others into Legionaries. And people, in search of better days, will follow him… will make a force which will fight and will win.” Therefore, a spiritual revolution would create the basis for a political revolution, since without the New Man no political program could achieve any lasting accomplishment.

The “movement” talks big about “eschewing defectives” while most of its leadership is highly defective personally.  Of course, they are ALL defective ideologically, and as regards strategy, but here I talk about person dysfunction.  Who among current American “movement” “leadership” is not obviously personally defective (ignoring ideology).  Probably only folks like Taylor and MacDonald.  Note that both are older gentlemen – the dreaded “boomers” – one being from a business background and the other an academic, people of substance.  Note that extreme dysfunction is not compatible with personal success outside of the “movement.”  Look at all the “movement” leaders whose entire lives have been practically spent as “leaders” and/or who failed in private, non-“movement” endeavors, and/or who quickly left “normie” life, probably because they couldn’t hack it, and realized they could live easier “off the fat of the land” as a tin cup rattling parasite.  A lack of personal success outside of the “movement” should be a warning sign.  And, no, please don’t invoke the spirit of Saint Adolf here as an example of a success who had no previous outside life success.  He was dysfunctional, made horrific errors of judgment, and helped wreck the White world with his ethnonationalist stupidities.  Looking closer to home in America, Yockey at least was a lawyer, he wasn’t some 20-something jackass who thinks screaming “Kek” is activism.  He may have become a sort of grafter later on, but he at least produced value, wrote important works, engaged in real-world activism, made an impact. Put it this way: he had a choice.  He could have become a successful lawyer, or even an academic, if he wanted to.  Can you imagine some of today’s “leaders” being successful in any “normie” endeavor?   That’s a litmus test.  One should become a leader by choice, not because one is incapable of being anything else.

*Of course, the deplatforming is being predominantly done by private actors, but with the same motivation.  In addition, we can ask why even rightist, conservative elites support the deplatforming ad refuse to use the power of the government to legislate major web business as public entities.  It comes down to the same thing: hostile elites.