Odds and Ends, 11/21/21

In der news.

A “movement” retard writes:

…the social reductionism of Dawkins, Salter, etc., in which human volition melts into the background and the genes compete against each other…

That’s a complete misrepresentation of what Salter wrote, and displays either a complete lack of understanding of that work, or, more likely, that the retard never read Salter’s work and is instead depending upon Asiatic HBD “critiques.”

Which leads us to:

(Btw, Razib Khan and the geneticists at gnxp, among others, debunked the non-scientist Salter's "EGI" many years ago.)

No one there is, or was, a “geneticist” and they “debunked” nothing. Their logically inept and factually incorrect self-interested “criticisms” were REPEATEDLY answered by me, in different forums, and Salter himself answered some of it in the introduction to the second edition of OGI.

Remember this?  Let us consider together. In the Pilleater tape, Greg Johnson claimed that he "vets" Amren conferences, telling Taylor who should be allowed to attend. Although there was some controversy about that (I think Forney or someone claimed that an Amren person told him that was not true), let's take Johnson at his word. If true, that means he went from denouncing the idea of live Amren conferences to vetting those same conferences in a few years time. Similarly, Derbyshire quickly transitioned from "Amren latrine flies" to being a honored speaker to those "latrine flies." And these guys still deny affirmative action? Really? Who are they fooling?

See this.

Pertness and ignorance may ask a question in three lines, which it will cost learning and ingenuity thirty pages to answer. When this is done, the same question shall be triumphantly asked again the next year, as if nothing had ever been written upon the subject.

That’s exactly the situation with attacks against Salterism. No matter how lengthy detailed and comprehensive my ripostes to those attacks; the retards just repeat them over and over again as if they’ve never been refuted.

The HBDer diet.

For lunch you’re gonna eat Chinese food. Now I don’t want you eating that crappy stuff. You wanna get the stuff with MSG. None of that non-MSG bullshit. I don’t care what you eat but you have to sit down and eat for at least 45 minutes straight. You can’t let go of the fork. Eat until your eyes swell up and become slits and you start to look like the woman behind the counter.

While much support for HBD comes from ethnic self-interest, either directly or from marriage and family, or from particular ideological grounds (Nordicism or some other hostility to pan-Europeanism), in some cases there may well be an aesthetic component to it. Think of the stereotype of the verbally adept, erudite, sophisticated, cosmopolitan Jew. Or, think of the stereotype of the quiet, hard-working, superficially agreeable Asian, with high test scores and violin playing.  From the standpoint of personal aesthetic preferences, an urbane WASP like Taylor may well prefer those types to White ethnics – even highly educated and accomplished ones – who are more rough-edged, uncouth, plain-speaking, with regional urban accents deriving from working class/lower middle class backgrounds.  Particularly, if these aesthetic preferences are combined with certain ideological fixations and/or personal friendships (e.g., Derbyshire and his Chinese wife and mixed race children), this can result in a strong pro-HBD bias.  And we cannot dismiss ethnic resentment against “White ethnic upstarts” (from which Jews are exempted for the reasons explained above and as well their exotic otherness, so that they escape the “narcissism of small differences” effect).

A friend of this blog at Gab posts:

personally think their is a HBD 1.0 and HBD 2.0 and they should be seen differently.

HBD 1.0 are Jensen, Sailer, Levin, Hart, Lynn and Rushton. Cochran and Murray I think are sorta bridges to 2.0.

I think your right that a lot of HBD is motivated by aesthetic preference. All these people were urbane in some way. New York astrophysicist Hart, Berkeley professor Jensen, Cambridge educated Lynn, peace corps Charles Murray etc.

HBD 2.0 are Sean Last, Emil OWK, Ryan Faulk, Cofnas, Anatoly Karlin, Woodley, Gregoire Canlorbe, Davide Piffer and Dutton.

HBD 2.0 are so bizarre and fringy. You have psychics, cryptozoologist, anime feet enthusiast, college dropouts, spiteful mutant theologians, people who want to be uploaded to a computer etc. I am personally confused on what motivates them.

I think their is definitely a strange psychology to the HBDer and it is definitely not "disinterested rationality" like they purport.

I'll admit not being very familiar with the 2.0 crowd.  Cofnas I know about, re: MacDonald and of course there's Dutton. Piffer I've commented on and Canlorbe I've mocked.  But I haven't really considered how more juvenile the newest crowd is (other than my comments about Dutton and his crazed antics on his videos).

If we assume that some of the Quota Queens sincerely believe that they are not anti-Med, then they are delusional. They simply do not seem to understand that their toxic brew of Nordicism, HBD Nordicism, ethnic fetishism, Anglocentrism, Germanocentrism, Sallis’ Law, Humphrey hagiography, HBD race realism, etc. alienates Meds. The problem is that even if they do not politically align with Nordicism, they have internalized its belief and memes. Since they believe (even if unconsciously) that Meds are inferior, they don’t, or can’t, grasp that Meds don’t see themselves as inferior and therefore will reject Der Movement for reasons that the Quota Queens don’t see. The Quota Queens, whether they admit it or not, see Meds as second-class, subaltern, borderline Whites (if White at all) and therefore do not understand why Meds react negatively to that “truth.”

Torba:

Christians can and should seize power (legally) of state legislatures in states like West Virginia and Tennessee and start passing Biblical legislation. Let the federal government sue, who cares? Ignore and enforce.

Ban abortion.

Mandate school choice and provide resources for homeschooling parents.

Ban ursury.

Incentivize nuclear family creation and expansion.

Close businesses on Sunday again.

Plenty more we can do. We should think about getting these states and more under Christian control before it's too late.

Anything missing from Andy's policy wish list? How about banning forced racial integration, affirmative action, resettlement of "refugees," etc.? No, instead we need to close businesses on Sunday. That's great. Car breaks down on Sunday - you're shit out of luck. No worries though, your local Negro will help you out, help you out real well. Indeed, once they are finished, you'll never need help with anything else ever again.

According to FOX News, being called a "White supremacist" is slander. Now, we need to understand what is meant by "White supremacist" - essentially, in "normie" lingo, a "White supremacist" is any activist who is, claims to be, or is labelled by others to be, merely "pro-White."  This not only puts an interesting focus on the attitude of FOX News, but also we note how much being a pro-White activist is anathema, even on the populist Right.  Contrary to the cries of the grifters - "we are making great progress, just send me more money" - the fact is that pro-White activism, REAL pro-White activism, isn't accepted by society any more than it was in the days of WN 1.0, which the grifters tell us were so bad compared to the wonderful WN 2.0 successes of today.

Don't drink the Kool-Aid.  It's all lies.

Sesame Street goes HBD.

What might have been.  I look forward to their upcoming report.

Listen to this.

Three points:

• 1. Pilleater had no problems attending; this puts into perspective Johnson's claims of vetting the conference.
• 2. All of the comments about Johnson and Counter-Currents were quite interesting.
• 3. The comments about the direction of Amren and the "movement" - Malkin and Asians, America First, American Freedom Party - are consistent with my recent writing on the subject. Of course, Pilleater thinks things that I object to are good, but the trends are what they are, independent of different opinions on whether the trends are good or bad.

Quota Queens on the march.