The Computational Jew

What is the genetic essence of Jewishness?

This post will mostly concern the majority of Jews – the Ashkenazim, that branch of Jewry that Whites are most familiar with.

Now, these Jews have been shown to be a mix of Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Eastern European ancestries, in proportions such as shown here.  However, as I have written before, Jews are more than this; they are more than merely a mix of these ancestries, as they have gone through genetic bottlenecks and have been subjected to selective pressures that have resulted in a unique suite of mental and physical traits that constitute the essence of “Jewishness” – e.g., relatively high intelligence, particularly of a verbal nature; a tropism toward achievement; a tropism toward neuroses and paranoia; greediness; misanthropy toward Gentiles; ethnocentrism and collectivism; dual morality; overall unpleasantness; a tropism toward exploiting and harming the host peoples among which they live; a particular physical appearance and traits; various genetic disorders, etc., much of which no doubt has a strong genetic component.  Some researchers have studies the genetics of, e.g., Ashkenazi intelligence, associating it with certain genetic disorders; thus, there is precedent in attempts to understand the genetic basis of the Jewish phenotype.  However, such studies were targeted to particular traits and not to the entire suite of traits that constitute “Jewishness.”

Now, simply mixing Middle Easterners, Southern Europeans, and Eastern Europeans would not reconstitute Ashkenazi Jews as we know them, even if such hybrids would no doubt have PCA and admixture profiles similar to Jews since the broad overall genomes would be similar.  But the specific genetics encoding the essence of Jewishness would not be present.  Thus, such non-Jewish hybrids would serve as a good baseline comparison to compare Jews to, in order to identify the specific genetic variations that differentiate Jews from simply hybrids of their ancestries.

If such non-Jewish hybrids exist in significant numbers, then their genomes can be used for comparison.  But it is not strictly necessary to find such hybrid.  Instead, I propose the methodology of determining The Computational Jew – using computational genetics of in silico modeling of non-Jewish hybrids in order to determine the genetic essence of Jewishness.

There are databases in which the genetics of Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Eastern European peoples are known – for example, one can use as the parental populations here Palestinians (and other Levantines such as Lebanese and Syrians, etc.), Italians, and Russians/Poles.  One could then use computational methods to model hybrids of these peoples in proportions similar to the range of ancestries found in Ashkenazi Jews.  Then one can compare actual Jewish genomes (of which there is plenty of data) to the in silico computational models of the non-Jewish Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Eastern European hybrids.  Genetic differences could then be identified, which can serve as the basis for identifying gene frequencies that determine “Jewishness” above and beyond the foundational baseline of a mixed Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Eastern European ancestry. These genetic variants and their frequencies can be then associated with function and phenotype, followed by gene expression studies of Jews (at the mRNA and protein levels) to correlate expression of relevant identified genes with phenotypes of interest.  In this manner, one can begin to build a tentative catalog of a specifically Jewish functional genetic distinctiveness – the genetic basis for the essence of “Jewishness.”  Again, the key point is the comparison between Jews as they exist today and the ancestral baseline of their derivation – that baseline being most practically created in silico, but any actual living non-Jewish people with such proportions can be used. One reason why the computational method would be superior is that actual people with the ancestry may be more recent mixes and thus would have larger chromosome blocks derived from their ancestries, compared to Jews in which the mixing took place earlier and thus the blocks would be smaller (and more inter-mixed).  This earlier mixing could be modeled via the computational method, yielding a fairer baseline comparison.

Once the genes and gene expression patterns defining the essence of Ashkenazi Jewishness are identified, and properly correlated to the associated phenotypes, a variety of follow-up questions can be evaluated.  Are Jews with certain ancestral profiles more or less likely to demonstrate the essence of Jewishness?  Which of the ancestral components of Jews is most associated with Jewishness; for example, are Jews that are “more Middle Eastern” more likely to manifest traits associated with Jewishness?  Or is it specific ancestral combinations that are more “Jewish?”  In addition, full Jews can be compared to part-Jews to determine the extent to which these genes and their consequent traits are dominant or recessive, and how they are modified by the ancestral components derived from the non-Jewish ancestors.  Do part-Jews resemble their Jewish ancestors; is a “Jewish taint” a dominant?  One could also compare the genomes of today’s Jews with those of Jewish remains from past eras, to understand how selection and genetic drift have influenced stereotypical Jewish traits over time.  For example, one theory suggests that ethnocentrism among full-blooded Jews has been increasing, since less ethnocentric Jews have out-married and became assimilated into the Gentile population. With identification of the proper genetics, such hypotheses, and others of a similar nature, can be tested.

The same methodology could be used for other Jewish groups, such as the Sephardim, if the founding populations and their percentages are identified. Non-Jewish groups can also be analyzed; for example, are American Negroes merely West African-British Isles hybrids or a selected population derived thereof, possibly enriched in gene variants encoding obesity, violence, and stupidity.

One criticism of this plan is that the traits in question may be due to a large number of genetic variants that each have a small effect and thus it may be difficult to identify the genes influencing certain phenotypes.  However, the only way to find this out is to do the experiment and given the distinctiveness of the Ashkenazi (and previous studies about them) it is more likely that valuable information will be obtained.  Another criticism is that epigenetic influences would not be identified by this method.  What is proposed here is the first step of analysis; no doubt other analyses would follow, possibly including epigenetics.  In addition, given that the phenotypes in question have been stable over long periods of time and in different environments they are most likely to be predominantly of genetic origin.

In any case, the approach is theoretically feasible and possibly could yield interesting and useful data.

They’re HuWhite

Yockey considers the Jew.

Excerpts from here.  Emphasis added.

The culture which produced the Jewish nation arose in Asia Minor around 100 B.C. This culture produced many nations, all of them, so far as we are concerned, similar to the Jews. These “nations” were not nations at all in our sense of the word, for they had no homeland. Citizenship in this alien type of nation was gained by being a believer in the religion of the group. Jews, Marcionites, Gnostics, Mohammedans — all these were nations, and to all of them membership in the nation was gained by being a believer. Intermarriage with non-believers was forbidden, and this inbreeding for two thousand years has made it possible today to pick out the Jew by his countenance. Thus, for the Jew, race and religion became identical, and if the Jew loses his religion, he loses little for he still remains a Jew by race. The unity of the race is not destroyed even though the great masses of the Jews become atheists.

After the dispersion of the Jews throughout Europe and Russia, they were entirely cut off from any contact with nations similar to themselves. They shut themselves up in the ghettoes of the cities and lived completely unto themselves. There they had their own religion, their own law, their own language, their own customs, their own diet, their own economy. Since they were nowhere at home, everywhere was equally home to them.

The early European nations felt the Jew to be as totally alien as he felt his surroundings to be. The Anglo-Saxons, the Goths, the Lombards, the Franks, all despised the usurious infidel. A popular rhyme of Gothic times portrays the three estates as the creation of God, and the usurious Jew as the creation of the Devil. Crusaders on their way to the Holy Land carried out wholesale massacres of Jews. Every European king at one time or another robbed the Jews and drove them from his domain. For 400 years the Jew was shut out from England. When he was allowed back, centuries more passed before he acquired or wanted civil rights of Englishmen. This persecution of the Jew that went on for 1,000 years took different forms — robbery through forced fines, extortion, exile, massacre — and it has had one determining, unchangeable result: it has reinforced in the Jew his original hatred for Christian civilization to the point where it is the sole content and meaning of his existence. This hatred is the breath of life to the Jew. He wants to tear down everything which surrounds him, every Western form of life, every Western idea. For a thousand years he cringed before the European master, who was so unassailable in his superiority. The figure of Shylock, drinking his gall and biding his time, taking his usury and saving the coins which represented to him the means of his liberation — this is the symbolic figure of the Jew for a thousand years. This consuming hatred on the part of the Jew is one of the most important facts in the world today. The Jew is a world power. How did this come about?

