Macro Socialism, Micro Capitalism

Political vs. Economic.

Considering the question of socialism vs. capitalism, we need to distinguish macro/political issues from those that are micro/economic.

Micro/economic issues ask what is the most efficient way to allocate resources, including and especially scarce resources, in a society?  What is the best way to enhance the standard of living? At this level, private property and supply/demand works best; therefore, at the micro/economic level, some type of (controlled and retrained) capitalism seems to be the best choice.

The macro/political level issues ask how should society be organized; what is the fundamental raison d’etre of your political system?  Does the economy exist to serve the people or the other way around?  Here, macro/political socialism is best – society should be organized to serve the interests of “the people” (the ethny – race and civilization), not the economy; a nation-state is more than an economy, the state should not prioritize the interest of the wealthy and major corporations, and “economic growth” should not be the driving force of decision-making. We should reject laissez-faire solutions, and opt for state-control, to a degree, a restraint of the capitalist micro/economic system so as to make sure that the economy serves the people, not the opposite. This is Political Socialism – an organized society in which economic activity is subordinated to, and controlled for, the interests of the nation.  At its lower levels, this economy can certainly include capitalist organization – private property, supply/demand, stock markets and banks, private investment, etc.- but that exists only as long as it serves the objectives of national prosperity and enrichment. The economy is the food of the nation, it is sustenance, not the purpose of existence, and it is means not ends. There can and should be a social safety net (for one’s own people, not racial and cultural aliens), and the wealthy should not be too wealthy and they should not control the economy and the political system.

When Yockey talked about “Ethical Socialism” he was talking about, and promoting, macro-level Political Socialism (akin to Spengler’s “Prussian Socialism”), not Marxism – in fact it is anti-Marxist, as was the socialism of National Socialism. When I criticize capitalism that is more about wealthy rent-seekers and “woke” corporations, not the small business owner or an individual investing in the stock market for retirement.

Politically, we should be socialist, but at the level of everyday economics, elements of capitalism can be reasonable, properly restrained constrained to meet the national interest.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Those Japanese Ice People

"Derb Jr." writes and whines. Read this as an antidote to despicable scum like Jason Malloy who once (~ 15 years ago) absurdly labeled Japan as a “Western” nation. If white people are to become minorities in the countries our ancestors built, and if we face a future where we may be ruled over by envious and malevolent non-whites, I would rather my overlords be Japanese than Muslims or sub-Saharan Africans.  And let’s not forget those Chinese girls with guns. Of course, if possible I prefer to live free among my own people. Too late…you made your bed and now lie in it… literally. But if, by some miracle, white ethno-states become a reality in the West, will I—and my Japanese wife and mixed-race child—be accepted?  No. Or would I be rejected as a miscegenating traitor to my race? Yes, you filthy scum. My wife has many years of experience living and working in the US, and our child was born there. We agree that life in America is in many ways preferable to living in Japan. ...
Read more

Tales of Fst: Sallis vs. Lewontin

A small scale yet informative analysis of genetic variation. Read this. We are all aware of the “more variation within groups than between groups” argument against the biological validity of race. Now, I believe – or at least hope – that honest population geneticists (albeit very few if any exist) know better not to make absurd claims about Lewontin’s “finding” – that it “makes race meaningless” or that “people are more closely related to members of other races than members of their own race.”  At least they won’t say that among themselves, in their publications, or among other types of academics, but maybe they’ll still try to fool the rubes; after all, from my personal experience most population geneticists are anti-White SJW leftists. The problem is more with your rank-and-file leftist, your Tim Wise types, your opinion writers, “anthropologists,” openly political population geneticists (the majority who are apparently dishonest), writers of “popular science,” politicians, blogg...
Read more

Take a Bite Out of That Nothingburger!

Der Movement: Always, always, always wrong. Watch this. The “nothingburger” continues , eh “movement?” Please read about the monsters here. The jury is still out as to what caused the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. Chinese authorities initially suspected a wet market in Wuhan where wild animals like bats and snakes were sold illegally. A nearby biolab has also attracted scrutiny, and increased suspicion as Chinese authorities have been stubbornly unwilling to cooperate with skeptics requests. But regardless of how the outbreak started, it has already raised questions about traditional Chinese practices of consuming wild animals, either for medicinal purposes - for example, it's believed that eating civet cats, vermin akin to raccoons, can bequeath more sexual vigor - or as delicacies (remember "bat soup"?). I suppose that “more sexual vigor” via a civet cat snack is necessary in the absence of any phenotypic sexual dimorphism among potential partners. SJWs (and I suppos...
Read more