Political EGI: EGI Speech I

Speaking out on behalf of Whites.

Note: The following should be viewed as a rough draft, a work in progress, and can be adapted and edited by people as they see fit, if they want to use this as a foundation for some sort of statement, speech, or address. I will likely produce more such items in the future, perhaps briefer, more specific and targeted pieces, in contrast to this more generalized statement. What we really need are people defending White interests explicitly; implicit statements really don’t serve White interests well any more. We’ve moved passed that. We need leaders who are not afraid to speak frankly about race and about the need to defend Whites as a race and to defend White interests. Note that this speech is aimed at White Americans; however, it can be adapted to other groups, including Whites in other nations (e.g., Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, etc.).

My Fellow White Americans,

White Americans are in a state of crisis. Our numbers are declining, not only as a proportion of the population but even as a real decline in the number of our people. Whites are losing political, social, and economic influence along with their demographic decline. Whites are vilified by academia, mass media, social media, corporations, by many politicians, particularly those on the Left. Even more telling, no major figures, across the political spectrum, explicitly speaks up in defense of Whites and of White interests. We observe all of the conservative politicians and other right-wing figures who criticize the progressive agenda and all they say is that those left wing policies are “bad for Blacks” or somehow have negative effects on “people of color.” To actually come out and openly, explicitly, advocate for White interests is the “original sin” in America – and in other countries as well. Well, I’m not going along with that, and neither should you. Our enemies will call us names, label as “racists” and “White supremacists” – demonstrating their hatred of Whites and their fear of Whites standing up for themselves and for their interests.

Since I am talking about race, we need to briefly talk about race itself. So, before I get into the main part of my talk, I’d like to address some arguments made against the idea of race; ironically enough, these arguments are often made by people obsessed with issues of race and in some cases are made by people who are strong advocates for their own racial group. They will say things such as “race does not exist; it has no biological basis and is merely a social construct.” Or they may say, ”there is more genetic variation within groups than between groups, so members of a group can be more similar to people in another group than their own,” or they may say that “genetic differences between groups are only a tiny fraction of all genes; we share most of our genes with each other.”  Now, don’t worry, I won’t delve deeply into the science here – the science being, by the way, in reality 100% on my side – but I will give you a good understanding of how you are being lied to by the people who make such misleading statements.  

Now, people can define “race” any way they want, but scientists who study population geneticists define what they call “continental population groups" - that is, people from Europe or Africa or East or South Asia, etc. One can find a large number of scientific papers that clearly show that these “continental population groups” form distinct clusters, distinct groupings, since they are objectively different from each other. That is in no way in any real dispute, and these “continental population groups” are essentially what most people mean when they talk about “race.” So, contrary to politically motivated lies, racial groups – defined in a rational manner – certainly do exist. It is true that genetic variation is greater within groups – and that applies to dogs and other animals as well as to people – but that is simply a function of the fact that most genetic variation is random. You can take any group of people – completely random groups, or people born on Tuesdays vs. people born on Wednesdays, or even families – and there will always be more genetic variation within groups than between. It is practically irrelevant.  It has nothing to do with the fact that certain groups – like continental races – are genetically distinct from each other. And, indeed, if you look at large numbers of genes together, members of a group will always be more similar to members of their own group than to others – which is why those groups cluster together to begin with. And that is why that, for example, if someone whose ancestry is from, say, Norway, takes one of those commercial ancestry tests, the results will show them as similar to other Norwegians, not similar to Nigerians or Chinese. Similarly, looking at this more broadly, in general, Europeans, Whites, are more similar to people of their own race than to others. And, finally, although people do share most of their genes with other people, regardless of race, we also share most of our genes with dogs, mice, and other animals. So what? It are the differences that are important. The genetic distinction between a family member and a complete stranger is small indeed.  I think it is important. Don’t you?

The analogy between one’s group and one’s family is very telling; an ethnic group or race is like an extended family, a group of people sharing deep ancestry, and sharing a common culture and a common identity. Regardless of what the liars tell you, Whites are such an extended family. In this sense, I’d like to cite the important work of an honest academic, Dr. Frank Salter, who wrote a book entitled: On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethnicity, and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration.  Salter outlines the interests – which he calls “ethnic genetic interests” – that members of a group have in the survival and well-being of their group. Just as someone has interests in the family that they are related to, so do they have enormous interests in the ethnic and racial family to which they belong. All peoples except for Whites recognize this; it is high time that we Whites join the rest of humanity in defending our interests.

When our group maintains itself or expands, when it prospers, then we benefit; when our group declines, we suffer. And we suffer not only the political, social, and economic consequences of this decline, but we also suffer because people like ourselves, people who we share deep ancestry with, our large extended family, suffers; and people who we are most similar to, in our very genes, are being diminished within the human family. We are suffering from the physical diminishment of our large extended family. Therefore, it can be as adaptive to support one’s ethnic or racial group as it would be to support one’s own family.