It was the Industrial Revolution in Europe and America which enabled the Jew, from having been Shylock for a thousand years, the despised and cringing usurer, to become the type of the modern Jew, the cinema dictator, the tyrant…His “liberty” meant that the Jew was free to squeeze out the life-blood of nations through usury and financial dictatorship. The “brotherhood of man” — that meant that the Jew was to be accepted as an equal — but that he was to maintain his ancient unity and desire for revenge…There was a great danger to the Jew in this removal of all barriers between him and the host nations. This danger was assimilation of the great mass of Jews. If this were to occur, the Rothschilds, Baruchs, Frankfurters, Rosenmans, Guggenheims, Schiffs, Lehmanns, Cohens — all these would be leaders without followers. They would lose their trustworthy followers who could penetrate everywhere and spread the influence of the Jew. One fruitful source of taxation would be gone. So the word “assimilated” became a term of contempt used by arch-Jews to describe other Jews who were losing their Jewish feelings and instincts. The Jew, with his two thousand years behind him, was faced with a perilous situation. No mere money manipulation could cope with this emergency. In this situation, the Jewish leaders invented Zionism…

…The invasion of Palestine, strategically important though it is, nevertheless stands in the shade of the vast invasion of America. During the short half century since Jewry adopted Zionism, some ten millions of Jews have been dumped on the shores of North America to displace Americans biologically and economically, to live parasitically on the American organism, to distort the social and spiritual life of the nation. The volume of the invasion has been such that even the slumbering, politically-unconscious white American has begun to blink his eyes and look around him in amazement, as he becomes gradually cognizant that his native land has passed into the possession of scheming, power-hungry, money-grubbing, total aliens…

…The Jew numbers approximately 10% of the North American populations but in the Second World War, a war fought solely for Jewish interests, a war of his fomenting, a war to increase his power, the conscripts in the American Army were only 2% Jewish, according to official records. Neither in his assumed role of American, nor in his actual status as member of the Jewish Culture-State-Nation-Race-People, was he willing to risk his blood, even in his own war. In the fighting forces he limited his participation to the administrative branches: Judge Advocate, Medical, Quartermaster, Finance. In the American Army Jewish conscripts have an unconditional right to a furlough for Passover, for Yom Kippur, for Rosh Hashanah. The induction of Jews into the Army is delayed over Jewish holidays — “to avoid undue hardship”. The Central Conference of American Rabbis in the 47th annual convention in New York addressed a resolution to the American Congress asking that Jews be exempted from conscription “in accordance with the highest interpretation of Judaism”!

In the publicly supported educational institutions for higher learning, the Jew is driving out the native American student. In the free universities, such as Wayne University and City College of New York, the Jew’s possession is complete. The Stock Exchange presents a similar picture. The New York Exchange is dormant on Jewish holidays. The Officers Reserve Corps is ever more penetrated by the Jews. The police forces of the large cities are under his control, and the Federal secret police enforce his bidding. He commands the National Guard in the populous states.

How has this come about? How has the native American been driven from the positions of representation, of power and respect in his own land? How has he been chased out of the professions, out of government, of the universities, out of the sources of public information? How did the interloper from Asia, the ghetto-creature from Kishnev, attain to his eminence whereupon he holds in his hands the decision of war or peace, and decides who are America’s friends and who are America’s enemies?

Two things are responsible for this situation in which America finds itself serving as a mere tool in the hands of an alien. First is Liberalism…

…But mere Liberalism alone does not account for it. The second factor has been the aggressive unity of the Jew, his cohesiveness born of hate, which has welded him together and organized his forces for his mission of destruction…

…He purged the central government of whoever could not be led by the nose, or bought. Who opposed was shouted down, smeared with vile labels, and so silenced.

Thus America was given a semitic countenance.

On the Jews

Thoughts.

A Gab correspondent who is as friend of this blog led me to this interesting article. I note it comes from the despicable rag Instauration, but sometimes one can find a gold nugget in a flood of sewage, so one can examine the following on its own merits. Some excerpts and my comments.

The questions in this case concern the Jew, and are basically esthetic and instinctive, as, indeed, all racial questions are.

Not surprising coming from Instauration, but I see that as incomplete. Yes, “esthetic and instinctive” questions are important, but so are those that are genetic/biological as well as cultural/historical. 

It is a truism that the Jew has puzzled the non-Jew since the beginning of time, and continues to do so. The non-Jew has always known that there is something different about the Jew, but has never been able to agree on what that something is. 

Very true and I have written on this as well (see below).

This difference is not the same as the differences between non-Jews. A European in Asia or Africa or the Americas, whether among sophisticated Chinese…

Sigh.  Again, not surprising about Instauration. Nordicists always have a strong tropism for Orientals.

No non-Jewish race, culture or individual has ever been able to find a common human bond with the Jew. 

Attention Jared Taylor!  Actually, this entire essay is a critique of the slavishly pro-Jewish attitude of the “movement’s” HBD “race realists.” If Jews are really such alien non-human entities, and if such a reality is something that is, or should be, instinctively recognized by mentally healthy and honest Gentles, then what does it say about “racially aware” “activists” who willingly – and in some cases enthusiastically - associate with and promote Jews and who strongly defend that behavior from critics?

In any case, no matter how suppressed and buried the instinct is today, every non-Jew still feels the lack of a common bond with the Jew.

Again – what does that say about the HBD race realists?

It is only in modern times that the Jew has been accepted as wholly human, no different from non-Jews in any particular. But as noted, this is a comment on modern times, not on the non-humanness of the Jew.

It is also a comment on the HBDers.

My own awareness of the depths of the difference came during and after an endless flight from Russia back to the United States on an official plane with a Jew as my only traveling companion. (From boyhood I had observed Jews in every sort of setting — scholastic, social, business and governmental — and naturally realized they were different, but not just how profound that difference was.) There were engine repairs and other delays on the flight, and we ended up spending four days in each other’s unrelieved company. For the first couple of days he was simply another Jew, under his Harvard-Wall Street-Georgetown veneer, but on the third day he went a step further. His artificial vitality had drained off and he had withdrawn — into his own world, I presumed. I was just as happy to be rid of his chatter, and thought no more about it. We were on the ground at a base in Spain, but still on the plane because takeoff was supposed to be imminent. I was reading and he was staring off into space, and it suddenly came to me that I was alone. Not in the sense of being with someone who had retreated into his own world and was not talking — for such a person is still there, and I would have been conscious of another human being occupying the rather cavernous interior of the plane but totally alone, in the purest sense of the word.

I still have the notebook in which I noted my thoughts at the time, as they came in a rush. [you can read the entirety of these comments in the original essay – I’ll just note the following]:

…one Jewish great-grandparent doesn’t result in acting one-eighth Jewish all the time, but entirely Jewish one-eighth of the time, or something like that. 

That’s stupid and asinine. Heritable traits do not function in that manner.

Usually in emergencies. As when alone. Dogma: No Jew can exist alone, so they must always attach, like barnacles. But how can this be? How can there be human form, however unattractive, without a human contained therein? They are husks, but how did it happen? Sun-struck, wandering in the desert, some gene wiped out, and the lack transmitted. Or missing from the beginning. Or an evolutionary dead end…

That should be detectable from genetic analyses? It would be interesting to determine the suite of cognitive and behavioral traits that lead to the emergent Jewish behavior that is characterized as "non-human." Further, these traits could be linked to particular gene sequences. Can we identify the biological essence of "Jewishness?"

Back to the main essay:

And yet…somewhere in each non-Jew faced with a Jew there is still a faint — exceedingly faint — twitch of instinct telling him that he is dealing with a creature who is not like him. 

