Of Boomers and Covids and Other News

In der news.

Following up on this, I want to once again express my distaste for all of the intergenerational warfare anti-Boomer memes coming from the Millennial and Zoomer retards of the Alt Right.

Can Boomers be justifiably critiqued? Of course, but the same goes for Millennials and Zoomers and whatever other (artificial, pop culture-created) generational cohort you wish to discuss. But what makes the anti-Boomer complaints particularly distasteful is the paranoid ideation of the youth that the selfish Boomers are "conspiring to rob the youth of their future” and the snide “OK Boomer” and hostile “fluff the pillow” memes. This is misdirected anger – instead of focusing anger on hard targets, such as the Left, the globalists, the Coloreds, the Jews, the youth instead vent their anger at easy, safe, and soft targets, such as White Boomers. That’s not only stupid and counter-productive, but cowardly as well.

I remember asking my father once why his generation didn’t fight back against the madness that erupted in America in the 1960s. His answer was honest if rather unflattering to himself and his generational peers – “we were afraid.” In the case of the Boomers, the problem wasn’t so much fear but naiveté. They really thought that voting for Reagan (twice) would make a difference, just like they thought that Trump and his MAGA agenda would make a difference. Stupid, yes, naïve, yes, but not malicious or selfish. And not necessarily fearful either.  There’s certainly no agenda to “get the youth” or “stick it to the Millennials.”  Similarly, when the “youth” wrecked American White racial activism with their Pepe Kek Alt Right nonsense, that wasn’t intentional, just bad judgment and stupidity. There’s plenty of bad judgment and stupidity to go around. To blame Boomers for the state of current day America is to grant them too much agency. They were simply hoodwinked like White Americans have been, endlessly, for more than a century.  They were the conned, not the con men.  

Laugh at this.  So, essentially, anonymous activists should just sit down and shut up, while we watch childish Millennials and Zoomers worship Nick Fuentes as if he were a god. Well, I suppose, being disappointed by the Boomer God Emperor Trump, the MAGA Pepe Kek crowd now have to turn to younger material.

Here is one of my easier and least insightful predictions: Groyperism is going to crash and burn in some sort of tragicomic collapse, as did the Alt Right.  The kids are not alright, and the inevitable outcome is, well...inevitable.

I do not want readers to misconstrue my previous comments about a covid-19 vaccine.  While I am generally pro-vaccination, I acknowledge that concerns about the safety profile of these covid-19 vaccines may be, generally speaking, valid, since these are new vaccines, being rushed through, with insufficient safety testing and profiling. My point is, and remains however, that comments about “microchips" and “humans are going to become genetically modified” are nonsense; the real problems would stem from unforeseen negative reactions to vaccine components and/or reactions to a (two-time) “bolus” exposure to the viral antigen in otherwise healthy individuals. However, if people want the crisis to end as quickly as possible, I’m not sure what the alternative is.

Likewise, I do not want my overall position on covid-19 to be misconstrued.  I maintain that the virus is serious and that the flubro attitude of “who cares” is rationally untenable.  However, even though I maintain that something needed and needs to be done, I never advocated for specific measures (precise lockdown procedures, for example). Most likely, the best option would have been either a more stringent Chinese approach or a more relaxed Swedish approach; the half-assed “in-between” American approach hasn’t done much good and has indeed damaged the economy.  

But, ultimately, my biggest objection to those who complain about covid-19, from both the covid alarmist and flubro directions, is that they refuse to hold the Chinese accountable for this crisis. And that is not just some abstract principle. The Chinese need to pay reparations to humans for what they have done and if they refuse they should be ostracized from the family of nations; as step one, cutting back the trade imbalances with China would be the functional equivalent of reparations.  Further, without holding the Chinese accountable, we just set the stage for the next plague they will unleash upon us, which may be far worse than the current one.  But, no, the Chinese are akin to gods, and criticizing gods is blasphemy and cannot be allowed.

The Lind hypothesis strikes again.  Those same types dominate Der Movement, and are now pushing a form of “woke” HBD multiculturalism, as exemplified by the multiracialist blog Counter-Currents.

To get a better understanding of the anti-White, pro-multiculturalist HBD Hapa site Counter-Currents, see the following comments:

See this.

Please see this comment (emphasis added).

Jud Jackson

Posted November 21, 2020 at 2:51 am | Permalink

Before Loving, were whites and yellows allowed to marry? I certainly think whites should not marry blacks and browns. Look how the Spanish screwed up all of Latin America. However, I don’t have a problem with whites marrying yellows. I know this is only anecdotal evidence but look at John Derbyshire and his wife and children. It seems to me that when a group with Average IQ of 100 marry into a group with Average IQ 105, the IQs of the offspring will be greater than 100 and this is a good thing. The same is true of crime rates. Yellows have lower crime rates than whites and so the offspring will have lower crime rates than whites. And that is a good thing.

This comment.

Sallis is always, ALWAYS right. I warned you all about the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist alliance, I warned you all that Counter-Currents was going to throw its lot in with “Rosie and the kids.” And there you go.  Greg Johnson argues for "White ethnostates" where up to one in ten citizens will be racial or ethnic aliens. Counter-Currents commentators openly shill for White-Asian mongrelization, using HBD arguments, and openly praising the Derbyshire clan. 

Still support Counter-Currents, rank-and-file?  Whither affirmative action?

Readers of EGI Notes understand what this is all about. Everyone, of both sexes, understands the reality of male superiority. This causes ressentiment among many women who then attempt to destroy masculinity wherever they find it – even in their own sons.

The Nietzschean “discovery” of ressentiment is one of the most useful and pragmatically accurate products of 19th century philosophy.

See this.

In philosophy and psychology, ressentiment (French pronunciation: [rəsɑ̃timɑ̃]) is one of the forms of resentment or hostility. The concept was of particular interest to some 19th century thinkers, most notably Friedrich Nietzsche. According to their use, ressentiment is a sense of hostility directed toward an object that one identifies as the cause of one's frustration, that is, an assignment of blame for one's frustration.[1] The sense of weakness or inferiority complex and perhaps even jealousy in the face of the "cause" generates a rejecting/justifying value system, or morality, which attacks or denies the perceived source of one's frustration. This value system is then used as a means of justifying one's own weaknesses by identifying the source of envy as objectively inferior, serving as a defense mechanism that prevents the resentful individual from addressing and overcoming their insecurities and flaws.