More Yockeyian Prescience

From Imperium.

This dividing of the Western Civilization between the two extra-European forces occurred as an instance of the Law of Political Plenum. European States were individually unable to wage war after 1945 because of the enormous requirements in industrial establishment and man-power. These existed only in Russia and America. Europe collectively thus became a political vacuum, because of the individual political incapacity of the States of the Western Civilization.

Thus, this is akin to the political weakness of European states in a pure ethnonationalist scenario. Even nuclear powers like the UK and France lack the population base and industrial power of larger nations. And if that is the case for them, what about, say, Estonia? Does anyone actually believe that China takes seriously nations like Belgium or Portugal? The ethnonationalists talk about “alliances” - an alliance is defined by mutual assistance against a common threat, a reciprocity of interests.  France and Latvia can make an alliance, no doubt. The purely material benefit to Latvia is obvious.  And to France?  Well, if Latvia become a vassal state, and allows its territory to become a staging area for French forces, if, politically speaking, Latvia becomes an appendage of France, then France can benefit. But then Latvia can ask: Whither sovereignty?  At least as part of some sort of racial nationalist European Union, the smaller nations together will have a say; more to the point, from the standpoint of power politics, the Union is the Union and it is not the case of “France defending Latvia” but of “the Union defending itself” – with both France and Latvia being integral components of that Union, a Union that, in its organic solidarity of its members, does not require transactional exchanges as part of so-called "national alliances."

To him who supplies protection also goes obedience. It will go either voluntarily, as the result of persuasion, or as the result of force. 

That applies to the France and Latvia example above, or any other such “alliance.” Obedience is the price of protection. Whither sovereignty? At least be an organic part of the entity providing protection, instead of being one unit subservient to another separate one.

This Yockey quote also applies to today’s America.  The state can no longer – or will no longer – provide protection to its White citizens.  Do those citizens therefore owe any obedience to that state?

Looking at the organism inwardly, the amount of protection and the amount of obedience, and the quality of these things, describes the inner strength of the unit. 

In that case, America is inwardly weak, indeed.

Where the protecting force is within a Culture and the area and populace protected also belong to the Culture, the obedience will be full, natural and voluntary, on the part of the Culture-bearing stratum at least when the issue is the existence of the Culture.

In America, the ruling elites are in part from outside the Culture of the West.

The existential nature of the Law is also shown by the fact that if a State is unable panto protect an area and population within its system, that area and population will pass into the system of another State that can protect and has the will to protect. The passing may be by revolt, it may be by war. It may be by negotiation, particularly if the protecting State allows a quasi-government to exist in the protected area, which can make a private understanding with other powers to deliver to them the population and territory.

This is the outcome.  If America is unwilling to protect White Americans, then White America needs to pass into another state system – preferably one they themselves create.

In a country where the cant of morality exercises a monopoly over political vocabulary, politicians cannot speak openly even to one another. The propaganda terror necessary to maintain such an absurd type of political terminology in contradiction to facts ends by weakening from within governments in such countries. Anyone making a purely factual remark becomes suspect, and some of the best brains have found their way thus into the concentration camps.
That is today’s America. Politicians cannot even speak honestly and openly about race, and purely factual statements result in social pricing and deplatforming – possibly eventually into actual concentration camps. Do Whites owe obedience to such a system?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Those Japanese Ice People

"Derb Jr." writes and whines. Read this as an antidote to despicable scum like Jason Malloy who once (~ 15 years ago) absurdly labeled Japan as a “Western” nation. If white people are to become minorities in the countries our ancestors built, and if we face a future where we may be ruled over by envious and malevolent non-whites, I would rather my overlords be Japanese than Muslims or sub-Saharan Africans.  And let’s not forget those Chinese girls with guns. Of course, if possible I prefer to live free among my own people. Too late…you made your bed and now lie in it… literally. But if, by some miracle, white ethno-states become a reality in the West, will I—and my Japanese wife and mixed-race child—be accepted?  No. Or would I be rejected as a miscegenating traitor to my race? Yes, you filthy scum. My wife has many years of experience living and working in the US, and our child was born there. We agree that life in America is in many ways preferable to living in Japan. ...
Read more

Tales of Fst: Sallis vs. Lewontin

A small scale yet informative analysis of genetic variation. Read this. We are all aware of the “more variation within groups than between groups” argument against the biological validity of race. Now, I believe – or at least hope – that honest population geneticists (albeit very few if any exist) know better not to make absurd claims about Lewontin’s “finding” – that it “makes race meaningless” or that “people are more closely related to members of other races than members of their own race.”  At least they won’t say that among themselves, in their publications, or among other types of academics, but maybe they’ll still try to fool the rubes; after all, from my personal experience most population geneticists are anti-White SJW leftists. The problem is more with your rank-and-file leftist, your Tim Wise types, your opinion writers, “anthropologists,” openly political population geneticists (the majority who are apparently dishonest), writers of “popular science,” politicians, blogg...
Read more

Take a Bite Out of That Nothingburger!

Der Movement: Always, always, always wrong. Watch this. The “nothingburger” continues , eh “movement?” Please read about the monsters here. The jury is still out as to what caused the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. Chinese authorities initially suspected a wet market in Wuhan where wild animals like bats and snakes were sold illegally. A nearby biolab has also attracted scrutiny, and increased suspicion as Chinese authorities have been stubbornly unwilling to cooperate with skeptics requests. But regardless of how the outbreak started, it has already raised questions about traditional Chinese practices of consuming wild animals, either for medicinal purposes - for example, it's believed that eating civet cats, vermin akin to raccoons, can bequeath more sexual vigor - or as delicacies (remember "bat soup"?). I suppose that “more sexual vigor” via a civet cat snack is necessary in the absence of any phenotypic sexual dimorphism among potential partners. SJWs (and I suppos...
Read more