That is the core message of the entire essay.  It is remarkably similar to something that I (independently) wrote:

One thing that has always struck me about Jews I have interacted with is that there is always a sense of their distinctiveness, their differences, their somewhat alien nature. Whether or not a given Jew considers themselves "White" or not (and sometimes transitions back and forth on that subject based on context), they are seemingly always cognizant of their ethnoracial, cultural, and historical differences to White Gentiles. Sometimes it is explicit; they admit they are a different ethnic group, a different people, a group with a very distinct identity; sometimes, it is implicit, but even when one hears Jews mendaciously state "it's only a religion" (which I do not believe that they believe), the sense of difference is still there. And, no, I do not believe that this is a figment of my "anti-Semitic" imagination, but rather is a real phenomenon, recognized by Jew and Gentile alike (and remember that I stated that sometimes it is explicit, being openly acknowledged). Both sides of the equation sense the barrier, the distance, that exists between Jew and Gentile, and it is an underlying feature of almost every interaction.

Interesting that the writer of the Instauration article and myself, separated by decades of time and no doubt by ethnicity and ideology, have come to the same conclusions about Jews and Jewish-Gentile relations.  In the case of my post, I concentrate a bit more on how the Jews view the differences while the Instauration writer looks more from the Gentile perspective. Two sides of the same coin. Back to the essay:

He stifles it immediately, of course, but it is there. And can come out in very odd ways. Especially in marriages between Jews and non-Jews, where the non-Jews spend so much time alone with Jews that they (the non-Jews) can hardly avoid tumbling to the non-humanness of their mates. They have to redouble their efforts to deny it, but the knowledge is inevitably there.

This writer asserts that non-Whites other than Jews are human, and capable for forming bonds with Whites, but I wonder.  In that part about inter-marriage, what if we replaced Jews with, say, Chinese?

So we parted, and have not seen each other since. Like so many others, she is out there somewhere, slowly unravelling what happened to her, slowly puzzling through the colossal weight and in­solent self-assurance of the swindle. She has been tricked since childhood into going against her instincts; there is a lifetime to be undone. Of course, it is a question whether that is possible.

What about HBDers tricking people about the nature of Jews (and Asians as well)?

An anecdote: A person I knew who had a peripheral association with Der Movement was on a long plane flight sitting next to a Hasidic Jew.  At the beginning of the trip, the Jew asked the fellow - "are you Jewish?''  Getting the answer of "no" the Jew at that point completely ignored the fellow and didn't engage in any talk for the rest of the trip.  This fellow said to me about Jews - "They cannot understand that Whites have interests, even Blacks understand that Whites have legitimate interests (even if they oppose them), but Jews cannot do so." Another anecdote: A Jewess I knew characterized the literary classic Moby Dick as "there was this whale, it was really big, and some guy wanted to kill it." Well, yes, but only a soulless cipher would end the description at that. I have had already discussed a situation I was aware of it in which a Jewess responded to a Gentile stating - in response to whining about "the Holocaust" - "other people suffered too" by asking the Gentile "why do you hate Jews so much?" Nice "people" huh?

Some Anecdotal Thoughts on the Jews

Some observations.

The following will be purely anecdotal, based on my personal observations.  In response to any potential criticism about that I will say that, first, anecdotal evidence can be useful as a supplement to more rigorous analysis, and I have written more objective pieces about the Jews in the past. Second, if rigorous analysis is what you want, no one has done it better than Kevin MacDonald, and Andrew Joyce at The Occidental Observer has also made important contributions on this subject to extend MacDonald's work. There is no need for me to repeat what others are doing, and doing well. Third, and linked to my first point, I believe that you will find that my anecdotal observations correlate well with the more rigorous analyses on this subject that you, hopefully, have read.

In my One Sheaf One Vine interview by Robert Griffin, I discussed some experiences with Jews, with an emphasis on childhood experiences; I'm not going to repeat that here.  Instead, I'm  going to focus on more recent observations, along with some relevant comments and observations about incidents from earlier times (e.g., the 1980s).

One thing that has always struck me about Jews I have interacted with is that there is always a sense of their distinctiveness, their differences, their somewhat alien nature. Whether or not a given Jew considers themselves "White" or not (and sometimes transitions back and forth on that subject based on context), they are seemingly always cognizant of their ethnoracial, cultural, and historical differences to White Gentiles. Sometimes it is explicit; they admit they are a different ethnic group, a different people, a group with a very distinct identity; sometimes, it is implicit, but even when one hears Jews mendaciously state "it's only a religion" (which I do not believe that they believe), the sense of difference is still there. And, no, I do not believe that this is a figment of my "anti-Semitic" imagination, but rather is a real phenomenon, recognized by Jew and Gentile alike (and remember that I stated that sometimes it is explicit, being openly acknowledged). Both sides of the equation sense the barrier, the distance, that exists between Jew and Gentile, and it is an underlying feature of almost every interaction.

Jewish identity is very important to Jews and colors virtually all that they do.  For example, I've know some "right-wing" Jews, both personally and, of course, there are the Amren Jews we've been familiar with. Those I've known personally were "right-wing" for group and/or personal reasons, nit because of an identification with traditional White America (from which they feel alienated) nor from any disinterested sense of adherence to more abstract "conservative" or "rightist" principles.  No, it was because they perceived the Left as "anti-Semitic" and "hostile to Israel" or they feared Black criminal violence and Black hatred of Jews. One can remember an Amren Jewish self-described "red diaper baby" moving to the right on race because of personal and familial negative experiences with Blacks.  You see, forced racial integration was all well and good, and to be strongly supported, when it was White Gentiles (particularly White ethnics) who were the ones being terrorized by Blacks, but, alas, ne Jews started suffering, then, by golly, we got to do something about those Negroes!  Then we can remember the Hart-Duke "dust-up" from the 2006 Amren conference, and all the other antics of Amren Jews (supporting a multiracial "White separatist state" or saying we should all support "the racial status quo"). To give some more flavor about that attitudes of "right-wing" Jews, I remember some you "right-wing" "Reagan-supporting" Jews telling me in the mid-late 1980s (and after) about how much they admire and support the traitor Pollard and how they themselves would, "without question," spy against the United States for Israel. 

Of course, most Jews I have known have been on the Left, motivated by an ill-concealed fear and hatred of White Gentiles. The younger generation of Jews, both those in academia (students, faculty, and administration) as well as those in the business world (including STEM-related business, such as biotech and Big Pharma) follow in the footsteps of the past generations of their people who agitated in the "civil rights movement."  Today's Jewish generations are, for the most part, fully on board the "diversity, equity, and inclusion" train and the recent hysteria about "social justice" has enthralled younger Jews, who see "wokeism" and their generation's "civil rights" moment (i.e.,  a way to strike against the hated Whites).  All the "fellow White people" mendacity aside, Jews, and particularly the younger Jews, and even more particularly the students, identify themselves as "oppressed people" of, well, if not "color," then definitely something different from Whites. When schools or companies have their "struggle sessions" against "racism" Jews whine along with Blacks and other Coloreds about being discriminated against. There is no difference. Mandatory corporate "diversity training sessions" discuss "the Holocaust" along with slavery and Jim Crow.  

This here from TOO is relevant to my point:

I note that Jewish students invariably identify as minorities, at odds with the dominant White American Christian culture, often making common cause with Blacks and other non-Whites as fellow victims of hatred and discrimination. Jewish students will invent special joint Jewish-Black celebrations, such as joint Passover dinner combined with a celebration of “Black emancipation” — Jews and Blacks together celebrating their similar d history of liberation.

Indeed. It is always Jews associating with and identifying with, Blacks and other Coloreds, as an "oppressed" non-White people opposed to the "racism" of White Gentile society.  And, just like Blacks and other Coloreds, Jews have a sense of entitlement.  I believe I once told a story I heard about the interaction of two female college students and I'll repeat it again here.  A Jewish female was whining about "the Holocaust" to a Greek-American female and the latter simply stated, "other people have suffered too," to which the Jew started screaming that the Greek was an "anti-Semite" and "why do you hate Jews so much?"  That's the attitude we are dealing with here.

