Racial Cuckoldry: The Kumar Case

And other news.

In a previous post, I commented on the Kumar case, and how the embrace of mixed-race Kumar, at Counter-Currents and elsewhere in Der Movement, is consistent with what I had previously written about the replacement of hardcore White nationalism with Asiaphilic multiracial right-wing populism.

Well, not surprisingly, the stupidity and racial cuckoldry from Der Movement gets worse. Here is a comment excerpt from Anglocentric Nordicist Van de Camp from the Counter-Currents Kumar article:

Regardless, there is a bit too much distraction in these comments over Mr. Kumar’s status as a Eurasian. If he has an R1a Haplogroup DNA marker (likely) he is descended from the Aryan invaders of India, whom Madison Grant argued were Nordic. Since that DNA type is prevalent in the Baltic and Scandinavia Grant is probably on to something. Carlton S. Coon did a deeper analysis and he concluded many Indians are Caucasoid (i. e. white).

So, Mr. Kumar is “ethnic” but certainly otherwise white. Mostly Nordic, partially Sub-Continental Mediterranean."

STOP with the "Aryan" nonsense already, as well as using "Mediterranean" to include South Asians. Modern genetic facts: South Asians are highly genetically distinct from Europeans; this is not in question, and can be discerned from whatever genetic analysis you may want to use – PCA, unsupervised admixture analysis, supervised admixture analysis, Fst, genetic kinship, whatever.

For example, see this.  And this.  And also this.

Perhaps Nordicist retards shouldn't depend on Madison Grant, Carleton Coon, and single locus markers to determine racial affinities. South Asians are distinct from Europeans and the "Aryan" nonsense is simply that the Iranic branch of Indo-European steppe peoples conquered India and admixed with the indigenous stock. This racial confusion is what you get from "movement" Luddites who think that viruses aren't real, Pasteur was a charlatan, and that we should ignore autosomal DNA population genetics studies in favor of the incoherent gibbering of "race theorists" from ~100 years ago.

Another comment excerpt from that same Counter-Currents article:

Who beez dee babee daddy? I would like to have more info. I’m gonna guess his father was from a northern caucasoid group…..which would be okay, no questions asked...

So, a North Indian ("northern caucasoid") father, who is completely distinct from Europeans, is "okay, no questions asked..." Meanwhile, according to Der Movement, Italians and Slavs are no good. Incredible. Confusion about who is White? Race cuckoldry? You bet!  Related to that, see this exchange:

NikandrosNovember 26, 2021 at 8:33 am

White nationalists are now more welcoming of Asians, Jews, Jamaicans, and mutts into the movement than they are of Southern and Eastern Europeans. Where did it all go so wrong?

Greg JohnsonNovember 26, 2021 at 8:51 am

That’s a lie. This will be your last comment.

Hail Nikandros! You are welcome at the Sallis Groupuscule, Mr. Nikandros. Cut the cord with Counter-Currents. By the way, Johnson, why so sensitive? Does the truth hurt?  Nikandros is 100% correct.  The same "movement" that embraces Kumar loathes and rejects Southern and Eastern Europeans. There is a Sallis' Law for a reason.

A Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog writes

typical gaslighting Greg, Steven Clark on Counter-Currents literally wrote 2 months ago that "Italians are the Morlocks, but hardly savage and brutal; they’re rather penned up like chickens who are awed by the swans", and called southern Europeans the equivalent of Guatemalans and Turks. Is that welcoming language?

So Greg bans people for "lying"? 90% of the counter-current commenters should be banned then.

Exactly. And then there's Goad constantly questioning the "Whiteness" of Italians; they aren't "Aryan" South Asians, after all. And then there is everything else of like manner all around the "movement."

Another comment excerpt from a Counter-Currents commentator:

Does this make him racially white? No, but he’s obviously culturally white, and a strong ally of white interests. That’s all that should matter in the voting booth...But a half-white thinking of himself as white, and whose non-white half is some kind of Caucasoid, can more plausibly be thought of as a kind of “honorary white”.

That's the Kaufmann Whiteshift agenda (see below) - we must accept "culturally white" mixed-race individuals.

