Indigenous Again

That definition once again.

In response to the offensive Salon article mentioned at Amren, I’d like to once again offer my definition of indigenous:

A group is indigenous to a territory when they are the oldest extant group that underwent ethnogenesis in that territory and cannot be said to be indigenous to any other territory.

Also see this.

A human group is indigenous when it is the oldest existing population to come into being as a distinct ethny, different from any other, in a specific territory.

So, while the Sami are indigenous to Lapland in Northern Scandinavia, all of the various ethnies of Europe are equally indigenous to their native homelands.

My definition of indigenous is fair, comprehensive, and serves White interests, but is of course ignored by the “movement;” after all, the Eloi must maintain their cordon sanitaire to protect against the dastardly Morlocks and their runty penned up chicken ideas.

By the way, speaking of the Sami, Der Movement (and Raciology) weeps (emphasis added):

Autosomal genetic analyses found that the Sámi people carry a significant amount of genome originating from an East Asian/Siberian source population, best represented by the North Asian Nganasan people, a Samoyedic people. This East Asian/Siberian component is found in mostly all European peoples at low frequency, higher among Northeastern Europeans, where it range between ~9% to ~30% among different Fennoscandian populations, with a average peak of 25% among the Sámi people. The specific East Asian/Siberian like ancestry is proposed to have arrived in Northeast Europe during the early Iron Age, linked to the arrival of Uralic languages. The East Asian/Siberian Nganasan-related component is also detected among ethnic northeast Russians at a frequency of 8%.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Those Japanese Ice People

"Derb Jr." writes and whines. Read this as an antidote to despicable scum like Jason Malloy who once (~ 15 years ago) absurdly labeled Japan as a “Western” nation. If white people are to become minorities in the countries our ancestors built, and if we face a future where we may be ruled over by envious and malevolent non-whites, I would rather my overlords be Japanese than Muslims or sub-Saharan Africans.  And let’s not forget those Chinese girls with guns. Of course, if possible I prefer to live free among my own people. Too late…you made your bed and now lie in it… literally. But if, by some miracle, white ethno-states become a reality in the West, will I—and my Japanese wife and mixed-race child—be accepted?  No. Or would I be rejected as a miscegenating traitor to my race? Yes, you filthy scum. My wife has many years of experience living and working in the US, and our child was born there. We agree that life in America is in many ways preferable to living in Japan. ...
Read more

Tales of Fst: Sallis vs. Lewontin

A small scale yet informative analysis of genetic variation. Read this. We are all aware of the “more variation within groups than between groups” argument against the biological validity of race. Now, I believe – or at least hope – that honest population geneticists (albeit very few if any exist) know better not to make absurd claims about Lewontin’s “finding” – that it “makes race meaningless” or that “people are more closely related to members of other races than members of their own race.”  At least they won’t say that among themselves, in their publications, or among other types of academics, but maybe they’ll still try to fool the rubes; after all, from my personal experience most population geneticists are anti-White SJW leftists. The problem is more with your rank-and-file leftist, your Tim Wise types, your opinion writers, “anthropologists,” openly political population geneticists (the majority who are apparently dishonest), writers of “popular science,” politicians, blogg...
Read more

Take a Bite Out of That Nothingburger!

Der Movement: Always, always, always wrong. Watch this. The “nothingburger” continues , eh “movement?” Please read about the monsters here. The jury is still out as to what caused the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. Chinese authorities initially suspected a wet market in Wuhan where wild animals like bats and snakes were sold illegally. A nearby biolab has also attracted scrutiny, and increased suspicion as Chinese authorities have been stubbornly unwilling to cooperate with skeptics requests. But regardless of how the outbreak started, it has already raised questions about traditional Chinese practices of consuming wild animals, either for medicinal purposes - for example, it's believed that eating civet cats, vermin akin to raccoons, can bequeath more sexual vigor - or as delicacies (remember "bat soup"?). I suppose that “more sexual vigor” via a civet cat snack is necessary in the absence of any phenotypic sexual dimorphism among potential partners. SJWs (and I suppos...
Read more