To have such a people with all of the power and influence that they have is a danger to White Americans and to Whites everywhere. Besides the immense damage they've done to America, one has only to look what the Jews did in the Soviet Union when they has the upper hand to know that their genocidal fury targeted to White Gentiles is an ever-present threat to the continued existence of our race.

It’s Der Jews

MacDonald vs. Cofnas. In all cases, emphasis added.

See this.  

I will say that both MacDonald and Cofnas should very carefully outline how their respective hypotheses can be falsified. However, I suspect that they'd create an outline designed to make falsification impossible. In any case, MacDonald is so far winning the debate. The evidence of Jewish influence being predominantly on the side of anti-White action is overwhelming.

In a telling comment indicating Jewish leadership of the pro-immigration forces and reflecting the disinterest of other immigrant groups from earlier in the century noted above (Neuringer, 1971: 83), Handlin complained about the apathy of other “hyphenated Americans” in joining the immigration battle. He repeatedly used the term ‘we’—as in “if we cannot beat [Sen. Pat] McCarran and his cohorts with their own weapons, we can do much to destroy the efficacy of those weapons” (4)—suggesting Handlin’s belief in a unified Jewish interest in liberal immigration policy…

Therefore, Southern and Eastern European White ethnics were not involved, in any meaningful way, in over-turning immigration restriction, even when that restriction limited their own numbers. It was the Jews who did it. Who did the Jews have as allies?  The answer:

An important part of this effort was to recruit Senator and future President John F. Kennedy to attach his name to A Nation of Immigrants (1958) and to recruit Senator and future Vice- President and Democratic presidential candidate Hubert Humphrey for his Stranger at Our Gate (1954)…

And, of course, we know the role of Ted Kennedy in the 1965 Immigration Act. Various "Nordish" politicians – both NW European Protestants as well as Irish Catholics - were the junior partners to the Jews in opening the floodgates to Third World immigration.

Moreover, minorities have an advantage in ethnic competition in being more mobilized than majorities (Salter, 2006). Mobilization is the willingness to make sacrifices for a cause, for example, by donating money, time, and labor. Even a small group with limited resources can exercise disproportionate influence when its members are highly mobilized and its opponents, though superior in numbers, are indifferent.

Can the same apply to intra-dissident politics?

Scandinavian societies are the most individualist cultures on Earth…

That MacDonald continues to assert that lie, refuted at my blog, and then cites himself as evidence (!!!), really trashes his reputation as an objective scholar.

Should Jews Be Welcomed in Movements Aimed at White Advocacy?...My view is that Jews should be allowed to join such movements...

The other shoe has dropped.  We should accept Jews now?  This from MacDonald?  Is this part of the “big tent” WN 3.0 agenda?  Gee, I guess even “anti-Semitism” now has to be compatible with “HBD race realism.”

Addendum

See this about intermarriage; that is a reference cited by MacDonald.

Abstract The study of Jewish intermarriage has largely ignored the measurement conventions prevalent in the field of demography such as using first marriages (as opposed to current marriages) and not controlling for mixed parentage. I re-analyze the NJPS 2000–2001 using first marriages and controlling for parentage and find evidence that intermarriage has leveled off among single ancestry Jews. Jewish intermarriage is placed in an American context by (1) putting in Kalmijn’s conceptual schema and (2) using the odds-ratio to compare intermarriage in controlling for group size. Single ancestry Jews are surprisingly endogamous compared with other groups in America. Two new directions for further research in a demographic context are discussed: including non-jewish spouses in population studies and thinking about mixed ancestry Jews in the context of multi-racial persons.

I’ve been saying that for about 20 years now, based on my reading of Alba’s ethnic data. Compared to European-American groups of similar demographic size, American Jews are outmarrying less than would be expected.

Among persons of single Jewish ancestry, however, intermarriage peaks in the period 1980–1989 at 39 % and then decreases to 32 % for the period 1990–2001...

…for comparison among groups odds ratios are preferable because they control for group size (Kalmijn 1998). As Rosenfeld (2008) explains, ‘‘The odds ratio for endogamy is simply the odds of endogamy divided by the odds of exogamy (or outmarriage). An odds ratio of 1 would mean that the category in question had no significance in the marriage market, because the odds of marrying within the group would have to be the same as the odds of marrying someone from outside…

(American) Odds Ratio Data: Negroes – 3525, “pure” Jews – 2085, Asians – 1056, “non-White” Hispanics – 596, “White” Hispanics – 329, ”mixed” Jews – 50

It would have been optimal to have White ethnic data for comparison, but I suppose that there are so few “pure” ethnics in America that this becomes difficult to calculate.  In any case, also note that for Jews, insofar as I know, the vast majority of outmarriage is with White Gentiles. Now, if we consider White ethnic groups, yes, most intermarriage is with other White ethnics, but as stated, they are already mostly mixed. If we consider Whites and Jews as racial groups, then White intermarriage is well distributed among Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Jews, while Jewish intermarriage is overwhelmingly with White Gentiles, as far as I am aware (precise data would be welcome). Thus, Jews are not mixing to the extent that they recommend to others.

Spencerian Apostasy?

In der news.

Once again, Greg: What qualifications did Richard Spencer have for being made President of the NPI? Apparently, all of Scott Greer’s “qualifications,” sans the “187 IQ.” And, many of your "qualifications" for being made TOQ editor, sans the PhD.

We are getting closer and closer to my prediction of Spencer dropping out of/repudiating Far Right activism.  It is possible that it won’t be a “clean break” but simply a gradual shift, and at some point we can say the line has been crossed and then that will be that. Keep in mind, once again, that this is the person who was made President of NPI.

If anyone is ultimately responsible for terminal White decline it is The Retard Right and its affirmative action “leadership.” Johnson will, of course, continue to deny that the affirmative action policy exists.

Thus, let us rewrite this:

Every time you think a man has fallen as far as he possibly go, you quickly realize how wrong you were.

To this:

Every time you think Der Movement has fallen as far as it could possibly go, you quickly realize how wrong you were.

When you read this, remember that Der Retards say that covid-19 is only a “cold” or a “flu” or a “hoax.”

(((fellow White people))) They’re HuWhite!

Cervantes:

…you are a female, and consequently inconstant!

…a female, as you observe, will follow here natural disposition, in spite of all you can do to oppose it.

…the natural disposition of women, which is always injudicious and imperfect.

…inveigh against the levity of the female sex: their fickleness, their double dealing, their rotten promises, their broken faith; and finally, their want of judgment in bestowing their affections.

More Fetishist Lies

Der Dumb Movement.

More fetishist lies about race:

Beau Albrecht

Posted January 13, 2021 at 4:26 am | Permalink

It was only around the 1980s that some of them started calling themselves non-White. It’s a long subject, but they’re essentially a peripheral Mediterranean population, not entirely too different from Greeks and Sicilians. If only they’d knock it off with the maladaptive behavior, they’d be a lot better accepted.

This was already addressed at this site, but the ignorant HBD-Nordicist (and “accept the Jews”) fruitcakes keep on spewing their OPEN LIES.

Time to laugh:

…how fauna and flora reproduce on Earth. That is, each chromosome has two halves, one inherited from the father and one from the mother. If the corresponding gene in the halves are not identical, one trumps the other and becomes manifest. Each half is a random mix of the two halves of the parent’s chromosome. This is also the reason why the child may have a trait of his grandparent that does not manifest in either parent.

That’s a completely and laughably incoherent explanation of the reality of meiotic recombination and independent assortment.  