His paternal lineage appears to be non-Dravidian, meaning that he must have some degree of ancient Aryan blood on both sides, strengthening his case for honorary membership...

I think Kumar deserves our fullest support.

Again, STOP with the Aryan nonsense. Do you know that Jews, as well as full-blooded Middle Easterners, are genetically (much) closer to Europeans than are “Aryan” South Asians?  STOP with the racial cuckoldry of adopting genetically distinct non-kin as some sort of “distant cousins.” It’s a lie.

A Gab correspondent who is a friend of this blog writes:

Its interesting how quickly we got to Eric Kaufmanns goal for white advocacy. Mixed-race people "embrace the white side of his identity [quote from the counter-currents article]" and a redefined basis of European nationalism to conform (unintentionally) with the "left modernist", "the mudshift.". Grossly maladaptive developments.

That is a great insight. Indeed, Der Movement is now behaving in a very Kaufmann-like manner.  Remember this?  Kaufmann’s idea is that Whites as we know them today (people of Old World European ethnic ancestry) will be replaced by a part-White mixed race population that will adopt “White culture” and a “White” identity, what I term “mudshift” – the race replacement of Whites by mixed-race mongrels pretending to be (and accepted by others as) White. 

Therefore, Counter-Currents and the rest of Der Movement, with their abandonment of the core principles of White nationalism and their scientifically illiterate embrace of racial cuckoldry, are strongly enabling the Kaufmann agenda. To them, Kumar is an “honorary White” or even a “mostly Nordic ethnic White.” 

He’s half South Asian, for godssakes!  

Further, they say that we have to support Kumar, since he adopts a “White identity” and is “culturally White” and “fights for White interests.”  Please tell me – how is ANY of that in ANY way different from Kaufmann's agenda?  And it is interesting that among the leading "Kumar is White" or "Kumar is an honorary White" supporters at Counter-Currents are Nordicist fans of Instauration and Humphrey Ireland. In case any of you thought that Nordicists were an odd fit in the HBD-Nordicist-ethnonationalist-Amnat alliance, think again. As long as the anti-swarthoid core ideology is maintained, then mixed-race mongrels passing as "White" are A-OK. Rosie and the Kids White nationalism. Thus, another comment excerpt from that same article:

American WN 1.0 was (and is) snobbish about ‘Whiteness’. Their essentialist biologism forecloses certain policy decisions about part-Whites to which WIN (sic) should not be beholden.

But of course. Rosie and the kids!

Der Movement supports multiracialism and miscegenation. Der Movement is the most dangerous enemy of the White Race, at least on the Right; Der Movement is a ruthless enemy of White racial survival.  For the White race to live, Der Movement must die.

Also see this.

Other news:

Germs/terrain is not either/or, but a continuum, with germs being the dominant factor. Consider the following diseases (assume no vaccination or prior infection):

Measles, Ebola, Rabies – terrain is essentially completely irrelevant; exposure = infection and illness

Covid, Influenza – terrain is a factor to some extent; exposure = likely infection, but not all people become equally ill (or ill at all)

Common Cold – terrain is a significant factor, but disease, when it occurs, of course comes from the virus; exposure = may or may not lead to infection, which may or may not lead to illness, based on a variety of factors, including host health

Not all disease causing entities are the same (that nasty complexity again).  Some are highly infectious and virulent, others less so. “Terrain” becomes an important factor to the extent that the entity is less infectious and/or virulent.

One problem is that in some cases, “terrain” may include factors beyond the control of the individual; for example, genetic factors likely play a part in response to covid.  In other cases, “terrain” may include factors that some would like to ignore.  Obesity is a major risk factor for covid. Some “movement” anti-vaxxers (who shall remain nameless), if I recall correctly, admitted to being overweight. Will they improve their “terrain” by putting down knife and fork and pushing away from the table?

Instead of blaming China, we instead hear that Pasteur - one of the White race's greatest minds - was a "charlatan."

A single maggot-infested dog turd, rotting on the sidewalk on a hot and humid August afternoon, is of infinitely greater value than the "movement" in its entirety.