As Dr. Salter notes, and which should be obvious to us all, a defined territory is typically crucial for the survival of a group. In the long run, territory is crucial for survival, and human history is largely a record of groups expanding and contracting, conquering or being conquered, migrating or being displaced by migrants. The loss of territory, whether by military defeat or displacement by migrants, brings group diminishment or destruction – precisely what is happening to Whites in “multicultural” America today; the same happens in Europe and in other majority White nations. 

While plunging birthrates may be damaging for Whites, their replacement by immigrants is much more damaging. A falling birthrate reduces the population but does not transform it, and a future increase in birthrates can always make up for the loss. Once immigrants have established themselves in a territory they are most likely a permanent addition. From the standpoint of genetic interests, the idea that “immigration makes up for low native birthrates” is pathological. The assertion that immigrants must be imported for “economic” reasons, or for some other short-sighted rationale, is therefore exposed as incredibly destructive to the interests of the pre-existing native population.

Any consideration of the costs vs. benefits of immigration – or of a multiracial society in general – must absolutely consider the costs incurred at the most basic, most personal, and most fundamental human level. A people do not “benefit” from a policy if that policy results in that people’s displacement and their replacement by others to an extent equivalent to genocide. Therefore, mass immigration of racially different peoples is genocide. Similarly, a multicultural, multiracial society that manages the demographic eclipse of its majority population is also practicing genocide. These are facts which cannot be responsibly evaded.

This is not meant to inspire dislike or anger towards immigrants – or towards any other people. On the contrary, such emotions are self-defeating and counter-productive. After all, these peoples are only taking advantage of the opportunities given to them for a better life and to expand their numbers in other peoples’ lands.

No, the ultimate causes of our decline are that the governments and “leaders” of majority White nations are openly and actively betraying the interests of their own peoples, and that the peoples of the West themselves, all too comfortable and unconcerned with their own demise, are seemingly uninterested in defending their interests. Or is it that Whites are grossly uninformed about where their real interests lie? Whites need to stop focusing exclusively on secondary issues such as economics and economic growth, “cultural assimilation,” employment opportunities, funding for pensions, and a myriad of other concerns which – while certainly important and certainly worthy of interest and consideration – pale in significance compared to the ultimate problem of demographic displacement.

Now, some people will complain that following my advice will “tear American apart.” Well, I have news for them - America is already torn apart. America has been torn apart because European Americans – White Christians - gave up on a group identity for themselves and instead adopted a color blind “we’re all Americans” approach, while every other group doubled down on their group identity and have constantly agitated to benefit their own group. When one side plays the game of identity politics and the other side does not, the side that plays always wins and the side that doesn’t play always loses. That alone explains much of what has happened to America and to White Americans over the last half-century and more.  White Americans need to stop sacrificing themselves and their interests for a dream that has ended – a dream that has become a nightmare.  Don’t listen to self-interested enemies who tell you not to play a game that they themselves are playing very well – and are winning at your expense. Of course, they don’t want you to play. Of course, they don't want you to win. They want to keep the winning all to themselves.  But you are not obligated to listen to the “advice” of those who hate you and want to keep you down. You instead have an obligation to yourselves, to your families, to your people, and to what used to be your country. 

We need to organize – legally and peacefully – we need to organize politically, socially, economically, in every way possible. If our enemies call us “supremacists” and “racists” and “terrorists” for standing up for ourselves, then that means every other group must be "racist supremacist terrorists" as well since all other groups strongly advocate and organize for their interests. 

Dr. Salter has stated that the only thing more damaging to a nation for a multiculturalism that fails is a multiculturalism is successful. Multiculturalism as it is practiced in America and throughout the West is based on the organized mobilization of minority groups and the passivity of the majority. It is time for the declining White majority to become mobilized as well. If that is “evil” then we are all evil together, non-Whites as well as Whites. There is no reason why Whites should forego the advantages enjoyed by others. The time for double standards is over.

And one last thing. As I’ve suggested, by noting that the same thing is happening in other nations, what I have said here about America applies elsewhere as well – Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, anywhere that you have large numbers of Europeans and others living together, competing for territory, resources, and power. This is not only an American problem; it is a global problem. Whites have lost their way. It is “the White man’s disease” – an inability to recognize and defend their own interests against others who have no such problem. As we stand in solidarity with our brothers and sisters in other lands, let us show them the way by fighting for our interests here in America.

It is time to stand up, fight back, and, for once, look to our own interests for a change. Someone has to do this. If not us, who?  If not now, when?

Thank you for listening.