Chinese vs. humans.  Can you believe HBD lies about the Chinese behavior and the whole “Arctic Alliance” nonsense?  Chinese are more alien to Whites than are Negroes.

Odds and Ends, 12/13/20

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

See this.

The WASPs who did engage in politics after World War II were some of the greatest traitors to this nation. Nelson Rockefeller, John Lindsay, and George Romney were all fierce advocates of the Civil Rights revolution and promoted white dispossession. There was no blue-blood reactionary in the political arena at this time. Rockefeller, Lindsay, and Romney were accurate representatives of their class.

Sounds like something Lind or Sallis would write, and it is true enough, no doubt.  But, hey! We’ll be told that we need more men like them and that they are of great benefit to all humanity.

The rest of the essay, like the book it is reviewing, is a complete confusion, conflating Jewish and Gentile “Ellis Islanders” – which is absurd.

For all their faults, the WASPs aren’t the ones invading the world while inviting it in.

It’s the elites who succeeded them.

Well, if by “elites” you mean the WASP-Jew alliance, augmented with ("douchebag") Irish like the Kennedys, then, yeah, you got it, right on target.

According to Greg Johnson, ”the Brimelows are wealthy.”  If this is so (and if not, mophead can take it up with the gaslighter, that’s what Johnson said), then we can ask why mophead took a personal compensation of ~ $180,000 in the last fiscal year covered in the VDARE filings on ProPublica?  

The next time a Quota Queen whines that their “movement” “needs more money” and that “people need to be generous” remember all of that.

Sallis right once again  It was I who stated that Asians – the Chinese in particular – pimp out their “women” to White males (not men) as agents of influence to promote Asian/Chinese interests – not only in HBD but in the broader society.

The woman at the center of the operation, a Chinese national named Fang Fang or Christine Fang, targeted up-and-coming local politicians in the Bay Area and across the country who had the potential to make it big on the national stage.

Through campaign fundraising, extensive networking, personal charisma, and romantic or sexual relationships with at least two Midwestern mayors, Fang was able to gain proximity to political power, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials and one former elected official.

Speaking of Suzie Wong, I don’t see why the HBD-Nordicists are posting about this.  After all, aren’t the Chinese gods?

See this.  I won’t even bother posting all of Johnson’s covid-alarmist and anti-flubro tweets from earlier this year. There were, probably, dozens of them.  The “man” is a monster; as I’ve often said – he is the most fundamentally dishonest individual I’ve ever had the displeasure of interacting with.

There is no way out but through Johnson.

Retweeted by Johnson – I suppose he’ll need a fresh pair of trousers. That said, Spencer is a jerk.  But, Greg, that’s your fellow Quota Queen. You’ve never answered my question – what credentials did Spencer have to be made President of NPI (or even his earlier editing jobs)?

Hey Goad, should we resent Ireland for sending all of their “douchebags” here?

Another idiot speaks.

…now that Spain is no longer a fascist country.

It never was one, retard. When are idiots going to stop classifying every rightist authoritarian state as "fascist?"  The Franco regime had all of the palingenetic revolutionary dynamism as a dead muskrat roadkill on the side of a highway.

Shamelessly rattling the tin cup.

And then on to golf!

Something must be done!  Law and order!

Since I often criticize people, it is only fair that I praise them when they do what I think is right. See this.  Note the picture of Abbie Hoffman with the note under it: 

Rubin’s close associate, fellow Jew Abbie Hoffman. Jared Taylor says this man is White.

Finally!  Someone in the hardcore WN 1.0 crowd finally critiques the "Jews are HuWhite" HBDers. Thank you, Mr. Strom.  More, please.  

We need a full-throated critical analysis of the Jew-worshipping and East Asian-worshipping "race realist" HBD cult.

Copy,copy,copy,steal,steal, steal:

The intelligence is clear: Beijing intends to dominate the U.S. and the rest of the planet economically, militarily and technologically. Many of China’s major public initiatives and prominent companies offer only a layer of camouflage to the activities of the Chinese Communist Party. I call its approach of economic espionage “rob, replicate and replace.” China robs U.S. companies of their intellectual property, replicates the technology, and then replaces the U.S. firms in the global marketplace.

     John Ratcliffe, U.S. Director of National Intelligence, “China is National Security Threat No. 1,” The Wall Street Journal, December 3, 2020

Kosher Jewish Racialism

The chosen people reveal themselves.  

When reading the material below, remember that Jews have been at the forefront of pushing racial integration on Whites and of promoting miscegenation between Whites, Blacks, and other races.

See this.  Excerpts (emphasis added):

Thousands of years ago, the Rabbis of old recognized that Jewish identity is the key to the survival of Klal Yisrael. To this end, they enacted three sets of food laws to limit socialization: bishul akum, pas akum, and stam yainom (cooked food, bread, and wine prepared by gentiles). This was based on the realization that bonds of friendship are established by eating together, and breaking bread with a stranger is the first step to developing a closer relationship. For thousands of years of exile, the biblical and rabbinic laws of kosher have formed a natural fortress that prevented the assimilation of the Jewish people into many different cultures of the world. Today, with spiraling assimilation wreaking havoc at a frightening rate, the prophetic vision of Chazal is all the more apparent. It is significant that even for secularized Jews, a kosher kitchen often remains the last bastion against intermarriage and assimilation.

The last bastion!  Protect the holy Jewish genepool from contamination from the lowly goyim.

More than two thousand years ago, the Rabbis 1 prohibited eating certain foods cooked 2 by non-Jews in order to limit socialization which might lead to intermarriage between Jews and gentiles.3 This prohibition is known as bishul akum. Food which has a bishul akum status is no more kosher than a sandwich of cold roast beef and cheese,4 even though the ingredients used to prepare the food were initially kosher in and of themselves.

So, kosher law has a strictly racialist foundation, to limit “socialization” with the chosen people and the lowly subhuman goys (i.e., you, dear reader) who live amongst them.  Anything to prevent Jewish intermarriage, while of course Jews promote miscegenation for Whites.

In recent years, with many women entering the workforce, it has become increasingly more prevalent for non-Jewish 5 help to prepare meals while a couple is away from home. Unfortunately, many people are completely unaware that food prepared by a non-Jewish live-in maid or babysitter may not be kosher, and even their utensils, pots and pans may require kosherization.6 

Oy vey!  The “utensils, pots and pans” are contaminated by the sub-human shiksas!  

There is a dispute among the Rishonim (early commentators) whether bishul akum is negated when a Jew contributes to the cooking process by lighting the fire before a non-Jew places a pot of food on the stove, The major codifiers of Jewish law argue this point as well…Alternatively, a Jew may turn on the fire after a non-Jew placed the pot on the cold stove,8 The Rama follows the lenient opinion, and allows a gentile to place raw food on a fire that was ignited by a Jew. Since the Jew has a share in the overall process, the food is, not considered to be bishul akum. 

Completely Middle Eastern, non-Western, and culturally alien.

Food that can be eaten in a raw state is not prohibited when cooked by a non-Jew.13 Since the food is edible without preparation, the consumer feels minimal appreciation to the chef, and eating the food does not engender socialization. 

Please consider the above.  Jews are so hateful and racist against Gentiles that they worry that a Jew eating food cooked by a non-Jew runs the danger of feeling “appreciation to the chef,” and that those normal feelings of human warmth would cause dastardly “socialization.” We let these people control our mass media, and have a disproportionate influence in politics, the economy, academia, etc.  What could go wrong?

What if the gentile cooks food to the point where it is partially edible, but a Jew completes the cooking process? 

What if?  Oh the agony! Great questions of world history!

One of the most fascinating applications of the halachos of bishul akum is with respect to the processing of fish. This is a broad topic, and to discuss it properly we must distinguish between three categories of processed fish: cold smoked fish, hot smoked fish and canned fish.

Very fascinating indeed!  A "broad topic" that requires much discussion.

