Brief Notes, 1/22/22

Two issues.

As part of Der Movement antics, Amren interviews van de Camp of all people.

I’d really like to see the USA with a 90 percent-plus white population that identifies with the Anglo-Dutch-German founding stock.

The micks, wops, and hunkies can all go to hell.

Much leftist thought isn’t just Jewish ethnic aims, though.

Of course not. it's Amren.

Ta-Nehisi Coates is a pretty good writer. 

As good as Lipton and Jayman?

I’d like to see the 1964 Civil Rights Act stuck down.

Stuck? Stuck down where?  

And what does van de Camp want?

Higher birthrates in all parts of the world.

Sure! Africans aren't reproducing enough.

See this.  Hood writes a long diatribe, akin to Lawrence and Brahmin, that could have been more succinctly written as a piece a fraction of its current length.

Creators were they who created peoples, and hung a faith and a love over them: thus they served life. Destroyers, are they who lay snares for many, they hang a sword and a hundred cravings over them. Where there is still a people, there the state is not understood, but hated as the evil eye, and as a sin against laws and customs. – Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

Easy for Nietzsche to write that when the White race was ascendant, and unthreatened from without or from mass immigration within.

Our opponents recognize this. That is why they make every effort to portray women, non-whites, homosexuals, and other protected groups in ways to ensure they can “see themselves” positively. Critics loved Black Panther because its “Afrofuturist” vison spoke to blacks’ myths about themselves. Similarly, the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s movie about “Shang-Chi” wasn’t just the latest in this never-ending franchise, but an “empowering” message to Asians.

And Hood writes for the HBD race realist site Amren, which is, fundamentally, “but an ‘empowering’ message to Asians.”

If the argument is that Western myths, stories, and heroes are so universal they belong to the world, this is an implicit admission of white cultural superiority. The Arthurian tradition, Greek dramas, Roman history, Shakespeare’s plays, Western royalty — many non-whites find these stories more interesting than their own pasts. Compare Haitian “emperor” Jean-Jacques Dessalines to Emperor Napoleon.

Hood is reading too much into this. Essentially, the “Coloreds cast to replace Whites” paradigm is just another System method of abuse and humiliation of Whites – and the System doesn’t need to make arguments such as what Hood suggests. Basically, it works like this. The casting is done to erase White history, attack Whites and White culture and morale; it is ritual humiliation. It is also done to habituate Whites to accepting Coloreds as a natural and integral part of White nations.  If anyone complains, they are “racist” and will be cancelled. Making arguments like Hood is making - "an implicit admission of white cultural superiority" – will be considered “racist” and ignored or attacked. People are cowed by the social pricing attacks. OK, Hood will say it is implicit, so no one needs to actually say it; it is implicitly accepted.  But, then, so what? People, privately, as atomized individuals, may roll their eyes and think arguments like what Hood has made, but it doesn't change anything. In fact, it may in one sense make the situation worse. When people are publicly forced to accept something that they privately know to be absurd, that rots the soul and destroys character and morale. Again - it is ritual humiliation. Implicit admissions are nothing positive.

Tolkien didn’t just speak to the mind, but to the soul. His work was rooted in the mystic chords of memory that define a nation. 

Of course.  Der Movement’s obsession with Tolkien is one of its major characteristics.  Although, that’s a Type I thing.