Odds and Ends, 11/19/20

In der news.

To White liberals, the real attitude toward celebrating things such as Black History Month is akin to a normal person celebrating a spastic retard finishing an event in the Special Olympics.

I suspect non-Whites detect this condescending attitude, which is why they are constantly seething with rage even against their “White allies.”  Racial resentment, racial envy, is likely at the root of most anti-White hostility. This is why Black females have the justifiable stereotype of always being angry – physical appearance is the most important thing for hominid females (and they know this, even if SJW “feminists” angrily deny it), and Black females must know that they are considered the most unattractive and undesirable among all of the major racial groups’ females. They see their co-racial males greatly preferring White women, and so they seethe with rage. When White liberals smile at Black invention myths or at some pitifully minor real Negro accomplishment, Blacks must really be boiling inside. To openly admit what is bothering them would be an overt admission of their self-realization of their perceived racial inferiority, so instead it comes out as an incoherent attack on “Whiteness” as a general principle – even “White allies” are tainted by “implicit bias” and the original sin of “White racism,” enriched as they are in their “White Privilege,” and so these Whites must be endlessly subjected to ritualistic humiliation. That gives the non-Whites a feeling of revenge and alleviates the guilt felt by White liberals for their covert self-realization of their own perceived racial superiority.

I suspect the same elements of resentment, revenge, and guilt inform radical feminism and sexualized “female domination” and “male submission” – both parties implicitly understand the reality of male superiority, and so it is manifested in various bizarre ideas and rituals. Then we get into Nietzsche’s ideas about ressentiment and slave morality that are related to the genesis of Christianity. There is a common underlying thread in these phenomena - resentment about a (perceived) realization of inferiority of one party, and feelings of guilt about a (perceived) realization of superiority of the other party.

And if this post is used as “evidence” that I am a “White supremacist” please note that I am specifically discussing the attitudes of White liberals and of non-Whites, both of whom behave in a manner indicating deep-seated attitudes of superiority and inferiority, respectively.

From my perspective, Whites are superior in some aspects, particularly cultural, scientific, and technical creativity, but are grossly inferior in others, such as adaptive fitness. Likewise, women are superior in being mothers and mothering, with men superior in just about everything else. Christian ressentiment is superior in propagating a slave morality, while more noble values are superior in every other way.

How other people perceive and act upon racial and sexual differences is for them to answer for, not me.  Christian ressentiment is for the Christians to answer for, not me.

What dope hired Bolton?

OK, I agree, but that doesn't mean we can't harshly critique Trump.

Someone who understands the disgusting pathetic turd that is Trump:

But we have to be realistic; the historically significant highpoint of the day was the President’s failure to join his vast army of loving, angry and motivated supporters. This was a terrible and tragic error which will cost Donald Trump and America dear.

What should have happened? At the very least, the President should gave given up an afternoon’s golf and spent a couple of hours with his crowd, chatting and giving the lucky few the selfies of their lives. A couple of hours returning the love and telling the faithful to be on standby and to get organised. This isn’t exactly political rocket science, it’s just common sense and decency.

You can measure the missed opportunity and the mentality of the man by asking: what would George Washington have done? Or Teddy Roosevelt, or JFK, or even Reagan or Obama? Anyone of them would have stood on the back of a pick-up, taken a bullhorn and given the speech of his life, the speech that made all the difference. Donald Trump gave a few waves and went off in his armoured limo to play golf.

Trump supporters assert that it would have been an unnecessary “security risk” for Trump to have physically addressed the crowd. Two responses to this are as follows.

First, if Trump had planned in advance to address the crowd, proper security measures could have been put in place. Second, at least he could have stayed in the White House and perhaps addressed the crowd via video. He didn’t have to go and play golf, for godssakes. Get a grip, Trump worshippers.

Why is Trump declaring himself a candidate for 2024?  Likely because he and his advisors believe that is a way to try to preclude federal prosecution – since it may “look bad” for Biden to be politically persecuting a future electoral rival (state prosecution would still be in play).  Of course, that depends upon the Left actually caring what they “look” like. Also, being in the electoral mix would not doubt be good for fund-raising and whatever other grifts Trump has in mind for the next four years.

Coulter on Trump:

“The reason I’m very happy that [President] Trump lost – and lost narrowly – is that a second term of Trump would have killed us,” Coulter said…“[W]ith Trump … He’d say these wild things that we’d get blamed for, he’d get attacked on, and then actually did nothing,” she explained…“Trump thinks, ‘I tweeted it. Therefore, it’s done’,” Coulter said…“It’s ironic … that he lost this election, very possibly because of cheating. Democrats cheat all the time. … Trump has been talking about ‘mail-in ballots are dangerous, they’re gonna steal this election.’ He’s been talking about it … probably all year,” she said….“Talking about it isn’t the same as doing it,” Coulter pointed out. “Much like as he tweeted out, ‘Law and Order,’ and yet cities are still burning across the nation. [He] didn’t do anything about it. It’s like he didn’t know he was president.”

More Boomer-bashing from Millennial/Zoomer retards.

…most are out-of-shape Boomers. This reveals a severe inferiority complex. Most of these people know consciously and/or subconsciously that they could never have the pride of wearing a uniform, be it military or law enforcement. They are weak, fat, and uninured to hardship.

Unlike youngsters today, who are more overweight/obese than any similar age cohort in history, who spend most of their free time with their faces stuck into a smart phone, with their lipid-enhanced jowls sagging down onto the screen. Various forms of cancer, heretofore typically observed only in the middle-aged and old, are now occurring in the young, and these are cancers known to be associated with being physically inactive lumps of lard.

So, the question for a typical youth of today is – which is bigger: their pot belly or the colon tumor festering in their large intestine alongside the remains of poorly digested Big Macs?

See this nonsense.  Essentially, Sallis is correct once again. You see, with Counter-Currents as part of the HBD alliance, we must leave room in America for "Rosie and the kids." Also note how this "10% alien is OK" "90% White nationalism" allows the Herrenvolk to colonize other people's nations. Morgan occupying Hungary? He's a ten percenter! Munro in Romania?  Farrell in Italy?  Full Moon Ancestry and "Bang East Europe?" The urinals of Europe's men's rooms haunted by shifty-eyed and hot-handed Quota Queens?  High-IQ Jews and Asians running America?  it's all A-OK!  Hart's vision or a multiracial "White separatist state" including "Asians and others" and his newer vision of a "conservative state" including "conservative Blacks" comes to pass under "ethnonationalist" "leadership." The ethnonationalist filth lie to you about how pan-Europeanism will "violate national sovereignty" while in reality it are the pan-Europeanists who support homogeneous nation states, while the ethnonationalists want to ensure the survival of multiculturalism so as to empower their favorite minorities and/or to justify the hypocrisy of having "ethnonationalist" ethnoimperialists living in other people's nations.

Remember - there is no way out but through Johnson.  White nationalism can flourish only if Johnson and Counter-Currents are unalterably opposed.

Counter-Currents supports de facto multiculturalism.  EGI Notes opposes multiculturalism.  The distinction is clear, no?