Various poskim have argued against the light bulb system. When a Jew adds a wood chip to a fire, it is rendered aish yisrael because the Jew is instrumental in preparing and intensifying the fire. In contrast, a light bulb remains separate and distinct from the fire, and the Jew is not a contributor to the primary source of heat. Others have raised another interesting objection. Electric companies typically change the source of power from one generator to another. Even if a Jew installs a light bulb, it would no longer be considered a fire of a Jew if the generator was subsequently changed by the electric company. In halachic terminology, this is referred to as kolu lo chitzov (his arrows – i.e. his action – has ended). The OU does not subscribe to the light bulb system…

You know, Yockey was 100% right when he drew a sharp line separating Jews from the West. Read the above.  Read all of it. There isn’t the slightest overlap between Jews and Judaism on the one hand, and Western civilization on the other. When talking about the Jews, we refer to a non-Western, Middle Eastern, Magian people, completely incompatible in every way with the West and with Western peoples and their civilization.

Food is a double-edged sword. While nutritious food provides basic sustenance and energy, spoiled food can have a devastating and even fatal effect on the human body. This same dichotomy is equally true for the spiritual dimension of man. Food consumed in conformity with the laws of the Torah elevates and sanctifies, while non-kosher food destroys and defiles the Jewish soul. On both levels, it’s not only what’s in the food that matters, but how it’s prepared as well. Indeed, we are playing with fire.

If a Jew eats food prepared by, or even looked at, a non-Jew, the Jewish soul will be defiled!  Indeed...playing with fire!  The fire of...ovens?  

What kosher problem may be obviated by using a touch-tone phone?

Please remind me again how the Jewish people are in any way even remotely connected to Western civilization?  I know they’re HuWhite, but still….

3 Intermarriage is the reason cited by Taz , Yoreh Daya 113:7, based on Tosofoth. Avodah Zora, 38a. Rashi in Avodah Zora (ibid), maintains that the Rabbis restricted socialization to prevent the inadvertent consumption of non-kosher food….

There it is. Kosher laws are designed as part of a Jewish racialist approach to avoid intermarriage. Got to keep that bloodline pure!  Meanwhile, anyone who objects to White-Black intermarriage is a racist hater and a Nazi, and we must all take action against that!

10…Similarly, if the pilot light of a home stove is prone to go out regularly, there is no guarantee that the non-Jew will not relight it when the residents are away from home.

OK, just let the gas continue to leak.  But then, isn’t that…gassing Jews?  

11 A separate issue that must be dealt with when non-Jewish help is left alone in a house is the concern that they may use the kitchen utensils to prepare non-kosher food. See Yoreh Daya 118:12 and Igros Moshe Vol. 1,61.

Oh no!  The non-Jewish help may actually – gasp! – touch the utensils!  

16 Source: Rabbi Yisrael Belsky. Yechava Daas suggests another reason to permit donuts cooked by a non-Jew. Donuts are boiled in oil. There are two opinions cited in Orach Chaim 168:13, whether boiled dough products are considered “bread”. With respect to the appropriate brachah, we follow the lenient opinion and recite borei minai mezonos, since brachos are a Rabbinic institution. However, with respect to bishul akum, which is also a Rabbinic decree, we assume they are “bread.” As noted later in this article, there are no bishul akum restrictions on bread items.

Eat your donuts, Moshe!  

23 Instant potatoes are fully cooked before they are dehydrated and made into flakes or powder. Nonetheless, Rav Belsky related from Rav Elyashuv, shlita, that they are permitted, based on the Avkas Rochel, quoted in the Yad Efraim, Yoreh Daya, 113:12, that food cooked by a non-Jew which was rendered inedible by dehydration and then was re-cooked by a Jew is not prohibited because of bishul akum. This same reasoning of the Avkas Rochel applies to instant potatoes which are prepared with hot water. Rabbi Belsky pointed out that this is the case only if instant potatoes cannot be made with cold water, and this assumption should be regularly re-examined.

Madness.

32 Nonetheless, there are those who disagree with the Pri Chodosh and prohibit coffee, tea or chocolate that were brewed by a gentile. See, for example, Pishchai Teshuva, 114:1, who cites Ponim Meiros that the reasoning of Tosafoth (that beer is permissible because the majority is water) is not the accepted halachah. See also the responsa of Shevet HaLevi, Vol. 2,44.

No Starbucks for you, Moshe!  Oy vey!  It’s a holocaust!

All of that reads like some sort of anti-Semitic caricature written by a Nutzi. Unfortunately, it's all too real.

Leftist Chutzpah, re: Portland

Hypocrisy. 

Behold the Left:

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting.

That’s The Huffington Post.  Improve experience by suspending commenting.  Gee, I guess they’re losing the debate, so…

Sort of like Greg Johnson “banning” people and refusing to debate them.

Anyway, what the Left is whining about this time - and what they don't want comments about because those comments would expose leftist hypocrisy - is that, according to the Left, the "Proud Boys" and other rightist groups are being allowed to "be violent with impunity" in Portland; the police are standing back and doing nothing.

Now, the chutzpah there is incredible.  For weeks, the Left has been running wild in America with near-impunity, particularly in Portland and Seattle - rioting, vandalism, attempted murder, assault and battery, lasers shined in eyes, anti-White racial harassment, wielding weapons, repeated race-based violations of federal fair housing laws to try and force Whites out of "gentrified" previously-Black neighborhoods, attacks against police, hate crimes against Whites, blocking traffic, and open treasonous insurrection against the US government with their violence-ridden "autonomous zone."  All of that with near impunity.  For the last four years of the administration of Antifa Don Trump, there has been anarcho-tyranny - the radical Left has been allowed to run wild with impunity, and when rightists, including Antifa Don's own deluded supporters, fight back, it are they, and they alone, who are arrested, prosecuted, and persecuted.  But, now, briefly, in Portland, we have a single moment of pure anarchy instead of anarcho-tyranny - BOTH sides are being allowed, more or less, to do what they want.  Very well.  And the outcome is such as that anyone could predict - in a fair and open battle, without anarcho-tyranny intervention, the Right comes out on top.  This proves, once and for all, that Antifa is, and always has been, part of the System, a branch of local, state, and federal government, street fighters for global capitalism, etc. They have achieved everything because they are protected by the System that they are a part of.  But, given a specific situation (Portland police losing their patience because they have been abandoned by the same System they and Antifa both serve) in which official protection is briefly withdrawn from the Left, and we see that they start whining in The Huffington Post how they are being "victimized" and "not protected by the police"- the same police they want to defund (as there is competition between the two branches of the System - why have both doing the same job?).

The lesson here is what people on the Right have been saying all along - the real problem is anarcho-tyranny, not anarchy.  If there was anarchy, then the Right could fill in the niche space left by the absence of state authority and institute their own law and order; however, the current System of anarcho-tyranny is an alliance between the System and the Left - however an alliance that is sometimes unstable when factions of the System see their own interests threatened by the leftist violence they encourage.

The carnivore diet.

I often mock Der Movement as a modern form of Ostara. And, as always, the other shoe drops.  The only thing worse than a Type I is a homosexual Type I.  Puts new meaning in the term “fetishist” eh?

A Western about moralpathy.

Gore Vidal in Julian (sort of paraphrasing Machiavelli):

One curious aspect of human society is that preventive measures are seldom taken to avert disaster, even web the exact nature of the approaching calamity is perfectly plain.

One can consider all sorts of easily foreseen "movement" disasters with respect to that quote.

An observation - True enough, the USSR was repressive throughout its entire existence, but there is this interesting dichotomy: It was when the USSR was led by non-Slavs (Jews, Georgians, mongrels like Lenin, etc.) that there was the mass murder of millions of Russian and Ukrainian Slavs, but after the Slavs took the reigns of power after the death of Stalin, the mass murder stopped (although of course repression remained). I suppose that this dichotomy is purely a coincidence - right? 

