Odds and Ends, 11/26/21

In der news.

See this: More evidence that Der Movement is moving toward pro-Asian populist multiracialism.

Without further ado, the elephant in the room: Mr. Kumar is mixed-race; half-white, half-Indian, to be precise. 

So, he's perfect for the new anti-WN "All Asia All the Time" "movement" that rejects hardcore racial nationalism.

His mother is Scots-Irish, with ancestry in North America that dates back to 1600s South Carolina; from his maternal lineage, he is a member of both the Sons of the American Revolution and the Sons of Confederate Veterans. 

He's better than you, wops and hunkies, and don't you forget it!

His father is an Indian immigrant; I asked Mr. Kumar when his father came to America, and he said that it was in the early 1980s.

Savitri Devi approves.

Now, many White Nationalists will argue that Mr. Kumar’s mother is a race traitor...

Well, isn't she?  Does Der Movement now disagree with that assessment?

...that his claim to four centuries of American heritage is thereby nullified...

Isn't it?  What if the mother had married a Nigerian?  What then?

...and that the sheer fact that we have political candidates with the surname “Kumar” is a portent of doom.

Isn't it?

There is some truth to those sentiments...

SOME????!!!!

...but at the risk of alienating some readers, I disagree. Yes, miscegenation is an evil which we should never have countenanced and which we should work to eradicate...

But, let's make unprincipled exceptions whenever convenient. Der Movement has lots of experience with that with Derbyshire.  You see how the slippery slope works?

...but it is not Mr. Kumar’s fault that his mother chose to marry an Indian man. 

What kind of argument is that? Wait...that'll be the new excuse to allow such people - including "the kids" - in Der Movement's "bring out your dead" Luddite ethnostate.

Her heritage did not evaporate simply because she married a foreigner.

Hey, it doesn't matter if Kumar is half-Indian. He has the Holy High Truster ancestry so he's better than some untermenschen from Southern of Eastern Europe.

I, for one, applaud Mr. Kumar for choosing to embrace the white side of his identity. 

So, any mixed race person who does the same - including mulattoes - should be similarly accepted, right?

More importantly, as I will go on to explore in further detail, Neil Robinson Kumar explicitly identifies himself as a white advocate. He openly fights on behalf of whites, for white interests...

My riposte: Ourselves Alone.

Fight LGBTQ Perversion.

Family is the most critical building block to civil society. To defile marriage is to destroy the family. America must flat-out reject the perversion of family life by the hateful, anti-Christian homosexual lobby."

That's part of Kumar's platform - does that mean he's against Counter-Currents?

At the AmRen Conference, Mr. Kumar greeted Jared Taylor and Peter Brimelow as old friends; of course, he writes for both of their publications, but the camaraderie appeared as genuine and as natural as can be.

But of course.

Mr. Kumar appears to be friendly with Andrew Torba, the heroic creator and CEO of Gab, a great Christian Patriot and a favorite target of the Global Judeocracy. They regularly repost each other.

Ditto

Der Movement - half-Asian mongrels good, White ethnics bad.  In summary, everything I wrote here is being proven to be 100% correct.

Some further comments on the Kumar issue. Of course, I have nothing against the man personally.  But one should not decide racial (or any other) policy based upon whether you like or dislike some individual (friends of Derbyshire take note). And, yes, in the unlikely event Kumar wins, that would be a positive for White interests, particularly from a Suvorov’s Law perspective. But a victory will depend mostly on the voters in Arkansas, and secondarily on campaign donors; Der Movement in theory need do nothing except briefly note that a “pro-White” non-White is running for office and say, “good luck.” And nothing more. I object to the enthusiastic cheerleading and support, the unprincipled exception excusing miscegenation, the hypocrisy in accepting mixed-race half Asians while rejecting White ethnics, all of it. Most of all, this fits into the pattern I have identified of Der Movement moving away from hardcore White nationalism and embracing multiracial right-wing populism.

Der Movement delights in the spectacle of Tucker Carlson talking about the Great Replacement and so the Quota Queens say that “the normies are moving in our direction.” What the Quota Queens don’t seem to realize is that they themselves are moving as well, in the opposite direction; Der Movement drifts toward rightist normies. Eventually FOX News and Der Movement will converge on Nick Fuentes/Michelle Malkin, leaving us with “Rosie and the Kids White Nationalism.”

This comes to pass because American “movement” “leaders” are all High Trusters, mostly from the American South or West, all with similar backgrounds, all with similar ways of “thinking,” and all with similar biases and hang-ups. They are all carbon copies of each other, and there isn’t an ounce’s worth of sense between them.

The Quota Queens are graded on their performance.  Left to right: Taylor (with moustache), Johnson, Heimbach, MacDonald, and Spencer.

See this. One sentence sums up the entire Amren experience:

Nordicists have on their side the facts of history, but the future would seem to belong to China with its eugenics program.

Reality: Archaeogenetic studies increasingly debunk Nordicist lies, and everything China does is based on what is stolen/copied from the West.

Der Movement continues to throw its lot in with anti-vaxxism. And Der Right continues to spread lies, such as that the vaccines don't have any effects at all on infection; this is not true.  See this as to why this stupidity from Der Movement is so destructive.

Excerpt of a comment left for that article:

Virology is fraud: viruses do not exist and do not cause disease

Pasteur was a charlatan

Der Movement couldn't do more to alienate STEM people if they tried. Well, maybe they are trying. Der Movement is dumber than your garden variety ghetto Negro. So...the person who wrote the comment above would have no problem with me injecting him with a bolus of live rabies virus, directly into his nervous system. Why not? Can we do that experiment?

From another comment:

We should infiltrate our views into the larger anti-vax conversation.

There you go. Then don't be surprised when academics, particularly scientists, are on the Left. Any sensible STEM person will be completely disgusted and alienated from the freakish, illogical, irrational, childish, and factually incorrect Luddite nonsense spewing forth from the fever swamps of Der Right.

And never forget that Johnson bans me from Counter-Currents, but allows the gibbering from nutcases who claim that viruses don't exist. It's all a conspiracy!  If you get sick then that's left-over damage from the napalm and mustard gas dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But, hey, I should be gratified - the faster Der Movement self-destructs, the better for us all.

If you have time, read this. That is science and logic as opposed to demented right-wing gibbering about "terrain theory." The point there about the child-like simplicity of germ denial "argumentation" underscores a point I made here. The basic problem is that Der Right is incapable of complex thinking. To them, a vaccine must be 100% effective and 100% safe in 100% of people, or else it is 100% useless. Similarly, 100% of microbes must infect 100% of people with 100% efficiency in 100% of circumstances, or else the germ theory of disease is false.  And that sort of retarded thinking is why we get apostates from Der Movement whose "epiphany" was "hey. I met this one Black person and they were nice to me, and this one White person I met was nasty." There are racial consequences for child-like simplicity, my dear "movement."