Sallis Right Once Again, 8/23/20

Exhibit #1000 in the series.  Sallis' Law strikes again.  Emphasis added.

Yesterday I wrote about the despicable semitic cunt “E. Furlong”-

To me, the problem is not that she’s half-Jewish, it is that she is dishonest and is slyly trying to appeal to sweaty fetishism to guarantee her own acceptance.  Southern Europeans are not here to be exploited by Jews in order to demand acceptance as Jews. Southern Europeans are not a “racial yardstick” for NEC White-wanna-bes to compare themselves to.

And here we go, today:

E. Furlongsays:

August 22, 2020 at 12:49 pm

Your arguments are fair, however, since there is far from any consensus amongst white people as to who would be considered white, with some going as far as to exclude Mediterraneans entirely, I find it hard to accept your perspective on the matter as gospel truth. Ask ten people, you will get ten different opinions. I hardly will put that of a stranger on the internet above all others...

Gee…that was quick, wasn’t it?

She behaves exactly like any mendacious gaslighting Jew.  Blood tells, doesn't it?

Go to Israel, alien.

An Interesting Coincidence

A fascinating convergence of articles. In all cases, emphasis added.

See this. Certainly an interesting article for TOO, eh?

I can see some credit in the main thesis of her argument that we should not automatically reject people because they have some Jewish ancestry (obviously part-Jews would be more acceptable than full).  However, ironically enough, this person’s distasteful (Nutzis want to to have sex with her – You might be surprised at the number of blatant “Nazis” I have dated or who have hit on me) and dishonest (see below) arguments disqualify her as being among those part-Jews we should accept.  She damns herself with her own, essentially very Jewish, behavior.  I reject her not because she is half-Jewish but because she is essentially vulgar and fundamentally dishonest (of course, if you believe those traits are at least in part genetically determined, then I am rejecting her for her ancestry).

Here’s an example of what I would consider (unless there is proof otherwise and then we should then see it) dishonesty:

..my mother’s ancestors, whose lineage can be traced largely to converts from Ancient Rome…

Let me translate that from “movement speak” to English for you:

See! I’m really half-Italian!  And if some of you guys (although she’s really on the wrong website for this argument) accept greasy wops, then you must accept me!  

In reality, this dishonest Jewess (to eliminate redundancy – “this Jewess”) can have no idea whether her specific maternal ancestry is really derived from “converts from Ancient Rome.”  How can she know what her ancestors were doing in Ancient Rome?  That's ~ 2000 years ago!  I know Jews are self-obsessed, but do they really have genealogical records going back twenty centuries?  Sort of hard to believe, isn't it?  How can they know whether they were descended from the Middle Eastern Diaspora or from “converts?”

If her argument instead is that ALL Ashkenazim are such “converts,” that’s a lie.  Genetic studies show that Ashkenazi Jews are a mix of Middle Eastern, Southern European (e.g., Italian), and Eastern European (e.g., Russian, Polish), perhaps with a bit of Germanic ancestry sprinkled in.  If the Jews were an even mix of Middle Eastern and Southern European then they would be found ~ midway between those two groups in West Eurasian PCA, and indeed some fraction of Jews are found there.  But, given that groups like Russians and Poles are at the other end of European PCA compared to, say, Italians, the Eastern European ancestry found in many Ashkenazim cause them to be “pulled” in the direction of (North)Eastern Europe in PCA, so that some of them overlap into the Southern European area.  But this does NOT mean that the Jews and the Southern Europeans are identical. It merely means that they share some ancestry and that other components of Ashkenazi ancestry cause them to be “northerly” shifted in PCA compared to what they would be had they lacked the Eastern European ancestry (hence, Sephardic Jews who tend to lack the Eastern European component are more “southerly” sifted compared to Ashkenazim). Of course, we are talking averages.  Ashkenazi Jews more Middle Eastern in ancestry will be more southerly shifted, those more Eastern European more northerly shifted.  Some Jews may be mostly Southern European in heritage and those will overlap with Southern Europe for that reason.  But on average, the above explanation holds.

And we must consider that Jews, particularly Ashkenazi Jews, are more than just the sum of their ancestral components. They are also a product of their peculiar history, including the centuries of selection within Europe for ethnocentrism, verbal intelligence, etc., as well as a cultural and historical tradition ("Magian") completely separate from that of the West, that sets them as a people apart.  You can take gentiles who are mixtures of, say, Syrians, Italians, and Russians, and those hybrids would not have high levels of Tay Sachs Disease and other of the myriad of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic diseases, nor would they have the particular Jewish cognitive profile, nor the stereotypical Jewish physical appearance, nor the unique Jewish genetic signature.  Again, just because a Jew is in position “X” in a PCA plot doesn’t mean that they are at all similar to gentiles who may be relatively close to such a position, which is determined by clines of gene frequencies along two principal component axes.

Unless this Jewess has genetic evidence that she is half-Italian, using the typical testing protocols that can distinguish European and Ashkenazi genetics, then there is no way for her to know that, specifically, her own Jewish lineage is from “Roman converts.” Given the nation-hopping of Jews, how can any Jew really know for certain their specific antecedents from 2,000 years ago?

Unless there is information available that absolutely confirms her narrative, then it is typical gaslighting Jewish dishonesty, and a good reason why she herself should be rejected, even if other half-Jews, who are more honest and honorable, are accepted.

I care not about her “button nose” and her self-satisfied narcissistic tales of being “hit on” by Nutzis. To me, the problem is not that she’s half-Jewish, it is that she is dishonest and is slyly trying to appeal to sweaty fetishism to guarantee her own acceptance.  Southern Europeans are not here to be exploited by Jews in order to demand acceptance as Jews. Southern Europeans are not a “racial yardstick" for NEC White-wanna-bes to compare themselves to. As genetic assays can distinguish Jews and part-Jews from ANY and ALL Europeans, then, unless you have evidence of not having Jewish genetic ancestry, then you had better make your pitch for acceptance based on being a part-Jew, not a part-“Roman.”

Another point – virtually every single self-identified open Jew or part-Jew associated with the “movement” inevitably proves to be a mendacious troublemaker.  With such a history, are the rest of us being unreasonable in being suspicious when these “fellow huWhites” want “in?”  I’m trying to think of one single person in Der Movement who (1) openly identifies as Jewish or part-Jewish; and (2) doesn’t peddle in lies, misinformation, gaslighting, destructive memes, etc.  I cannot think of one single example – and that’s after 25 years of being involved in activism.

But now, compare that Jewish TOO essay to the following that popped at Amren up at virtually exactly the same time; thus, note this.

RW: While most if not all within the “alt-right” or more relevantly, the “Dissident Right” are against miscegenation, it seems like some of them won’t settle for anything less than a 100 percent white ethnostate. They say things like, “If we allow even one good, decent black person in, it will be the slippery slope that will lead us right back to the same problems.” So, they are hostile to even one black or mixed person being either within or allied to the Dissident movement. Do whites need to be 100 percent exclusionary towards non-whites and mixed-race people or families to bring back the much-needed positive white identity to take back the country and stop the Great Replacement?

NS: No, I think that they are just extremely paranoid. If you truly fix the problem and come up with a competent system that adequately judges peoples’ character, then you will not have that problem. It’s an overreaction to what is happening now. You don’t have to exclude all non-whites and ban all mixed-race families to control the numbers and keep the white population the majority and dominant. It is irrational.

I’m definitely not saying that most blacks are like me, I know that they aren’t, but there definitely are a few, and I don’t see why the few who don’t hate whites, who don’t hate America, need to be cast out with all the rest who deserve it. Jesse Lee Peterson, for example, is not going to undermine and subvert the white ethnostate from within if he were allowed. The amount of blacks like me and Jesse is probably under 5 percent.

There we go.  An article at Amren saying we should accept “conservative” Negroes.  Well, why not?  Isn’t that the current position of the great and good Professor Hart? More to the point, if we accept nice mixed White-Black marriages like this, then certainly we must also accept nice White-Yellow marriages like that of Johnny and “Rosie.” After all, as we well know, the real problem is with the low-IQ wops, anyway. Why object to a few upstanding Negroes? You may even find a nice “red-pilled” Black to marry.  It's all good!  Interesting that The Occidental Observer and American Renaissance, two of the major HBD sites in Der Movement, publish at exactly the same time articles telling us that it is irrational to reject Jews, Negroes, mixed marriages, etc. You see, Italians, Romanians, Hungarians, etc. are all no-goodniks, but we need to look out for “Rosie and the kids.”  After all, we must remember our priorities. Miscegenation is A-OK, and if you disagree, an elderly and diseased HBDer will invite you to his home so as to punch you in the nose!

And with respect to this excerpt:

You don’t have to exclude all non-whites and ban all mixed-race families to control the numbers and keep the white population the majority and dominant. It is irrational.

Yeah, irrational.  Well, my answer here is the same as my response to “J Richards” long ago, who was saying that a 5% non-White (and since he was a rabid anti-Semite, he wasn’t talking about Jews and part-Jews but rather Negresses and “Rosies”) minority was acceptable.  Very well.  And how are you going to manage that?  How are you going to ensure that the numbers stay where you want them?  If the non-White percentage starts increasing you will do what? Deport?  Sterilize?  Kill?  If the percentage decreases below your set point, will you let more in?  And what about miscegenation?  Will you outlaw intermarriage?  If not, what about the widening numbers of individuals with ancestry derived from the non-White minority?  Will they be assimilated into the White majority, permanently adding their genes to the White genepool?  Will they agitate for more “rights” and increased numbers for their fully non-White kin?  Where do you draw the line?  How do you prevent the whole race problem from starting again?  And given “regression to the mean” (HBDers believe in that, right?) how do you know that the offspring of those intelligent and upstanding conservative Blacks will not’ start spray-painting graffiti, throwing garbage in the streets, attacking Whites, rioting, and demanding “equal rights” and “closer relations” with their “Black brothers and sisters” elsewhere?  We’ll go through all the trouble to set up the “ethnostate” just so we can retain the same race problem that destroyed the old America and forced the creation of the ethnostate to begin with.  That is what is truly irrational.

And, since my family genetic history traces back to blacks who lived in Europe, I’m sure there’s a small portion of European DNA that helps me see things the way I do as well.

It sure hasn’t helped your intelligence much, since you completely ignore the fact that your typical “African-Americans” – including all those that this Negress says she despises – are approximately 15-20% of European ancestry (mostly Herrenvolk British) and they display all the behaviors decried in the article. So, why hasn’t that “small portion of European DNA” helped them?

In summary, it’s interesting that websites that represent factions of HBD, which consider Southern Europeans to be the lowest form of humanity possible, eagerly grasp onto half-Jews, conservative Negroes, and mixed-race couples. But, Jews are Jews (high IQ!) and there are more White-Yellow couples than White-Black, and we must never forget that HBD is nothing more or less than a political movement to elevate Jewish and Asian interests above those of Whites.  When considered thus, the juxtaposition of these two articles at major HBD websites should not be surprising.  In the HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance, HBD is in charge, just like Jews and Asians will be in charge of the “Arctic Alliance.” Sit down, shut up, and obey your masters, White man. Moshe Finkelstein and Wei Fuk Yu are giving you your marching orders.  Obedience and obeisance! 

New Fst and Kinship Estimators

And a statement on Identity.

In all cases, emphasis added.

The abstract:

Kinship coefficients and FST, which measure genetic relatedness and the overall population structure, respectively, have important biomedical applications. However, existing estimators are only accurate under restrictive conditions that most natural population structures do not satisfy. We recently derived new kinship and FST estimators for arbitrary population structures [1, 2]. Our estimates on human datasets reveal a complex population structure driven by founder effects due to dispersal from Africa and admixture. Notably, our new approach estimates larger FST values of 26% for native worldwide human populations and 23% for admixed Hispanic individuals, whereas the existing approach estimates 9.8% and 2.6%, respectively. While previous work correctly measured FST between subpopulation pairs, our generalized FST measures genetic distances among all individuals and their most recent common ancestor (MRCA) population, revealing that genetic differentiation is greater than previously appreciated. This analysis demonstrates that estimating kinship and FST under more realistic assumptions is important for modern population genetic analysis.

I’m not a fan of Fst for genetic distance estimates for reasons discussed at this blog, and based on peer-reviewed literature, but it is used for that by many, so let’s see what this paper says.

From the main text:

However, the most commonly-used standard kinship estimator [9, 10, 13–19] is accurate only in the absence of population structure [2, 20]. Likewise, current FST estimators assume that individuals are partitioned into statistically-independent subpopulations [4, 5, 21–23], which does not hold for human and other complex population structures.

About Hispanics:

In particular, since differentiation increases from AFR to EUR to AMR (Fig. 3), the greatest kinship is between individuals with higher AMR ancestry, and the lowest kinship is between individuals with higher AFR ancestry (Fig. 4B and C).

So, it would seem that Hispanics like Mexicans and Peruvians have greater kinship among them than do the Caribbean-type Hispanics who stress Negro admixture to a greater extent.  Genetic differentiation (and kinship) seems highest among Amerindians and Pacific Islanders.

Fst between populations may be “substantially larger” than previously determined:

Remarkably, our estimated FST of 0.260 is substantially larger than estimates around 0.098 from existing approaches (Fig. 3) and previous measurements based on FST [30, 45] or related variance component models [31, 46, 47] — except for some AMOVA  ST estimates [48] (pairwise FST estimates [23, 49– 52] are not generally comparable to our estimate). Existing approaches underestimate FST because they assume zero kinship between subpopulations, clearly incorrect as seen in Fig. 1C, whereas our new approach models arbitrary kinship between individuals and leverages kinship to estimate FST.

Consistent with the “genes follow geography” paradigm, with genetic variation being both clinal and discontinuous.

We typically see that each ancestry cluster is concentrated in a certain geographical region, and this ancestry is also present to a lesser extent in neighboring regions and diminishes with geographical distance from its point of greatest concentration. This again argues for a complex population structure where relatedness at the population level falls on a continuum rather than taking on discrete values. The most notable geographic discontinuities in ancestry were observed for cluster 3, which is roughly West Eurasian ancestry.

And within West Eurasians?

Among West Eurasians, kinship is higher within Europe, reflecting another bottleneck.

So much for those that have denied any differences among West Eurasians.

It would be useful to use the new kinship estimator to get quantitative data for groups and transform those into child equivalents as well. That would be important for biopolitical considerations, an important component, but not the only component, of biopolitical identity. Identity – particularly from the general Yockeyian perspective I espouse – has multiple components.

Interestingly, he authors of this paper take a similar perspective; thus:

This partition into subpopulation is based on geography, history, language families, and our kinship estimates.

If “history” includes cultural/civilizational components, which are the major proximate interests, then this tracks well with my idea of Identity, composed both from the key ultimate interest (genetic kinship) and the major proximate interests. These different sets of interests synergize to form sharp discontinuities which are not present when only one interest is considered in isolation.

Now, I do not agree with the authors including the Ashkenazim in the European subpopulation, but that does not mean their approach is wrong – they are simply following the same simplistic mindset reflected by the testing companies that “they are found in Europe so they are European,” ignoring the history of the Ashkenazim as a Diaspora group akin to the Roma.

But, that’s a minor detail. The major approach of synergistic Identity is sound.